pc-onanism-by-aaaa.png

A study seeking to investigate differences in men who watch pornography and those who do not soon had to change its research objectives after it failed to find any men who did not have such experience.

Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse of the University of Montreal apparently thought he would be able to find participants who had no experience of pornography:

“We started our research seeking men in their 20s who had never consumed pornography. We couldn’t find any.”

Giving up on his original plan, the professor instead opted to interview 20 heterosexual male students about their experiences with pornography.

The average age they first watched pornography was 10.

90% of their pornography came from the Internet, with “single” men watching an average of 40 minutes of pornography three times a week, whilst men in relationships only viewed 20 minutes 1.7 times a week.

The professor asserts that pornography has no negative effect on male sexuality, based on his sample claiming in interviews that they had nothing to do with pornography they found offensive or distasteful.

His 20 told him they were normal:

“Not one subject had a pathological sexuality. In fact, all of their sexual practices were quite conventional.”

Of course, any supposed scientist drawing conclusions from an unrepresentative sample of but 20 interviewed face-to-face over an embarrassing topic is probably not worth taking seriously no matter what his conclusions might be…



    Post Comment »
    265 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by RopeXPantsu
    05:30 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is why feminazis can't win.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:42 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you have a dick then your gonna watch porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:46 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Since many said there is nothing wrong with watching porn here is my response:
    Actually there is something very very very wrong with watching porn.
    That is that for someone uninformed on sexuality like it is likely 10 year olds are watching porn extremes will give them the wrong idea about sex.
    I really don't think rapes and tentacles and body modifications and etc. are a good thing for uninformed children(at ages like that they count as children) since they will see it as educational material.
    Also to those people porn may be inducing the "not big enough" complex which may inhibit them from heaving a normal sexual life.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:57 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree. If your ten year olds free to look at anything on the internet, then you might aswell call yourself failure as a responsible parent.

    And just because these teens don't admit that they watch extreme types of porn, doesn't mean they haven't.

    Atleast before women had rights, they were somewhat respected. Don't see any gentlemen these days.

    Comment by TinTwit
    02:05 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You two jumped to extremes way too quickly--the study wasn't about "extreme porn", it was about pornography in general.

    I watched porn at 10. I grew up just fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:31 18/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the issue isn't so much porn as things that are extreme. It's when something is extreme is when the problems arise. For example anytime any religion has decided YOUR GOD IS WRONG YOU MUST DIE, and gone on to attempt to annihilate said other religion.
    Also, extreme speed, if you drive fast, you can crash and die. Shall go out on a limb and point out extreme drinking as something dangerous? granted those examples are a far stretch from extreme porn, but the point is still there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:19 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    1) There is nothing wrong with watching porn.
    2) Most students have had family living classes for 3 years by age 10. They're not "uninformed"
    3) They won't see it as educational material.

    Your last point abut the "not big enough" complex, if it means what I think it means, however, makes sense to an extent, however I have calculated it as within the last 5%, thereby being classified as "rare". The vast majority will never even think about 2d.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:24 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "any supposed scientist drawing conclusions from an unrepresentative sample of but 20 interviewed face-to-face over an embarrassing topic is probably not worth taking seriously no matter what his conclusions might be…"

    That's a somewhat novice interpretation of research methodology.

    Sampling is frequently taken as a demographic from the population. A scientist who tried to over-generalize their findings (like saying that the findings applied to all men with internet access), or didn't report the demographic data should not be taken seriously.

    Basic qualitative research through face to face interview has plenty of merit, though, and 20 is a fairly robust sample for qualitative research. Though it probably lacks the full merit of the original research design, they can still draw meaningful conclusions-- it's just more ethnographic than statistical in nature. Though it seems they've already found that r is close to 1 for men:porn :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:01 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    CONSUMED? Doesn't consumption refer to either eating, or purchasing? Who the fuck BUYS porn come on... Eating it on the other hand... HAH on the other hand. That's where the magazine goes while I fap.

    Comment by dzodzu
    10:51 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Once you start you can't stop. When was it for me?..... something Between 11 and 13...
    *goes back to prontube, faps, faps..*

    Comment by Stiyl-Magnus19
    Comment by Shalala
    04:54 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I so hate being a man. It sucks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:03 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is news?

    Comment by Ukonkivi
    02:36 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A 20 person sample is so pathetically low it's embarrassing. I can imagine people doing a survey may end up with the notion that "some samples is better than none", but for a group to make view based upon that, is just facepalm worthy.

    Also, my dad had never looked at porn, if rated R movies with sexual or nude scenes does not count.

    Comment by erochichi
    06:17 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As i wrote elsewhere, bigger number of samples will only underline the result yet more, despite of some people denying their porn watching probably will be found.
    Ukonkivi, is your username taken from a stone in a lake in (Ala-Hippa in Vuotjärvi) Eastern Finland? I spent my childhood summerS there too.
    If i guess this right, i can tell that your father`s porn watching was more than you think.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:09 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What I object to isn't so much the small sample as the way they said he "Couldn't find any." So after asking 20 people he just gave up? That's like going to the mall, and the first 20 ppl you see are all blonde or brunette, and concluding that there's no such thing as red-heads.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:48 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have never* watched porn.

    *Never may or may not mean in the last twenty minutes.

    Comment by Riiku
    01:13 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    20 minutes!!?? Wow, how'd you do that? You must be walking willpower essence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:16 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This sort of thing would heavily depend on what they consider porn. If they mean images, written, or film intended for such purpose, there are surely men who hasn't ever "watched" porn.

    However, they most likely unconsciously, or consciously have seen some throughout their life, such as when walking past a magazine shelf, or on the internet, but such study would be as pointless as trying to find out how many people who know of pornography.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:07 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I do wonder how many millions of sex crimes good ole porn and masturbation prevents on a yearly basis.

    What amuses me is that feminists typically loathe porn. The same porn and masturbation which ventilates the otherwise extreme frustration among males.

    There are drawbacks of course.

    Comment by erochichi
    06:47 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    As if women don`t masturbate themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:11 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Feminazis must not since they seem to be with PMS 24/7.

    Comment by erochichi
    07:16 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can you tell what drawbacks? Sounds impossible.

    Comment by ドラゴン
    04:32 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    God damn thats the hawtest pic i've ever seen =}

    Comment by ドラゴン
    04:32 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    God damn thats the hawtest pic i've ever seen =}

    Comment by Rethardus
    04:11 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "90% of their pornography came from the Internet, with “single” men watching an average of 40 minutes of pornography three times a week, whilst men in relationships only viewed 20 minutes 1.7 times a week."

    What?!

    Three times a week? One point seven times a week?
    Not on daily base I see?

    Bunch of weaklings!

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:13 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    THANK YOU.

    So many comments and only one who seems to question this! Heck as a woman a watch at least some ecchi manga once a day; how come men watch only 40 mins thrice a week?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:24 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    age 10?
    Sheesh, I didn't start until 15. Not that I've stopped since, mind you.

    Comment by remus
    03:28 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For these kind of studies... tell us something we don't know...it is pretty obvious like sand in Sahara...

    Comment by RogueLioness
    03:49 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    my boyfriend says i watch more porn than him! O_o

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:52 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I dont watch porn. I don't think there's anything appealing about seeing plastic slutty women being pounded into by fat hairy men, etc.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:14 05/08/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    What the fuck kind of porn are you watching? o.O

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:53 10/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    real men wastch porn!!!!! XD

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:33 14/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't watch porn.

    I look at porn Pictures.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:27 26/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the internet was made for it

    18:45 11/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    How the hell can you post that you've never seen any porn when there's porn in every corner of this site??

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:58 11/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    “Not one subject had a pathological sexuality. In fact, all of their sexual practices were quite conventional.”

    It all depends on the definition "normal."

    Comment by Lebowski
    04:05 11/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    porn is awesome when your ten

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:22 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "40 minutes of pornography three times a week"

    Damn, I'm well over that average.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:23 02/02/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    You have to remember though that the sample size of this study is terribly small. 20 people is nowhere near enough to generate accurate data.

    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    17:07 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course every man watches it! If a man doesn't watch any porn means he's not a man lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:12 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And now we wait for the feminazis to jump ALL over this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:52 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damnit if I wasn't suppose to masturbate to porn then the Y chromosome wouldn't look like a damn penis!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:49 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In Soviet Russian porn watches you!!!!!!

    Comment by h8GWB
    10:06 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's surprisingly true.

    ...So says my identity theft.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:10 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In other breaking news water is wet!

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:52 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Blleeeeeehh!! I have never watched a porn with a 3D ugly pigs!! 2D is my kingdom >_< ;)

    Comment by Takumi
    09:59 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is a fatal flaw in this study, because there is only one man who doesn't watch porn... and it's James May!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:49 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    captain slow just watches the type no other man would

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:34 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    porn makes my penis cry :')

    Comment by takarada
    07:46 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The study is rubbish, lots of men don't look at porn but they are all married.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:39 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dam now i'm eroused by text stimuli

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:45 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's totally obvious that all men have watched porn be it accidental or not. At some point of man's life he has to watch porn. Ancient Greece has their porn, Feudal Japan has it, the Hindus have the Kama Sutra and so on. Prof's just making a big deal about something that has been done by almost everyone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:34 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well I'd say kids get some sort of sex ed years before that age. Hell, a webpage being used for class over a decade ago when I was <10 had lewd ads slip though. Needless to say, the whole class knew what it was. It wouldn't be much of a stretch to say something like Google was possibly created to look for some fucking porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Big surprise there, kind of reminds me of the time a teacher of mine singled me out as the only one in the class who she thought didnt watch porn due to my innocent looking face. I just laughed to myself and remembered Bible Black.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:15 18/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh gods. bible black. WHY WOULD YOU REMIND ME?!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:31 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, a study like this where your sample is that low, based on interviews only and where you don't have a base for comparison means you fail as a researcher and at science.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:30 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm sure there's a man who hasn't seen porn somewhere. Like a man raised by animals on a deserted isle who has no concept that other human beings exist.

    Comment by Kelvin
    18:25 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good thing I'm a man.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:26 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    What I wonder is why professors have to waste their time on that. Is that necessary research? I smell embezzlement of research funds.

    Comment by basilio
    18:33 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't think it has anything to do with research funds. Maybe it was just personal curiosity.

    Or maybe the feminazi's are trying to establish a link between pornography and "healthy sexual lives" so they can control what men whack off to, too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:49 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    10 year wtf i started with 8 xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:48 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wouldn't wanna be in their lab.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:36 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "All Men Watch Porn"

    is this study's objective to make men sound like total pervert by stating the obvious like that ?

    I mean, all girls watch porn too, just like men. That's just in human nature.

    Man I've caught years ago my 9 years old imouto 'acidentally' watching porn.

    (Lucky (?) her I wasn't the one I was today, no yaranaika)

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:53 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think the professor wanted to find out if there was any kind of different ways of thining or reasoning between people who watch porn and people who never watch it, but I think he didn't make the effort to get as many people into the experiment.

    Comment by Ray
    19:34 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stand back everybody! This looks like a job for Captain Obvious!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:31 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's either this:

    Knowing what is porn already proves you watch it.

    OR

    Asking what porn is after being asked if you watch it just proves you're lying.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:51 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    40,000 man hours and 60 billion dollars later... we have the results that could have been found with a five second google search.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:07 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ''Of course, any supposed scientist drawing conclusions from an unrepresentative sample of but 20 interviewed face-to-face over an embarrassing topic is probably not worth taking seriously no matter what his conclusions might be…''

    If you know this then why post it? To confuse people? Are you evil or something?

    Comment by Artefact

    Most probably, yes.

    Comment by Sylar
    20:06 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    For the fun of it i suppose and the page hits off course.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:46 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No matter how small the group of people interviewed may be, it still seems more than probable that the results are nearly correct.
    Of nearly all people I know i am certain that they at least watched porn. Of course, there are exceptions, but i widely i like to consider his study as correct.

    Comment by Minimoto
    17:49 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Isn't 10 years old a little young though?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:40 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    nope its 5 years to late

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:26 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not really. Well at least my brother and his friends always found their dads porn videos at around that age; so maybe it was harder to get porn before the internet, but it sure doesn't mean kids weren't interested in it.

    Comment by h8GWB
    18:21 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OF COURSE NOT. I'm surprised he never snuck a peek at a dirty magazine much earlier.

    I'm suprisingly vocal about this issue.
    ...I surprise myself. (≧ω≦)

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:05 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It has to do with the Internet, I think.

    When I was ten, the high-speed, spam- and porn-clogged Internet we have today did not exist. At that age, I'd not seen any porn movies, though at six I'd seen some of my dad's copies of 'Playboy' magazine.

    Now, porn is easily accessible on-line, so young kids can get movies, etc.

    I've never cared for movie porn, but have come to like anime fanservice/porn.

    Perhaps the prof should have surveyed: 2-D vs 3-D porn viewage.

    Comment by Juuza Sama
    08:37 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I remember those old time, it was difficult to find porn video, we were always curious to watch it. But now, all those kids who's born after year 2000 wont suffer from that :/ They'll just have to ask Mr.Google to fill they're pleasure

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:26 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good idea

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    agree'd on the high speed thing, my first porn image was at a friends house and i was like "meh".

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Morthoseth
    17:47 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what is this porn you speak of?

    Comment by stillcode
    17:50 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you're a heterosexual male and you've never watched porn, something is wrong with you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:51 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've been whackin it since the 5th grade at about 10. Pretty accurate.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:53 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was raised to be somewhat of a gentleman, but I watch porn and hentai too, a man has urges you know.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    16:47 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    A real gentleman would share his collection of 2D and 3D porn with his lady (I don't understand why the men I meet get so freaked out when I just barely mention porn).

    Comment by kajunbowser
    17:58 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I concur. +100 to you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:51 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what a stupid investigation. Its obvious all men watch porn

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:28 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Aren't there some religious people who never watched porn? (or at least young adult religious people?) I think this professor didn't look well enough. Of course he won't find non-watchers if he asks around, say, college grounds.

    Comment by erochichi
    02:02 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Religious people are those who`s honesty in this issue you never can trust.
    They lie about everything, even to themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:06 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    QFT

    Comment by Sylar
    20:01 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you talking about the same people that hide young little boys in there basement so they can rape them at night.

    Comment by erochichi
    02:05 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And those Amish men so ignorant they still believe in stork coming with babies, despite having their "own children". Wonder who are the real fathers? High priests?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:51 04/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When the Amish reach a certain age they are forced to go out into the real world for a time. During this time it is safe to assume that they will come into contact with porn, since the point of this pilgrimage is to experience worldly vices, reject them, and return to God and the community. @erochichi you win the most ignorant person of the day award. Where did you come up with that bullshit? After watching the movie Kingpin?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:36 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    He might try it with the amish people...
    No offense meant, but i really think he might find someone there wo really NEVER watched any porn movies or read any porn magazines.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:49 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hahahaha no, but aren't there some? I beleive there's everything out there; you can probably find men out there who don't want porn in any way.

    Comment by IMThatGuy
    17:54 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Apparently not if someone had to create a study about it.

    Comment by Mimiru_Tsuki
    17:47 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When do girls start?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:11 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I found a dirty tape in the normal vhs collection at 8. Then I started watching it again when I discovered the internet at 12. I am now a happy female at 23.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:24 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Personally I started around 11-13, but can't recall the exact moment in time right now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Lies! We all know there are no girls on the interne

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:45 05/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Candlejack knows no bounds, he sees your attempts to avoi

    20:19 03/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see C@ndle J@ck caught yo






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments