Sankaku Complex Forums » General

  1. my animu watching portable rig (aka laptop)

    it's a dell btw
    core2DUO T7500 @ 2.2GHz
    4GB ram //cant rmb what brand, upgraded it frm 2GB
    250GB HDD, 7200rpm
    GeForce 8400M, nvidia
    some shitty motherboard from dell that's been replaced 3 times, covered by warranty.
    that's all i can rmb...

    my video production rig (aka desktop)

    Asus P6TD Deluxe Motherboard
    Intel Core i7-950 3.06GHz S1366 w/ Fan
    Kingston 6GB DDR3-1333 Kit (3x2GB) PC3-10600
    Samsung Internal 22X SATA DVD+-RW
    WD Caviar Black 1TB 7200RPM 3.5" SATA 3.0Gbps w/ 32MB Cache
    Asus ATI radeon 5870
    Asus Xonar Essence STX 5.1 PCIe
    Antec Nine Hundred 750W //case

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  2. Man, seeing all these suckaz with their i7s kinda makes me wanna change my mobo to fit an i7 too.

    Would it be unrealistic for me if I wanna wait until i7s hit at least 4GHz(without OC) to replace my Core2 Quad 9400 2.66GHz? It'll be quite some time before another PC game I like will get released anyway, and games I continue to play now runs at above average settings, so personally I don't see the need. All my graphic designing works still run satisfyingly even when working with resolutions above 7k pixels too. I hope you guys can supply some informed opinions.

    Als, for those who has 4GHz RAM and above, pray to God that your OS is 64bit!

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  3. Avatar Image

    -

    I've an AMD

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  4. jamesownsall said:
    Would it be unrealistic for me if I wanna wait until i7s hit at least 4GHz(without OC) to replace my Core2 Quad 9400 2.66GHz?

    Yes, seeing as i7s are unlikely to ever get that high without overclocks.

    Also, here's a fun fact, since you seem to believe the megahertz myth:

    The clock speed of a processor does not tell you how fast/powerful it is. If you have two processors with the same architecture and the same number of cores (e.g. two different i7s) then the one with the high clock speed will be better. However, an i7 at, say, 2.4GHz will easily outperform a Core2 quad at 2.66GHz. Imagine clock cycles as being like the number of steps a runner can take in a second and processor architecture as telling you how long his legs are. If two runners have legs that are the same length, the one who can take the most steps in a second will win the race. However, if their legs are different lengths, the one with longer legs might still win even if he takes fewer steps, because each step takes him further. See?

    Basically, there are three ways of making CPUs perform better. The first is by adding more cores and making use of applications that support multi-threading. The second is making more efficient architectures that can get more done in each clock cycle. The third is adding more clock cycles per second and boasting of 9001MHz speeds. Unfortunately, we've reached a point where increasing the clock speed creates dramatic increases in temperature and power use, meaning that Intel are focussing on the first two and AMD are focussing on copying them. Processors are unlikely to go far beyond 4GHz any time soon. This may change when graphene chips start to be used, since they can endure higher temperatures. This is a pretty shitty explanation; I'd be able to give you a better one if it weren't 03:41 where I live.

    Not that it matters for a gaymen rig, however. cheese_cake will no doubt benefit from his i7 when he's making videos, but people only interested in playing Crysis on max settings with at least 100x antialiasing are better off keeping their Core2/Phenom II and spending their money of a better graphics card. If whatever graphic design you do is light stuff (like Photoshop), then you probably don't need an i7.

    jamesownsall said:Als, for those who has 4GHz RAM and above, pray to God that your OS is 64bit!

    4GHz RAM? What the fuck?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    I think you mean 4 gigabytes.

    And yes, people with obscene amounts of RAM are wasting it if they are using 32-bit Windows (32-bit Linux does not have this problem). 32-bit Windows can only use 3.25GB of RAM.

    maeriden said:
    I've an AMD

    HAHAHAHAHAH!

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  5. Avatar Image

    -

    What, it was cheaper

    *hides in a corner crying*

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  6. btw, what are the opinions on Asus ATI radeon 5870? that was around the time it came out. got it because store vendor recommended it >.> store was recommended by a trusted tech support frm a university.... so i thought the recommendation for getting ATI might be of some value. i also got a meagre discount, but a discount none the less d:

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  7. kudichan said:

    some shit wit my mishap...

    GODDAMN! That's humiliating! I guess it got mixed with what I talked earlier about clockspeed.

    Thanks for the link on clockspeed though. I never really understood the full extent of relationship between clockspeed and overall performance. Based on what you say though, upgrading to i7 NOW seems like a waste of cash still. Maybe if my priorities change, like Elder Scrolls 5 gets released in June or something(along with a new graphics card of course).

    maeriden said:
    What, it was cheaper

    *hides in a corner crying*

    I won't look down on an AMD user though. Intel might seem like the cooler of the two manufacturers to have, but there are some specific purposes that AMD can do both BETTER and CHEAPER. At least, that's the conclusion I get after reading the endless AMD/Intel CPU comparisons all these years.

    AMD's picking up real good I say. Their CPUs don't tend to overheat as terribly now as they used to. Plenty of educated folks have been repeatedly telling me that if you still get your current gen AMDs overheated, you probably had your tower put in an oven or something, lol. Don't quote me for that though.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  8. Avatar Image

    -

    I have to admit that when I bought the pieces to make my first (and current) pc I didn't understand much about it, so I only looked at the numbers and price. The outcome was an amd cpu with high clock but no real use for it, 4 GB ram with 32-bit os (/facepalm), and a couple of other noob things

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  9. cheese_cake said:
    btw, what are the opinions on Asus ATI radeon 5870? that was around the time it came out. got it because store vendor recommended it >.> store was recommended by a trusted tech support frm a university.... so i thought the recommendation for getting ATI might be of some value. i also got a meagre discount, but a discount none the less d:

    It's a fairly high-end card, so unless you're doing some serious gaming, it's overkill.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  10. kudichan said:

    It's a fairly high-end card, so unless you're doing some serious gaming, it's overkill.

    what's serious gaming? i've played empire total war @ highest settings w/ no lag... so i'm guessing serious is a whole lot more serious d:

    also, how does the card compare to other nvidia cards? better, worse for it's price range? d:

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  11. cheese_cake said:

    what's serious gaming? i've played empire total war @ highest settings w/ no lag... so i'm guessing serious is a whole lot more serious d:

    No, that's not serious :3

    I'm talking about serious in a "graphics" kind of way. Anything with a lot of detailed 3D models and textures (such as Crysis) will require a decent card to play at maximum settings at a high resolution. Strategy games usually aren't the most graphically intensive.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  12. hmm... lots of mentions of Crysis.... think i'll try it coming spring break :3

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  13. cheese_cake said:
    hmm... lots of mentions of Crysis.... think i'll try it coming spring break :3

    That's because Crysis is the game everyone uses for graphical benchmarking, for now.

    A lot of people that I've read said that it's highly detailed and shit. However, there are also some who proposed that Crysis is just an unoptimized game. Take it all with a grain of salt.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  14. My spec:
    Amd Athlon II x4 630 2.8ghz, Quad core
    4gb RAM
    ATI HD 5670
    Thermaltake V3 Black edition case with 450watt psu
    some 1tb HDD I got for free when I did work experience I think its a Western digital

    One day ill try and get a ATI dual gpu, a HD 6970 Hopefully :3

    maeriden said:
    I've an AMD

    Its funny how some people hate AMD and haven't even used it, it is so much cheaper and still awesome power (and more power efficient) most people I know think they need Intel for gaming but that's really a issue for the gpu where Nvidia and ATI are prity much equal
    And as a added bonus AMD recently lowered the prices on the Phenom cpu's again (too bad that wont get to australia for a year or 2 -.- )

    cheese_cake said:
    btw, what are the opinions on Asus ATI radeon 5870?

    Dont have one myself (wouldn't mind one :3 ) but like already mentioned its a high end card only get it if you plan on gaming on higher quality/demanding games. most current FPS will need rather high end cards I think Battlefield 3 coming out sometime this year will need a card like that to run on higher quality.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  15. Intel Core i7 930 - Asus P6X58D-E - Thermalright CoGage True Spirit rev. B - G.Skill Falcon 256GB SSD -
    Western Digital Caviar Black 2TB SATA x2 - Corsair HX750 (750W) - G.Skill Trident 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3-2000 -
    Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 1GB - Cooler Master HAF 922 Red -

    I also have:
    Intel Core i7 920 - Acer FX58M - Acer custom cooling - Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB SATA - Seagate Barracuda 500GB SATA - FSP Group 550W - Samsung 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1066 - ATi/AMD Radeon HD 4870 512MB - Acer M7220 Black-Orange

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  16. Guy who knows nothing about computers here. I'm thinking of updating my pc that I don't really use at the moment, for some gaming and stuff. I bought a new power supply, a new graphics card and some ram already. But it turns out that I need a new motherboard as well because it was not compatable with the graphics card or ram.

    The graphics card that I got was the GTX 460. My friend suggested it. Will it work with the following motherboard?

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-Gigabyte-GA-G41MT-ES2L-Motherboard-Overclocked/dp/B003YGWYHO/ref=sr_1_27?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1297007623&sr=1-27

    I found this on amazon and as far as I can tell, it seems to be a really good deal. But is it really?

    Thanks for any help I may get.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  17. It's not exactly advisable of buying them NOT at the same time, especially in your case. What's the PSU? What's the RAM? At least the graphics card you mentioned (and is a good bang-for-buck choice too).

    OK let's put it this way. There are new Intel's out; there's a problem with them however, so ignore P67/H67 for now.

    You'd be better off with a P55/H55. The LGA775 is way too old of a platform now.

    CPU
    Motherboard
    CPU cooler

    A bit more expensive yes, but actually miles better than that (even when THAT is overclocked). You can overclock these further too anyway (or maybe not, if you choose not to).

    Just to be frank though, I would have preferred you haven't really bought anything yet when you asked for advice.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  18. Jash said:
    Its funny how some people hate AMD and haven't even used it, it is so much cheaper and still awesome power (and more power efficient) most people I know think they need Intel for gaming but that's really a issue for the gpu where Nvidia and ATI are prity much equal
    And as a added bonus AMD recently lowered the prices on the Phenom cpu's again (too bad that wont get to australia for a year or 2 -.- )

    AMD can't compete with Intel in terms of power.

    It is also true than a Phenom II will be enough for the average gamer, but that's not because AMD makes CPUs are as good as Intel's; it's because high-end modern CPUs are far more than the average gamer needs. Even a mid-range CPU (like AMD's most powerful CPUs) is easily enough.

    However, you forget one fatal weakness of AMD's processors: they aren't endorsed by SNSD. This instantly makes them inferior.

    U jelly AMDfags?

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  19. kudichan said:

    U jelly AMDfags?

    Former AMD user here.

    I mean EEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWW.... K-Pop? FUCK THAT SHIT!

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote
  20. jamesownsall said:

    Former AMD user here.

    I mean EEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWW.... K-Pop? FUCK THAT SHIT!

    It's not about the music, it's about Taeyeon's gloriousness.

    Posted 4 years ago # Quote

Reply »

You must log in to post.