Trump Calls Out “Rocket Man” at UN

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-2

President Trump has surgically struck best Korea with one of his notorious Twitter kill shots, dubbing pot shot dictator Kim Jong Un “rocket man” (faithfully reported by the Japanese media as “roketto-man”) both on Twitter and then in an actual address to the UN.

The tweet from Trump himself that started it all:

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Trump-Initial-Tweet

His follow up at the UN:

Trump supporters naturally began posting rocket-themed Kim-chan imagery:

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-1

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-2

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-4

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-3

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-5

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-6

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-7

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-8

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-9

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-10

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-11

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-12

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-13

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-14

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-15

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-16

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Twitter-Photoshop-17

Responses to Trump’s tweet have ranged from support to the usual Trump bashing:

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-1

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-2

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-3

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-4

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-5

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-6

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-7

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-8

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-9

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-10

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-11

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Response-12

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-13

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-14

KimJongUn-RocketMan-Tweet-Responses-15


    Post Comment »
    136 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    02:10 20/09/2017 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Fatty Kim 3 the rocket man vs Ronald Dump!
    Hopefully he'll stop shitting rockets at japan before war happens

    Comment by Anonymous

    North Korea are lucky that the US has neutered Japan. The Japan of old(See WW2) would have invaded mainland North Korea.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:44 20/09/2017 # ! Good (+0.6)

    the Nippon of old WW2 owned North Korea and raped all their women.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:32 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @17:54 Also why we are not dealing with a possible red Japan, or a north and south Japan today.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:10 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ 17:54 And they did, thus Hiroshima with 2nd Army's HQ.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:15 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ 17:54 Along with 20,000+ combatants, as well as other non-Japanese such as Koreans, and part of the surviving Korean royal family.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:54 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    And then civilians had to pay for what the imperial army had done, why not bomb the imperial army headquarters instead of civilians?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:12 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Your neutered=mass-murdered, right?

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:52 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol, so many people here are ignoring the rape of Nanking it's not funny. Japan also used many of its POWs as Guinea pigs for their own experiments..

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:26 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes, japan digimorphed from proud country to weeb land and germany will have mandatory rape hours for shitskins soon enough. Murrica, never change.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:16 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Mass-murdered? You mean the atomic bombs, the act of war that was almost certainly a net-positive in terms of deaths, both civilian and military, compared to a mainland invasion? Not to mention all the bad shit that Japan did during the war; ever heard of the Rape of Nanking, or the horrible experiments by Unit 731. Japan was no better than Germany during the war.

    Avatar of Dark Mage
    Comment by Dark Mage
    14:23 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    An invasion of Japan would have killed many more people.
    Stalin would have taken a large part of the country as spoils of war.
    Then China and the rest of east Asia wanted retributions for the crimes committed against them.
    Literally the best outcome for WWII Japan was to surrender to the US.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dark Mage, have you come from alternative universe to tell us that? It's nothing to talk about.

    Comment by Anonymous

    "Japan was no better than Germany during the war". So was USA. The difference is, it's all in the past for Germany/Japan, but not for USA. After mass-murdering in Korea, they did the same thing in Vietnam, Libya, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and even now are killing people in Syria.
    And for all retards, thinking that "atomic bombs, the act of war that was almost certainly a net-positive in terms of deaths": go kill yourself with all your relatives. it will surely be "net positive" :/

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:32 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    As much as I dislike Trump... This is gold.
    I can't see Kim liking this one bit, which makes it even better.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:48 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Leave it to Liberals to turn a harmless Trump vs Kim tweet thing into a Trump vs the Left thing.

    If the left did something under 8 years of Obama, maybe they wouldn't be sperging at Donald today and would actually be in the right.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:00 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Obama was just a tool to trigger middle east destabilization and along with that screw the US and EU.

    Look at how many NGOs were born after that, how much pressure many politics and certain powerful civilians are making on the govs to fund them now lol. Plus the votes for posing as a "i love everybody" pro migrant person while discrediting adversaries and general public for being concerned over their own security and how that is going to be used as a reason to even more laws and less freedom.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:46 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @14:36
    You know, if people didn't have the right to mock a leader of a country because they thought they were doing the wrong thing, I wouldn't really want to live there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:36 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    That actually does make some sense. Like some Bond tier group is behind all of that. From his Nobel prize to the brainwashed masses today. God I hope you never see what the left and its sympathizers outside America says about Donald today as they think they are in the right as the left today has encouraged openly mocking the face of the country.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:06 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @15:46 I guess I mean countries you'd normally consider the bad guy nations, for example North Korea today and Iran a few years ago. In the past they always stood out as being radical states with their opinions especially on news broadcasts but today you'd see the same from the left and its in-borders. But its even more complex than just that. Academia from outside the US often throws tantrums towards the Potus, especially when Trump said no to giving poorer nations money on the climate change tax.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:45 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @21:06
    What are you talking about? The liberal viewpoint is that Trump is an asshole making an ass of himself. Places like Iran and North Korea are saying that he shows that America is the nasty, villainous place that they always said it was, ready to threaten or invade anyone at a moments notice.
    And where did you get "saying no to giving poorer nations money on the climate change tax"? Do you mean pulling out of the Paris Accord? The self-promise agreement which had countries make their own goals and had no financial obligation or punishment if they failed them, only the promise of the global community to keep the global temperature from rising two degrees Celsius?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:59 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    What the hell are you actually talking about?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:02 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Leave it to Liberals-" I stopped reading after that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:38 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes it's synonym of uneducated hillbilly ranting.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:59 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    When 2020 rolls around, I'm going to make it a point that all candidates are asked whether or not they frequent social media, be it Twitter, Facebook, or even fucking MySpace. If their answer is 'yes' for any of them then they will not get my vote.

    On the one hand, access to Twitter lets us know our President more intimately than ever before, giving us a good look at what kind of person they are behind all the secrecy. On the other hand, access to Twitter lets us know our President more intimately than ever before, and showing us just how terrifyingly similar to high school the world of politics really is.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:16 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    And I might end up missing myTokyo Olympics along with the rest of the world if war breaks? Life already sucks as it is, don't make it even worse you ugly looking politician bastards!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    High school never really ends, we just give the people giving us grief different titles.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:13 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.3)

    NK threatens to "wipe America off face of the Earth", nobody bats an eye.
    Trump calls Kim rocket man: Massive liberal outrage.

    Why are these people still living the US?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:30 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    NK doesn't have the capability to do any serious (if any at all) damage to the us. However, the US has one of the strongest armies and weaponry in the world and it's the only country that has used nukes on another country. Trump is a war monger just like the rest of them and I normally don't take anything clowns like him say but WW3 is not something to joke about or take lightly. Lots and lots of innocent people could be killed and the US government and it's supporters wont give a fuck, just like in the middle east.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:41 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nobody knows what the fuck NK is really doing or when they might decide to attack somebody. Do you give random kids fire-starting matches under the assumption they'll never, ever start a fire?

    What do you do when the kids run off with the matches and threaten to set your house on fire with them? Walk away because they can't be serious?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:39 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    OP here.
    NK might not have capabilities to wipe the US but they are sure progressing fast while at the same time diplomacy was proven noneffective.
    How long are we gonna play this UN pretend game? Until they actually develop a missile capable of delivering a nuke?

    Trump is not a war monger, he is a business man, and every time there is a war, he loses money. Plus remember he promised no wars during elections, so he is on a quite problematic decision here.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:52 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Most economies see an upturn during wartime, so long as there is a clearly defined enemy and victory conditions. Off the top of my head, Vietnam and the War on Terror are the only two conflicts in American history that did not see an economic upturn.

    Secondly, the problem isn't North Korea. It's how China reacts to the United States' response that determines how things play out.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:14 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    What are you basing the "nobody bats an eye" part on, exactly?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:44 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Not OP but its still so retarded to freak out about this rocket man meme. Liberals are out of ideas on how to try and hunt down Trump.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:43 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @12:46,12:51
    "All the smooth talkers just con the people and everyone's had enough of that."

    In the past, many Presidents have managed to keep a majority of their campaign promises. As for people enjoying Trumps' "straight talk", his approval has recently up-ticked to 40%, but has--on the whole--maintained a downward trend. People don't seem to be liking or buying what he's selling. It's not truths, its just childish, unprofessional speaking.

    "Its as though you think betrayal and backstabbing isn't in the playbook."

    Oh, its entirely possible for China to reverse its stance on supporting North Korea in favor of the United States. It would just be reversing a decades held policy with a country that they get cheap, near slave labor from and serves as a buffer between them and the United States' allies.
    Look, it is actually a lot more possible than I make it out to be that China says "fuck it" and either doesn't support NK if stuff goes down, or actively invades them before the US has a chance. But I don't really like the odds on them following through with their current policies, especially if landing on that scenario means we enter conflict with them that could quickly escalate into something more.

    In my opinion, the situation requires a delicate hand, with at least a little knowledge of the history behind the current political climate, and a willingness to at least listen to those closer and more tied to the subject than oneself, all three of which President Trump has consistently failed to so in his interactions with other foreign powers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:51 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @08:57
    "Second, a large part of the problem is how China reacts to the American response. They have stated that depending on what actions are taken in prevention of or retaliation to North Korea will draw them into the conflict against us. Provoking and then threatening North Korea with annihilation doesn't exactly do wonders to keep them more on our side of the bench."

    It's a dog-eat-dog world.
    China will help the side that benefits them the most, regardless of what is said between leaders.

    It's as though you think betrayal and backstabbing isn't in the playbook.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:46 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @08:57
    "First, a lot of them are mad because it is unprofessional and unbecoming of the office of the president. Is it a matter of impeachment? No. Is it damn embarrassing to have a President behave this way? Yes."

    All the smooth talkers just con the people and everyone's had enough of that.

    Anyone appealing to professionalism or sensibility probably lack both, and if they don't, they prefer looks over substance and thus are shallow.

    Within the top tier of corporations, people talk very casually, but when they talk to their customers they put on a Handsome Face.

    Trump is just breaking that fourth wall and being a straight talker.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:57 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    First, a lot of them are mad because it is unprofessional and unbecoming of the office of the president. Is it a matter of impeachment? No. Is it damn embarrassing to have a President behave this way? Yes.

    Second, a large part of the problem is how China reacts to the American response. They have stated that depending on what actions are taken in prevention of or retaliation to North Korea will draw them into the conflict against us. Provoking and then threatening North Korea with annihilation doesn't exactly do wonders to keep them more on our side of the bench.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:58 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah it's easier to just say everything's retarded .

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:44 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Dark Knight

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:09 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    And when will that be?
    For years now they'll been all bark and no bite.
    Now don't miss understand me I think they should be taken seriously.
    But at the same time America elected a fucking idiot and he's not making things any better in my opinion.
    But hey you do make a valid point.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:54 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, trying to discredit Kim is a good thing, but i am not sure if that will work for a lunatic isolated in a country with access to weapons and good from China and Russia.

    I believe the US should have ignored most of the middle east and invaded NK on the first treat they made. There would be no need to fear of nuclear war since China and Russia would never risk that to help Kim. Would have avoided a migrant crisis and NK would be over by now.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:48 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Your history is a little off. There was a triangle with the USSR, communist China, and North Korea for the longest time. When the USSR dissolved in 1991, North Korea knew it lost a lot of serious backing, and began it's nuclear program. It wasn't long after that the first deal was made between North Korea and then-President Clinton in an attempt to halt their progression. This was because we just left the Cold War and didn't really have the public support for a hot one and because of the fragility of the region, marching on North Korea would likely have been seen as a threat to China, who may very well have thrown in support at that time. This has been the same story for quite a while now; the threat lies less in what North Korea is actually capable of, but rather in the resultant reaction by China towards any action taken.

    Comment by Anonymous

    North Korea make big statements every time they want something from other countries in the region and then they get a little and they tell their people the big countries are afraid of them.

    trump is now going against standard practices and will not cave in. Not sure how that is going to go.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:40 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    SOP for North Korean threats has been to bitch-slap them with an economic sanction and go back to ignoring them for a few years. Admittedly, it hasn't been the most effective tactic, but China didn't really want UN inspectors going in to make sure deals were carried out, or boots on the ground to enforce any other rulings. Long and short is that no one has buckled to North Korea, although China has probably kept greater trade relations than should have been allowed; for an embargoed nation, they've got some suspiciously modern tech. Not cutting edge, mind you, but if trade has been cut off for 30+ years, they shouldn't have American computer hardware and software from even 20 years ago.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:06 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why should anyone give a shit about "wipe America off face of the Earth" statement. Its a right thing to do after all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:25 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fuck off, pure and simple. There are 300 million people here, most of which probably don't give a rats ass beyond how this is affecting them and their families. Our government can be shit at times, and our leaders can be assholes, but that doesn't mean that an entire country and it's people need to die; a sentiment which I would say works both ways.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:03 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because we have the best Korean BBQ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:48 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because nobody can stop or invade the US, to much military, to large, to many civilians that are armed more then most countries armies.

    US could use things like MOAB's to cause earthquakes, then blast them from the sea with electromagnetic railguns to cause exploding lines of death for miles, then send in an army of drones and armed petman's/atlas's, then bomb them with mach 4 jets they could never stop, then drop some of their near thousand nukes on them if they really wanted.

    North Korea's struggling to develop technology from WW2. Using shitty Chinese materials that fail every other launch.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:48 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, no, no.

    Citizens can NOT stand up against organized armed forces. NK may not be able to invade, but Russia and China sure as fuck could.

    I used to think like you, but over the years I've seen otherwise. It's a nice thought, but it's not really all that accurate.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:47 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Would never work, people would tend to form organized resistances, and being unorganized is exactly the reason why they cause so much trouble.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:26 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    With all due respect, groups like ISIS aren't traditionally organized, and are proving to be hellish for fighting forces like the US and British to effectively root out and quash. If, somehow, the mainland United States was invaded, I could see the armed populace organizing into guerrilla cells that could be similarly resistant.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:21 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    'US could use things like MOAB's to cause earthquakes, then blast them from the sea with electromagnetic railguns to cause exploding lines of death for miles, then send in an army of drones and armed petman's/atlas's, then bomb them with mach 4 jets they could never stop, then drop some of their near thousand nukes on them if they really wanted.'

    And then mom woke me up and told to go to school :(

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:57 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have yet to see any outrage of any kind. I just see memes.

    Avatar of Mitchell
    Comment by Mitchell
    12:15 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    You can only Shit talk for so long before someone calls you on it. And Sadly for NK, they have been called on it. I hope it doesn't come it it, but dude needs to be outed already. YES our president is a moron.....nope no comeback for that. (NK does this when they want something?) WHO THE FUCK CARES, this is not the way people who rule nations should act, Lets just sit back and let them, until they do DO something horrible. GOOD PLAN.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:33 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it was just North Korea we were dealing with, the situation would be simple: park the fleet off their coast and pepper any and all military installations with enough ordinance to knock them back to the stone age. The problem as it stands, and why we've been stuck in this 'wait and see' period, is that we don't know how China will respond to any action we take. They've already stated that if the wrong action is taken, they will step in against us.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:07 25/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    they've also said if nk strikes first that they won't be helping them.

    Avatar of Esfruj Esfifurz
    Comment by Esfruj Esfifurz
    13:49 20/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because NK could never hurt the US, but Trump starting a war would mean WW3, South Korea and Japan (allies of the US, mind you) being nuked and America losing the few traces of moral high ground it has left. You fucking idiot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:45 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Because NK could never hurt the US"
    A while ago NK couldn't even launch a missile, now they are dropping them all over Japan's air space right into the ocean. Look at where they are guided to...

    This libtard logic of pissing yourself to avoid rape is what is gonna kill us all lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:52 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @12:59
    I think its pretty clear from context that 'right action' or 'wrong action' didn't mean 'morally superior/acceptable' so much as it meant 'was an acceptable action to China'. No doubt, NK is the lowest man on the morality totem pole, but China will act in whatever way benefits them the most, and I don't like that it's at best even odds that the side with NK as against it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:59 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @08:30
    China will say one thing and do another.
    This isn't some babies game.

    Whatever move they make it won't be based on morality, although the propaganda will say so.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:06 25/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    @08:30
    china has said if nk attacks first that they are on their own.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:30 21/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    While I agree there is a threat posed by North Korea that Esfruj isn't acknowledging, that doesn't mean the situation that clean. The problem with Trump's rhetoric isn't how NK will respond, but rather what China will do. They've already stated that if the USA takes the wrong action with or in retaliation to North Korea, they will step in too. Somehow, provoking Rocket-Man and threatening retaliatory annihilation doesn't strike me as a 'right action' in China's book.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:01 20/09/2017 # ! Drivel (-0.8)

    Keep in mind that SanCon is pretty much equivalent to a cheap tabloid and whatever you read here is biased in one way or another. What you're seeing here is only 1/2 (if not less) of the whole picture.

    Just because no popular news outlets reported any saucy twitter posts after NK threats doesn't mean nobody cared about it. It's just more sensationalist (therefore more fitting of a tabloid) to report on how "everyone" (actually just a vocal minority mostly consisting of people who falsely believe their opinion carries any weight) is calling Trump a child.

    Don't generalize based on sensationalist news. Think for yourself.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments