bayonetta-breast-and-butt-glamour-5.jpg

bayonetta-breast-and-butt-glamour-4.jpg

The suspicions that the PS3 port of Bayonetta would be markedly inferior to the Xbox 360 original have been born out, with comparisons of the demos revealing that the graphics on the PS3 are noticeably degraded, with muddy textures, fewer polygons and lower framerates…

The comparisons, with the Xbox 360 on top; you will likely need to view them full size and side by side to see the differences:

bayonetta-sega-quality-360.jpg
bayonetta-sega-quality-ps3.jpg
bayonetta-sega-quality-360a.jpg
bayonetta-sega-quality-ps3a.jpg
bayonetta-sega-quality-360b.jpg
bayonetta-sega-quality-ps3b.jpg
bayonetta_360-091009-1.jpg
bayonetta_ps3-091009-1.jpg
bayonetta_360-091009-2.jpg
bayonetta_ps3-091009-2.jpg

converted-by-sega.jpg

The PS3 port has been handled independently by Sega, and it seems Platinum Games is keen not to take credit for the port as Sega is being branded very heavily as the party responsible, a decision Platinum will doubtless be regretting.

Xbox 360 fans are delightedly celebrating the minor differences as a battle won in the lately especially hard fought console wars.

The superior Xbox 360 version is available for pre-order now.

bayonetta-breast-and-butt-glamour-2.jpg

bayonetta-breast-and-butt-glamour.jpg



    Post Comment »
    267 Comments
    Comment by luizf
    03:07 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The PS3 version looks like SHIT..

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:34 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    +1

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:28 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    +2

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:50 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    +3

    Comment by Schrobby
    04:51 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    +9000

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:57 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    +4

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:22 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    1...2...3...or maybe 6 Fag-Box users I see thar

    Comment by Maikeru
    05:41 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    1...just 1 fagstation user I see thar ^^

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:53 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.6)

    +7?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:06 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.6)

    +∞

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:18 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I wonder how much microsoft paid to pull this shit off hahahaha

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:28 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.6)

    + taco O______o

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    i wonder how much Sony didn't pay to fuck this up

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:51 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    they both look like shit

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:45 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    n i was going to get this too.... change my mind.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Is mainly a difference in contrast and resolution.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:16 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    the graphics looks similar to ninja gaiden 2 on 360 and PS3, but in this case backwards.

    Comment by chad001
    12:35 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Ouch.. .that must've hurt some of the 360-users...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:24 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    just put on PC, it'll beat both in graphics quality in all its sexiness...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:37 21/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    +1 for pc gaming

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 25/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    +2

    cause pc don't need modding to get games to work.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:05 25/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    lol pc is far superior to pms3 and xbox3shitty

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:56 25/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    + 65535

    That's bullshit. And I thought Fallout 3 got butchered in the cross-console release. But that, I can get a better look from the old Compaq PC from '95 sitting in my bedroom closet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:25 13/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    WOW.
    That's a lot of fan-fags.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:12 22/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Holy Sh*t!!! You guys need to get a life! I game is a game is a game is a game....Play what ya got.(then again I am the sorry @ss posting this).

    Comment by k
    03:37 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wtf!!
    Blue Ray Disc got ripped OMG, lazy bastard!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    XBox is Loli
    PS3 is Oppai

    Loli = Win http://mikeinel.deviantart.com/art/Console-war-139378672

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:28 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, nice pic. And suddenly I want a PS3 badly!! :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:50 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    that is not a loli.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I want the lo....
    Wtf Microsoft! False advertisement! False advertisement!

    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    11:04 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Loli is looking nice.. let's take a "taste" eh? heh heh heh....

    AAAAAGGGRHHHH!!

    What the FUCK!! My skin is sweating BLOOD!, mY cokck has fallen offffaksh

    FucdkKK!! it's~ it;'s`~_- The horrid 360jak ^%$6--~~~****... >hurling?l

    Whaet!! zhe wasz aborne wiith It?!!

    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    11:06 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *choke*

    >gasp<

    hte horrid..

    rEd riNGs of daerth!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:07 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    I prefer loli over oppai
    and man, the Red Ring looks deadly

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:38 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    I will have to say that the Xbox 360 isn't even female.

    I'm being serious.

    If it was, it would be a butch lesbian female.

    PS3, I think, would be characterised as female with a medium-sized chest and the PS3 Slim would be a female with a DFC.

    And now I want a PS3 Slim.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:05 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.2)

    DFC?? Deadly flat chest?

    Comment by Myballz
    22:23 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Boobs or Children then again I would take boobs over Children.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:04 10/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    I don't understand why anyone would be surprised that the xbox is vastly superior to the ps3 at this point in time. Both Consoles have been out for years now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:43 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    No, SEGA sucks at porting games... thats for sure...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:52 11/10/2009 # ! Bad (-0.4)

    -1

    Comment by First Posting Idiot
    06:25 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The PS3 has vastly better capabilities, but developers slack off when they make their games Multi platform. The 360 is easier to develop on, which makes them not put forth the effort to fine tune their PS3 versions.

    When it comes to fine tuned Exclusives and Re releases(Sigma for example), the PS3's are vastly better than the 360's are graphics wise.

    Comment by Chris
    23:03 10/10/2009 # ! Good (+0.4)

    What an ironic name.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:31 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, I agree... Only faggot could be named Chris;P

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:46 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Be nice Anon

    It could be short for Christina

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:07 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You still believe in that ?? LOL :]

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:57 15/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I do not think you understand computer hardware at all... The xbox 360 has a superior GPU which means it will have better graphics... The Theoretical maximum for ps3 hardware is lower vs xbox 360 hardware. Add in the fact that the xbox 360 is developer friendly and you have a lose lose situation for the ps3...Basically if you squeezed both systems for all they are worth you will get more out of the xbox, but it is much easier to squeeze then the ps3.

    Do some research xbox has an ati gpu and IBM cpu

    Ps3 has nvidia gpu with with IBM cpu...

    The ATI gpu is superior to the Nvidia GPU

    And the Cpus are almost equal with an edge in max theoretical power in the cells favor... difficult to program for though so...

    Comment by Member548
    08:13 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Shut up Artefact you PS3 cock smoker always posting stories to make the 360 look bad!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Read the article again, moron

    Inb4 don't feed the trolls

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HaHa, the XBox is better than the PS3 you know it i know it, we all know it so buy one and play happy online- you can add me: Xboblons435 gamertag! lets play Halo3!

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the xcrap is made of shit. Enjoy this little victory bec of a terribly stupid and lazy developer. Go enjoy your RROD.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:17 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ugh I can't believe there are console wars on a site like this... Give it a rest, kids.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:26 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, 360 owners get to see the worst designed character ever made in a game in slightly better resolutions. Enjoy your sarah palin clone w/ bad anatomy and terrible design. Ugly ass HD granny, 360 users have surely triumphed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:00 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Technical: This game and Resident Evil 5 have different video output levels compared to their 360 versions... it's visually obvious.

    For instance, the black levels are obviously not calibrated here, and should be adjusted ASAP.

    Adjustments can also be made using the video output settings on the console, and on the HDTV itself, and I'm sure everyone does this, right???

    I personally calbrate using some video playback test patterns, and then set my games to play using those settings on console and HDTV.... works real well for me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:30 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh well I got both systems so it doesn't really matter to me which one looks better since I'm still gonna get it for the PS3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:31 24/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't believe those photos I have Jap. ps3 account and have played the demo for myself awesome game, fast game play and great graphics too, Just wait until you get the chance to play it for yourself,

    Comment by EyE
    03:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who said sankaku is a ps3 fanboy?

    03:09 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon did

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:13 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes i did it ^-^

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No I did

    Comment by fatimmortal
    03:26 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually...it was me. >.<

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:05 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    wasnt anon, EyE did.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I broke the dam.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:09 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh look! kittens

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:52 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh noz they got washed away in the flood!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:32 03/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm eating a sandwich. psn: xeberus333

    Comment by Hellmen
    11:33 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's the thing about Xbawks fanboys. Humiliate their religion and they'll start BAAAWWWing about bias and unequal journalism.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:09 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're doing the same now ;] .

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:05 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So I take it you've never seen a PS3 fanboy then?

    03:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    some sort of revenge huh...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wonder what the ps3 maniacs will say...

    360 blablabla beta tester blablabl?

    not today huh?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:13 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually, beta tests come before releases and this one is dual release so this would only be eligible for "horrible port" or "lol sega"

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:51 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I HOPE THAT THEY'RE NOT SAYING BETA ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY LEARNED WHAT THE FUCK BETA MEANS GODDAMN

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    OR PERHAPS ANON WILL DISCOVER THE MAGIC OF SARCASM

    Comment by Chris
    23:05 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HOLY SHIT GUYS I CAN'T TURN THE CRUISE CONTROL OFF, AND MY SARCASOMETER IS BROKEN WHAT DO I DO?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:15 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ABCDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

    CRUISE CONTROL ALPHABETSSS!!!!!

    Comment by Palmtop Tiger
    03:14 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who the fuck cares about minuscule graphical differences. Buy the game on whatever system you own and play the motherfuckin thing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:16 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Minuscule? The ps3 port is clearly fucked up..
    Who would pay for a game in that state?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I hope you're being sarcastic

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:59 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No. Anon1 is right, I tried the demo myself, and found everything very very washed out, textures and lighting on the PS3 version IS shit...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That fact that I can tell that the textures are muddied from just the screenshots (I'm no graphics maniac, btw) is enough to say that, yes, the ps3 version got fucked up...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    but it is not a big enough difference for somebody with only a ps3 to not get the game they were excited about

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you can't see the differences with a naked eye and even them vertical you need your eyes checked. The PS3 version looks beyond crap, kind of what they did with washing everything out with the PS3 port of RE5.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:07 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anyway, sell those consoles and buy a pc...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:34 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes. sell your 300 console and buy a 3000 dollar computer you have to upgrade to play anything, that is then obsolete in a year

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You don't know fucking anything about PC gaming.

    Also, it really isn't any huge graphical difference here, the only real problem is the black levels. Muddier textures is scarcely going to kill you when the game's actually in motion (I also didn't have any framerate issues when I played it).

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:52 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "yes. sell your 300 console and buy a 3000 dollar computer you have to upgrade to play anything, that is then obsolete in a year"

    You must be poor, or unlucky.

    Comment by Chris
    23:09 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wait, wat? It takes a $3000 computer to play anything new?

    This is news to me and my 2 year old computer which cost me a grand when I got it and haven't upgraded since...

    Keep in mind I didn't even build my computer. If I had it probably would've cost $600 or so.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    not trying to disagree but already doing it, i dont think it is just "minuscule graphical differences"

    in reality its kinda huge IMHO....

    but i agree with you in playing the game whatever way you have it...

    Comment by Pandemonia
    03:33 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    chances are these are taken from a setup similar to mine... i have my xbox plugged into a video card in my PC

    I can take screenshots directly from the stream of games I play, should i wish to. It can cause screen lag if I'm doing too much on the PC, but it's generally pretty good.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:31 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    They are not minuscule.

    Comment by Keirnoth
    05:55 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's one thing if the graphics look like crap.

    But the reduced framerate will KILL the game. Lowered framerates ADVERSELY affect gameplay because the timing for certain moves will be changed. Based off of my experience of DMC4 PS3 vs DMC4 PC on a good PC, I had difficulties playing the PS3 version because of slowdown in certain areas that the PC did not have. Revving with Nero was a pain in the ass due to the framerate slowdown.

    If there's anything that's timing based that you must do in Bayonetta (and if it's looking to be the spiritual successor of DMC, it better be), having a shoddy port with shit framerate is going to be FAIL.

    The part I don't get is why didn't Bayonetta get created on the PS3 FIRST, seeing how the userbase in Japan is *much* MUCH bigger than the X360 userbase. Kamiya a X360 fanboy?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's cheaper to develop on 360. This is Platinum Games' 2nd game. They don't have the time or money to spend on making PS3 lead platform. They're not even doing the porting. SEGA is doing the job themselves.

    Also contrary to popular belief, Japan is not the most profitable market when it comes to console games. An example is DMC4 in North America where the 360 version outsold the PS3 version even though all other previous games were Sony exclusive. Both however combined for about 1 million copies sold within the first month.

    So while they do want to cater to the Japanese market, they have to look beyond that as well as keep costs at a minimum. At the end of the day, it's still a business and the number one thing that matters is profit and cost reduction.

    Comment by Keirnoth
    08:09 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thank Anonymous for your clear and informative answer.

    The question is how well DMC4 sold overall for the Japanese and US market. What were the numbers for the PS3 JP version of DMC4? Did those numbers beat the X360 US version? If so, then following that logic ideally I would imagine concentrating your development energies on the PS3 JP version first and outsourcing the X360 port would help them rake in the money.

    Needless to say, if this port IS as bad of a port as is being sensationalized here, then Platinum Games is going to lose a good portion of their JP userbase.

    I'm going to get the JP PS3 version myself to see how well it performs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:39 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is suprise but you are right!
    WTF!! Is going on?

    Comment by moreno
    03:19 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    i still think for the ps3 pics, they did not have their ps3 displays settings for "rgb full range" set to full.

    although, that still wouldnt fix blurry textures, shitty lighting, and all that...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    will this game come out for pc to??

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:08 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who would be stupid enough to give away their game for free?

    ...BESIDES Valve.

    Comment by Dano
    03:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Meh, wasn't planning on getting this Sarah Palin simulator anyways.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:43 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But there has never been a more epic moose-killing simulator! How can you miss it?!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:46 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Your loss.

    Comment by Reboot
    03:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    HA HA!
    You deserve it, sonyfags.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Rofl Sonyfags? Wich one is it going worse for Xbox or ps3?

    Comment by Chris
    23:34 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Xbawksfags 1 Sonyfags ... well, looking through the first page of articles posted with tags "Xbox 360" and "PS3", about 6.

    Let's be realistic here. Both consoles have their faults and advantages, but the Xbox 360 is shit. I don't care how good you may claim it is, when you know it'll crap out on you 50% of the time, it's unacceptable.

    It doesn't matter to me if I can get a new one under warranty, I feel downright insulted that a company would expect me to spend money on such a shoddy product. Then what of it if it's not still under warranty, and I own several games? Put down another $300 or lose the ability to play the games I've already bought?

    Even if the Xbox 360's specs were better then the PS3's (they aren't) or it was cheaper (Xbox 360 120 GB Elite - $299.99 CAD, PS3 Slim 120GB - $299.99 CAD), I still wouldn't buy it over a competing console. The hard-line of the matter is that Xbox 360 is a broken system, by any standard you'd hold other electronic devices to.

    No amount of graphic comparisons, "beta tests", exclusive releases, or superior game franchises will change this fact.

    Maybe during the next gen I'll give Microsoft a chance. I won't be buying for at least a year after the new gen system comes out though. I consider them high-risk if I were to buy right when it came out, before extensive user reviews.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Really but you need to cheer up ;]. Dont cry xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:10 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, it could be worse. It could be someone using a magazine poll as fact for their 50% rather then independent warranties study that brought that number down to 24%.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sega lost a lot money because of $ony (Dreamcast thing), is only natural they want revenge.

    Comment by Reboot
    03:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmm... You've got a point there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:54 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    no, he doesn't have a point. sega is currently in the business of "making money."

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:11 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...So they sabotage Sony by sabotaging themselves...

    I see a few faults in logic right there.

    03:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh you...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The game looks like shit.

    I see no problem

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:26 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Graphics suck on PS3 yeah, yet you dont talk about how it has framerate drops and tearing all over the place on PS3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:31 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    hey fuck you

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:50 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm a PS3 only owner and I can see tearing in the second picture (at the level of her head).
    Kind of pissed off by the work of Sega, especially when you know the quality of the Platinum team... :-(

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:27 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    CROTCH! sorry, had to post about it.

    And another thing... check out that ass.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:27 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But the game won't be censored, right?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:30 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Feels good to have both consoles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:32 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So, Is the gameplay like Devil may Cry or something?
    The xbawks ver. looks good..

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:36 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Who cares. It's all about gameplay.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:34 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the frame rate effects the gameplay

    and the ps3 framerate sucks

    so who cares? people who want good gameplay care, fool

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:56 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    go play shadow of the colossus and come back telling me it was a bad game because it gets choppy at times, thanks

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:18 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lmao, what a horrible comparison. Shadow of the Colossus is a very slow paced game. Not a high speed action and combo heavy game like Bayonetta. I played the ps3 demo myself, and it's beyond terrible. It's actually hard on the eyes because the frame rate stutters so much.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:39 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    dayum.. the differences are so clear even here...

    unless the both of them don't have the same specs in EVERYTHING...

    from the TV settings, to the system settings...

    cause if they ARE both the same, just dayum...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:43 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    minuscule graphical differences
    people are going way too crzay about this

    I want to see the Japanese Sales of this game when the 360 is currently dying, even beaten by the Ps2 several times

    Playing through the PS3 demo I had no problems with Frames or something like that

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Someone is in denial.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:11 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah ur definately in denial, you need some good glasses man..

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:47 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Its from the creator of DMC. I played the demo and the gameplay is really awesome.

    Comment by Sylar
    04:33 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But why did they chose that huge Sarah Palin woman instead of a nice pretty girl. Someone in there staff has a bad taste in women.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:54 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So true.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't know, it doesn't look absolutely gorgeous on either console to me. The gameplay looked interesting, so my purchase (for PS3) will be decided with that. The graphical differences between the two aren't enough to _not_ buy the PS3 version, and certainly not enough to buy an Xbox for specifically.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is just the demos. I'm going to wait for the actual game before deciding which is better. Already preordered for the PS3, thou. Just don't see the point in getting a XBox/360 as the games that I actually want to play end up getting ported to one of the other consoles or the PC. They usually have more content than the original when ported anyways.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:18 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You forgot about shity framerate and tearing on ps3 ver ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In what state? At least neither game has zombies or huge space dudes...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:52 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The dude who did this subject. Is he really sure that he didn't invert the pics? And there's the stuffs about activing full HD thing on the display menu.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:57 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, sadly the PS3 port really is like this..
    I guess the developer is aiming at the american market, where the xbox games sales crush the ps3's

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:54 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So what would be the reason for me too buy this game, besides the ugly bitch.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dat ass and good gameplay

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:59 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Been playing both demos side by side...the frame-rate difference is terribly noticeable and much more of an issue than the PS3's washed out textures and general blurriness.

    It's nowhere near unplayable, but unless they fix this for the western release (which they are rumoured to do), anyone who has the choice between them certainly shouldn't pick the PS3 version. SEGA dropped the ball on this one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:59 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    now Arte be honest did you cry a little bit while writing that article?

    Comment by Sylar
    04:29 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    His soul was torn. He will never be the same man again.

    Comment by blackpepper
    11:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Arte has soul?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:25 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    a kishin soul

    Comment by DieHardjagged
    04:00 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Haha, wait a second, dont tell me some picked up my comparison link and made a Article about it :D

    Good to know, anyway, its sad that the PS3 V. looks like Shit, i do hope they fix this issue until release.. but fuck, its coming out already this month in Japan so i think it will be fucked up like this anyway.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    First 2 pics FAPFAPFAPFAP

    Comment by Unicogirl
    04:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To quote:Palmtop Tiger - Buy the game on whatever system you own and play the motherfuckin thing.
    __

    I've been saying this for years... minus the cussing part. What is it with people and their system battles!?

    Less time arguing and epenising, more time video game playing. THE END.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:03 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree 100%, so long as the game is playable.
    However, if the game is fast paced AND suffers from frame rate issues, then the game is NOT playable. In which you case you should get it for whichever system it actually IS playable on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:31 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I bet arte was crying when he wrote this

    hahahahahha

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:56 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yea, probably laughed so hard he did start crying. Especially at all the Xbox fanboys that are so happy that SEGA fucked up this port, because it makes them feel "superior" XD

    Comment by Tateha
    04:38 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ps3 looks like shit this time, but in all honesty both versions look like shit in comparison to other games.

    sega. can't even do a good port. they really are the masters of failing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:43 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I just played the demo, and in action it doesn't actually look all that bad at all. I seee the Xbros are still trying to root for their (defective) system of choice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:22 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see someones crying here :] .

    Comment by Hunger
    04:58 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    TThis all comes from laziness and biased production....no console stands a chance against the preference of the producers of a game

    Comment by Canadane
    04:58 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    XD, SOMEONE CLEARLY DOESN'T HAVE THEIR PS3 SETTINGS SET UP CORRECTLTY.

    GAME LOOKS AWESOME ON MY TV, JUST LIKE THE 360

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:06 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, sure, bro.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Everything looks better on crack.

    Comment by Kortaku
    05:07 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ouch...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:13 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wrong TV settings FTW!

    Comment by Draken
    05:20 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The only convincing xbox argument i've heard in my life ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:23 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was amazed at how horrible the ps3 demo was. The frame rate is so bad that it's seriously the worst I've seen in an action game like this in years.

    Comment by Lord Ryo
    05:38 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I’ll admit; the pictures make the PS3 version look like shit, but unless the video was labeled wrong, the PS3 version looked vastly superior. I’ll have to say, as long as the PS3 version isn’t censored over the Xbox, I’ll most definitely be getting it for the PS3. The 360 tends to lag when there’s a lot of visuals on the screen, and this game looks visually impressive so I’d hate to have my 360 slow down because of it. That and the fact that my trophy percentage is a lot higher than my gamertag.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:39 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well there's one game crossed off my list.

    Comment by Maikeru
    05:42 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    aaah, wait, that makes me an xbox whore O_o

    oh well, I didnt really mind any of the consoles in the first place ^^~ nintendo is still my favourite company though xD

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:52 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I see the texture differences, but... I see bad aliasing on both. Haven't they heard of anti-aliasing?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:23 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not on this shity hardwares ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:52 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Blame Sega for doing such a crappy job converting the PS3 version

    Comment by Frans
    07:27 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Like you said... basically it's a port... usually on simultaneous release you only hear a lead platform. You hear a port when a game is already released on platform A and will be released on platform B. In this case it's a port that going to be released simultaneously... SEGA has less time to convert Bayonetta compared to doing regular port.
    For a true comparison you'll have to wait for the US version, since SEGA still trying to improve things on the PS3 version which is scheduled to release on January 2010.

    If any of you guys want to import the JP PS3 version, my suggestion is wait for the US version.

    I do hope that SEGA will release a patch to improve the JP PS3 version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:57 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    anyone elsa botherd by the fact shes coverd in hair?

    Comment by DieHardjagged
    06:47 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, shes still sexy and on top off that ill think she will undress faster :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:48 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Played the demo, game played fine for me. Any problems there might have been aren't even close to big enough to warrant all the bitching and moaning.

    Personally, the game looks nothing like these screen shots on my TV......then again I have my PS3 & TV settings set up correctly.....

    For everyone complaining about the PS3 version looking washed out, plain and simple to fix. Adjust your TV settings and play around with the color, brightness, detail, and picture settings. Problem solved.

    And why in God's name would anyone really pay attention to shit like this when you can make the game look 10x better than what they show just by fiddling with a few settings?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:49 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think they BOTH look like shit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Where is your god now, Artefact?

    Comment by Frans
    07:11 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 is definitely inferior... this is what happen when you want simultaneous release but with a workflow like a port. Basically PS3 version is a port of the Xbox360 version. The difference with other simultaneous release is that usually they handle both version in-house or at least the team that makes either version is working very closely. This one is like Platinum Games make it first then it trickles to SEGA. To make it simple, PS3 version is rushed to meet the simultaneous release schedule.

    The good news for US and PAL countries is that the PS3 version according to SEGA will be improved. Basically the US and PAL PS3 version will have an extra 2 months of work compared to the JP version. Bayonetta US PS3 version will definitely be better than JP version... although how much better is still unknown... (it can be that they'll just improve the framerate which is the biggest flaw from the PS3 version or improve the whole damn thing... who knows?)

    Comment by MusicalNote
    07:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    To be honest, so long as I can tell what the fuck I'm doing, I don't see the big deal about this. I still use a giant block of a TV rather than upgrading to a high def. It would just be obsolete in a year or two anyway.

    A game can have the best graphics ever and still suck donkey cock. If the graphics matter so damn much, maybe you want a movie rather than a game.

    Comment by Frans
    07:33 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The problem isn't about graphics as in visual only, but the framerate of the PS3 version is inferior to the Xbox360 and that could be felt no matter how crappy your TV is. So even with worse graphic they still can't maintain a stable framerate for the PS3 version.
    It's still playable, but definitely need some improvements.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:27 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    yea microsoft paid big to make it look better but ps3 graphic engine can do alot better then 360 lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:29 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    so what does this proves? that the PS3 is a weak system? NO!
    the developers of this are crap.

    i hope SONY releases GOW3 on the same time they releases Boyonetta in US so this game bomb hard.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:34 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe its weak ?? Hmmm ?? Sonyfags are bitching about inferior ng2 for x360 etc becouse they think that their conole is superior and x360 hardware suck ;] but when it comes to the opposite side they blame developers and everything else but not their shity and crapy designed hardware lol ;]. Maybe you need to blame your beloved sony for creating useless architecture ,poor sdk and support.
    Sony got really big problems on learning on their mistakes designing gaming hardware :>

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:32 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's funny how the Xbox version looks better than the PS3 version. Shouldn't it be the other way around?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:39 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You don't know anything about gaming do you... PS3 versions of multiplatform games are visually inferior to the 360 versions 99% of the time.

    Comment by Hitokiri
    07:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    >Xbox 360 fans are delightedly celebrating the minor >differences as a battle won in the lately especially
    >hard fought console wars.

    Ps3 fan boy much?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:41 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ke acaso esto es un conplot contra sony al hacer un port bastante mierda no puedo creer que la caja 360 le gane a sony por favor solo en un mundo donde pueda existir la fantasia

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:47 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whoa, that's a very noticeable difference, even when NOT zoomed in. That's terrible...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mmmh!! this photos appear to me like fake.
    I have pc and ps3 on the same TV (a very nice lcd Sharp Top gamma HDserie) and if I switch channel (from pc to ps3 and viceversa) the images on this review about Ps3 version of game are not the same with Bayonetta demo running on my ps3,that are more similiar and often also better,than images called of Xbox360 on this review.In fact ps3 photos are really(but Really Really) different from demo.The difference is very high.
    This remember me about the "scandal" of ps3 video review that was taked without setting ov video on XMB.
    But after this,I found not problems with framerate and general speed of game,but I can't say if Xbox 360 version is more fast.

    Sorry for my english and I'm not a supporter of any console except Dreamcast!

    Masato.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dont cry :]

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:21 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    bullshit!, i have the demo on my ps3 and its hooked up to a cheap vizio. it looks nothing like those screen shots. not washed out at all. graphics look great

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:36 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what do you say about lo-res textures and less detail in environment ?? ;] Or maybe about poor framerate compared to my side by side ps3 and x360 demos ?? ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Muhahah, Xbox wins Xbox is better than PS3 muhaha losers :D :D :D PS3 is dust

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:26 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kind of confusing after the thing with the Gaiden screenshots. Oh well.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:36 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck. I was so excited for this game... I hate this shit with the PS3 having to conform to XBOX capacity and STILL getting shafted in the end. SHAFTED.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:59 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just goes to show you, the actual theoretical power a system has usually doesn't play a very large role in the graphics you see in the games, until pretty close to the end of its cycle, when developers have learned the most efficient ways to squeeze every last bit of functionality out of them.

    But yeah, the PS3 version is very noticeably inferior, though it probably wouldn't bother me much, except frame rate issue can effect gameplay, so...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:01 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well is a PS3 what did thought ? PS3 is SHIT maked from Dust- buy a XBox and play -losers!

    Comment by ScarredBushido
    09:08 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    kool

    Comment by echelon64
    09:10 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Huh? WTF is the difference? You must be playing the game Artefact-style zoomed in to 500%.I went ahead and took the screenshots to 1900X900 and didn't see a damn difference. I just see different lighting. Sarah Palin? I like to think of it as a Bristol Palin Stimulator, have you seen the rack on her daughter? F**King Amazing.
    But you got to commend Artefact, he pisses of the Xbox RROD fans and then smooths it over by pissing of the DRE hurt it's-a-Sony fanboys so he(she?) can rake in the cash.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    09:19 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Should have gone the Sigma way: release it one year later with additional stuff and probably less gore and/or nudity.

    Both PS3 owners and Sony itself would have been happier.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:42 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    FACT IS HERE:

    WHO CARE ABOUT THIS GAME? ITS LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER DMC RIP OFF ANYWAY.AND THE GRAPHIC ITSELF IS HORRIBLE EVEN THOUGH IT IS ON 360.LOOKS LIKE LAST GEN.PITY GAY BOX.

    2ND FACT:
    FFXIII NEED 3 DISC !!!??? LMAO

    3RD FACT:
    360 ALL IT HAVE IS SHIT GAME WITH GAY PEOPLE IN FPS MOOD.WHAT A SHAME DONT GIVE ME COMMENT LIKE 360 HAVE A LOT OF GAMES...EXCLUSIVE IN 360?DONT MAKE ME LAUGH ALL IT HAVE IS FPS FPS FPS GET A LIFE.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:32 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sour-graping too much.

    The butthurt of console gamers goes both ways. Sony fans butthurting Xbox360 fans and vice-versa. That means they're both gay for fucking each other in the ass.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    00:59 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cataloging anything at all as "gay" while mentioning Final Fantasy's greatness must be the absolute ultimate in ironic hilarity.

    Comment by hALOTOO
    12:16 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ARE YOU ON DRUGS?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:30 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I prefer my 360 over PS3, but it's bullshit either console should get a worse port. Customers on "both sides" should get what they paid for, not sloppy-ass ports like this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:40 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Know what you need to stop making articles like this without proper facts, The PS3 screen shots are not from an HDMI source and are from the factory default settings for display.

    Conversion from component cables makes the screens look like that muddy look.

    Comment by ChaosAngelZero
    01:03 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, then you can go watch this: http://www.gametrailers.com/video/ps3-360-demo-bayonetta/57537

    Screen tearing galore, booya!

    Also, may I ask why the default display settings for the PS3 seem to suck donkey dick while the 360's don't? I mean, what's to be gained by not configuring the system to its optimal settings for modern displays, anyways?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:40 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    muddy textures too ?? LOL Someones crying here .

    Comment by maxchain
    11:11 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    She's a BRICK... HOUSE

    She's mighty migh-tay, just lettin' it all hang out

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:28 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS3 version has inferior textures, an unstable mess of a frame rate and suffers from censorship.

    And yet it'll still outsell the 360 version (four copies worldwide compared to two, it's a Platinum Games title afterall, nobody gives a shit about anything they make - Okami, God Hand, MadWorld etc.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:31 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Very nice bod, but why can't she have big boobs, would bouncing boobies take away from her voluptuous butt?

    Comment by knuclear200x
    11:38 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We should just be happy we get to see her fine uncensored ass.

    Comment by Roukou
    11:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid nudity filter is just to get horny 13 year olds to buy the game.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:57 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I need the best graphics for when I'm looking at DAT ASS!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:07 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I really don't have high hopes for this game. When the main character in a game is a sexy woman, it's usually a sign that the game sucks and that the game company is hoping that a bunch a kids will buy it for the fanservice and not care about the rest of the game. With a character that's as fanservicey as this it makes me feel that there is going to be a huge fatally flaw with this game.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:32 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Poor PS3, being treated like an ass since day 1 (when price tag was announce); and poor XBOX 360, mock by the problems of rush design.

    Holy crap, I just notice a pattern: Sega Saturn VS Sony Playstation; history repeating itself, but this time Sega is ready for old revenge.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:50 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The issue is not so much the graphics as it is the god damn ANIMATION. IT's tearing EVERYWHERE, no vsync, horrible!
    Even the FMVs and title screen (which i suspect is part fmv too) have tearing ffs!

    Screw you Sega.

    Comment by Elle Lowel
    12:55 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not seeing it.. however i'm SURE the PS3 version will be obviously censored to shit.. so im gonna have to give the X-box it's due

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:35 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not really minor when you have to look at garbage graphics through the whole game.

    Comment by Elle Lowel
    13:36 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not seeing it.. however i'm SURE the PS3 version will be obviously censored to shit.. so im gonna have to give the X-box it's due.. I guess.

    Comment by arielaol
    15:03 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    lets just hope sony gets distracted by a random loli in the office while the games being checked

    off topic/
    its good to see that ppl still play 3D custom girl ^^,
    ontopic/

    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    14:06 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If I bought this game for a "Castlevania Fetish Thrill" I think I will then buy it from the "X-box 360" bargain bin.

    The only question is: "Will there be ANY X-360s available on the 'used' market or will they all expire via RROD?"

    A PS3 at least, WORKS. My PS1 - WORKS. My PS2 - WORKS. Turn them on 10 years from now, they will all still WORK.

    My V1 Xbox - Crashes right and left, ten times as often as my 486DX50 PC did when I tried to render movie screen sized images and browse the net at the same time on Win 3.1 or play "Die by the Sword" on a P200 with no good graphics card. Sometimes I have to fight with it to play a non scratched Music CD...

    However, "Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath" is an incredible game so lush and beautiful I wish I could enter it. Even made me like the idea of Westerns which despite being in a 'Western' state I don't really like that genre that much. And "Elder Scrolls: Morrowind" is similarly enticing...

    I guess if they were women...

    The PS series would be reasonably attractive bookish women who are very stable and a bit bossy and spartan, but could do a job, do their chores, be super loyal, remind you to do your part but be supportive and not judgmental as long as you were trying, help with the kids and have regular efficient sex. You'd sometimes wish she'd have bigger tits or do other efficient missionary position, but you could totally trust her and she'd love you. And suggesting a "Boob Job" or a "Different Position" would just make her mad, you'd know it without asking it, so you wouldn't dare.

    The X-Box series would be super gorgeous fashion model women with lots of friends and wild impulses who could teach every pervert from DeSade to Chester M. a lesson or two. "Don't get mad at me for drugging your drink, dahling, it made you a man possessed. I haven't been fucked that hard since I was a grade schooler, should I tell you...?" They'd be taking you to the beach one day, then impulsively flying you to Paris to fuck on Jim Morrison's grave, and what was that job you thought you had...? But you used to have a lot on your credit cards... And they'd either and all at once randomly leave you for some beefy psycho then come back crying and demand you fight him because he wanted to pimp her... Or she'd suddenly crash and be a basket case of depression, and you'd be trying to get her not to kill herself and ignoring the fire of all your possessions in the bathtub... Or she'd go into "RROD" mode and turn into a "Lorena Bobbitt" horror show chick chasing you around with a carving knife... Then she'd be back to (Ab) normal and go on her usual schedule...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:24 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    each to their own, ps3 has far more potential but as it stands 360 has a better catalog of titles. where the hell is gran turismo anyone? plus blu ray is a plus. if i were to get anyone one of these consoles which i won't by the way, i would get a ps3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:43 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry dude but without good gpu this potentiall is only good on paper and flodinghome ;] .

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:53 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    effin' bullcrap... everyone knows the PS3 has superior graphics than Xbox. Lousy port... they should do their work properly.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You wish. All the games so far have looked exactly the same on both platforms. It's like comparing Arial to Helvetica. Nobody worth giving a shit about would see the difference. There's a maximum amount of detail the human eye can see, and with 1080p HDTV we've already exceeded that.
    And plus, who gives a shit about how the PS3 version looks. Even if it did look better the gameplay will still suck because of its crappy controller built from the 90s made specifically for minimal comfort and utility.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:44 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah right ... mhmmmm ;] Keep dreaming ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:14 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    *sigh*

    I'll wait for the pc version of this game, at least it shall be uncensor and have something better than the consoles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:18 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    TEXASDUDE:
    Looking at the screen shots and video.

    - The PS3 used might not have its contrast / black levels set correctly. That alone can make both versions look much more similar.

    - Some textures on the PS3 have a bit less detailed... but in movement, hard to tell the difference.

    - But in the ViDEO clip, the PS3 has Anti-Aliasing, so I'm not seeing the JAGGIES that are easily visible on the 360 version. So perhaps this is causing some of the issues.

    Personally, I'm okay with both versions, just calibrate the PS3 which can be done on the console end or the game itself.

    Technically, the 360 has a bit more powerful ATI GPU over the PS3's nVidia version.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:45 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You called it "port disaster" and then "minor differences". Gotta love the bias on this site.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:55 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmmm...
    I guess they're just feeling sorry for the 360 because how much it fails today...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:46 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    But when ps3 fails it fails hard ;] .

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:56 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    More like buy PC for $800 dolars and spend at least 3 years playing games at far better quality than consoles. Then you upgrade your video card for ~$200 and you spend at least another 3 years with it.

    Oh and that's just if you want to play at max settings. Right now most games that are recently released run comfortably on 5+ old video cards and CPUs.

    Now the problem with PC is that games are almost exclusively released for Windows, so you may have to shell $50 for an OEM OS, unless you know how to acquire one without paying.

    The only drawback of PC gaming there ever was, is that many great games are released on console only out of fear of piracy.
    But then again, the same holds true the other way around if you like RTS/MMO/FPS games.

    Anyway, there is no reason for fanboyish PC bashing. Consoles are an obsolete gaming model that should have ended with the age of PS2/Dreamcast. They have absolutely no advantage over a PC. If you think you are paying less than a brand new $800 PC by adding the cost of X-Box live and DLC (which is free on the PC), you are deluded.
    Oh yeah, PCs don't go belly up in <1 year. My previous PC is currently 7+ years old and has been working almost daily for all this time.

    The so called "NextGen" consoles have been largely obsolete for nearly 3 years compared to PCs. I fail to see what is so superior to them, unless you are too damn stupid to use one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:27 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ridicilous

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:43 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I Don't care about this game! WTF if you want to see woman naked so much just watch a porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:02 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Awww, b*tthurt S*ny fainbois with their inferior console won't be able to babble about "purfect" versions this time! :(

    What, S*ny haven't managed to make a fraud agreement to make X360 port worse a second time? Oh, well, I guess it's pantsu sniffing time for their fanbois, again! ;P

    Comment by DK
    00:15 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Enjoy your HD Sarah Palin game, Xfag.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:19 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sega got lazy and didn't do it the way they should have. Nothing more, nothing less. Xbox360 can only win in the "Has so many FPS games you think it's a PC" department..

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:22 10/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The comparisons, with the Xbox 360 on top; you will likely need to view them full size and side by side to see the differences:"

    Sure... if you're blind!

    Who cares anyway when there's Castle Crashing to be done!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:15 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    We're comparing textures on game demos now. Wow.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:23 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    minor... it would be huge difference if it would be the otherway around...

    It's the Truth

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:36 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ive got both, i dont care as much as you reading this posting.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:42 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have both systems. I guess i'll be buying the Xbox version. Thanks for helping me decide.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:37 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    ps3 has better first party games and a rockstar exclusive game coming up (agent)
    99% of xbox exclusives also come out for the pc, and thus aren't exclusive..

    goodbye playing uncharted 2, yet another exclusive you won't ever get to play because your too cheap to just get a PS3...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:25 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Someones crying here :} .

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:43 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    PS2 graphics for the PS3! Well done Sony.

    Comment by DieHardjagged
    03:58 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ok folks, here is the COMPARISON Video between the PS3 and 360 Version:
    http://www.gametrailers.com/video/ps3-360-demo-bayonetta/57538

    Comment by GodOfSpeed
    07:53 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeap this time the PS3 version really looks like shit. Because of Sega porting the game instead of Platinum Games themselves porting it.

    Well i have no choice but to get the 360 version, i did really compare them and the difference is day and night.

    I prefer to play action games on the PS3 because i prefer PS controller and trophies. If the difference is minimal, i will get the PS3 version, but this time it seems unlikely, while the 360 version does actually hits 60fps (important for a action game to hit 60fps) while the PS3 version only hit 51fps max. Z_Z

    Comment by arielaol
    14:56 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    people need to start understanding that graphics are just a bonus developers give us...you can have the best graphics in the world and still end up with a game as bad as big mother truckers 2...as long as the gameplay (which what really makes a video game a video game) remains the same i'll still buy it for PS3. note: I have a Xbox360 and a Wii(its in a box never to see the light of day unless i need a backup Gamecube)

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:48 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Gameplay will be not he same becouse of framerate issues on ps3 ;]

    Comment by arielaol
    16:00 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    how bad we talking? If it goes from 60fps to 57fps...thats not to bad but 60fps to 32fps...thats a different story. Ill get the 360 version if gameplay is effected by obvious reasons and not by something i need to slow down and zoom in 10x just to notice

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:56 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nothing to worry about. Someone just got the screenshots mixed up.

    Either that, or someone's intentionally doing this to make the 360 look better.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:49 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stop crying ;]

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:30 11/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Looks like the exact same game just the ps3 version is brighter? Turn down the brightness and you'd probably not even be able to tell the difference.

    Also its a well known fact that 360 is easier to make games for, So because of that, developers make multi's for 360, because if they started on ps3 they would probably make it to much for the 360 to handle if they weren't lazy. Then they'd have to rewrite the entire thing almost from scratch.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:50 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dude i think thats time to buy some glasses .

    Comment by metatron
    01:04 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    DAT ASS B|

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:25 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    eat shit PS3 Fags

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:24 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    say goodbye to the dreamcast 2 eeuuuuhhh sorry xbox360.
    people like you aren't helping the xbox360, your idiocy causes people to instantly buy a PS3...

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:24 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    who wants to play with a troll like you online? and pay 59$ a year for it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:31 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Geez there are still people not knowing that Bayonetta is developed by DMC-creator.. and constant mentioning of Sarah Palin is getting old.. why not Angela Aki for a change?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Does anyone honestly give a shit about Bayonetta? It's just Devil May Cry staring Sarah Palin.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:06 14/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL, yeah, the game looks ridiculous. Fuck Bayonetta and Nero. Dante FTW!

    Comment by hALOTOO
    12:40 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I guess there is a benefit owning both systems,to me it look finished version VS unfinished version

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:34 12/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck. Why did my XBOX 360 have to RRoD?!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:05 14/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    People who argue 360 vs PS3, are just to poor to own both, and that is sad. Glad I'm rich. I would hate to have to buy used games, and stand in line with food stamps.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 15/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uhm...in the video, The only difference is that the PS3-version is darker, nothing more! And it looks nicer too. About the screenshots, I don't give a sh*t. The video clearly shows what evidence there is, right? Just simple otaku myconsoleisbetterthanyours trash-talk.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:03 28/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't believe this :[

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:28 31/10/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck 360 ps3 is still a superior system.

    Just most programmers are not familiar with porting to a ps3.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:43 06/11/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    If one thing about the last few generations has bothered me, it's the overemphesis of graphics as the ONLY quantifier for what makes which port better. Graphics are indeed a big deal in this day and age, but for me, i'll always go with whichever console I'm more comfortable playing, or which has more material (as in the case of RE4). I'm more comfortable with the PS controller than I ever was the Xbox, so I'll generally get the PS version (though, the built in harddrive did have me renting a lot of ports on the original XBox since my memory cards were often full).

    Hell, I've played the PS3 demo and didn't notice a damn thing wrong with it until I read the articles afterward. Chances are, you probably won't notice playing it either. Really, the only graphics problem I have with the PS3 is that we're three generation in now with HD gaming, and there's STILL no anti-aliasing.

    The point I'm making is FUCK THE GRAPHICS and just play the damn game. Who gives a shit what console it's on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:11 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree, just play the game and shut the fuck up. PS3 no longer has a load time issue since Sega released a patch that cuts load time by 2/3, so no more crying about that either!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:09 06/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thats actually the comparison between the Japanese version and American version... Good job.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:55 13/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I just tried the PS3 demo. It does not look bad at all. The crap box version may be better, but the difference is not enough for all this crying

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:48 14/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Man Sega was so good in the Genesis era but now they are just crap. Wont buy another game from Sega until is a good Sonic game hope and pray one day they might make one until then just rent those Sega little shit of ports.

    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Forum Posts

Recent Comments