Sony Puritans: “Sony Check” Worse Than Nintendo

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Riiku
    02:00 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Hey, everyone in mah family loevs cleaning naked lolis, so no need to censor it.

    Srsly, is it really so horrible? In modern thriller/horror movies we see much more horrible things. Like a depiction of a magnum bullet blow young girl's brains out (The Hills Have Eyes), or a girl being raped and than butchered with knife (Last House on the Left). And children do watch them you know.

    I think it's far worse than even CP.

    Avatar of Y10NRDY
    Comment by Y10NRDY
    04:01 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    aw c'mon. whaddya want, sorny? a bunch of dirty lolis? waitWAT? never mind.

    Comment by NotAnonymous
    06:57 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I always liked Nintendo more. Hopefully, this will prove to immature console fanboys that Nintendo isn't "kiddy".

    Avatar of Lord Ryo
    Comment by Lord Ryo
    00:31 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It seems like the concept of the game alone makes it not a family game, but isn’t that what ratings are for? Nothing pisses me off more than when I see some shit like this, is Sony trying to put a rating system on its own console? If something in a video game is inappropriate for young players then they or their parents simply don’t purchase it. It’s just so annoying when things get censored for younger audiences, like a bloody violent game is going to be okay for kids just because they censor the box art, or adding a little extra steam in a game where you wash naked lolis is going to make it family friendly!

    I had the upmost faith in Sony when I bought my PS3 for $600 when they first came out. But now none of the good PS3 games even come out in America now, Xbox gets all the exclusives, Nintendo is starting to actually impress me, and now this…

    Avatar of muteKi
    Comment by muteKi
    00:26 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Heh, considering how awesome Madworld and No More Heroes are, I think Nintendo's strategy on the matter is a mostly sound one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damn that game looks hot as fuck.... DO WANT.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:51 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Wii version is clearly superior.
    Imagine cleaning those lolis with the power of waggle motion.
    Clearly superior.

    Comment by Anon
    01:50 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i wont even bother reading the article, the pics are interesting enough

    Avatar of Icy-nee-san
    Comment by Icy-nee-san
    01:09 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh sony...


    Avatar of Aero
    Comment by Cerenado
    05:32 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Isn't your *head* getting sore? :P

    Avatar of sanimej2
    Comment by sanimej2
    08:53 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    18:20 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so now getting better censored equal bad/worse?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:19 09/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh, so family friendly...

    I guess now it's fine to show it to children, since it's censored.


    Comment by Anonymous
    21:55 09/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    bwaahahah. i bought the wii version last year. so when i just saw this headline i was shocked, because i thought a new PS2 version with more CGs and more features was released. fortunately i was wrong.
    *continues to fap to the wii version*

    Avatar of jr2nd
    Comment by jr2nd
    22:07 25/08/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    and this was on the ps2? damn I miss all the good shit -.-

    Comment by tokugawa
    07:54 10/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That traditional image of Nintendo hasn't been the case for at least 10 years now (I think it stopped around the time of the N64).

    Sony actually does content checks when you develop a game for their platforms and they can kill your project at 5 milestone points during that project (where you have to submit your game).

    Nintendo only does a technical check-up at the end (which every console maker does, Sony and Microsoft too).

    I'm a game developer so I know all this. Sony is content-aware and (under the mantle of "ensuring quality content") also kills projects they deem unsuitable for their consoles.

    Nintendo allows everything as long as the technical requirements are met.

    How do you think all the shovelware on Nintendo consoles made it through?

    Comment by thegirlguywhosaysheisagirl
    16:17 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sony worse than Nintendo? How is it that the platform made for adults is being censored more than the platform made for children? It befuddles the mind.

    Comment by M
    08:36 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sony's really screwing themselves over. I guess the low sales of the PS3 is finally getting to their heads eh?

    Comment by Bob
    08:02 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This has nothing to do with Sony or Nintendo, because I remember some Wii RPG having to censor one of the characters' underboob.

    Avatar of knuclear200x
    Comment by knuclear200x
    08:49 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...U...pinus... U...pi...nus...Penis...I did it.......

    Avatar of Ookami
    Comment by Ookami
    10:53 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see a great combo of Nekomimi-loli-DFLs :3~

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:37 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's the secret plan of all the console makers so the otaku will "gotta buy 'em all!" (one console of each type) to get the ero content they want.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:55 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    How the fuck was THAT allowed on the Wii!?

    Comment by REalert
    19:48 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    huh.. so eating a banana while soaping is the shiznit now huh...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:41 19/11/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    sexually suggestive objects is all the rage man

    Comment by Arcane Azmadi
    19:43 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh yes, the PS3 is certainly DOOMED to to fail now that's Sony is showing cowardice on the issue of putting child porn games on the console!

    Note the thick sarcasm.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:46 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're an idiot.

    Comment by Arcane Azmadi
    00:23 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm, let me think about that... no, you are.

    Comment by someoneelse
    06:58 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The easiest path is that of intollerance.

    btw, is it possible to raep a sado-machist?
    (2D is not real... (would I rather have my kid find a 2D hgame w/ underage girl, or his friend's dad's S&M catalogue?))

    Internet Arguing=Special Olympics!

    Comment by Sic
    03:35 09/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Um... this is a PS2 game, sir.

    Avatar of sanimej2
    Comment by sanimej2
    08:51 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The game is actually on the PS2.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:58 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anyone who has been paying attention for a while knows Sony is infamous for this. Nintendo doing such censorship is a thing of the long-ago past before game ratings.

    Comment by Sarkhan Vol
    20:00 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There was a time when Nintendo got in troubles with the FCC for antitrust litigation. Well, those days are long gone. Sony is the new overlord of draconian practices. It's like uncontrolled AIDS where the viral load keeps going up and up, until shits hit the fence. They need to be curbed before it's too late.

    Avatar of Katameido
    Comment by MaidNiac
    20:20 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    WTF!? I didn't know that Sony made a pact with UNICEF..
    Delicious game anyway.. :3

    Avatar of Tateha
    Comment by Tate
    20:17 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    why does sony do this shit?

    well, maybe because they really want the ps2 to die out.

    an effective method I suppose...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:27 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Panzer IV
    19:05 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ......................................................................DAMN YU PS3!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:05 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so the game is about cleaning your loli? ALRIGHTY

    Avatar of 13k
    Comment by 13k
    01:04 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    now that you mention it, i noticed there's an ungodly amount of soap bubbles in almost every picture...

    Avatar of Omochikaeri
    Comment by Omochikaeri
    19:10 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    With your tongue? If so, I'm in.

    Comment by Makkun
    21:05 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    if you don't mind licking the not-so-delicious soap

    Comment by Storm Wing
    22:05 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But teh soap is Strawberry flavoured~ X3

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm pretty sure that it is on top of Sony's list to worry about the few people who would gladly pay money for a loli scrubbing game.

    Comment by KorTaku
    02:38 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i dunno. i sorta like some of the Sony version pictures...but thats because i liked to be teased.

    You may also recall that X-Blade on the PS3 was more modest that the Xbox release…

    that = than typo?

    Comment by RLich
    19:01 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sony your really asking to be shut down huh?

    Comment by Storm Wing
    19:24 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Boo~!! @ "Safe work" Images from Sony. need moar flesh to shown!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:55 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    moar loli
    less agnes

    Comment by greator
    04:07 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I go back and fuck myself.

    Comment by Storm Wing
    06:55 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of Robocop
    Comment by Robocop
    06:52 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you have some serious issues greator... very serious issues...

    Comment by Chris
    07:05 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Toiski is Genre Savvy. If you have a time machine, never ever try to use it to kill Hitler. You are guaranteed to make the world a terrible place.

    A far better idea is stopping the assassination of Ferdinand. It might not stop WWI (and by extension WWII) but it has a far lower chance of back firing on you.

    Comment by John Doe
    22:05 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, that "Alternate Future" theories. If you kill Hitler, you got 2 options ahead:
    1. Better future, no war.
    2. Worst future. A more sadistic tirant will rule.

    Like that, Chris??

    Comment by SenseiSyaoranLi
    21:08 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    a great eroge, its so much loli

    Comment by The Jumper
    15:25 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what is your time machine?

    i like mine to be a Delorean

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:07 08/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm isn't this funny after ps3 released that porn thing.

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex Arcana
    20:34 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    More Loli Agnes... :3

    Fetch me my time machine!

    Comment by Storm Wing
    22:04 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Better yet, MetalMasquerade. Kill all the bad guys in history. (Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, etc, etc, ...)

    *Use time machine & rob gold mine*

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex Arcana
    22:26 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey- my time machine, my rules!

    Anyway, it all depends on how much semen Loli-agnes can hold. I'll try to scuttle the manhattan project and make a taco run while I'm at it, but no promises. The price of time machine fuel is just ridiculous.

    Avatar of Toiski
    Comment by Toiski
    23:13 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If there's one lesson we've learned from history that didn't happen, it's NOT to kill Hitler. If he's dead, the next in line to assume control of the NSDAP and Germany will be more competent. As a result, Germany wins the Second World War. Don't kill baby Hitler.

    Also... In a similar move, I think somebody will/has already gone back in time to raep Agnes-tan. That's why she started to go after lolicon in the first place!

    Comment by anonymous
    21:55 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    no way NYAN!!

    Avatar of First Posting Idiot
    Comment by MetalMasquerade
    20:45 07/08/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    While you're using your time machine, please help us out and kill John Conner. We would be very appreciative.........

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments