Sankaku Complex Forums » General

[closed]

Regarding the Chinese Building Built in 15 Days...

  1. I'm referring to this article. I acknowledge that this is a rant, but a rant with purpose (I hope). I welcome any INTELLIGENT discussion.

    From reading the article, I am astounded by the ignorance of many Sankaku Complex users (though some may argue that it's not astounding). If many of you have done your research you would know that this is very impressive and has the very real possibility of being *gasp*... SAFE and SECURE.

    Pre-fabricated homes are not new. Pre-fabricated buildings are uncommon, but the Empire State Building was partly built with this concept in mind. Link. This building in question employs the same basic principles as the construction of the Empire State Building, only further worked upon and improved.

    Additionally, the most glaring blindness I noticed in the comments section of the article was the assumption that the design of the building was rushed. This is a pre-fabricated building, so the majority of its parts were manufactured (presumably with precision) well ahead of its date of assembly—of which we see in the video.

    And what's this? Windows, dry wall, and floorboards in American constructions are ALSO pre-manufactured? *GASPS* The only difference I see here—and I'm no engineer—is that in the USA, the majority of the time it takes to build a home is from having to build the structure and foundation of EVERY part of the house as they are not pre-assembled. Imagine the time it takes to build all of these on site:




    (If the links are dead, search for images of buildings/houses/skyscrapers under construction)

    In this case, the construction of the building mentioned in the article merely simplified the construction process, with the Chinese engineers realizing they can just build the structural frames in a factory where it is more efficient than building it at the construction site. When they finished building the parts they just deliver them and do all the necessary connections at the site, which I'm assuming is important but relatively easy job to have done right. In essence, this is no different than putting together a computer, and we all know how reliable doing that is.

    Seems like a sound and innovating building process, but I'm no engineer.

    "But didn't you read the articles about the collapsed train, sinking ship, collapsed buildings, and all sorts of other China fail?"

    Of course I did. But come on, China has a population of over 1 billion people and is a pretty sizable area. You are bound to see differing standards of building quality, and corruption in this densely-populated country. For sure you can't truthfully say that the USA or even Britain, Russia, or Brazil as a whole have the same building standards throughout their regions.

    For some reason, I have some level of trust and respect for Broad Group (the name of the Chinese construction company). Of course, even still I won't want to stay in that hotel until it there is compelling evidence that this innovative building meets adequate safety standards, and that information is scarce at the moment. I want to see how [proficient] engineers from around the world evaluate this building, and if they would certify it safe to live in.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  2. Doesn't matter, sancom will always hate china.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  3. OP must be really bored.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  4. OP is

    Attachments

    1. butthurt.png 4 years old
    Posted 4 years ago #
  5. Yeah, even before posting this I realized I'm trying to reason with a community full of immature 4channers.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  6. palmtop-tiger said:
    OP is

    =====

    and YOU - "talk about me" -?

    Attachments

    1. NOT_HAPPY!_v3.jpg 4 years old
    Posted 4 years ago #
  7. temporary213 said:
    Yeah, even before posting this I realized I'm trying to reason with a community full of immature sancomers.

    Ftfy.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  8. temporary213 said:
    Yeah, even before posting this I realized I'm trying to reason with a community full of immature 4channers.

    Okay, so they why did you post this? Unless you are mad or something, there wasn't any reason to defend the construction company.

    It's not too much of a stretch to think corners were cut to build this in 15 days, much less with China's track record of quality.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  9. It should be noted the 15 days did not include the foundation that needs 30 days to cure.
    So really it was 15 days to erect not build since 90% of the work was done before hand in building the foundation and modular parts.

    The also use a much larger then normal work force for this project in short it was a publicity stunt to sell a product.

    Still I'd question the quality of the assembly as they had no time to double check everything.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  10. This is - "why" - I (personally) never take anything placed on the media front too seriously (at first) unless its happening - "live"

    So, much info not placed, because of the ambiguity of it all, let alone the one-sided story, so I wait to see what comes up later, and then make up my mind on it.

    Besides - anyone - with a half a brain (knows) that there's more than (just) 2 actual sides to every story...

    Posted 4 years ago #
  11. temporary213 said:

    WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!?

    You... you mean the comments on SanCom articles are... misinformed?

    My god, this is truly a revelation! Never had we even thought...

    Something must be done immediately!

    Posted 4 years ago #
  12. brningpyre said:

    WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!?

    You... you mean the comments on SanCom articles are... misinformed?

    My god, this is truly a revelation! Never had we even thought...

    Something must be done immediately!

    ======

    Attachments

    1. cheers!.JPG 4 years old
    Posted 4 years ago #
  13. op, did you just became a registered member just to post this?

    Posted 4 years ago #
  14. brningpyre said:

    WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT!?

    You... you mean the comments on SanCom articles are... misinformed?

    My god, this is truly a revelation! Never had we even thought...

    Something must be done immediately!

    Wait...sancom articles really are misinformed? That can't be! Next thing, you'll be telling me we have too many aya hirano articles and top ten-

    Attachments

    1. whatisthis.gif 4 years old
    Posted 4 years ago #
  15. And OP was never heard from again.

    Your business is appreciated.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  16. China ftw, SanCom is pretty wrong on this one.

    China, China!

    Posted 4 years ago #
  17. Maybe OP is one of the "fifty-cent" Chinese posters? I have met a few, especially in Huffington Post, idiot accidently revealed he had 2 different accounts (by forgetting to log out in the other account).

    To those who don't know who the fifty centers are, they are Chinese who are paid 50 cents for posting a favourable comment about China, both in Chinese and English websites (met the idiot in HuffingtonPost).

    Posted 4 years ago #
  18. The problem i had with the china 15-days building is not the top section which consist of lego pieces being bolted each other. It's the fucking foundation.

    I have no idea what kind of trick they did to do it, but my guts telling me that they cut corner on the most important section of the building. So yeah OP, China still suck.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  19. Cool story bro.

    Posted 4 years ago #
  20. temporary213 said:
    Yeah, even before posting this I realized I'm trying to reason with a community full of immature 4channers.

    >names himself Anonymous
    >calls the rest of us immature 4channers

    It's been a while since Sancon was compared to 4chan, hasn't it?

    Posted 4 years ago #

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.