2D vs 3D: “Who Needs 3D Anyway!”

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of R3TAK
    Comment by R3TAK
    15:20 22/09/2011 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    This seems to work in the opposite way and make me think that 3D girls are actually more attractive.

    Avatar of ollie
    Comment by ollie
    16:02 22/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.7)

    I agree, some of the real models are way more attractive than the cartoon versions, which in some cases are creepy.

    Avatar of Crommus
    Comment by Crommus
    20:28 22/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    It's kind of creepy that the only girl which is drawn 1:1 is that love doll.
    I have to agree these examples point out the surperiority of 3D instead of the opposite.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:55 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    and some of the proportions are either off or they are midgets.

    That doll comparison was funny

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:50 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Don't call a BJD a "love doll" you incompetent fuck!

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:09 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    It is all depending on how and what style of art the artist used. Different style might give different impression. But the fact that the model used are quite beautiful, it becomes very hard for the artist to create a much better version that out stands the 3D version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:34 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    21:09, The thing is even though some of the models are pretty hot, I see a lot of ways the artist can improve their picture. What I don't understand is why some of the actions in the 3D pic is different than the 2D pics... YOU HAVE A FUCKING PICTURE TO DRAW! JUST DRAW THE PIC EXACTLY THE WAY IT IS. For example the first pic has the 3D haruhi holding her legs and the 2D pic has haruhi pulling up her sock. Come the fuck on. It's not that hard to simply draw what you see.

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    18:14 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    The blond kid is way creepier in 3D.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why would anyone make a 2D out of a 3D? Even worse, making a 2D out of a 3D who is trying to copy a 2D? That's insane.

    2D are always better, THESE ONES can be made out of 3Ds, but 2D aren't based on 3D woman, they are made to be better, so they do not aim so low... You 3D WEEABOOS trashs are the ones trying to copy the 2D.

    Screw my english, I have money.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Absolutely. Also note the 2Ds are copies of the 3D which means the 2D samples "need" the 3D images.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Everything else, however, shows 3D being superior.

    Avatar of Darklob
    Comment by Darklob
    15:23 22/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    After looking at the first example I doubt those Otaku will think its the opposite way.........

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:46 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Sorry but atleast 70% won this time

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:47 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    70% of the 2d.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:14 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    All that needs to be said is 09, 25, 29.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I say this is one successful attempt of reverse psychology!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:10 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    They are trying to make us normal!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:10 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    That's the whole point. This whole article is sarcasm.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:07 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Congratulations. You get 10 evolution points

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:26 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep my thoughts exactly, actually people outside the otaku lifestyle that watch anime that like a character they usually like to meet a real person with the traits of that character whether its looks or personality.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:32 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was about to say something like that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:48 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some of the 2D art is complete shit, like pic 34. Talk about atrocious, lol!

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:48 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    15:53 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes, this time around the renderings are awful, the few
    ones at least since most are badly traced photos.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think the 2ch crypt crawlers are starting to lose their senses...lose more of them...dive further in the negative...fuck...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:30 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    third/fourth/fifth'd or whatever we're up to.
    I can't help but find the fact that we're on the third attempt to insist 2d's better in a matter of days pretty funny.
    Almost as funny as how bad a job they're doing.

    Avatar of Actar
    Comment by Actar
    16:21 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have to say that it's mostly because of the artists' individual style that may or may not put you off. For me, it's only creepy if they try to do a realistic trace with small eyes and accurate facial features.

    Comment by Envoy Loves You
    21:30 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is more like photoshopped 3D vs 2D rather than actual 3D

    Avatar of Liusiwei
    Comment by Liusiwei
    21:48 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The artists are on various levels

    Comment by Anonymous


    We are comparing 2D to photos, which are often created with the help of heavy makeup beneficial lighting and often retouching.
    Or how Cindy Crawford one put it referring to a retouched photograph "even I don't look like Cindy Crawford..."
    Photos of beautiful 3D girls are often the result of more painting than the 2D counterparts.

    Not to forget that only the last three pictures display the true advantage of 2D:
    NOT being confined to what exists in reality!

    Avatar of Megidola
    Comment by Megidola
    00:12 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're ignoring an even more important point-
    Comparing 2D drawings to photos is putting 2D in its most advantageous position.
    Imagine if they'd compared sex with a woman to humping a dakimakura...

    Comment by Anonymous

    that's because 3d girls are actually more attractive, i will admit ive fapped to hentai but nothing beats the real thing, once u virgins get some u'll realise it too, heck even if ur ugly and fat u can pay for it, itll cost a lot less than ur dolls. ;-)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:02 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I rather pay for dolls than STDs, thank you very much.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kiddo, chances are? If you're paying for it, you can afford a god damn condom.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 24/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    >implying condom has a 100% chance to prevent STDs.


    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 24/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    >implying condom has a 100% chance to prevent STDs.


    Comment by Anonymous
    21:14 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    like I pay for hentai on the net, and i've tried the real thing but still 2D FTW

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    >implying I have not tried the pussy and meh it was nothing.

    Shit just not worth it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:45 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Your hands =/= the real thing FYI

    Avatar of Spigot
    Comment by Spigot
    15:31 22/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.7)

    3D women only lost once.

    Fuck, I'm more normal than I thought.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:07 23/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Get better artwork! A lot of the 3D photos are much more artistic than the lazy 2D pics! Many 3D photos here were nicely shot (angle, light, colors). You have to win a great artwork with greater artwork!

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    20:18 22/09/2011 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Meh, just no. For some reason 3D won this time too. Find better artists yo. :V

    Also image 21 and 22. Drawing an anime doll with anime style. They were pretty much on par.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:02 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some of those 2D transformations didn't have much incoomon with the original 3D. Though that may be pretty disputable over the last 2 pics.

    On another note I think whoever has drawn 34 must be quite gutsy to upload a 2D pic thats FAR worse (not simply ibferrior like most of the rest) then the one it's supposedly based on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:46 26/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah, 34 looks absolutely creepy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Why the 2D isn't that great? because every picture are trace back as from 3D to 2D. Most of 3D picture are naturally good as we seen it and the 2D picture are just Copy of the original so our brain denied it as true form. Why not coping a 2D picture into a 3D picture, you'll understand that the 2D look more natural.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:09 26/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ok the 3d dool and doll was the wow close for me

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:33 23/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The amount of normalfaggotry in here is beyond me.

    Form which hole are all these normalfags coming out from into here!?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:49 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Was a shock to me too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:21 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    nah, 3d still wins.... next time dont pick such cute girls...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:08 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I like cute girls. o_o

    Comment by Anonymous

    yeah, but the 2d in this article is a lot better than the other similar articles

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:23 22/09/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    For this comparision, 3d > 2d

    This is especially true regarding the first half.

    Comment by Anonymous

    I can never grow a boner for a 3D anymore.

    Fuck, I'm more normal than I thought.

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments