You are proceeding to a page containing mature content. Is this OK?

check Yes, show me everything
close No, hide anything sensitive

California DFEH Orders Riot Games to Inform Employees of Their Rights

Riot Games, the developer behind the wildly-received MOBA League of Legends, was issued a court order from the Department of Fair Employment and Housing of California (the same group that is taking action against Activision Blizzard) stating they must inform employees of their rights.

Previously, the DFEH demanded $400 million from Riot after they agreed to pay out $10 million. In this round, the DFEH insists that Riot inform its employees that they have the right to talk to government officials about unlawful workplace practices.

It has been reported, and confirmed by the DFEH themselves, that California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing alleges that Riot is keeping its employees from speaking to them and preventing employees with any sort of useful information from coming forward:

“Agreements that attempt to bar individuals from filing a complaint or assisting in a DFEH case run afoul of the anti-retaliation and anti-interference provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act,” said DFEH Director Kevin Kish. “Employers cannot impose a penalty on people who engage in protected activity under statutes enforced by DFEH. The very existence of such agreements has a chilling effect on the willingness of individuals to come forward with information that may be of importance to the DFEH as it seeks to advance the public interest in the elimination of unlawful employment discrimination and harassment.”

The court-ordered notice informs workers that they “may freely cooperate, participate, and obtain potential relief, if awarded,” in DFEH’s pending action, and that “Riot Games cannot retaliate or take any adverse action against [them] for speaking with DFEH, participating in DFEH pending action, or obtaining potential relief in such action.” Moreover, “Riot Games cannot require [any worker] to either notify the company or obtain permission before speaking with DFEH,” and that “[i]t is unlawful for [any] employer to retaliate against [workers] for speaking to the government or otherwise voluntarily participating or cooperating in government proceedings.”

This is likely in relation to Riot’s policy of forced arbitration, wherein cases such as sexual discrimination are taken out of court so things are settled quietly. Riot denies these claims, and in an email to the Verge, a spokesperson insisted that severance agreements don’t have any clause preventing employees from speaking to government officials, and it’s written in plain language:

“Nothing in this agreement prohibits you from reporting possible violations of federal or state law or regulation to any governmental agency or entity.”

Riot insists that this has been a standard part of the severance agreement.

Leave a Comment

All comments must abide by the commenting rules.

79 Comments