Fucking Germans with their crazy declensions!
This is why we bombed Dresden. And why I'll do it again!
Fucking Germans with their crazy declensions!
This is why we bombed Dresden. And why I'll do it again!
dirtypair said:
The Mormons do, don't they?
Well the Mormons generally don't rape lolis but they do a lot of other stuff that's annoying.
If I was president of my country they wouldn't get away with half the shit they do such as using their religion as a tax shelter and I'd outlaw missionaries being able to pester people.
They can leave fliers,hold BBQs, and do TV evangelism etc to promote their religion.
I guess I'm not as cruel as Kudi though I would dispatch the pedophile ring Charles Bronson style.
dirtypair said:
The Mormons do, don't they?
Mormon college known as Brigham Young University is accepting Gay's and lesbian's the problem is they kick out one's that do act out on it.
Muslim pedophiles -- As sad as it is, turn-a-bout's fair play. Europeans had their way with other peoples during those times they had colonies all over the world. And now their descendants are gettin' a little taste of it back.
Mormons -- For awhile they actually tried proselytizing in my neighborhood. Didn't last long. People got tired of them using offers to do yard work or other house chores as an excuse to get into your home and they had to compete with the Jehovah's Witnesses who've been annoying people for ages with their own door-to-door campaign. However, somehow they still managed to get a zoning permit to build a main temple down town.
Pyrus said:
Muslim pedophiles -- As sad as it is, turn-a-bout's fair play. Europeans had their way with other peoples during those times they had colonies all over the world. And now their descendants are gettin' a little taste of it back.
Die.
Seriously, European dominance is a very recent thing. For about 1000 years of its existence, it was the Islamic world that was dominant, often ruling over vast areas of Europe for centuries with a tiny interlude of European control in small parts of the Levantine coast for a few decades. European Christians under their rule were horrendously oppressed and enslaved in their millions. Black Africans under their rule (Muslim or not) were enslaved and oppressed in their tens of millions. Hindus under their rule were enslaved and oppressed in their tens of millions.
This whole "colonial revenge" narrative is historically ignorant. If anything, the brief period of Western rule in the Islamic world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was the colonial revenge, in which the former oppressors got a taste of their own medicine.
It's not [historically] ignorant. It's simply a case of every dog having his day. One group for whatever reason decides to mess with another group. Then the other group gets revenge. Then some other people jump in for one side or the other. And finally, everyone involved takes turns "Doin' to you what you did to me." Before that Islamic period you speak of, there was the Romans (Europeans). Before them was the Persians (Middle Easterners), and Greeks (Europeans again) and so on back and forth. Who started it and when, no one knows. But once it started, it spread all over the world and at some point, everyone had at least one chance to do it to someone else.
Myballz said:
Mormon college known as Brigham Young University is accepting Gay's and lesbian's the problem is they kick out one's that do act out on it.
That's retarded. I'd be more upset that Gays and Lesbians would actually attend school there. Why do that to yourself? I understand if you are willing to hold out, but i don't expect peers to be as understand as the administration is appearing to be.
Pyrus said:
It's not [historically] ignorant. It's simply a case of every dog having his day. One group for whatever reason decides to mess with another group. Then the other group gets revenge. Then some other people jump in for one side or the other. And finally, everyone involved takes turns "Doin' to you what you did to me." Before that Islamic period you speak of, there was the Romans (Europeans). Before them was the Persians (Middle Easterners), and Greeks (Europeans again) and so on back and forth. Who started it and when, no one knows. But once it started, it spread all over the world and at some point, everyone had at least one chance to do it to someone else.
British people weren't involved in any of those things. And the people in Rochdale are descended from peasants who didn't even have anything to with imperialism and saw no benefit from it.
And the whole idea of "every dog having its day" or "colonial revenge" is incredibly retarded because it involves taking revenge for what happened to someone else, and taking it out on someone who did not commit the crime. Do you not see how stupid that idea is? You're talking as if people somehow "inherit" guilt despite not having done anything. And people "inherit" victimhood. And you're attempting to make excuses for collective punishment. Bullshit.
So when did these children have their chance to oppress someone? Never. Although they are now bound to be so fucked up that they'll abuse someone in the future. Possibly any children that they may have.
And who abused these rapists? All of them were born after the British left their country. If anyone abused them, it was probably someone from their own "group".
It's like the Montagues & the Capulets or the Jets and the Sharks or the Hatfields and the McKoys: It doesn't matter if the people you get your revenge on are not the instigators, it doesn't even matter if you youself weren't around for whatever it is that you're gettin' revenge for. All that matters is that the "other guy" or his real or imagined ancestor did something to "you" or your real or imagined ancestor and the time for some "payback" in now. And you're not gonna take any prisoners, make any compromises, or spare any innocents 'cause it's glory & revenge in the name of familial, racial, or some other organizational pride and/or righteousness.
It's not that I agree with it or anything, but that seems to be how far too many people seem willing to think and act: You did this to me or your ancestor did this to my ancestor, so I'll do it to you or leave it to my kid to get your kid in the future.
Pyrus said:
It's like the Montagues & the Capulets or the Jets and the Sharks or the Hatfields and the McKoys: It doesn't matter if the people you get your revenge on are not the instigators, it doesn't even matter if you youself weren't around for whatever it is that you're gettin' revenge for. All that matters is that the "other guy" or his real or imagined ancestor did something to "you" or your real or imagined ancestor and the time for some "payback" in now. And you're not gonna take any prisoners, make any compromises, or spare any innocents 'cause it's glory & revenge in the name of familial, racial, or some other organizational pride and/or righteousness.
It's not that I agree with it or anything, but that seems to be how far too many people seem willing to think and act: You did this to me or your ancestor did this to my ancestor, so I'll do it to you or leave it to my kid to get your kid in the future.
Oh so you don't actually agree with it; you'e just stating how other people think? Sure thing, brah.
Anyway, anyone who does think like that and sees child rape as some form of cosmic justice for something that happened 100 years before he was born should be shot. Not as a punishment for rape, but because the human gene pool is better off without such fuckatrds.
Oh shit, you've got me talking like Char.
Pyrus said:
It's like the Montagues & the Capulets or the Jets and the Sharks or the Hatfields and the McKoys: It doesn't matter if the people you get your revenge on are not the instigators, it doesn't even matter if you youself weren't around for whatever it is that you're gettin' revenge for. All that matters is that the "other guy" or his real or imagined ancestor did something to "you" or your real or imagined ancestor and the time for some "payback" in now. And you're not gonna take any prisoners, make any compromises, or spare any innocents 'cause it's glory & revenge in the name of familial, racial, or some other organizational pride and/or righteousness.
It's not that I agree with it or anything, but that seems to be how far too many people seem willing to think and act: You did this to me or your ancestor did this to my ancestor, so I'll do it to you or leave it to my kid to get your kid in the future.
blind hatred is the best hatred. but your initial comment and continued defense of it clearly places you in agreement with this concept of revenge your defining.
Cantido said:
That's retarded. I'd be more upset that Gays and Lesbians would actually attend school there. Why do that to yourself? I understand if you are willing to hold out, but i don't expect peers to be as understand as the administration is appearing to be.
I don't attend college over there I heard that from both a Gawker article and youtube videos.The only crapy college I go to is Central Texas College the only issue people have with me is my past in Germany.
kudichan said:
You're talking as if people somehow "inherit" guilt despite not having done anything. And people "inherit" victimhood.
Sadly some people think you can inherit both victimhood and guilt. Its how modern day Africans where able to get the modern day British government to apologize for the slave trade.
Or how a British war veteran had a go at my German friend despite the fact that he's in his twenties and clearly had no involvement in the second world war.
Its a sad state of affairs when you can be blamed for the mistakes of your ancestors.
kudichan said:
Oh so you don't actually agree with it; you'e just stating how other people think? Sure thing, brah.
Trepiz said:
blind hatred is the best hatred. but your initial comment and continued defense of it clearly places you in agreement with this concept of revenge your defining.
It's called "playing the Devil's advocate." Lawyers do it for money all the time. It's when you look at things from the [usually unpopular or even wrong] other viewpoint or stance. Either for money, or to troll (a favorite reason on this site), or the sake of argument itself. To play the Devil's advocate, you don't need to agree with or even like the viewpoint. Only to be able to see the logic or reason by which it exists.
If you don't like the revenge motif, how 'bout one of its close relatives? Doin' stuff to people simply because they're not your people and as such it's okay. 'Cause doin' it to your own people wouldn't be appreciated or tolerated and you value their good will or at least their willingness to turn a blind eye to your unsavory antics.
StefanKinoshita said:
Sadly some people think you can inherit both victimhood and guilt. Its how modern day Africans where able to get the modern day British government to apologize for the slave trade.
Or how a British war veteran had a go at my German friend despite the fact that he's in his twenties and clearly had no involvement in the second world war.Its a sad state of affairs when you can be blamed for the mistakes of your ancestors.
I dunno, I think it's pretty cool.
brb raping Vegio as revenge for the Roman invasion of Britain.
Pyrus said:
LOL I WAS PLAYING TEH DEVILS ADVOCATES ALL ALONG!
We believe you.
Pleased to be of mild amusement!
I still say just shoot them and make it look like a drug deal gone bad or rival gang did it.
Or maybe knock them off one at a time making it look like they had accidents.
Mi6 is supposed to be really good at this sorta stuff.
I say shoot them and blame the Irish.
Kill two birds with one stone.
This topic has been closed to new replies.