Sankaku Complex Forums » Anime

  1. sifian said:
    It is easier to defy authority when one has become accustomed to defying that authority. Therefore, setting too many restrictions that are likely to be broken actually hampers the respect one might have for greater and more important restrictions.

    In this case, someone who cannot find his peerage appealing is more likely to resort to illegal activity should there be no legal outlet available.

    If someone is bound to defy authority from the start, the strength and number of the restrictions do not matter. Only when the punishment enforced is far greater than the former will any form of consideration be given; a few years in jail compared to the death sentence.

    Artefact's point is that there MUST be a disconnection between the offending material and the person's behavior. The argument makes the assumption that a connection between the offending material and behavior exists, where the offending material is a substitute for his behavior to act on.

    That's why it doesn't work.

    EDIT: Brevity

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  2. Avatar Image

    GTR

    Artefact said:

    A large number of these Japanese loli fans are still outraged that 3D child pornography was recently outlawed, so if you are trying to persuade people of the need for artistic freedoms to be protected they are perhaps not the best people to invoke.

    word

    And in general modern Japanese are pretty hopeless at proper political "public relations" - taking rhetorical cues from them is likely not helpful.

    why

    Much better to look at successful lobbying efforts, like the gaming industry or, indeed, the NRA.

    We also have ACLU, but can't rely on them most of the time because, unlike the NRA, ACLU covers wider issues and I don't agree with them in some of their issues.

    As a non-American, what do you think of ACLU?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  3. You can only support progress when it's your liberty?
    but not others?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  4. Sukunai said:

    My only concern is Pavlov.
    If I smack you in the head and offer a stimulus, eventually you WILL link the smack in the head with the stimulus. Anyone wishing to refute that proven fact, please leave your IQ at the door, you don't seem to need it.

    your example is wrong but what you say is right (from what I can see). You broke down the proposition network down in it's structure but missed out some information symbols, also age heavily affects the structure of the network. If you smack an adult or teenager everytime you offer a stimulus they will equate you + stimulus -> pain, a child would equate the stimulus overall without context, with pain due to lack of a substancially developed network to sufficiently separate the symbols (or rather the child wouldn't know that different people may behave differently depending on the stimulus).

    So I would say that if you gave a 2d lolicon fictional loli, He would equate fiction + loli -> arousal rather than loli irrelevant of form -> arousal. Of course there are thousands of other factors that are involved in this but for simplicity sake...

    This is why from what I can see, you get so many 2d only lolicon.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  5. GTR said:

    We also have ACLU, but can't rely on them most of the time because, unlike the NRA, ACLU covers wider issues and I don't agree with them in some of their issues.

    As a non-American, what do you think of ACLU?

    They stood up for NAMBLA; why wouldn't they defend individuals who have a thing for FICTIONAL children?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  6. wats NAMBLA?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  7. North American Man/Boy Love Association.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  8. I hav an idea of wat it is but is it possible?

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote

Reply

You must log in to post.