Jash said:
Its funny how us in Australia had this go through probably early this year (cant remember) and now its just gone away.
exactly... Here they were saying " internet should be for educational purposes only".. and now look at tony abott. washed up >.>
I think this recent one here in australia would be the 3rd or 4th time that they have tried to put it through. and failed every time.
so, how to delete this post when the delete option doesn't work. Any guesses?
Then again maybe this is what they want...
master-evil said:
Dude, it politicians, politicians only care about there own personal agenda and keeping a cuisse sit in the government, the only thing they do is try to keep the people quiet by choosing the easiest thing they can get rid of or censor, if it isn't "for the children" it because of some religion moral obligation in-which isn't even suppose to be happening but still does because personal religion isn't SUPPOSE to have a part in politics.
give me a shot gun i'll fix this lol
Censoring can never be a good thing. Everyone who demands censorship should be shot on sight.
Schrobby said:
Censoring can never be a good thing. Everyone who demands censorship should be shot on sight.
^this^
Schrobby said:
Censoring can never be a good thing. Everyone who demands censorship should be shot on sight.
i'll do it for free ^_^ just make it legal for me to do this. heck depending on how they want to censor it depends on how badly they get shot. example censoring porn, legs and arms get dipped in oil and shot with fire arrows, and force them to drink oil 2 and shove a arrow down their throat. sounds good?
Schrobby said:
Censoring can never be a good thing. Everyone who demands censorship should be shot on sight.
I agree I even have an idea for the right weapon for the job.
mizushima said:
i'll do it for free ^_^ just make it legal for me to do this. heck depending on how they want to censor it depends on how badly they get shot. example censoring porn, legs and arms get dipped in oil and shot with fire arrows, and force them to drink oil 2 and shove a arrow down their throat. sounds good?
or you can do this with them
lets do this we can get more this way
tingle said:
is the vote schedule before or after the new congress is seated?
get ready to BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWW
Senate panel approves domain name seizure bill
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20023238-38.html
A controversial proposal allowing the government to pull the plug on Web sites accused of aiding piracy is closer to becoming a federal law.
After a flurry of last-minute lobbying from representatives of content providers including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), a Senate committee approved the measure today by a unanimous vote.
update 11:30 a.m. PT: I received an e-mail from Gigi Sohn of Public Knowledge, which the RIAA said was "protecting online thieves" by opposing the bill. Sohn said: "And they are willing to throw free speech, International cooperation, due process, and the proper functioning of the Internet in the trash in the hope of shutting down a few bad actors. Their goal could be accomplished in a way that doesn't have those consequences, but the media conglomerates aren't interested."Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20023238-38.html#ixzz15fwibbGp
I'm not sure, because I don't I can answer. Why is it a yes or no question when your giving us two different choices "bood" or "bad".
how will i, in canada, be affected by this bill?
cheese_cake said:
how will i, in canada, be affected by this bill?
If any of the sites you frequent are us based they will be shut down if they fall under it.
GTR said:
get ready to BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWW
Senate panel approves domain name seizure bill
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20023238-38.htmlA controversial proposal allowing the government to pull the plug on Web sites accused of aiding piracy is closer to becoming a federal law.
After a flurry of last-minute lobbying from representatives of content providers including the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), a Senate committee approved the measure today by a unanimous vote.
I want a list of names of every pile of shit that voted for the bill.
Really this information should be public so people will know when a senator decides to suck lobbyist cock vs put the people's interests first.
That way they'll know not the vote for said asshat in the future because he/she betrayed them.
Schrobby said:
Censoring can never be a good thing. Everyone who demands censorship should be shot on sight.
Just to play Devil's advocate, what about things that present a clear and present danger? Should falsely shouting fire in a theater be protected under the first amendment? Censorship has such a negative connotation that people forget how it protects them everyday. If it wasn't for limits on some of our freedoms, there would be an epidemic of abuse.
Char said:
Really this information should be public so people will know when a senator decides to suck lobbyist cock vs put the people's interests first.
That way they'll know not the vote for said asshat in the future because he/she betrayed them.
Lobbyists do support the interests of people, however since not everyone thinks the same politically, people lobby for different things. If listening to a lobbyman is betrayal on the part of the senator, then we are effectively limiting a projection of our interests to the government.
x0pwsk said:
Just to play Devil's advocate, what about things that present a clear and present danger? Should falsely shouting fire in a theater be protected under the first amendment? Censorship has such a negative connotation that people forget how it protects them everyday. If it wasn't for limits on some of our freedoms, there would be an epidemic of abuse.
Lobbyists do support the interests of people, however since not everyone thinks the same politically, people lobby for different things. If listening to a lobbyman is betrayal on the part of the senator, then we are effectively limiting a projection of our interests to the government.
In this case it is as the MPAA and RIAA are a very small minority.
It pretty much comes down to they promised to do one thing but went and did another simply because they accepted a bribe.
The bribe is usually in the form of campaign contributions as this is technically legal well it's a gray area "A company can't directly contribute more then x amount but they can use a lobbyist group the MPAA and RIAA for example which are simply a mouth piece for the recording and movie industry while the corn refiners association is the same for big agribiz such as Monsanto."
BTW the first US laws making cannabis illegal where the result of a disinformation and lobbying campaign by the cotton and pesticide industry.
But they do often accept personal gifts from someone lobbying but this can come back on them as happened with Ted Stevens aka Mr tubes.
Char said:
char's rage! IT'S OVER 8000!
unsung said:
char's rage! IT'S OVER 8000!
Actually pretty sure a supersayians minimum power is over 100 million. Could be wrong though. Oh and i know the meme and if it was a typo the you're doin it wrong.
You must log in to post.
Senran Kagura Live Action Trailer “Absolutely Cringe-worthy”
Tales of The Rays PV
Charming Aegis Yukata Figure
Shoujo Kara Shoujo e Rather Tame
Nozomi Ero-Cosplay by Rin Higurashi Highly Cheeky
