http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/first-gay-wedding-held-at-tokyo-disney-resort-2
Damn. The girl in the left is hot what a waste of dick penetration.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/first-gay-wedding-held-at-tokyo-disney-resort-2
Damn. The girl in the left is hot what a waste of dick penetration.
oh
Of course no one cares because it is two girls. Now have two guys try to get married at Disneyland.
I'm not used to females being called 'gay'. When did that happen?
xichisex said:
Of course no one cares because it is two girls.
Yep.
Just read some of the comments. Just think how worse it would be with two penises getting those marriage papers signed with Minnie and Mickey. Then it would be national news.
Altair said:
Damn. The girl in the left is hot what a waste of space this thread is.
Altair said:
Damn. The girl in the left is hot what a waste of dick penetration.
I'm curious of what you'd say if both are
xichisex said:
Then it would be national news.
That's for sure.
I was hoping it was two gay guys at the US Disneyland as it would have offended more people.
While you guys are proclaiming your apathy, I find it odd that it's in Japan were gay marriage is unrecognized.
Dint bother reading the article so is it First Gay Wedding? Or just cus its the first one being held at Disney Land?
It's the first gay wedding at the Tokyo Disney Resort.
However:
gay marriage has no legal standing in Japan.
xichisex said:
Then it would be national news.
It's listed under national news, though -_-
H-Ero said:
It's the first gay wedding at the Tokyo Disney Resort.However:
gay marriage has no legal standing in Japan.
======
~ and this is - "why" - I am apathetic towards this issue...
I have no interest in it (nor Diss-ney) anyway...
~ regardless, - "let whoever marry whoever they wish" - why make a big deal about it? -
~ If its on Diss-ney property or a small insignificant island in wonderland, located in the south-seas? - who really cares? ~ it will have its 15 minutes of fame, then be a memorable history afterwards.
I'm apathetic because I doubt that the OP intended to discuss any issues.
I'm apathetic because the article isn't trying to make this seem like it's a big story (because it's not). This is most likely just to follow up after the previous reports about the outfit restrictions.
This topic has been closed to new replies.