A man has been arrested for engaging in indecent acts with a schoolgirl friend after her mother invited him to come to her house to give her some private tutelage and then turned him over to police.
The 32-year-old unemployed Osaka prefecture man became acquainted with a high schooler in nearby Nara prefecture by way of an unnamed video site.
The two continued their friendship for some six months with the assent of the girl’s mother.
The girl then approached her mother for advice as her friend “wants to take me out with him” – her mother replied that “you might as well get him to help you with your studies at home then,” and he paid a visit to their home.
There the pair’s acquaintance took a decidedly intimate turn, but for some reason the mother decided to consult with the local police.
They promptly arrested the man on charges of engaging in indecent acts with a minor, which he admitted to.
Online, for some reason there is a certain amount of sympathy for his case:
“Isn’t this OK with parental approval?”
“I’m failing to see what he did wrong.”
“I don’t get what happened here.”
“The mother approved it and dobbed him in. I bet she found out he was unemployed and wanted rid of him.”
“That mother laid a vicious trap for him there…”
“Obviously a trap. Probably didn’t think she could nail him unless she got him in the house.”
“Probably wanted him himself and grassed him up out of jealousy.”
“Wasn’t this a genuine relationship?”
“That mother, what a bitch. So she basically lied about approving of it…”
“She worked it all out after finding out he had no job.”
“She may have said ‘you can date her’ but she probably thought to herself ‘I didn’t say anything about sex!'”
“She probably did want him, but there is no way she could compete with a JK so she got him busted out of spite.”
“An unemployed 30-year-old has no future. Doubtless she didn’t want him breeding with her daughter.”
“He probably lied about his age and occupation at first. I can’t believe you guys would tell anyone what you really do all day.”
“What kind of brainless woman tells an unemployed 32-year-old to give her daughter private lessons anyway.”
“Sex was not supposed to be part of the curriculum.”
“You have to wonder just where out police’s priorities are hearing these stories.”
“If he had only cut her in on the action too!”
“What happened to this country, they were dating properly and everything!”
“Face it, even if it is consensual as an unemployed 32-year-old man you are still going to be arrested if you try to have sex.”
| 
Ellen Baker’s Illustrator: “Keep It Clean!”
Bullet Girls 2 Goes At It From All Angles
Sword Art Online: Hollow Realization A Real Grind
Koutetsujou no Kabaneri Immensely Gruesome
Tomoyo After Now on Steam Greenlight
Keiji Inafune Crafts Super Mario Maker Level
Singer Kouji Wada Succumbs to Cancer
Hatsumi Kosaka Bikini Figure
Sankaku App 2.0: Uploading & Editing
New Overwatch Pose Trolls SJWs: “Well Played Blizzard!”
Top 10 Cross-Anime Couples
Strip Fighter 5 Fights Dirty
Netoge no Yome MMORPG Romance Anime
“Official” Signed C.C. Labia Spread Nets $8,000
Sakamoto desu ga The Epitome of Perfection
Anne Happy Anything But Unhappy
Titillating Tomoka Wedding Figure
Touhou Ero-MMD Quite Ravenous
Babymetal Rocks Out On The Late Show
Uniqlo Bra CMs: “Show Us Your Breasts!”
Kashiwazaki Sena Cosplay Pure & Innocent
Minami Kotori Casino Girl Cosplay Takes No Chances
Shimakaze Cosplay by Ema Sakura
Harley Quinn Cosplay by Miyuko Colorfully Crazy
Sonico Ero-Cosplay by Yuka Hoshikage Super Sexy
Kasugano Sora Bunny Girl Cosplay Absolutely Admirable
Goddess of 2ch: “Barely Legal Beauty!”
Highly Yuri Tenryuu & Tatsuta Cosplay by Garo & Usagi
Yuyuko Cosplay by Aimer Lai Truly Enchanting
Tohsaka Rin Ero-Cosplay by Ayane Exceptionally Sexy
I know what happened, he didnt pay her.
Now this sounds about right
Or he didn't pay "them enough"
I know what happened! THE MOM GOT JEALOUS!
That woman is a dumbass. She should go to jail for letting him.
turned out it's actually a shoot for hentai manga adaptation AV
mother made sure to catch that sack of shit in the act & that he could not escape scott free in one quick swoop
*mother made sure to join that lucky sod in the act & that he could not escape being sandwiched in one quick swoop
there. corrected for you.
What a cute little delusional world you like in. Sugoi!!!
He should have just taught here how to dip and eat strawberries and cherries instead.
Teach how to brush her teeths then !
i'll teach her how to brush her tits
lickie lockon
It's clear this was consensual. This poor guy is a victim of dumb laws.
You do realize that the girl was a minor right? She's the only innocent one involved in this one. Both the idiotic mother, and the guy are equally at fault here.
that's assuming the perfect the-guy-is-a-lolicon and the-mom-is-an-ignorant-parent scenario. there's still the possibility of the guy just genuinely want to be friends with the kid and the mom's blindly jumping the gun on him
It says right there that they got intimate.
Yet again there are just too many factors involved that were left out. Such as the mother had never met him before, potentially, and when she saw him may have gotten a bad vibe and understandably didn't trust him, especially when sex is involved on supposedly their first meeting. Also we don't know the age of the girl, but realistically it's a stigma to have a younger girl in a sexual relationship with an older guy one way or another.
I'm not against a consensual relationship of that nature with parental knowledge, but it also places a lot of responsibility on the man who has to have the wherewithal to take into account that a teenager is still impressionable in ways that are unique to each teenager, and that there is a part of the relationship that, at least for the first few years of it, will not be equal because of the nature of a teenager's mind not having reached its third stage of development for full cognitive thought. He will have had experience and his mind having grown through the third stage puts her at a mental disadvantage perceiving the relationship. It's why the number 18 exists in the first place for legality here, but it should be a guideline, not a criminalization. A teenager is bright and understanding enough in second stage development to know they want sex and are able to have a relationship... most of them are just really, really not very perceptive or understanding, and often downright selfish and whiny. There are some very mature teenagers out there though who do not give off that vibe and can have a natural conversation with an older person with understanding beyond their age.
The number 18 years is mostly just America. Countries saner on sex have it at 16, that's the majority. Personally I agree with Japan's generally 14 limit.
thats because you're a virgin and you can only fantasize about minors because you can pretend you're taking advantage of them
Anon@01:26, Its state by state you ignorant arse.
For example, my state also has a consent of 16.
While not the best, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America.]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America. Shit there are more states that have a consent of 16 than 18. Although a minor under federal law is 18, unless you do something outrageous that gets the feds involved it would all be done in local courts, if it even got to that point.
Blame California (where the AoC is 18) and its influence on movies and TV for everyone think the AoC is 18 in all of the USA and/or the world.
Are you going with the idiotic minor=autorape from the eeuu law or what?
I think that is part of the definition of 'dumb laws' This was a consensual relationship, who the fuck cares if she is 17. The age of consent law is a joke.
Not to mention that he met her on a video dating site, so she was already posting dirty material of herself. I dont call that innocent.
Knew a perfectly logical and reasonable comment would get down voted on this site. You people are sick.
I don't see anything in what sankaku posted, stating her age. Just says high schooler.
But, "stupid law" or not, it's there. It's well known. Anyone who breaks it takes a risk. This guy got caught, he goes to jail. Nothing difficult about it.
Well...this site IS made by perverts for perverts. What do you expect?
It kind of pisses me off that this MARI0 guy doesn't even realise his comment was illogical and unreasonable.
Being a minor doesn't make you innocent. It just makes you legally dumb enough to not have to take responsibility.
So? Where I come from (rural Netherlands) it's common to become sexually active around the age of 14 and no one is any the worse for that.
In USA its common to be sexually active in highschool too. But with each-other not 30 year olds!
Except your sister.
In the NL, the age of consent* is 16, as far as I know. So, if she was in fact 17 as stated above (it's not mentioned anywhere in the text), she'd have been ok there.
Sadly that doesn't apply to almost any other place in the world. (Japan included)
* Or, more precisely, the age that lawmakers have decided is not too early for you to decide for yourself with whom you engage in a relationship.
So sex between a 16 year old and another 16 year old, is somehow different then the sex between a 16 year old and a 30 year old?
Um. Yes? A 30 year old is in a position of much greater psychological stability than a 16 year old, and has an implicit trust and authority over minors, especially if they're in the position of a tutor. The whole -point- of age of consent laws is that a young person doesn't necessarily have the knowledge, experience, and maturity to be expected to make reasoned decisions about consent like an adult does. In the case of two younger people, however, while that may still be true, neither person is in the same position of power over the other. It's the difference between two kids making a mutual mistake and one adult taking advantage of a kid's naivete.
Yeah, because high schoolers don't know about sex, it's not as if she's past puberty, right?
The law is good it's the idiotic people like this that uses the law in an idiotic way.
The law is there to protect children, not to restraint children of any consensual relationship.
Can't really tell which side of the fence you're on with the way you worded that. Considering she's of age for consent, and her mother even consented, nothing is wrong until her mother changes her mind during the act. The stupid person here is the mother, either that or she's just a huge asshole.
She would have been old enough in Japan to date the guy with the mother's consent. He was completely in the right until the mother basically revoked that consent without telling him.
You do realize that Japanese school girls are total sluts, right? 'Innocent'? Pshaw. Nonsense.
oh yeah, dumb laws that prevent people from exploiting your children....
you need to be able to trust tutors, which this is not doing any good towards
The law is good it's the idiotic people like this that uses the law in an idiotic way.
The law is there to protect children, not to restraint children of any consensual relationship.
You didn't read the article, did you?
You people are disgusting
you're also disgusting for typing sancom url and pressed enter!
actually, some ppl can just google sankaku then click a link, without having to type.
type in the URL*
no u
oretachi wa minna kimochiwarui
Oh no! Someone is uncomfortable on the internet?
u mad bro?