Overdeveloped?

rudiguur said:
but i was just expressing my own opinion, not barring other peoples opinions.

I <3 U, Alessa

Keep your hands off my pet troll!

I'm all for DFC. Big breasts disgust me.

kajunbowser said:
Exactly how big is your limit?

He stated it earlier in the thread.

maga said:
Anything over an A is too overdeveloped...

At least give the nymph class (A to BB) a chance. I share the same sentiment as Zenki:

Zenki wrote
I'm more of a shape then size kinda person.

Nothing smaller than size A, no bigger than the D class, as long as the size fits the woman's frame and has the right shape.

Not everybody is Bisexual or Omnisexual.
It would be nice though.

I'm bisexual, but I still have my preferences. Flatter chests being one of them.

maga said:

Some people claim to be bisexual just to get attention... I'm not really sure about my orientation. I have my questionable moments.

Same here it wouldn't be if traps would stop looking so do-able to me. I woke up think about the trap in No bra

maga said:
Some people claim to be bisexual just to get attention...

Am I being told I don't exist again? I knew I didn't want to throw down that word again. I have enough of a hard time claiming bisexual as it is.
I started looking for words like Polysexual and Pansexual and stuff just because I became afraid of the term.

Well I'll tell you this. I like penis more than vagina. But I'm still attracted to vagina and especially cameltoe. I'm attracted to hairy women more than unhairy women. That includes not just crotch hair, but that hirisute fetish mentioned on one Sankaku article, which was about armpit hair, I like armpit hair on girls, the fetish that that article presented. I'm into upper lip hair on women, I adore just a bit of peach fuzz and my mind immediately things of licking it. As well as hair other places such as like on the female chest. I'd rather be penetrated than penetrate. I like girls taller than me, rather than shorter. I don't like either the hourglass shape or a v-shape, but a flat board shape. Extending, I don't like curvy girls that is, with wide hips and such, and muscular manly men. However, I do like slightly muscular women at least, and I'm not sure when my limit lies. For instance, I really like the abs of and want to lick them of the muscular blue undergarmented lady in one of the earlier flat chested gallery. I also like the muscle bathing suit Haruhi picture better than the original. I like feminine leaning faces(but male enough leaning to just ADORE reverse traps). I like looking at yaoi and gay pornography more than yuri and lesbian pornography. I like smaller breasts to larger breasts, optimally being AA and completely washboard.

More simply put, I like traps and reverse traps the best.
What am I?

Diorte said:
Wtf is omnisexual? Last I knew, either you liked dick, vag, or both. If you say you like none, then you're still gay.

Omnisexual, oddly, is a somehow different term from Pansexual. Even though both seem to imply attraction to all. I remember another person at another forum told me I was wrong in stating that I am Pansexual in that Pansexuality implies attraction to all. But really Pansexuality is a gender rejecting sexuality that claims gender blindness and rejection of the gender binary that bisexuality implies, not necessarily attraction to all. Which is one more reason I believe in the term Pansexual for myself more than Bisexual, because I'm not really into womanly women or manly men. And that preference also shows a rejection of attraction to all or no preference. So I think I am a Pansexual, but not an omnisexual.

I am almost omnisexual, in some ways. I'm able to be physically attracted to most things if I force myself. I bet I could even masturbate to ejaculation to a football if I tried to make myself. However, I still have distinct preferences. And heavy leanings. I've also got the hunch there are some things I could never be sexually aroused by even with years of effort. So I don't think the word omnisexual applies to me.

There's more to sexuality than just liking penis or vagina. There's all kinds of fetishes or paraphilias out there. Pedophilia is one of them. Also Zoophilia and foot fetishes and ect. Many people here have a breast fetish. Speaking of which, I am not a pedophile, that's one thing preventing me from being an omnisexual. One would have to also be a pedophile in order to be an omnisexual. But not in order to be a Pansexual.

Well then, I'm primarily bisexual. Who prefers androgyny.
I'd have to force myself to be attracted to breasts, by the way. But I know I'm capable of it. It certainly doesn't tickle my mental sexual fancy, but I can press a few buttons and make myself masturbate to some womanly breasts if I tried. Not an effort I enjoy making, though.

And I agree that no matter how womanly the man, it's still a man and homosexual attraction if you're a man. And that no matter how manly the woman, if you're a man and attracted to it, it's heterosexual.

A penis is a penis. A vagina is a vagina. If you're attracted to a penis, and you're a guy, it's homosexual. Period. If you're attracted to vagina, and you're a guy, it's heterosexual. If you're attracted to a vagina, and you're a woman, it's homosexual. Period. If you're attracted to a penis, and you're a woman, it's heterosexual. If you're attracted to both, you're bisexual. Period.

The fact I often have an honestly hard time often choosing between a penis and a vagina, should be further proof how bisexual I am.

Now if only I didn't feel like I had the need to decide because people don't think bisexuals exist. Because I really don't want to decide. But I also don't want to annoy both homosexuals and heterosexuals by telling them I'm bi. By the way, I don't even understand how a person can claim to be bisexual and not be. As long as a sexy guy claiming to be bisexual or bi-curious is will to have sex with and date me, I could care less whether they're a "real" or "fake" bisexual.

It is said that sexual tendencies in general lie on a continuum, and few are straight or gay with absolutely no interest -- dare I say utter repulsion -- at the thought of sex with someone of the other sex.

As a result it would probably be fair to say that most people are in fact bisexual -- certainly a strong binary in that regard seems to be a more modern social development; in the age of the Roman empire it's well-known that people had sex without concern for the sex of the person, male or female.