asarpang said:
Thank god they came then, eh?
stop trolling this sites been going downhill since normaln people started coming. well that and arte not posting pervy articles anymore.
Misakite said:
Raping is bad.But raping in your mind or in 2D is perfectly fine.
yes agreed but the real question is whether or not you belive in STATUTORY rape as being the same as real rape.
Sorrior said:
yes agreed but the real question is whether or not you belive in STATUTORY rape as being the same as real rape.
Actually raping someone is bad.
Statutory rape is silly.
Child rapists are evil >.<
but i dont mind prison rape! lolz jk!
Ninsheart said:
The problem isn't that they could be sexualized, but you might simply not want nudes of yourself to be out there later. An 8-year-old might agree to having a nude picture of himself taken, but will very likely regret it when he's an adult.
Just like someone who regrets stupid nude pictures of themselves in a drunken binge when they were 18?
Misakite said:
But raping in
your mind or in2D is perfectly fine.
indeed it is indeed it is
Sorrior said:stop trolling this sites been going downhill since normaln people started coming. well that and arte not posting pervy articles anymore.
So it's an improvement, then.
a lolicon said:
Do you really need to reload for an entire day before being able to spew more weaksauce insults?
You've gotta be the most pathetic troll ever.
Well regardless of how hard I might try lolireject, you'll always cross the finish line of that contest before me.
Even if your posts have about the same value as shit stain on shorts.
asarpang said:
Sorrior said:
stop trolling this sites been going downhill since normaln people started coming. well that and arte not posting pervy articles anymore.
So it's an improvement, then.
死ね!
Sukunai said:
C'mon. You're not even trying any more. You're trolling for a reaction, aren't you? Then give me something worth reacting to.
now i remember why i avoid the forum.
the-envoy said:
Just like someone who regrets stupid nude pictures of themselves in a drunken binge when they were 18?
Yes.
But I can't take pity on an 18 year old who has perfect assessment skills and thus the possibility to avoid such embarrassing things from happening, yet binges and temporarily throws away said assessment skills, even while knowing how important they are.
Children, in contrast should probably be protected somewhat, since they're not capable of assessing decision and consequences very well yet. (I can't disagree with you if you say some 18 year olds don't have proper assessment skills either, but I think it's a fine age to at least expect them to have some at.)
But the point you made is good.
Ninsheart said:
Yes.
But I can't take pity on an 18 year old who has perfect assessment skills and thus the possibility to avoid such embarrassing things from happening, yet binges and temporarily throws away said assessment skills, even while knowing how important they are.
Children, in contrast should probably be protected somewhat, since they're not capable of assessing decision and consequences very well yet. (I can't disagree with you if you say some 18 year olds don't have proper assessment skills either, but I think it's a fine age to at least expect them to have some at.)
But the point you made is good.
But then there are people like me for whom said skills have almost always been developed. It just varies. ALso 18 is a bit low for someone to be mature at least in the U.S. most people NEVER seem to get them.
Sorrior said:
But then there are people like me for whom said skills have almost always been developed. It just varies. ALso 18 is a bit low for someone to be mature at least in the U.S. most people NEVER seem to get them.
As has been said by someone else on here, whilst it may be true that some people mature faster than others, we must still have a single legal age for all age restricted activities since we can't have different laws for different people. We must instead have a single law which works for most people, and age by which most people are (or should be) old enough to make up their mind. We must also reconcile this with reality; for example, it would be pointless making the AOC so high that it will just be ignored because most people are having sex at a much younger age. Any law must be one that most people are willing to follow if it is going to be successful. Prohibition in the 1920s United States is an example of what happens when unrealistic laws are made.
I also can't help but wonder to what extent people's ideas of what the right age to have sex is are influenced by their own country's laws. I can't help but notice that a lot of people from the US think the right age to have sex is 18 and a lot of people from the UK think it should be 16.
For my part, I think it should be 13 if the age difference is small (say, less than 3 years) and something like 15 or 16 in other cases. However, it happens that I actually do think that the age at which people should be able to star in porn should be somewhere around 18 due to the longer lasting consequences of such actions, the easier enforceability of such laws and the fact that this is the age of legal majority in a lot of countries. Of course, it's possible that I only think this because one has to be 18 to star in porn where I live.
kudichan said:
we must still have a single legal age for all age restricted activities
No we don't. The technology exists to make laws fit the individual in cases such as this.
For instance give everyone a thumb drive and/or subdermal implant that can be updated with medical info. These devices would also contain a persons legal rights/permissions. For instance an individual starts displayinga clear interest in sex so use the device and make em legal. Similarly it could be used for drugs license infractins and so on. In short customize laws and rights to the individual. Not that hard when you think about it and it would really simplify things.
edit forgot to mention that as usual i was pointing out the exception to the rule. I tend to do that sicne most people get stuck in thought processes revolving around absolutes.
Also 18 as an age of consent is just stupid in the extreme. Kids are screwing at FAR younger ages.
Personally i say we run a test and interview a couple that is say a 14-15 year old who's seeing someone about 20-30 and see how hey turn out long run WITHOUT being ripped apart. I see most of this damage that supposedly happens from the relationship as happening instead because of law enforcement ripping apart there relationship But i would also be willing to amend my views should untainted research show it and sadly to get that testimonies won't work.
EDIT 2
I just finished your post and i actually say 13-14 should be age of consent. I am american as in fom the U.S. however i prefer to make up myow mind on my own views.The other fun fact is that most places in the U.S. have 16 as age of consent but we're led to belive 18 is most comon. My state for instance has 16 or so with "prental permission" hello statutory rape charges should ya break up. But ogveral i believe our instincts are there for a reason and we should follow them as best we can. But then mine tend to border on supernatural levels of accuracy for what's best so ya know i could be biased.
Sorrior said:
No we don't. The technology exists to make laws fit the individual in cases such as this.
For instance give everyone a thumb drive and/or subdermal implant that can be updated with medical info. These devices would also contain a persons legal rights/permissions. For instance an individual starts displayinga clear interest in sex so use the device and make em legal. Similarly it could be used for drugs license infractins and so on. In short customize laws and rights to the individual. Not that hard when you think about it and it would really simplify things.
Something incredibly complicated would simplify things?
Doing something like that would probably be extremely expensive, would make people complain about unfairness or discrimination if they weren't given the same permissions as someone else, and has great potential to be abused. Governments aren't to be trusted.
Sorrior said:edit forgot to mention that as usual i was pointing out the exception to the rule. I tend to do that sicne most people get stuck in thought processes revolving around absolutes.
I find that people tend not to think enough about absolutes and make too much of exceptions.
Sorrior said:Personally i say we run a test and interview a couple that is say a 14-15 year old who's seeing someone about 20-30 and see how hey turn out long run WITHOUT being ripped apart. I see most of this damage that supposedly happens from the relationship as happening instead because of law enforcement ripping apart there relationship But i would also be willing to amend my views should untainted research show it and sadly to get that testimonies won't work.
Once again, that's impractical due to the cost of interviewing so many couples and the potential for abuse or disagreement with the decision. Everyone who didn't like the results of the test would bitch about or even appeal against the results.
Sorrior said:I am american as in fom the U.S. however i prefer to make up myow mind on my own views.The other fun fact is that most places in the U.S. have 16 as age of consent but we're led to belive 18 is most comon.
I blame Hollywood. The AOC in California is 18, no? And therefore nearly every film and TV programme talks about 18 as being the legal age.
I'm kinda barging in on this post all of a sudden but: I think that pedophiles aren't necessarily bad, people who have book fetishes aren't really bad unless they actually do something. Pedos that won't actually touch a child wrongfully are fine in my book, speaking of books, people who are turned on by books are fine as well as long as my books aren't all sticky and wet after they 'come' over for the day.
You must log in to post.
Yandere Simulator “Could Be Renamed”
Studio FOW Short Totally Tentacular
Phantom World Stretching Expectations
Charming Futaba Nendoroid
How You Wish KyoAni Made Phantom World…
