Sankaku Complex Forums » Anime

  1. Then what the fuck are you doing here if your not? lol

    Obviously, those who are not and call themselves the self-proclaimed
    anti-lolicon is an ignorant person.

    To say lolicon's are the same as pedophiles? Oh please.

    Really though i was under the impression everyone was.
    But who gives a shit? There's no shame in being a lolicon.

    We are just a different kind of Anime fan. That's all there is
    to it.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  2. No, I prefer breasts.

    Lolicons and pedophiles are the same. They both are sexually attracted to children. Pedosexuals are the ones who fuck children. Lolicons and pedophiles are truly harmless. Pedosexuals who rape real lolis are harmless as well. Lolis grow up to be psychotic whores either way.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  3. Alessa said:

    Lolicons and pedophiles are the same.

    No they're not.

    There you go with your horrible judgements again.

    First you say that when we discipline children we rape them
    and now you say that lolicon's see as more than just a 2D thing.

    You have a warped mind indeed.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  4. For some people, trolling is a hobby.
    Also, this site doesn't ONLY cater to lolicons.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  5. I thought we had this topic already

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  6. A lolicon is to a pedophile as a pedophile is to a child molestor.

    Similar, but one is a lot worse than the other and you're a complete moron for assuming they are the same.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  7. I smell fire.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  8. A pedophile is only sexually attracted to pre-adolescents. A pedosexual has sex with pre-adolescents. A pedosexual might have sex with pre-adolescents because of pedophilic desires, because that is what is available to him, or other reasons. I know society likes to use pedophile as a blanket term for any adult involved with anything sexual and a minor but that is improper usage. Lolicon is just a Japanese word for pedophile. Though in the West in anime communities a lolicon is a pedophile in the closet who wants to believe he is better than pedophiles since his interest is only in drawn pre-adolescents. His interest extends beyond this but he pretends it doesn't and he tries to restrict himself to the drawn to retain his fabricated moral superiority.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  9. Loli Star said:
    Then what the fuck are you doing here if your not? lol

    Obviously, those who are not and call themselves the self-proclaimed
    anti-lolicon is an ignorant person.

    To say lolicon's are the same as pedophiles? Oh please.

    Really though i was under the impression everyone was.
    But who gives a shit? There's no shame in being a lolicon.

    We are just a different kind of Anime fan. That's all there is
    to it.

    AWE Shit!...here we go again!- lol. The title of your thread is "So Not everyone is a Lolicon?" (question mark)...as in "Am I right?".

    YES!- I am NOT a Loli-con. If you are - whatever. I only give a shit when I'm this Sancon and I'm bored. When I leave I could care less....doesn't change the fact that you're 'Predators in Training'...but there's nothing I can do about you is there?

    Go get a real Legal Age women you Shlubs!!!!

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  10. Bastille said:
    A lolicon is to a pedophile as a pedophile is to a child molestor.

    Similar, but one is a lot worse than the other and you're a complete moron for assuming they are the same.

    It's almost like a Sexually Deviant S.A.T. Question- lol.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  11. i can sense the thred will be full of hate

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  12. Lolicons and Pedophiles are not the same, Pedophiles have interest in real children and from some cases from reading, also lolis. Lolicons have interest in just fictional.........
    Ok im trying to weed out the fucking difference but it truly is a line that is blurred. When u take all the bad stuff for pedophiles and try and draw it away from lolicons you still end up with things from pedophiles that slightly lingerer over lolicons. Its a subject that shouldn't even be touched because, in the real world you would have about 96% of the population saying its all the same. on sancon its the other way around.

    My thoughts, it is a cleaver way of marketing by taking that form and turning it into fictional art you create something thats untouchable because touching it violates all the art rules in this world. so its like a free pass, and the people who do this knows that.
    The same can be said about Jr. Idols, have you seen a jr. idol video?
    I don't think 13 year olds should be bathing in jello and rubbing vibrators over their body's.

    Its a good marketing tool, thats only working in japan. That shit doesn't fly here in the usa. from the looks of it its not gonna be flying too much in japan either

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  13. M I N N said:
    Lolicons and Pedophiles are not the same, Pedophiles have interest in real children and from some cases from reading, also lolis. Lolicons have interest in just fictional.........
    Ok im trying to weed out the fucking difference but it truly is a line that is blurred. When u take all the bad stuff for pedophiles and try and draw it away from lolicons you still end up with things from pedophiles that slightly lingerer over lolicons. Its a subject that shouldn't even be touched because, in the real world you would have about 96% of the population saying its all the same. on sancon its the other way around.

    Excellent Assessment! This is why I keep mentioning that there isn't a Difference cause to anyone (especially with Kids!) with Common Sense - there isn't.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  14. M I N N said:
    Lolicons and Pedophiles are not the same, Pedophiles have interest in real children and from some cases from reading, also lolis. Lolicons have interest in just fictional.........
    Ok im trying to weed out the fucking difference but it truly is a line that is blurred. When u take all the bad stuff for pedophiles and try and draw it away from lolicons you still end up with things from pedophiles that slightly lingerer over lolicons. Its a subject that shouldn't even be touched because, in the real world you would have about 96% of the population saying its all the same. on sancon its the other way around.

    /. disagrees with your 96% stat

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  15. I find funny the usage of lolicon (Lolita Complex) to pedophiles, since Lolita was actually a post-pubescent teenager, anyway.

    Also, whether or not lolicon = pedophile depends on what definition of lolicon we are using.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  16. Hitoshura said:

    Also, whether or not lolicon = pedophile depends on what definition of lolicon we are using.

    I by default assume 2D unless stated otherwise.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  17. Avatar Image

    CS

    M I N N said:
    Lolicons and Pedophiles are not the same, Pedophiles have interest in real children and from some cases from reading, also lolis. Lolicons have interest in just fictional.........
    Ok im trying to weed out the fucking difference but it truly is a line that is blurred. When u take all the bad stuff for pedophiles and try and draw it away from lolicons you still end up with things from pedophiles that slightly lingerer over lolicons. Its a subject that shouldn't even be touched because, in the real world you would have about 96% of the population saying its all the same. on sancon its the other way around.

    This is an excellent contrast summary. Especially the sentence before last--the far-above assumption is so grounded in everything that mentioning the word 'loli' outside of places like SanCom--even places that are otherwise shockingly relaxed--is like walking into a castle's powder room with an armful of lit torches.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  18. we would have to actually survey pedos and ask them why they are interested in kids. cross reference with a responds from lolicons asking why are they interested in 2d lolis.

    it may match up it may not. 4chan would seem like a good place for this survey.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  19. Even in Japan, loli has become and aesthetic which means multiple things.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote
  20. Loli is customary used in Japan as "underage". A loli = underage (whether 3D or 2D). In the West and elsewhere in the world, it generally refers to a visual standard found in 2D.

    EDIT: I posted this before seeing Ukonvivi's post.

    But the aesthetic standards used to refer to loli in Japan are mostly used by politicians wishing to see lolicon banned ("you can't draw what it looks to be a child"). To Japanese otaku, the line is more blurred out, since the same aesthetic standards they like (loli) generally implies someone below 18 years.

    Posted 6 years ago # Quote

Reply »

You must log in to post.