triniking1234 said:
Not too bad.
At least your president doesn't have to deal with things like this, right?
triniking1234 said:
Not too bad.
At least your president doesn't have to deal with things like this, right?
pilu said:
They are basically the same. You don't get addicted to a drug, rather you'll get addicted to increased dopamine activity. Same with running, sex or workout. Everything you do is for that sweet dopamine burst.
i don't think i'm going to got through withdrawals if i stop working out... honestly i wish i COULD get addicted to that.
I want a cyborg president! With machine gun hands and laser eye beams!
mascarpone said:
I want a cyborg president! With machine gun hands and laser eyes!
or zombie reagan
danhibiki said:
i don't think i'm going to got through withdrawals if i stop working out... honestly i wish i COULD get addicted to that.
There are some cases.
Also, not everyone get's addicted to meth or heroin and there are social smokers/drinkers too.
btw the least addictive, but still enjoyable drugs are psychedelics like 'shrooms or LSD.
MasterInfamous said:
At least your president doesn't have to deal with things like this, right?
Our President doesn't but we give our Prime Minister a hard time.
Adrenaline > all
pilu said:
There are some cases.
Also, not everyone get's addicted to meth or heroin and there are social smokers/drinkers too.
btw the least addictive, but still enjoyable drugs are psychedelics like 'shrooms or LSD.
then they should be legal... unless they directly cause other people harm. see my view is that there shouldn't be laws protecting us from ourselves, just laws to protect us from others.
palmtop-tiger said:
Adrenaline > all
Take ephedrine, then take meth. Notice the difference. Realize that adrenaline doesn't feel good.
danhibiki said:
then they should be legal... unless they directly cause other people harm. see my view is that there shouldn't be laws protecting us from ourselves, just laws to protect us from others.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2010/11/drugs_cause_most_harm
Notice how alcohol is number one.
pilu said:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2010/11/drugs_cause_most_harm
Notice how alcohol is number one.
hmmm that's interesting didn't think weed could be all that dangerous... i wonder how much of that it from driving under the influence.
You Think?...Hmmmm. Possibly.
All MFC girls are capitalist silly goose. What?, some chick is gonna give HALF her income to 'Lesser people'?? Those girls work hard showering, picking out sex toys, and doing Cum shows.
Hell, 1/3 of them wouldn't even be on MFC (or have the time for it) if there was a Better Economy & Job market.
I thought you'd find the jokes amusing but where ever the conversation takes you is fine with me. I am not a "Topic Nazi" - I'm glad I could bring you all together.
My Threads are the only ones where you can just let it all hang out....like we used to in the old days.
I'm actually looking forward to this
the-envoy said:
I'm actually looking forward to this
and every nerd and geek in the world. ^.^
danhibiki said:
hmmm that's interesting didn't think weed could be all that dangerous... i wonder how much of that it from driving under the influence.
The problem with weed is that people underestimate the harm it can do(also, the research papers done on it might show more harm than it actually does, because of politics) . If you know your mind, know the substance, know your body and know your source, then nothing is really dangerous.
the-envoy said:
I'm actually looking forward to this
Hellz yeahz!
pilu said:
The problem with weed is that people underestimate the harm it can do(also, the research papers done on it might show more harm than it actually does, because of politics) . If you know your mind, know the substance, know your body and know your source, then nothing is really dangerous.
i guess that's really the problem with a lot of studies, either the people are going to be blinded to anything other than what they are trying to prove or disprove, or people will just not trust a study because it doesn't reflect what they already believed.
danhibiki said:
i guess that's really the problem with a lot of studies, either the people are going to be blinded to anything other than what they are trying to prove or disprove, or people will just not trust a study because it doesn't reflect what they already believed.
Good studies are done with preset aims and methodology that isn't biased for one side, so if the data is good, the results should reflect reality.
But there are things like researcher bias, flaws in the design of the study or just plain old bribery.
danhibiki said:
and every nerd and geek in the world. ^.^
Apparently I qualify. I had to explain to a friend, when we saw the trailer, that Lincoln split rails in his youth, which explains the axe.
Bah, I just watched that, expecting the movie trailer (which is much better).
pilu said:
Good studies are done with preset aims and methodology that isn't biased for one side, so if the data is good, the results should reflect reality.
But there are things like researcher bias, flaws in the design of the study or just plain old bribery.
yup, and then whether or not people choose to even believe its findings.
This topic has been closed to new replies.