Gate An Absolute Calamity

Gate-Episode20-Omake-5

Gate-Episode20-Omake-3

Gate-Episode20-Omake-8

Further conflict has arisen with fantasy vs military anime Gate, as the series focuses on the vulnerable Sherry as she is forcibly tasked with a heavy responsibility that will surely have watchers on the edge of their seats.

Gate-Episode20-1

Gate-Episode20-2

Gate-Episode20-3

Gate-Episode20-4

Gate-Episode20-5

Gate-Episode20-7

Gate-Episode20-8

Gate-Episode20-9

Gate-Episode20-10

Gate-Episode20-11

Gate-Episode20-12

Gate-Episode20-13

Gate-Episode20-14

Gate-Episode20-15

Gate-Episode20-16

Gate-Episode20-17

Gate-Episode20-18

Gate-Episode20-19

Gate-Episode20-20

Gate-Episode20-21

Gate-Episode20-22

Gate-Episode20-23

Gate-Episode20-24

Gate-Episode20-25

Gate-Episode20-26

Gate-Episode20-27

Gate-Episode20-28

Gate-Episode20-29

Gate-Episode20-30

Gate-Episode20-31

Gate-Episode20-32

Gate-Episode20-33

Gate-Episode20-34

Gate-Episode20-35

Gate-Episode20-36

Gate-Episode20-37

Gate-Episode20-38

Gate-Episode20-39

Omake:

Gate-Episode20-Omake-1

Gate-Episode20-Omake-2

Gate-Episode20-Omake-3

Gate-Episode20-Omake-4

Gate-Episode20-Omake-5

Gate-Episode20-Omake-6

Gate-Episode20-Omake-7

Gate-Episode20-Omake-8

Gate-Episode20-Omake-9


    Post Comment »
    27 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Rawbeard
    Comment by Rawbeard
    23:01 27/02/2016 # ! Good (+0.4)

    still a better love story than Twilight.

    Avatar of Palmtop Twintails
    Comment by Palmtop Twintails
    15:06 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Diplomatic immunity is useful for being a lolicon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:50 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Though considering that the show setting is set in what looked to be the age of the Roman Empire, nobody Imperial will charge the diplomat for being a lolicon.

    Unfortunately that means he will have to become citizen because the moment he steps through that Gate he will immediately be charged for being a lolicon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:06 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Pedophilia was looked down upon in ancient Rome. I don't think it was outlawed but most people found it repulsive.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:37 28/02/2016 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    And homosexuality was the most normal thing in all of Ancient Rome

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:46 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Rya, how did your delusions transform "Of the fifteen emperors..." into "Wealthy romans...".

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:44 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Pedophilia wasn't looked down on, it was part of everyday life."

    Citation needed.

    Avatar of Rya
    Comment by Rya
    18:46 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you pull that out of your ass? Young sex slaves (boys most often) and castrates in brothels were the norm. After christianity took root they had to pass a LAW to make it prostitution of your own daugters illegal. Pedophilia wasn't looked down on, it was part of everyday life.

    Avatar of Trigrim
    Comment by Trigrim
    18:47 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    That does not sound true, how do you know that?

    Avatar of Rya
    Comment by Rya
    21:20 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    20:20 Did you miss the word "slaves" in my post? And then you go on and support the point that wealthy romans (except one) were apparently all fucking little boys. Thanks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:20 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey Rya, you ignoramus, look at this:

    "However, penetration was illegal for free born youths;"

    If sex with young boys was so socially acceptable why this, dumbass?

    and

    The social acceptance of pederastic relations waxed and waned during the centuries. Conservative thinkers condemned it – along with other forms of indulgence. Tacitus attacks the Greek customs of gymnasia et otia et turpes amores (palaestrae, idleness, and shameful loves).[53] The emperors, however, indulged in male love – most of it of a pederastic nature. As Edward Gibbon mentions, of the first fifteen emperors, "Claudius was the only one whose taste in love was entirely correct", the implication being that he was the only one not to take men or boys as lovers.[54]

    Tacitus was not Christian.

    Note that sex with little girls was less acceptable. I read that years ago while it was perhaps legal, it was not something honourable. Sex with little boys who were not free may have been more acceptable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:20 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Tigrim, you should not get all your historical info from NAMBLA and other pedophile sites.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:30 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=109501
    He cites actual historians and not NAMBLA activists:

    According to Colin Spencer ;The men who had relationships with prepubescent boys around twelve or younger were generally looked down upon for their actions

    "this reproach was not for any legal reasons, but due to the fact that the Greeks thought the prepubescent boys did not have the mental capacity to be fully aware of what they were doing"

    And according to Foucault it was not acceptable to have sex with those too young because:
    "it arrests growth and disturbs the development of the signs of puberty."

    so as we can see in the ancient greece pedophilia was seen as abnormal as nowadays

    So we have to distinguish between "pedophilia" and the practice of pederasty in antiquity. Now another interesting date it's in Greece:

    The physical dimension of the relationship ranged from fully chaste to sexual intercourse. Bringing back the sparta example that you gave.

    Xenophon in his Constitution of the Lacedaimonians says that Spartan customs were unsuited to pederasty: a man might aim for idealized friendship with a boy but a sexual relationship was considered "an abomination" tantamount to incest.

    Now related to ancient rome's .where sex was more ambiguous.

    On one hand the children and even the adolescents were protected by the law against sexual predators. But that only apply to free-born childs and as you accurately say the only "pederastic relationships" (an anti-ethic version) were focused on "explotation" of young slave males.

    having said that ;IT DOESN'T mean that if an adult had a sexual intercourse with slave child (younger than 12) that would considred normal or aproved by roman's society but there's was a few romans could do.. to prosecute the guilty one . Since slaves wasn't considered humans but instead "objects".

    so as you can see i such things took place in rome was primarily to loophole that it had regarding child slaves.

    In Conclusion Pedophilia was no more normal nor less than it is nowadays.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:14 28/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    age of consent is 16 in Japan right? that's the age he said she'll be when they marry.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 28/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, he "only" has to wait 4 years to go back to Japan. And that's not enough for the actual "crime" not to go unpunished by the japanese justice.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:17 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    He would not be a pedophile even in earth, for he did not touch her, he only promised to marry her later.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:49 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey Anon, are you trying to say he would be a pedophile, rapist, or molester on earth? Are you trying to say this scene was made for pedophiles? Your post looks like nonsense.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:44 28/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    you guys should read properly he did not say sugawara is a pedo. he just defined whats a pedo and there is still a chance for sugawara to be a pedo although it's unlikely and he's only doing it like what most guys would do, to protect a young girl.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:42 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Pedo is not same as child molester/rapist. A pedo is someone who wants to have sex with girls under 13, who have flat chests and so on, and whether he or she acts on those impulses or not is not relevant. So he could still be a pedo, although every normal guy would want to rescue that little girl and promising to marry her one day is a type of joke promise one makes to a child. Little girls often say they want to marry their fathers etc. It's just infantile idealised affection these kids have and there is nothing sexual in it, likewise it's likely that it's what this guy meant here. However for lolicons this is fanservice because they get the idea that there is a possibility he may actually marry her and "consummate" the marriage. And no in history this usually did not occur, for even in child marriages the arranged marriages were between children and they only got to live together after puberty.

    Comment by Anonymous

    What the fuck are you talking about? You should really learn how to create an argument before you present your argument against your imagination to the public.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:52 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Only degenerates would watch this scene and scream, "Pedo!".

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:12 28/02/2016 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Now that could have been a really bad ending for Sherry.

    Captain Beefeater, LOL!!! I wonder what kind of beef she likes?

    Avatar of Shadow C
    Comment by Shadow C
    02:13 29/02/2016 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    These character names have no chill.

    Avatar of Swarthy
    Comment by Swarthy
    16:17 27/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    10/10 loli waifu

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:55 29/02/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should just kill everyone in "power" and be done with it.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Boring episode.




    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments