You are proceeding to a page containing mature content. Is this OK?

check Yes, show me everything
close No, hide anything sensitive

Azumanga Daioh Now Azumanga&!


The recent remake of the fan-favorite 4-koma series Azumanga Daioh’s first volume has attracted much attention, due to the vastly redrawn artwork by the original mangaka Kiyohiko Azuma.

As his style has changed substantially from 1999’s Azumanga to today’s currently running Yotsuba&!, the differences in some panels is truly striking, influencing one fan to create a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of the new and old versions, as can be seen below…

To begin with, a recent entry on Azuma’s personal site provides some of the artist’s thoughts on redrawing his most popular work.

Here is an excerpt of the most relevant portions:

And so, I drew Azumanga for the first time in a long while.

I’m sure it might cause uncomfortable feelings for some fans, but it is the Azumanga of Today.

I struggled with exactly how much of my old style to bring back, but for the most part I went with my most current style.

Looking at it from my own perspective, trying to bring back some of my older style makes me feel like I’m purposefully making the art look worse, so it was a little painful for me to do.

Even with my style of 4-koma, looking back at it now makes me think about how simplistic it was.

As for the drawing method I used, I adopted the thought of making changes to the exterior surface, but still make it so that it would easily fit into the “core” of Azumanga.

Intrigued by the profound differences found in the new version, Sangencyaya collected these comparison images:






The new style does indeed resemble Azuma’s more recent art in Yotsubato:

Youtsubato Example Art


Here is another eye comparison, this time of Chiyo – it is worth mentioning that the early chapters of Azumanga were done in 1999, quite early in Azuma’s career, and Azumanga’s art did improve over its 3 year run:





The resemblance to Yotsubato’s style is particularly obvious here.


This is substantially harder to spot, but changes in the toning, or shading used was also noticed:





In the original, toning was used to color the inside of an open mouth, and to accentuate the character’s shadows, but the new version lacks it, creating a more minimalistic look.

Character Lines

The script is mostly unchanged, but there are some exceptions, some due to repositioning portions of the text elsewhere on the page, among other reasons…



“I think I might’ve just seen some really cute pantsu…”




Another change was to the personal pronouns for “I” used by the hapless male student whose bike was stolen by Yukari in Chapter 1 from the masucline “Ore” to the gender-neutral “Watashi”, since he has somehow turned into a girl in the past decade (He fell into a Jusenkyo spring perhaps?)



“Aaah! My Bicycle!!”



Aaah! My Bicycle!!

Joke Punchlines

This example that Sangencyaca selected is difficult to understand for someone who doesn’t remember the context (or never read the original), but it does give a good look at the bespectacled Koyomi’s different character styles.



“Everything’s OK!!

That kid will be fine being by himself!”

“That’s not what you said in the beginning!!”



“Alright then…

Just shut the window properly and go back home quickly.”


One of the most important (and noticeable) changes made clearly must be to the various oppai of the large schoolgirl cast.

This proved to be a rather confusing comparison for many, as many readers apparently mistook the old version for the new in our earlier post.

Old (Left) vs. New (Right)


The lack of toning lines, along with a change in Sakaki’s service mizugi from a less revealing, but more form-fitting one makes for a vastly different image, and it isn’t hard to see how some could easily mistake the two at a quick glance…

Fellow readers of moonrunes can find the fascinating full analysis of the changes at Sangencyaca here and here.

The new reprint of Volume 1 is also available.

Leave a Comment