Sankaku Complex Forums » Meta

Sankaku Complex viewed from Google

Started 6 years ago by Artefact, currently has 40 posts - latest post is by Geerie

Tags:
- Google
- loli
- Meta
- Sankaku Complex
- SEO
Feed for this topic

12 Next »

Artefact

I was taking a look at Google Analytics, and thought I might share yesterday's top results:

Visits Pages/Visit Avg. Time on Site % New Visits Bounce Rate
1. sankaku complex 1,470 5.39 00:05:31 17.41% 28.44%
2. sankaku 826 4.92 00:04:53 16.46% 29.66%
3. sankakucomplex 245 6.05 00:06:19 12.65% 33.47%
4. megurine luka 100 4.39 00:06:07 11.00% 39.00%
5. 3d custom girl 94 3.39 00:02:55 32.98% 30.85%
6. munto tv 79 3.61 00:03:32 16.46% 32.91%
7. lolicon 69 3.93 00:03:17 68.12% 55.07%
8. persona 4 wallpaper 60 2.53 00:03:05 38.33% 51.67%
9. touhou anime 57 4.67 00:05:56 8.77% 28.07%
10. 3d custom girl mods 55 4.09 00:04:12 23.64% 30.91%
11. shibari 52 3.42 00:02:10 90.38% 44.23%
12. mizugi kanojo 48 3.06 00:01:46 43.75% 31.25%
13. oppai 47 5.87 00:07:13 53.19% 34.04%
14. gundam 00 wallpaper 44 4.39 00:02:47 59.09% 38.64%
15. sakura complex 41 6.39 00:05:03 29.27% 19.51%
16. chrome shelled regios 39 3.26 00:03:22 48.72% 48.72%
17. ecchi 38 7.37 00:05:00 84.21% 28.95%
18. pantsu 38 7.26 00:08:24 60.53% 28.95%
19. tony taka 36 5.58 00:05:57 30.56% 19.44%
20. shimapan 35 3.83 00:03:28 0.00% 31.43%

This is out of a total of 16,000 visits via Google - as you can see, the keyword gravity is quite diffuse. What's odd here is that we have hardly any content relating to some of these titles - I presume other sites have even less. If we but had more contributors...

I expect a lot of people are using Google and autocomplete to find their their favourite sites, explaining the high amount of such searching.

SERPS-wise we long ago conquered "sankaku", which used to belong to some obscure judo waza, but taking "complex" may take some time.

I also noticed for the first time some interesting new spellings:

29. sakaku complex 28 4.57 00:04:28 14.29% 32.14%
30. sansaku complex 28 2.75 00:05:34 10.71% 57.14
34. sankoku complex 26 4.27 00:05:00 3.85% 26.92%

Since we place first for all these no action is required to help people with the name, I think.

Not sure about this:

15. sakura complex 41 6.39 00:05:03 29.27% 19.51%

Given the bounce rate I presume they find what they are looking for.

Now I think I have to find something Megurine Luka related to post...

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Mina

Sakura Complex....doesn't feel right to me D:

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Quen

I find the loli related keyword's rate to be strange, seeing how we don't carry any loli content here!

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Michio

Quen said:
I find the loli related keyword's rate to be strange, seeing how we don't carry any loli content here!

sup

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/225332

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Quen

Michio said:

sup

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/225332

Greetings.

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/20433/guro-izumi_konata-loli-lucky_star-raep-tagme

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Artefact

That's a different site. These stats are for http://www.sankakucomplex.com only.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Geerie

Quen said:

Greetings.

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/20433/guro-izumi_konata-loli-lucky_star-raep-tagme

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/index?tags=loli

12685 tags uh-oh

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Spoony_Bard

There are loli-related articles. After all, that's how I originally found this site last year when it was starting out.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Artefact

But they are usually "about" loli rather than "consisting of" loli (unless you count harmless swimsuits). In fact most of them seem to be about lolicon rather than actual loli...

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Michio

Quen said:

Greetings.

http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/20433/guro-izumi_konata-loli-lucky_star-raep-tagme

Why is there a guro tag? lol

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Geerie

Artefact said:
I was taking a look at Google Analytics, and thought I might share yesterday's top results:

[quote]

15. sakura complex 41 6.39 00:05:03 29.27% 19.51%

when i stumbled across the site i couldnt remember what it was called i remember looking this up i cant remember if i found it this way or not though.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Spoony_Bard

Artefact said:
But they are usually "about" loli rather than "consisting of" loli (unless you count harmless swimsuits). In fact most of them seem to be about lolicon rather than actual loli...

That's why I said "loli-related."

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Ichiro Ino

artefact, what's the traffic sources overview?

might be that most visitors go directly?

is searching images in google (image tab) counted in the "Keywords"?

I think most of your visitors where from google image search results...

it's where I came from

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Quen

ichiro_ino said:
artefact, what's the traffic sources overview?

might be that most visitors go directly?

is searching images in google (image tab) counted in the "Keywords"?

I think most of your visitors where from google image search results...

it's where I came from

I'm not especially good at reading Analytic's readout, but if I'm reading it properly it says about a third of visitors visit the site directly.

I wouldn't know how to differentiate normal Google vistors from Google Image vistors, though.

Looking at the amount of link-ins for "munto tv" and "megurine luka" confuses me, now that I look closely...

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Artefact

Only a few hundred come in daily from image search. Here are the top 10 referrers for the past month:

1. (direct) / (none) 454,100 5.00 00:06:34 34.41% 36.69%
2. google / organic 407,336 5.04 00:06:06 37.41% 40.28%
3. chan.sankakucomplex.com / referral 70,019 5.94 00:08:39 4.24% 28.89%
4. dannychoo.com / referral 26,729 4.92 00:06:23 8.67% 31.83%
5. yahoo / organic 23,733 5.42 00:06:04 52.93% 42.19%
6. animenano.com / referral 22,842 3.60 00:04:42 15.69% 39.32%
7. google.com / referral 17,395 3.35 00:04:30 18.29% 45.06%
8. antenna.animeblogger.net / referral 17,254 3.19 00:03:54 10.22% 40.48%
9. images.google.com / referral 13,603 6.08 00:06:37 62.99% 37.70%
10. myanimelist.net / referral 8,090 4.18 00:06:51 12.98% 40.96%

Google.com is their feed reader. Direct is probably mainly feed readers and bookmarks.

Roughly a third come in via search engines, a third direct and a third by links.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Spoony_Bard

I'm surprised more don't come through image search. Sankaku's image channel has some very good pics.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Artefact

That's a different site, with separate statistics.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
CC
Googles image search seems to do a pretty poor job at indexing them to.
Looking at the generated sourcecode for an image page a few possible causes come to light.
1. Alt text repeats the URL's keywords, might be considered as keyword spam.
2. Non-standard orig_height and orig_width attributes in the image attribute, guessing they have to do something with the javascript functions being able to do something with them.
3. The count is visibility: hidden to people with javascript disabled, might get blacklisted for that
Not sure how any of the other image search engines work as I don't use them :), search engine optimizing has only been worth it for google for me. As the country where I live in googles market share is over 9000! errr like 98%.
Posted 6 years ago # Quote
tingle

roflmywaffle @ #7 lolicon

Posted 6 years ago # Quote
Michio

tingle said:
roflmywaffle @ #7 lolicon

I like how lolicon has the highest bounce rate.

Posted 6 years ago # Quote

12 Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.