Sankaku Complex Forums » General

  1. Diorte said:
    How will they think differently about them if they don't exist?

    Niches of humans such as "butch women" and "feminine women" will exist, but as individuals and if labeled under a non-gender colored label. As in, we won't consider them masculine or feminine women, we'll just have a different label for it.

    Diorte said:
    What are all these gender roles you're so against? Give me every single one, I want to know just how anti-gender roles you really are.

    I'll attempt to go into as many as I can right now.

    Pants have already been on the path to gender neutrality for a while now. But people still apparently think of some pants as "for women" and some as "for men". I see no need in this distinction. Also, I want to move more women's clothing out of this area, not just men's clothing. Men should be able to wear dresses and people think nothing of it. I honestly I agree with much difference in clothing to begin with. Also, men who have large breasts, and many do, should feel no strangeness is wearing a bra. Pretty much all clothing that I'm aware can be made to be unisex.

    If you have big boobs, you need a bra. If you don't have big boobs, you don't.
    It's as simple as that. Not all men are flat chested.

    I'm not for boys and girls to have different toys directed at them. There's no reason for some toys to be for girls and some for boys. They should all just be toys for kids and targeted at kids.

    I'm for universalizing hair styles. Shorted haired women and long haired men should be as common as long haired men and short haired women.

    I'm for gender neutralizing careers as much as possible. Some people believe it's not. I'm for attempting to prove that wrong. I don't think people should think of life in terms of "jobs for women" and "jobs for men". Some people again, believe that's impossible. Fine, but I disagree. And nothing bad will come of attempting to close the gap. If there are so called biological limitations, I don't believe so. But if there are, they'll show up when they show up.

    I'm for equality of other aesthetics. I'm for equalizing the treatment of men AND women's shaving. I don't care if a society wants shaved legs or not. But I don't think women should have to worry about shaving in areas men not.

    I'm for neutralizing marriage name workings. And not only promote men being as able to take the last name of women as women take men's, but encourage the two to be in fairly equal amount. Doesn't need to be truly equal, there's no quota, only to the point it's not thought of differently.

    Men are told to be dominant in bed. When I see no need to imply that they should. I'm for promoting female dominance until that changes a little and people are less likely to think of sex as a man dominating a woman.

    To expand upon the career thing, I'm for eliminating the idea of the woman as a caretaker and the man as a moneymaker. I want househusbanding to be thought of in the same way as housewiving. I don't want women to be thought of as cookers, cleaners, housekeepers, and babyraisers, anymore than men.

    Getting rid of women's and men's separate bathrooms is perhaps not a very important aspect to getting rid of gender roles. It's pretty minor if you think about it. And perhaps not feasible right now. However, I am for the making of more available unisex bathrooms. As an option of people who are willing to use them.

    Still trying to think of more at the moment. You can help mention some if you like.
    I'm sure I'm forgetting quite a few at the moment.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  2. Ukonkivi said:
    Pants have already been on the path to gender neutrality for a while now. But people still apparently think of some pants as "for women" and some as "for men". I see no need in this distinction. Also, I want to move more women's clothing out of this area, not just men's clothing. Men should be able to wear dresses and people think nothing of it. I honestly I agree with much difference in clothing to begin with. Also, men who have large breasts, and many do, should feel no strangeness is wearing a bra. Pretty much all clothing that I'm aware can be made to be unisex.

    Chick pants are made specifically to fit the general chick's legs. They have less crotch room because there's nothing there, and they're made to hug their legs and make them more attractive. Guy pants have more crotch room, because we have stuff there, and they focus less on hugging the legs because of this. Chicks still choose to wear guy pants and guys still make the mistake of trying on chick pants. You can wear either one, but there's a reason for the difference.

    If you have big boobs, you need a bra. If you don't have big boobs, you don't.
    It's as simple as that. Not all men are flat chested.

    You don't NEED a bra, they just help prevent your boobs from sagging and looking gross. Men boobs are gross to begin with, so they're more focused on getting rid of them than they are making them look nice.

    I'm not for boys and girls to have different toys directed at them. There's no reason for some toys to be for girls and some for boys. They should all just be toys for kids and targeted at kids.

    There are toys targeted at all kids in general. The only toys I actually see anymore that are gender-specific are dolls. Besides, Pokemon cards and toys and stuff are much more interesting than "dress up the girl" toys, so I don't really care about them. I never had any boy-specific toys, just video games and shit.

    I'm for universalizing hair styles. Shorted haired women and long haired men should be as common as long haired men and short haired women.

    This is already happening. I actually like chicks with shorter hair. Guys with long hair do exist. Look at your stereotypical metalheads and Fabio, and Fabio's a fucking hunk. Quite a lot of lady models have short hair, so this one's really pointless.

    I'm for gender neutralizing careers as much as possible. Some people believe it's not. I'm for attempting to prove that wrong. I don't think people should think of life in terms of "jobs for women" and "jobs for men". Some people again, believe that's impossible. Fine, but I disagree. And nothing bad will come of attempting to close the gap. If there are so called biological limitations, I don't believe so. But if there are, they'll show up when they show up.

    What are "jobs for men" and "jobs for women?" I don't know of any.

    I'm for equality of other aesthetics. I'm for equalizing the treatment of men AND women's shaving. I don't care if a society wants shaved legs or not. But I don't think women should have to worry about shaving in areas men not.

    I'm a man, and I shave everything. I think body hair is absolutely disgusting. Also, there are a lot of chicks who think body hair on a guy is hot, so a guy who shaves can be equally repulsive to a chick as a chick who doesn't shave to a guy. This one is really just personal preference. Also, the laser hair removal business is getting a lot more male customers, so more guys are getting rid of body hair anyways.

    I'm for neutralizing marriage name workings. And not only promote men being as able to take the last name of women as women take men's, but encourage the two to be in fairly equal amount. Doesn't need to be truly equal, there's no quota, only to the point it's not thought of differently.

    People can choose to do this anyways. Nobody is stopping them. This is a traditional, conservative thing, not so much to do with gender.

    Men are told to be dominant in bed. When I see no need to imply that they should. I'm for promoting female dominance until that changes a little and people are less likely to think of sex as a man dominating a woman.

    The need that implies that they should is that they're generally stronger and can easily dominate. I don't really care, I do it both ways, and plenty of couples do. Nobody grew up being told "Son, you HAVE to be on top, otherwise you're not a man!" This one isn't even realistic.

    To expand upon the career thing, I'm for eliminating the idea of the woman as a caretaker and the man as a moneymaker. I want househusbanding to be thought of in the same way as housewiving. I don't want women to be thought of as cookers, cleaners, housekeepers, and babyraisers, anymore than men.

    I don't know of any households who think like this. The man and woman have always been equal in every house I've been in.

    Getting rid of women's and men's separate bathrooms is perhaps not a very important aspect to getting rid of gender roles. It's pretty minor if you think about it. And perhaps not feasible right now. However, I am for the making of more available unisex bathrooms. As an option of people who are willing to use them.

    This probably won't ever happen anytime soon because of how easily someone can yell "Rape!" or something and fuck someone's life over for nothing. Also, what if a woman has to take her little daughter to the bathroom? You don't want her accidentally seeing a grown man's penis do you?

    Still trying to think of more at the moment. You can help mention some if you like.
    I'm sure I'm forgetting quite a few at the moment.

    I don't think I can really think of any because the world isn't separated so much by gender where I live. Maybe it is where you are, but none of these are really issues around here. I've seen guys with chick pants, guys with long hair, chicks who don't shave, guys who do shave, women who are dominant, girls who play with the same toys boys do, pretty much everything you think doesn't happen. This is why I don't get what the big deal is oO

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  3. Diorte said:
    Chick pants are made specifically to fit the general chick's legs. They have less crotch room because there's nothing there,

    Apparently the "scene guys" who wear girls pants don't have any problem.
    Yeah right, a guys crotch doesn't need much breathing room. Tight pants aren't any tighter on the cock than briefs.

    Diorte said:
    and they're made to hug their legs and make them more attractive.

    And yet no pants to hug a man's legs? You know, there are people out there who find a man's legs attractive.

    Diorte said:
    Guy pants have more crotch room

    But again, they do need it. Nor do women need a tightness around the crotch area.

    Diorte said:
    guys still make the mistake of trying on chick pants.

    That's not a mistake.

    Diorte said:
    but there's a reason for the difference.

    Nope.

    Diorte said:
    they just help prevent your boobs from sagging and looking gross.

    Oh, I thought there were because "women with big boobs need support". And it was a HEALTH thing. In that case, women don't need bras at all.

    Diorte said:
    Men boobs are gross to begin with

    Your subjective viewpoint.

    Diorte said:
    There are toys targeted at all kids in general.

    And this is how all toys should be.

    Diorte said:
    The only toys I actually see anymore that are gender-specific are dolls.

    There's a lot more than that. But I don't see any reason for dolls to be more for girls than boys.

    Diorte said:
    Besides, Pokemon cards and toys and stuff are much more interesting than "dress up the girl" toys, so I don't really care about them.

    Yes, in your EXTREMELY subjective viewpoint.

    Diorte said:
    I never had any boy-specific toys

    You never had any action figures? Construction sets? Toy trucks?
    Those are all toys targeted at boys.

    I would also say that for the longest time, and still a little bit now, the video gaming industry has targeted itself toward boys.

    Diorte said:
    This is already happening.

    Very very slowly. It's still not considered normal. I want it to stop being a gender role altogether. And it still is one.

    Diorte said:
    I actually like chicks with shorter hair.

    So do I. But women having short hair is still considered butch.

    Diorte said:
    Guys with long hair do exist.

    My words never implied they didn't. I implied that it being a looked down upon minority is simply not enough. Again, I said I want it to be considered as normal as guys with short hair, which it is not.
    Guys with long hair still have a harder time getting a job. And they're still looked down upon by society for not conforming to this gender role.

    Saying there is a gender role in no way implies there aren't deviations.

    Diorte said:
    Look at your stereotypical metalheads

    Again, big deal. Your examples do nothing to contradict what I say.
    Metalheads are not mainstream. Metalheads are not accepted by society.
    I'm talking about a gender role here. Bringing up a group that is nonconformist does not change the fact this is a gender role.

    Diorte said:
    and Fabio, and Fabio's a fucking hunk.

    To a few, he's attractive. And there's hundred of thousands of Visual Kei fangirls who swoon over men in make-up and dresses. (Oh, make-up, that's one gender role I forgot to bring up)

    It's still a gender role nonconformity though.

    Diorte said:
    Quite a lot of lady models have short hair

    I suppose if one added up all the female models in the world with short hair, into a big ol' flight hangar or someone, one might considered it "a lot". However, it's still an extremely minority. If 1/5000 female models has short hair, that would still be a lot of short haired models out there. But it would still be an extreme minority.

    Diorte said:
    so this one's really pointless.

    Actually, your counterexamples are pointless.

    Diorte said:
    What are "jobs for men" and "jobs for women?" I don't know of any.

    Construction work is considered of the "man" gender role.
    Beautician is considered of the "woman" gender role.
    Doctor is considered of the "man" gender role.
    Nurse is considered of the "woman" gender role.
    Almost any sports related career is considered of the "man" gender role.
    Just to name a few.

    Diorte said:
    I'm a man, and I shave everything.

    That's nice. But you're deviating from gender roles by doing it.

    Diorte said:
    Also, there are a lot of chicks who think body hair on a guy is hot

    And there are guys like me who think body hair on a girl is hot.

    Diorte said:
    Also, the laser hair removal business is getting a lot more male customers, so more guys are getting rid of body hair anyways.

    And I can only hope that continues to go up and become more normal.

    Diorte said:
    People can choose to do this anyways.

    On every sector of the planet? I'd like to see evidence which points to that.

    Diorte said:
    This is a traditional, conservative thing, not so much to do with gender.

    Being for gender roles, IS a conservative thing.
    And it's a gender role thing. In most societies, it's considered a norm that in marriage, the wife takes the last name of the husband. This involves gender. And whether it's a choice or not, I would wish it more common for men to take on the name of the wife. And be considered as normal as the reverse.

    Diorte said:
    I don't really care, I do it both ways, and plenty of couples do. Nobody grew up being told "Son, you HAVE to be on top, otherwise you're not a man!"

    Maybe not your parents, no. But your peers, the media industry, including and especially the porn industry, implies this is the way things should be. In fact, sexual norms imply in gender that if a woman wants to be dominant in bed, she's a lesbian, and if a man wants to be submissive in bed, she's gay. While this is not true at all.

    A lot of peers will definitely say things like "Dude, if you don't want to be on top like that, what kind of pussy of a man are you?". Parents aren't as likely to even discuss such bedroom matters with their children.

    Diorte said:
    This one isn't even realistic.

    Adding little quips like this at the end, doesn't change the lack of sensibility in your rebuttals.

    Diorte said:
    I don't know of any households who think like this. The man and woman have always been equal in every house I've been in.

    I know quite a few. You must have been to some really nice houses.
    I run across people who think housewiving should be encoraged. And from what I hear, it's certainly the norm in Japan.

    Diorte said:
    This probably won't ever happen anytime soon because of how easily someone can yell "Rape!"

    Again, I didn't say it was important, or even feasible right probably. But I think that many people would benefit many people and society in general to have a few more unisex bathrooms. And people who go into them should be of an open mind anyway. Not prone to doing such things. Again, unisex bathrooms would benefit certain people, and I believe more need to exist. I'm not saying male and female bathrooms need to be done away with or anything. At least in our current era, at least.

    But that'll bring me to a gender role discussion about rape later.

    Diorte said:
    Also, what if a woman has to take her little daughter to the bathroom? You don't want her accidentally seeing a grown man's penis do you?

    Why should it be any better for a little boy to see a grown man's penis?

    Diorte said:
    Maybe it is where you are, but none of these are really issues around here. I've seen guys with chick pants, guys with long hair, chicks who don't shave, guys who do shave, women who are dominant, girls who play with the same toys boys do

    Oh sure. But it's considered abnormal here. Being considered abnormal doesn't imply that it doesn't happen.

    I bet people in your area call guys who wear girl pants "emo pussy faggots" and various other insults at their lack of masculinity.

    "Some" does not imply anything against what I've been saying.

    Diorte said:
    pretty much everything you think doesn't happen.

    What you're doing here, and what you've been doing here, is a strawman argument. I never said anything about it not happening. Or there being exceptions. I'm for getting rid of the GENDER ROLES.

    Diorte said:
    This is why I don't get what the big deal is oO

    That would imply an awful lack of reading comprehension then, if you're not making a strawman argument on purpose.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  4. Diorte said:
    You don't want her accidentally seeing a grown man's penis do you?

    The key word being "accidentally". XD

    For the record, I'm for more privatized restrooms. Not segregated by gender, but by *person*.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  5. Alright. Gender queer pansexual here, who also happens to enjoy dressing as male, female, and everything inbetween. First off, gender is the social construct and expectations based upon a masculine or feminine identity. Sex is the biology, do you have male parts or female parts. This is why transgender and transexual are different. THERE IS A FUCKING DIFFERENCE. Second. Yeah I have a dick. Fuck you if you wanna categorize me a certain way because of that, I know who I am. I don't buy into the male gender role of sports, cars, grunting, talking about the chicks I've fucked, or trying to prove my masculinity through pointless competition. I also don't buy into the gender role for females of buying tons of clothes (although it is fulfilling to buy a new outfit from time to time), bitching about men, constantly worrying about whether I'm too fat, ad nauseum. The issue here is whether or not my sex should match my gender? Fuck that. Or is it whether the pansexual and the gender queer line up? Fuck that. You all don't quite have a grasp on the concepts, so what you're really arguing about is the degree to which you are comfortable with people outside the norms. As for the original post, I think the parents are trying to do something cool by shielding their child from gender role expectations, but at the same time, boys hang out with boys and girls hang out with girls during childhood. One has to wonder where a "genderless" child would fit in... I have a feeling the child will establish some form of gender identity rather quickly, although whether or not it will match their biology I couldn't even begin to guess. As far as the hormones go... who here has their doctorate in human biology and physiology? With maybe a specialization in nutrition? People who's sex and gender match have naturally occuring hormone imbalances all the time, and then throw in the hormones pumped into all meat availible commercially, and you have no FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
    Anyway, my two cents: gender and sex have a tenuous relationship, sexuality has an even more tenuous relationship with both. Cultural norms fuck with all the internal processes and try and turn us into "normal" heterosexual, cissexual individuals. Apparently we have some cultural norms enforcement cops on Sankaku who think "dudes should be dudes," but that's ok, since I'e learned to have thick skin and pity ignorant people.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  6. I've worn chick pants, they're extremely uncomfortable. Scene boys only keep doing it because they think it's hot to the chicks, not because they don't have a problem with it.

    Construction work is considered of the "man" gender role.
    I know chicks who do this.

    Beautician is considered of the "woman" gender role.
    I know guys who do this.

    Doctor is considered of the "man" gender role.
    Bullshit.

    Nurse is considered of the "woman" gender role.
    More bullshit.

    Almost any sports related career is considered of the "man" gender role.
    Also bullshit.

    The rest, I'm not even going to reply to, because you think the world is a giant male vs female gender role war with people being torutred all over the place. You're not even making an argument, you're basically just saying "Nu-uh" to everything with nothing to back it. Have fun in your horrible gender role dominated world, where seeing no problem with gender roles makes someone horribly ignorant and a piece of shit cultural norm police officer. I'm gonna go have fun with my normal friends like the rest of the world. Be glad anyone even bothers to take you seriously in the Internet.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  7. Diorte said:
    Construction work is considered of the "man" gender role.
    I know chicks who do this.

    Again, deviations does not stop something from being considered a gender role.
    Read what I have to say about things and stop ignoring.

    Diorte said:
    The rest, I'm not even going to reply to, because you think the world is a giant male vs female gender role war with people being torutred all over the place.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_ridicule

    Diorte said:
    You're not even making an argument, you're basically just saying "Nu-uh" to everything with nothing to back it.

    Wrong. Go back, read it, respond. And stop saying stupid untrue things.
    I make detailed, sensible rebuttals, and you're not responding to them because you have no decent response, so you've give up. While you're the one responding to statement with words like "bullshit" without giving any information or reasoning at all. I hate for this to sound like a "NO U" response, but I've gone into heavy detail in response to you. You've just said things like "Bullshit" as a response. So if anything like "you're just saying nu-uh to everything", it's you. And if you think that's not true, try to provide reasons, don't just state something like that you know is not true.

    You've been ignoring arguments of mine. You've not be using logic. You've been misrepresenting my argument. You've been responding to things my argument wasn't about and representing it as my argument. And now you're trying to provide illogical, fallacy filled excuses as to why you won't respond to my argument. And you're being a hypocrite by labeling someone else as making a "nuh-uh" argument, without providing evidence, and then in the very same post, doing nothing more than claiming a bunch of statements are "bullshit".

    Diorte said:
    Have fun in your horrible gender role dominated world, where seeing no problem with gender roles makes someone horribly ignorant and a piece of shit cultural norm police officer.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_ridicule

    Diorte said:
    I'm gonna go have fun with my normal friends like the rest of the world.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_pity

    Diorte said:
    Be glad anyone even bothers to take you seriously in the Internet.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_pity
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_consequences
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_intellectual_and_mental_stability_or_capability

    I'm sorry, I'm here to present my own subjective desires for the world here in a logical, objective manner. Not be popular.

    Diorte said:
    I've worn chick pants, they're extremely uncomfortable.

    I've worn chick pants, they weren't extremely uncomfortable.

    I hate high heels, period. But I wore a pair out of curiosity, they were extremely uncomfortable. And now I hate them even more.

    I'm forgetting the exact terminology right now for a personal case example presented as evidence, but it's no kind of argument to argue from personal experience. A personal, one case example is not an argument and is illogical to do so.

    Ah yes, now I remember, anecdotal evidence. You're using anecdotal evidence.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence

    Diorte said:
    Scene boys only keep doing it because they think it's hot to the chicks, not because they don't have a problem with it.

    Again, I don't see how your assertion is any kind of proof.

    Also, I just want to give a shoutout to kyonichi and say I agree with pretty much everything or almost everything he has to say.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  8. wow Ukonkvi my hero.
    hate how people expect u do and act a certain way just because of wat gender u are . It's far too anoying, mostly when its from the oposite sex.
    She was like "men dont behave like that"
    Me - "F#$& U bitch!! this curry is hot, cant help it if makes my eyes are watery" (well i didn't say f%$& U ^_^ )

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  9. They just need to pass laws against gender typical behavior and then arrest any child who fails to comply. Or they could do like the Americans and use a taser. Then any girl who acts like a girl can be zapped into acting like a sexless robot.

    The Swedes don't want blondes to have more fun anymore!

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  10. Avatar Image

     

    Artefact has spoken.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote

Reply

You must log in to post.