Sankaku Complex Forums » Meta

Sankaku Complex Image Board

  1. A 2chan like image board owned by Sankaku Complex...

    feasible?

    having 50,000 unique visitors, 400,000 page views a day, wouldn't it be best if SanCon had it's own image board?

    maybe HE have thought of this...

    but oh well, let's just wait...

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  2. Bad idea me thinks

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  3. I think the channel is fine as-is myself. An imageboard would be redundant.

    Not to mention that every thread would basically be that lolispam.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  4. muteKi said:
    Not to mention that every thread would basically be that lolispam.

    You make it sound like a bad thing

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  5. Not too sure about this too. More to the "no" side though.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  6. DO NOT WANT!
    I somehow liked the Danbooru look more than Futaba.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  7. We already had one. Sankaku Channel v1. It seems to be broken at the moment, and I closed it to new postings as it was just attracting spam.

    How can you fail to see that a booru style site is completely superior to chan site in every respect?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  8. Artefact said:

    How can you fail to see that a booru style site is completely superior to chan site in every respect?

    But the chan-style sites are a lot more famous then the booru-style

    I don't think anyone at my school doesnt know about 4chan, and at least half of them know 2chan XD

    The only ones who know about booru is me and the other few otakus :P

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  9. ichiro_ino said:

    having 50,000 unique visitors, 400,000 page views a day, wouldn't it be best if SanCon had it's own image board?

    http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  10. Icy-nee-san said:
    I don't think anyone at my school doesnt know about 4chan, and at least half of them know 2chan XD

    Naruto and Bleach are also much more famous than Noir and Kaiba.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  11. Avatar Image

    tB

    Blitz said:
    Bad idea me thinks

    Very. VERY bad idea.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  12. Artefact said:

    How can you fail to see that a booru style site is completely superior to chan site in every respect?

    i agree with this, booru style actual has organisation and is user friendly when looking for something, chan style is nothing than random pictures and comments as well as requests...

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  13. DHYohko said:

    i agree with this, booru style actual has organisation and is user friendly when looking for something, chan style is nothing than random pictures and comments as well as requests...

    True...

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  14. Avatar Image

    CC

    The danbooru way is decent, though they should have made different types for shows/artists/characters etc instead of these nasty _(artist) postfixes.. but then again I'm the only who would complain about such things.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  15. Avatar Image

    Kip

    I've always wanted a booru for demotivational posters.

    I can never seem to find the right one for the right situation...

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  16. muteKi said:

    Naruto and Bleach are also much more famous than Noir and Kaiba.

    Never heard of Noir or Kaiba :P

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  17. Yawta rectify that situation immediately, Icy.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  18. ichiro_ino said:
    A 2chan like image board owned by Sankaku Complex...

    feasible?

    having 50,000 unique visitors, 400,000 page views a day, wouldn't it be best if SanCon had it's own image board?

    maybe HE have thought of this...

    but oh well, let's just wait...

    Yes, if you like troll hordes. Out of those 50,000,000 hits, im sure a percentage of them came from 4chan and another percentage are from haters.
    An image board would also solidify the mindset that SankCon is 4chan's rival. I don't understand why some people think that. Shouldn't it be compared to sites within its class?

    My point is, it wouldn't be a good thing, it would just invite bad company.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  19. It's like Artefact says. We already had one (back when I was still just another lurker, ah the memories...), and that didn't work out so nicely. There were a few gems though, like that one (note: hit the cancel button).

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  20. Shuu said:
    It's like Artefact says. We already had one (back when I was still just another lurker, ah the memories...), and that didn't work out so nicely. There were a few gems though, like that one (note: hit the cancel button).

    I can see why it was a failure... x.x

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote

Reply

You must log in to post.