9-Year-Old Rapes 6-Year-Old: Youngest Ever

Sure does....

yup, definitely new

I wonder how many will interrupt their rabid fapping, staring at the screen with a shocked expression in a vane attempt to understand the situation when i say "lolicons are NOT pedophiles"

overt +1

noob

Well some are Overt, but it's not a requirement. Then again, you can like prepubescent girls and not be a pedophile so long as you still like giant bazongas.

+1

TRUE indeed.

what about lolicons?

Lolicons with their 2Ds,,,

lolicon =/= pedophiles

as a lolicon i only like little anime girls....i dont like real little girls

real girl i want is a slut who knows what the fuck she is doing

unfortunately that's the best line ever murmured here. props for epic fail

very very true.

Is it lolicon if a loli (er.. shota) raeps another loli?

In my opinion, sexual attraction generates rape(not every time, but it is usually the first step) so if someone raped a loli I would consider the rapist a fellow lolicon.

lol i see wat u did there!

lol. xD

Yes, they make good beds for tramps I hear.

Or [New] Dell[hi]…[?]

ZETSUBOSHITA !!!!!

"This World where People don´t have a Sense of Humour is leaving me in Despair !!!!"

Guess might as well, take my life......

Bailed out does not mean case closed. It means that he spends time with mom and pop while waiting for his trial instead of sitting in a jail cell.

If he were my kid, he'd probably would have preferred the jail cell.

The parents are to blame, obviously. Seriously, when your kid does stupid things because they're underage, it's usually because the parents are neglectful. When teenagers do stupid things, it's usually because the parents had no clue how to bond with the kid as a child. When kids do stupid things as young adults, it's because the parents are stupid fucks who couldn't fucking teach their kid things like moral, ethics, and other shit. IT'S THE PARENTS' FAULT. So, they should punish the parents in some way.

morals dont work on SanCom

@ "IT'S THE PARENTS' FAULT": I'm not defending the kid, but sometimes, no matter how hard the parents try, a kid will just do stupid/bad shit.

Usually, though, there's parental failure involved.

There are two parts:

I) Kid's gotta love his parents, and be loved by his parents, or he won't care what they think.

II) Kid's gotta know what his parents will do to him if he does bad things.

If a kid's being beaten or abused, all he'll care about is not getting caught.

your on sancon itñs your parents fault.

I'm sure his parents will handle him at home... maybe that's how this mess started....

All the comments like this don't fool me.

You're fapping to the idea of a 9 year old boy being raped in prison!!!

You sick fuck. :) Although I'm otaku, I have morals.

yeah yeah....
dont forget sankaku is watching you (T_T)

no you cant, non-indians not allowed

That's one epic Bollywood reference, dude X3

Force causes blood, beating causes blood, wrong hole use (he's 9, I wouldn't be surprised) causes blood, loss of virginity causes blood. Any one of these alone does not constitute profusely, but a mix of three or more, and there's your answer.

^VIRGIN^^^^^^^^^

Indeed I am, also gynaecologist. Also I forgot dragging, I would assume that would cause some ammount of blood given a struggle.

We have people that educated here on Sankaku?

Welcome to the club!

I'm not well-versed in such matters, but:

Aren't most 9yos pretty big, if you're six?

^touche

A gynecologist here at SanCom. Hmm, must be a pediatric gynecologist, lucky bastard.

I like this version of Kami's post more:
A gynecologist here at SanCom. Hmm, must be bs.

"I would genocide that entire family"

"just becasue it's been done to you, doens't mean you do it to someone else"

Warning: consistency error.

but they didn't genocide his entire family.....so there is no consistency error. and even they did, there is still no consistency error, since they are not "someone else"

Owned by the first anon...I think not,though the second anon to post has my respect. I'd say it was the 2nd anon to post that owned me with the convincing argument.

thus Exitium failed

He gets sent to jail. While there, he experiences hell for two years, then experiences rehab + hell for two more years. He would be out by time time he turns 15 and still have the rest of his life for redemption.

How's that?

At this age, prison alone will do more harm than good. Deterrence theory, which happens to be the cornerstone of the US criminal justice system, has been demonstrated to be ineffective. First, depends on rational choice theory, which relies on the assumption that people are rational, and they will always make a rational decision. Second, deterrence through punishment only works when the punishment is swift, certain, and severe. People, and especially children, aren't rational, and no matter how severe the punishment is, if it's not certain and immediate in all circumstances, it won't do any good.

The three factors that have the greatest determination on criminal behavior are sex, age, and stakes in conformity (though admittedly, stakes in conformity can cover a wide range of factors). Nothing can be done for the boys gender, and males always commit more crimes than females. Most people, however, grow out of crime, and numerous studies have shown that crime peaks in the late teens and early twenties, and gradually but steadily declines thereafter. The chances of a person reoffending is the same whether that person has been to prison or not, so other than making the victims or the community feel better, and allowing politicians to claim they're doing something, prison serves no real purpose.

In the long run, giving him something to lose would be the most effective means at preventing reoffending, but it's also the most difficult. There are various formal and informal ways to do this, but basically, he has to admit that he did it. The community (mostly his family) must accept that he did it, and the community, as a whole must state that they know exactly what he did. This is the most difficult part though, the community must then state that while what he did was horrible, he doesn't have to be a horrible person. Lastly, he has to be given a way out, a way to be accepted back into the community. This can't be automatic, and would be pointless if it were easy. Both his community and the victim should be able to set various conditions, such as mandatory counseling, house arrest, whatever, so long as the conditions focus on preventing further crime, instead of on punishment. If he fulfills these conditions, he should be accepted as part of the community. This can't be a one week or one month process either. In cultures that practice such a criminal justice system this usually takes at least a year, and involves multiple meetings between the offender and representatives of the community.

If this sounds too lenient, imagine if it was you. Imagine that you had to stand before your entire school or place of work, with your entire family, all your friends, your neighbors, and anybody else in your town who wants to attend present, and imagine you had to tell all of them exactly what you'd done. Not just the rape itself, but the harm you did to the victim, and to the community. Then, imagine you had to do it 5 or 10 times over the course of a year.

Well, in the US, that would probably be a death sentence. In cultures that focus on preventing crime instead of punishing offenders though, when the community as a whole tells an offender that they're sick, but that they can be redeemed, and that as long as they meet the expectations of the community and work towards reforming themselves that they'll be accepted, reoffence rates are exceedingly low.

I know this sounds like some new age bullshit, but look at it this way. How long would you want him to go to prison for if you knew for every year he was in, two more girls would be raped? The US has already answered this question, and decided that retaliation is more important than preventing further crime. This is where the US really drops the ball. If someone commits a sexual offense, they're labeled, sometimes for life, as a sexual predator. They have to tell everybody in their community, which in the US ensures they'll never be accepted as part of the community. They're told they're predators, and with nothing to lose are even officially labeled as such, yet people act surprised when they behave exactly like what everybody tells them they are.

That doesn't mean detention is completely useless though. In cultures that use this system, reoffending, while rare, generally results in banishment, usually for a specified amount of time, but sometimes permanently. If he should happen to reoffend, he could be “banished” to a detention facility for whatever amount of time is appropriate for the crime, and then when he gets out, begin the process of being reintegrated into the community. Sending him to prison or a juvenile detention facility and calling it done would certainly be easier, but he'll either be the same, better, or worse when he gets out. I seriously doubt he'd be better, so prison alone would, at best, do nothing.

I suppose that could work. I guess it's a wait and hope for the best type of situation isn't it?

But killing him would serve as a deterrent. Threaten to chop the hands of any caught stealing and most would be too chicken to try to steal again. That, or they will try to do it alot more discretely.

But of course, if you pass a law where every thief is to be amputated, every rapist impaled and every murderer shot by the firing squad, you are going to rapidly lose popular support, which is a problem because most of the world isn't run by a dictatorship or any other forms of government with a strong-man as its leader.

off with his dick!

All the foaming at the mouth rapid, hysterical creeps are Americans.

That should have been "rabid" not "rapid"

@tomorrowill
All the foaming at the mouth "rabid", hysterical greeps are NOT americans. They are official morons and are from obviously shortsighted groups of people from around the globe.
The Boy realy needs help as he has seen interactions of a violent sort from his parents or there respective excursions. Do you think that at 9 years old he has any idea that its wrong if he isn't told thats its wrong? He is in India after all, and there views on women and equal rights is a bit off.
Stop bashing americans! *gives finger*

I mistyped "creeps", my bad.

Konami Code failure. Lose 1 life.

Future gamer? NOT!

pfft... sad
oh wait... I don't get it!

I did hear that those on 4chan also dislike black people, not that I don't disagree, so it looks like the majority here and on 4chan are whites and east asians? I'm Indian by the way.
: )

It's just statistics. Most of the people with computers are white and asian. And FWIW, I try to hate all cultures equally.

Artefact just makes that easier.

Then we are in agreement. Splendid.