jamesownsall said:
Dude, that still amounts to 'not having the balls' in the end. They look above them and they only see the short term threat. They don't want to consider the long term effects of continuous stupidity brought forth by these bureaucrats.
Or maybe they do, but like I said, it always ends up being "...BUT THEY'D FUCK US BACK IN THE ASS!!" or "Let someone else do it". It's inconvenient.
I mean, just look at what Internet does for Japan in general; they may be doing dogeza on a daily basis in real life, but the rage on their interwebs is massive. Being anonymous makes everyone take out the social mask they wear in front of other people, but in Japan's conformist society, this is painfully obvious(I remember reading a book about it, co-authored by native Japanese)...
// Read this knowing that the information here might be false or misinformed
I do think the Japs are much more conformist than the US let's say, but you're being a bit biased imo because the US populace has a whole history of essentially looking the other way when it came to these governmental litigation creeps.
The general individual on the street is wayy too busy living their lives in these increasingly 'competitive' times to care about politics, about complex financial instruments and alien technical babble - in fact, they've never really cared about politics and these sorts of stuff as long as they are still able to live reasonably comfortable; only when issues become salient and often already raised by someone else, will they maybe join in and 'fight for their rights'.
They want everything done by everyone else. SOPA for example - the only reason all that was dropped was because they had HUGE names like Google and 'expert' after 'expert' saying that it was a bad idea - not to mention the reasonable amount of media coverage of it on it; in those cases, for politicians and judges to actually pass the rule would be viewed as ridiculous by everyone who was watching (it's a very observable fact that the more salient the actions of those in power is, the less likely they abuse it).
People don't really care about SOPA itself, most probably don't even know about it and what it was (I don't much tbh) - but they would care about the US government ignoring culturally widely held 'experts' - holders of the 'truth' - like 'Google' and 'Tim Burners Lee' the co-founder of the internet and going ahead with their actions.
I'd make a big bet, and say that if companies like Google and etc hadn't raised their voice, that bill quite probably would have gone through very easily.
My point being.. Japan would need something like that. The politicians by themselves won't bother to act - well, they might, but they might not also. Having a widely culturally viewed 'holder of the truth' raise the issue though I would say, would do something about it.
--
edit. Although I did read a article by some professor about how after WWII, there was a case where some uprising by the Japanese educated youth was poorly handled - and as a side effect of that, the Japs became more passive and subservient then ever. The guy actually went as far as to say that it was a foundation on which anime, manga and all these escapist mediums grew upon; the jap youths essentially wanted to escape from their bitter reality because they felt they couldn't 'change the system'.
edit2. Maybe the problem with Japan, is that they don't really have that 'charismatic leader' or entity to raise the issue. Just wait a little longer nips, me is coming to save you... I just hope I do so in time..