Sankaku Complex Forums » General

  1. Gantz_Playboy said:

    You started it

    WELL YOURE NOT COMING TO MY BIRTHDAY PARTY

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  2. Damn mere, that's just harsh.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  3. Can I say something that may make me sound like GTR/Gantz playboy?

    So the Canadian Pipeline. Denied for "environmental reasons" We have over 5000 miles of pipe crisscrossing the US already. This goes over dry land and is totally safe and would lower the cost of oil, and therefor gas.

    So it's denied.

    We are STILL buying the oil. It's being shipped via train instead. Coal burning, high carbon imprint, expensive, much more likely to spill train. Where is the logic?

    Now comes the GTR/Gantz part. Those trains are owned by Berkshire Hathaway, the company that gives MASSIVE amounts of donations to Obama and whose CEO is always praising Obama.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  4. The pipeline thing is great. Now we aren't shipping refining jobs out of Alberta. Woo hoo~!

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  5. To directly respond to Tingle, it wasn't the oil itself that was the environmental concern. The pipeline construction was going to destroy a shit ton of wildlife habitats.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  6. mere said:

    WELL YOURE NOT COMING TO MY BIRTHDAY PARTY

    Is that the one where you become legal? /人◕ ‿‿ ◕人\

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  7. tingle said:
    Can I say something that may make me sound like GTR/Gantz playboy?

    So the Canadian Pipeline. Denied for "environmental reasons" We have over 5000 miles of pipe crisscrossing the US already. This goes over dry land and is totally safe and would lower the cost of oil, and therefor gas.

    So it's denied.

    We are STILL buying the oil. It's being shipped via train instead. Coal burning, high carbon imprint, expensive, much more likely to spill train. Where is the logic?

    Now comes the GTR/Gantz part. Those trains are owned by Berkshire Hathaway, the company that gives MASSIVE amounts of donations to Obama and whose CEO is always praising Obama.

    It's Political obviously. Obama needs to scratch the back of his Anti-Oil Enviromentalist yahoos. He pissed away 20,000 NEW USA jobs to do that. Meanwhile he has like 11 Bankrupt Solyndra solar type plants that got Stimulus cash and it's all bankrupt - All the Oil that's going from Brazil to China by "Petrobras"? Guess who owns a controlling interest in that?? George Soros (Obama's benefactor).... So Oil is evil when it's Bush but nor when youre a Liberal Billionaire like Soros?

    He couldn't give a shit about Canada - you have nothing he wants.

    giascle said:
    oh my god I'm laughing so hard

    I actually did as well when I imagined you reading that when I typed it...strange.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  8. don't mind me, I'm just adding some oil to the fire

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  9. Brobama.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  10. Vegio said:
    don't mind me, I'm just adding some oil to the fire

    well....she's had the surgery- she's well now- Time to VOTE for the REST of Us! - lol. It's funny, I can understand a leftist vote for Obama but I crack up when I see someone all 'wide-eyed' and excited over Ron Paul - I gotta laugh. You can tell they only know about "Half" the shit he stands for and they get all indignant when you snicker at them.

    Florida should be interesting - Romney's really laying into Gingrich who stepped on a landmine last Thursday? in a debate discussing Immigration for which Newt tryed to call Mitt's policy of NO Amnesty "UnAmerican"- Romney's father is actually of Mexican descent and his wifes father is an Immigrant from the UK.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  11. Ron Paul has some good ideas.... he also might be a bit crazy. I'm talkin' like tinfoil hat crazy. I'd love to see him in the white house. I mean there's no way he can fuck things up more than they already are right? besides, maybe we need some bat shit insane guy to bring us some new ideas to get this country on track. That being said, I'm probably going to vote fore Stephen Colbert.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  12. h

    brningpyre said:
    To directly respond to Tingle, it wasn't the oil itself that was the environmental concern. The pipeline construction was going to destroy a shit ton of wildlife habitats.

    how does a pipe little more then four feet wide do that? Who or what would that kill? It's less intrusive then widening a road.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  13. Obama wins by even more votes then he did over McCain..

    It really isn't hard to "guess" considering the Republican candidates and how there's so much to hate about both.

    Really isn't any point in the thread at this point, heh...

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  14. cats2 said:
    Obama wins by even more votes then he did over McCain..

    It really isn't hard to "guess" considering the Republican candidates and how there's so much to hate about both.

    Really isn't any point in the thread at this point, heh...

    Not really sure about that. It's all up in the air in my opinion, but if I were a bettin' man, I'd bet on Obama getting re-elected. The key number to watch for is his approval rating the day before the election. George Bush barely got re-elected in 2004 with a 49% approval rating. I feel that Obama can get away with 46 or 47% the day before the election and still get re-elected. And if the economy starts producing jobs again, his rating will be at least that high.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  15. Meanwhile...

    Romney crushes Newt in the Florida Primary, winning 50 delegates in the process.

    98% in:
    Mitt Romney 46% (771,842)
    Newt Gingrich 32% (531,294)
    Rick Santorum 13% (222,248)
    Ron Paul 7% (116,776)

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  16. ^Romney will probably be the nominee seeing as Newt and Santorum will cannibalize each other, unless one of the two drops out due to lack of money (a real possibility for Santorum.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  17. kanika said:

    Not really sure about that. It's all up in the air in my opinion, but if I were a bettin' man, I'd bet on Obama getting re-elected. The key number to watch for is his approval rating the day before the election. George Bush barely got re-elected in 2004 with a 49% approval rating. I feel that Obama can get away with 46 or 47% the day before the election and still get re-elected. And if the economy starts producing jobs again, his rating will be at least that high.

    Pretty much all he needs to do is pull some strings to get gas prices down like Clinton did.

    In a real election Newt and Paul probably would have the best chance at beating Obama.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  18. serious politic discussion + Sancom =

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  19. HEY GUYS! HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT RON PAUL?

    Attachments

    1. We_re_all_fucked_anyways.jpg 4 years old
    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  20. Char said:

    Pretty much all he needs to do is pull some strings to get gas prices down like Clinton did.

    Well he sure is doing a good job of that considering what he did with Keystone.

    Ina real election Newt and Paul probably would have the best chance at beating Obama.

    Obama would win against Newt. Women will vote for Obama over Newt. Newt also doesn't present the GOP with good electoral numbers. Mittens is the only one with any real chance of winning Rust Belt and Midwestern states like PA, OH, MI, WI, and IA... and if he's competitive there, that means Obama has to hold New South states like VA, NC, and FL... and he'd also have to pick up GA as well.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote

Reply »

You must log in to post.