Subarashii Sekai Superbly Seductive
The Wolf-Boy & The Girl in The Red Hood Sweetly Feral
Rory Mercury Cosplay Godly & Gothic
One Piece: Burning Blood Trailers Fiery Hot
Ero-Manga Sensei Anime Announced
Stuff like this is why I always carry a knife, learned to walk without making noise, and eliminated all sense of self preservation.
Sankaku Complex Forums » General
-
Posted 4 years ago #
-
I have a Chinese friend. He never tried to stab me or run over me with his car.
So far...Posted 4 years ago # -
pilandi said:
NO! I've had enough of China this and China that! FUCK YOU!Sick of China then How about Brazil?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yCvJfK8uD70Posted 4 years ago # -
Hah, Men killing women over "love", that's an older and even sillier story of our society.
Fucking sexist idiots, and this happens everywhere.
Posted 4 years ago # -
Lilith said:
Hah, Men killing women over "love", that's an older and even sillier story of our society.Fucking sexist idiots, and this happens everywhere.
Indeed it happens everywhere, buddy. Only difference here is that the event happened in board day-light and in the opened crowd. Yet, nobody intervened, Chinese have to sympathy for their fellow men.
Posted 4 years ago # -
They've been like that since forever, they're bound to change eventually, specially with globalization. One generation ago Korean youth still ate dogs, nowadays they already hate dog eaters in general, that kind of cultural thing gets overridden fast, you know what doesn't? Husbands killing wives.
Posted 4 years ago # -
Overpopulation made everyone expendable and one less human being mean less competition in society.
On the other hand, if everyone were like this town:
Posted 4 years ago # -
I would intervene if I had a weapon of some sort, like a bat or a piece of wood and smash the guys head in but people are way to fucked up to help a random stranger plus, look at it this way, HEROES DIE IN REAL-LIVE!
Posted 4 years ago # -
master-evil said:
I would intervene if I had a weapon of some sort, like a bat or a piece of wood and smash the guys head in but people are way to fucked up to help a random stranger plus, look at it this way, HEROES DIE IN REAL-LIVE!I view it another way. People aren't fucked up enough to intervene. They're all so passive because they've managed to exist their entire lives without any conflict or psychological trauma / "disorder" that would cause them to adapt by developing superhero / protector personalities.
Action or reaction from a sentient creature only occurs when a negative state of being is reached; as bland and smooth as people are encouraged to be these days under the guise of being "well-adjusted," it's no wonder they don't even remember how to react anymore.
Posted 4 years ago # -
So in other words, in order for someone to "react" to a station like this, they would first need to be fucked up ?
Posted 4 years ago # -
master-evil said:
So in other words, in order for someone to "react" to a station like this, they would first need to be fucked up ?Aggression is a strong response to a negative state of being. People no longer recognize witnessing murder and violence as negative states but merely "things that happen" because they, personally, are so far removed from violence. They no longer know what to make of it when they see it, so their only reaction is the natural reaction to fear the unknown and thus they flee.
It's rather like being hungry. You think of it as perfectly reasonable to eat because you've done it a million times as a response to the negative feeling of hunger. If you take a man who has been fed automatically before he ever experienced hunger for years by machine with a tube in his gut, and then remove the machine, he will have no way of knowing what to do when he becomes hungry for the first time. After such a long period of time of relying on the machine, he will be terrified of the strange sensation of hunger, and then die of starvation because his natural instinct to consume food will have been quashed.
Same thing with violence. People have their natural, violent instincts suppressed by society from day one, so they have no idea how to use it when they need to.
Posted 4 years ago # -
kyubey said:
Overpopulation made everyone expendable and one less human being mean less competition in society.Actually that is true.
I saw on a documentary that talked about are some people wired to kill and there is a nomadic tribe where no one has remembered a murder taking place in three generations.Posted 4 years ago # -
kyubey said:
On the other hand, if everyone were like this town:Lynch mobs are not social progress.
Posted 4 years ago # -
brningpyre said:
Lynch mobs are not social progress.
I never said it is nigga.
Also it is vigilante justice, not a lynching.
Posted 4 years ago # -
kyubey said:
Also it is vigilante justice, not a lynching.... I... Wow.
Posted 4 years ago # -
brningpyre said:
... I... Wow.
Wow, 2 words.
Anyway, i just don't consider it a lynching, those thieves didn't die in the end. There were also 2 cops among that crowd. This is just a rare case where people still help each other in China. Lynching in China would be in Xinjiang where the Uighur attack the Han on the street and vice versa.
Posted 4 years ago # -
If that was the wrong man, would it still be vigilante justice? If nobody dies, it's not a lynching?
A lynch mob and vigilante justice are one and the same thing. You can't just support it when it suits your purposes.
A thief happened to get caught this time, but what if they were picking on some gay guy? Is there still a difference between vigilante justice and lynch mobs in that case? Is it magically no longer vigilantism just because you don't think their cause is just?
Posted 4 years ago # -
Vigilante is when you think criminal punishment is nonexistent or insufficient and therefore take the law into your own hands punishing a law breaker.
Lynching is when a mob want to inflict violence on a person that usually result in death, the purpose are usally to intimiate or oppress.
Mmmmm not much different in the end i guess, except anyone can be a vigilante and it is mostly motivated by someone breaking the law. While lynching require 2 or more person and is usaully generate by intolerance.
brningpyre said:
A lynch mob and vigilante justice are one and the same thing. You can't just support it when it suits your purposes.
Yes i can! i am Kyubey.
brningpyre said:
A thief happened to get caught this time, but what if they were picking on some gay guy? Is there still a difference between vigilante justice and lynch mobs in that case? Is it magically no longer vigilantism just because you don't think their cause is just?Are they beating him because it is illegal to be gay? Or are they beating him because they hate gays?
Posted 4 years ago # -
If you're just going to come up with new definitions for words, then there's no point in debating that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigilante
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LynchingPosted 4 years ago # -
brningpyre said:
If you're just going to come up with new definitions for words, then there's no point in debating that.There is no point debating on the internet in general, so yeah you win, you are smart.
Posted 4 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.