Comment on China Pirates Aircraft Carrier by 34-tan:

If they’re foolish enough to challenge the US and UK navy with this thing that is what will happen.

The Chinese at times kinda remind me of the Pakleds from STNG.


34-tan made other comments on this post:

  • China Pirates Aircraft Carrier:
    Sell them the designs to Ares I and V and we should see some fire works. Really people talk about them being ahead in the space race but they have yet to actually get a probe to Mars ,their crewed vehicle only seats 3, and their rocket uses hundreds of tons of toxic propellants. If you are not in a country on the ITAR banned list you can literally go buy a better rocket and spacecraft off the shelf in the US. As for how this carrier will meet it’s demise don’t think it’ll crack in two as the …

  • China Pirates Aircraft Carrier:
    Russia has an equivalent to the US navy seals and they know the weaknesses of the ship. I would not be surprised at all if it ends up sinking because someone attached a limpet mine to it.

  • China Pirates Aircraft Carrier:
    I figured they rigged some sort of catapult on this class of ships after retiring the Yak-38 VTOL fighters but it seems the Su-33 can work with just a ramp but they had to add active cooling to the jet deflectors. But the catapult is not the most dangerous part of carrier operations. It’s the landings that are the most dangerous. Carrier landings are pretty much a controlled crash and you need something the absorb the energy of the incoming plane. The arrestor system has as many scary failure …

  • China Pirates Aircraft Carrier:
    Since they likely got the ship sans a propulsion system they probably kludge in a diesel engine from a container ship. They likely rigged a steam generator by mostly recovering heat from the diesel exhaust I expect all kinds of bugs with the launch catapult. Plus the boilers could go boom.

Recent comments by 34-tan:

  • 2D Dating, China Style:
    It has a surreal kinda feeling to it.

  • PS4 Japan Sales = 320,000 “As Bad As The Vita!”:
    The hardware is mediocre except for the amount and speed of memory and they pushed to hard on useless social features so no one is impressed. I think the PS4 will still be mildly successful because everyone else screwed up worse but it likely will be much shorter lived then the PS1 PS2 and PS3.

  • PS4 Japan Sales = 320,000 “As Bad As The Vita!”:
    @ Anon 03:45 I touched on the X86 thing they could have at least choose a good X86 architecture vs something so low end. Even an old Core 2 quad or quad core FX would beat it across the board when paired with a good graphics card. Heck some very fast clocked i3s duals probably are just as fast. From a hardware stand point they’re not even trying.

  • PS4 Japan Sales = 320,000 “As Bad As The Vita!”:
    Editing is broke The system should in theory be easy to crack then the PS3. But even PS2 emulation may be a difficult on the PS4 due to the use of 8 shit tier X86 cores vs four fast ones. The emulator would have to be fairly multithreaded like anything else on the console must be. There is Gaikai streaming but it’s at best a half assed solution that would demand a fast connection and nearby servers to be useable plus the ridiculousness of paying for old games.

  • PS4 Japan Sales = 320,000 “As Bad As The Vita!”:
    Most consoles don’t need an internet connection to play single player games even Steam’s off line mode is kinda crappy so you end up having to crack your steam games if you want to play them off line. BTW I covered to lack of backwards compatibility on the PS4. The fact they used 8 shit tier X86


Popular

Recent Articles