Sankaku Complex Forums » General

[closed]

Did Google ban loli?

  1. Just use a different search engine, google tracks all of our searches anyway

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. No one cares about the legality.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  3. Avatar Image

    JD

    joriandrake said:

    Hm, actually the answer kinda is "Yes, Google did." as I see it due to the heavy filtering. This will also make it harder to look up new or translated loli game releases, and loli art, et cetera.

    Rub-Jelly-On-Me said:
    Images still shows loli's though, just can't find videos of lolis anymore. Images aren't really filtered, but the text search is.

    Well, images still show up but not a single one of them is erotic or often not even close to it, while the main "hentai" genre can still be looked up, meanwhile not being able to focus the browser results with trying to look up "hentai loli" is the new twist to things.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  4. joriandrake said:
    Hm, actually the answer kinda is "Yes, Google did."

    Google did not "ban loli", nor have they "made loli illegal". Stupid thread is stupid.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  5. Avatar Image

    JD

    spacesavage said:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

    As I understand it loli isn't banned on an US national scale, but had some cases where owners got hurt for it, my own nation is nowhere on the list though and you would usually see someone looking at you weird here for watching normal anime and not hentai ("If you have to look at Japanese stuff to begin with" - as someone I know put it)

    Posted 2 years ago #
  6. A full fledged image board is probably a better choice for porn.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  7. Avatar Image

    JD

    aneko said:

    No, Google did not "ban loli", nor have they "made it illegal". Stupid thread is stupid.

    So, filtering the results of the word out doesn't mean according to you that they banned loli porn on their own accord?

    Also, thread titles are compact description of the content (in better cases) and my exact questions were in the first post, not the title.

    However, as it seems soon after I posted I found the answer on All The Fallen, which confirmed the problem being fault of Google and not on my side of the borders.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  8. joriandrake said:
    So, filtering the results of the word out doesn't mean according to you that they banned loli porn on their own accord?

    Not according to anyone who knows what a search engine does.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  9. Avatar Image

    JD

    joriandrake said:

    So, filtering the results of the word out doesn't mean according to you that they banned loli porn on their own accord?

    Also, thread titles are compact description of the content (in better cases) and my exact questions were in the first post, not the title.

    However, as it seems soon after I posted I found the answer on All The Fallen, which confirmed the problem being fault of Google and not on my side of the borders.

    mascarpone said:
    A full fledged image board is probably a better choice for porn.

    Probably, but erasing this many "Loli" results will impact how easy you can look up new anime/hentai/eroge/RPG releases and localizations.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  10. aneko said:

    Not according to anyone who knows what a search engine does.

    Aneko, they announced that they would ban nsfw loli's, 2d and 3d, from their search queries.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  11. Avatar Image

    JD

    aneko said:

    Not according to anyone who knows what a search engine does.

    Well excuse me then, but I just read now about 4 threads on the matter, and no one except you here try to argue in defense of Google blocking this content. I start to consider it a possibility that you or a family member actually work for Google or is otherwise affiliated, perhaps through a subsidiary like YouTube or Gmail.

    Rub-Jelly-On-Me said:

    Aneko, they announced that they would ban nsfw loli's, 2d and 3d, from their search queries.

    They did? goddamn it, they declare it clearly and still noone questioned why or how can they do that?

    Posted 2 years ago #
  12. This is the first time in quite a while I feel a thread needs to be deleted for being utterly pointless.
    This topic is completely stupid and the more the op posts the more I think they too are completely stupid.
    Keep in mind this is coming from someone who on average brings nothing to the conversation.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  13. Google should ban you from making stupid threads on this site.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  14. joriandrake said:

    Well excuse me then, but I just read now about 4 threads on the matter, and no one except you here try to argue in defense of Google blocking this content. I start to consider it a possibility that you or a family member actually work for Google or is otherwise affiliated, perhaps through a subsidiary like YouTube or Gmail.

    They did? goddamn it, they declare it clearly and still noone questioned why or how can they do that?

    Everyone's too busy accepting gays to accept pedos, pls use common sense.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  15. Avatar Image

    JD

    notsure said:
    This is the first time in quite a while I feel a thread needs to be deleted for being utterly pointless.
    This topic is completely stupid and the more the op posts the more I think they too are completely stupid.
    Keep in mind this is coming from someone who on average brings nothing to the conversation.

    Okay you do have your right to whatever opinion you have on me, I don't like to post on forums to begin with and even registering here 3 years ago was a hard decision for me.

    However, considering what kind of other threads here are, why would be an information thread about recent Google related events be in any way deletion worthy?

    And while I don't think my writing is that terrible keep it in mind my mother language isn't English, I barely returned from work home, and it is exactly 04:35 here.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  16. Poop said:
    Google should ban you from making stupid threads on this site.

    Attachments

    1. 1389260827983.gif 2 years old
    Posted 2 years ago #
  17. joriandrake said:

    However, considering what kind of other threads here are, why would be an information thread about (1)recent Google related events be in any way deletion worthy?

    (2)And while I don't think my writing is that terrible keep it in mind my mother language isn't English, I barely returned from work home, and it is exactly 04:35 here.

    1. This is why you're dumb. This isn't recent at all.

    2. Stop making excuses, my opinions of you have nothing to do with your grasp of the english language.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  18. This isn't recent, I complained and got flamed for making a thread about this months ago.

    Posted 2 years ago #
  19. joriandrake said:
    no one except you here try to argue in defense of Google blocking this content.

    I must not have been paying attention when I did that. Could you point it out?

    joriandrake said:
    I start to consider it a possibility that you or a family member actually work for Google

    I'm starting to consider a certain possibility myself.

    Rub-Jelly-On-Me said:
    they would ban nsfw loli's, 2d and 3d, from their search queries.

    Which does absolutely nothing to the actual porn. It's right where you left it.

    Posted 2 years ago #

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.