Anime Exec Busted for JK Cosplay Sex Shoot

ikamusume-cosplay-abuse

The director of a Kyoto-based anime company has been arrested for having a schoolgirl engage in lewd and lascivious cosplay so he could sate his photographic urges.

According to police, a 50-year-old director of an “anime advertising firm” based in Kyoto used met a 17-year-old high school girl on a cosplay site.

Exploiting her interest in cosplay, he invited her to a private cosplay shoot, luring her out with the lie that “I rented a studio and another girl is coming.”

He managed to get her to an Osaka hotel, where he had her wear a costume and then took 520 “obscene” photographs of her in what must have been some at times very partial cosplay, along with 11 videos.

Police have charged him with child pornography related offences due to the nature of the photographs he took.

The suspect concedes he undertook the shoot, but that he “thought she was over 18” and that he “doesn’t want to talk about what we did.”

Police are also investigating whether he had been engaged in the same sort of antics with other girls after finding a large number of similar images on his computer.

The incident apparently came to light the month after the shoot itself, when the girl and her parents approached police.


    Post Comment »
    143 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    17:00 10/09/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    >met a 17-year-old

    I'm failing to see a problem here. The AoC is 16.

    Avatar of macona
    Comment by macona
    01:06 11/09/2013 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Laws are nebulous at best in Japan. The police can pretty much make things up as they go along and just hold you until you confess.

    Avatar of ALAKTORN
    Comment by ALAKTORN
    22:13 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    “The national age of consent in Japan is 13 as specified by the Japanese Penal Code Articles 176 and 177.[36][dead link] However, prefectures can have ordinances that prohibit sexual activities with any minor under 18.[37]”

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:09 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    He produced photos and videos = Kiddy porn.

    Had he done what he wanted without taking photos and videos than that would've been fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:49 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    what's fucked up is that there's a lot of gravure idols around 14 years old that pose in obscene poses, but obviously there's no nudity. This is probably a made up charge, what he did wrong was to lure and deceive a minor.

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    00:04 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "obviously there's no nudity"

    ...anymore.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:11 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, what he did wrong was not give the police a cut.

    Comment by Anonymous

    17 years old?, must be a child then....

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    17:49 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    A true shame for him that he's not a cop or a teacher.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:20 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Age of consent is 13 in most of Japan, but the age of majority is 18. Ergo, by law, she is a child and taking indecent photos is kiddie porn. Oddly, sex would have been legal as long as no gift of any kind was given to the girl. This would constitute child prostitution.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:33 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    -because you're an idiot. The age of consent is lower than 18 in a LOT of countries, but you still can't take pictures of them impaled on your dick until they're 18, dumbass.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:29 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's clearly because he didn't censor them properly.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:00 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    AoC is 13 in Japan actually.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:44 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Depends on the prefecture

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:40 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Age of Consent is a bullshit and arbitrary human concept that fails to take into consideration the differences between individuals.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:37 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not arbitrary. AoC is related to the development of high level reasoning skills in children and teenagers. Think of it as an opportunity for kids to wise up.

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    19:30 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @ Anon 16:10

    In his defense, even though his argument is completely not based on this, he is also correct about the fact that brain development should not be the end-all be-all of human sexual agreement. Passion is a must. If we deny our passion, we deny what it means to be human. The JRPGs aren't just spouting nonsense, even if it's become a tad cliche.

    Fear of consequence is what we consider to be the mark of an adult, and yet fear of consequence is also why we give up our dreams, so realistically teenagers just enjoying themselves and having sex, and also enjoying sex with someone more experienced, is not necessarily something to be frowned upon. The people we blame are the older people because by default we believe they are being manipulative, simply by the nature of the situation. We're prejudiced because, let's face it, it's common for that to be the situation.

    What has not evolved into the laws though is that children are far, far more intelligent than they used to be, in more ways than one. The innate intelligence of the modern child is so far above that of the previous generations that you will begin to see widespread appearances of children 'remembering' experiences they've never had, such as the kids who can pick up an instrument suddenly and play like a master, or can read books by placing their hands on them. These exist, and will appear more and more often.

    We were designed to have sex and procreate as adolescents based on human history. The legal aspects are merely because in modern society responsibilities exist in a different format, and you would be a drain on the economy if you had a child at an age where you could not support them. The child itself and the act of having said child are not in dispute at all. However reprehensible it may be to others, it's really none of their business if someone who's 30 has sex with someone who's 15 and they decide to keep the kid that comes from the union. The parents may have some words or bullets for the guy, but really those are the only parties who should be involved. If he chooses to stick around and be a father, and the girl wanted it anyway, what's left is merely judgements based on preconceived notions of fear.

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    16:17 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    It is not arbitrary, but it most definitely is not a 'plateau' as it is perceived. Children hit 3 major ages of reason in early life. 3-5, 11-14, and 16-18 in general. Cognitive deduction is not trained or fully prepared in most normal kids by the age of 13, they basically are only just able to perceive their mortality and the any real fundamental facets of consequence. Experiences differ and generate more mature children (and less mature children if an AMV creator I speak with who happens to be 14 is any indication) and therefore are not 100% accurate to any individual, but most people who think the age of consent is arbitrary are ones who either ignore, or don't even recognize, their 'hindsight 20/20' perspective on it. You as you are now can perceive it as 'no problem,' however there is a very obvious thing you can watch as a mature adult to see children being manipulated by people with more experience and knowledge than they. An adolescent is interested in sex, however, because of biology. So the middle ground is to have them wait a bit longer, between the second and third awakenings, so that they can make a more informed decision based on an understanding of consequence in modern society. 13 and 14 years olds still have sex here though, but they are completely intuitive about it, and often make horrible decisions. And let's face it, a 14-year-old boy has no real idea what love is without the lust attached.

    Avatar of yezeik1
    Comment by yezeik1
    05:26 18/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    """We were designed to have sex and procreate as adolescents based on human history. The legal aspects are merely because in modern society responsibilities exist in a different format, and you would be a drain on the economy if you had a child at an age where you could not support them. The child itself and the act of having said child are not in dispute at all. However reprehensible it may be to others, it's really none of their business if someone who's 30 has sex with someone who's 15 and they decide to keep the kid that comes from the union. The parents may have some words or bullets for the guy, but really those are the only parties who should be involved. If he chooses to stick around and be a father, and the girl wanted it anyway, what's left is merely judgements based on preconceived notions of fear."""

    ^^^^ +1 for that commment.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:10 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    And even "brain development doesn't stop until 25" is an absurdly oversimplified description of neurological processes that don't actually mean what you think they mean and aren't fully understood.

    Worse, even if you were somewhere in the ballpark of "correct" regarding "brain development", you fail to take into account the varying degrees of mental capacity of the human population, and even if you did that, you'd STILL need to find a test that actually produces useful results.

    You're using meaningless premises to draw an incoherent conclusion.

    >Think of it as an opportunity for kids to wise up.

    Insufferably smug and paternalistic.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:59 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Brain development doesn't stop until 25, so yeah, uhm, it is pretty much arbitrary, as shown by the range of laws regarding it in various countries.

    This sounds a lot like the guys who use evo psych to tell us why women can't write computer programs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:50 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Fear of consequence is what we consider to be the mark of an adult, and yet fear of consequence is also why we give up our dreams,"

    This is such stupid binary thinking. Many people do not give up their dreams. In fact they wise up and pursue other dreams or they modify their tactics to get to those dreams. As you get older and gain experience and your brain/mind matures you're able to grow beyond the stupid childish ambitions you had and focus on more, sensible and appropriate pursuits. This need no mean something less. Take Bill Gates. He may have had a dream of being a policeman as a kid. In his adult days he aimed for and became the richest man in the world.

    HouseLife, who may or may not be some sort of child sex apologist, is suggesting that that's wrong-- that Bill Gates should never have given up his dream of being a plod. Because childish passion and joy and other quaint bullshit based either on sentimentality or just a disingenous attempt to justify child sex -- so that pedos can look at very young naked girls - and it's all legal.

    I call BS.

    Never mind that young kids are stupid and when they screw around and get pregnant, or get HIV, or get HPV or just spoil something nice by making something as beautiful as sex vulgar - because they'll either sleep with 1. pedos - who will vulgarise it and exploit them, or 2. sleep with slighlty older pathetic teen boys who are jackasses who'll exploit these girls too.

    Sorry mate. Girls should keep their pants on. If you want underage porn, look at hentai.

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    16:18 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ Anon 6:02

    We were talking about people having sex with younger people when older. Honestly I believe that the concept of the initiatrix and the initiator should exist, that there be people who guide young people into sexual understanding without actually having sex so they become comfortable around it, like the priestesses of old to a degree. It would help across the board I think to open people up to the experience without being blitzed by it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:02 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    >So the middle ground is to have them wait a bit longer, between the second and third awakenings, so that they can make a more informed decision based on an understanding of consequence in modern society.

    I waited and now I'm close to a 30-year-old sexually confused virgin who's too timid to try anything with anyone.

    I'm sure the American moralists are right, though; not being able to have any kind of sexual experience back when I was developing the ability to do that probably didn't affect me, just like how you can easily learn to socialize if you were raised in a box until you were 15.

    I sure am grateful to the old women in charge that I have ended up this way. Sex not being conceived as a terrifying poisonous thing would probably not have helped me at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:17 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah. Like allowing women to get married at 16. What would japanese ppolice do if this happened between a man and his legal wife, I wonder...

    Avatar of Uncommon0taku
    Comment by Uncommon0taku
    07:27 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    the creepy little black neko that is smoking a cigarette saying;

    Yay!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:16 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, but 16y old is ready to fuck imo, be it who ever.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:54 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm sure there are many dudes who also think that you're also ready for some fscking.

    Like your opinion counts....

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:59 10/09/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Pics or it didn´t happen :-P

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:29 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Pics or it didn't happen" should be the motto of a new religious group that believes there was nothing until the invention of photography. Stupid.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:54 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wasn't that the problem?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:16 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    still not motivated to interacT? another problem created.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:44 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    i fail to see how i should be motivated in cooperation with "friendship /erpressung".

    Avatar of Rya
    Comment by Rya
    16:16 10/09/2013 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Sounds to me like a normal junior idol shoot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:09 10/09/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    AKB is okay because of yakuza '-'

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    00:48 11/09/2013 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Also there's plenty of magazines of child idols.

    Plenty.

    Not that I know anything about it, of course.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Mb the nature of the pics isn't something it should be considered " a normal junior idol shoot"

    Comment by Anonymous

    pics as proof?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:37 10/09/2013 # ! Good (+0.7)

    17 year old.....CP.........

    You know what? NO!

    This has gone on way too long now. I refuse to take this bullshit any longer! 17 year old WOMEN are NO CHILDREN! NOWHERE in the fucking world are those CHILDREN!

    I am very much against exploitation or violence against actual children. True and actual children, which do not have the mental or physical capacity to help themselves against adults. But this? For fucks sake! Those are fully sentient, free-willed and responsible women, not children.

    Do yourselves a favour and speak up against this ridiculous Cp death-knell tactic or we will end up in a not-so-distant future that sees males in prison for just having a penis at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:06 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Just wait till the feminists get the AoC raised to 21 or 25 (politicians can't stand against "protect the children" laws). Then Girls Gone Wild and the like will be "child porn" and we'll be hearing about depraved "pedophiles" "abusing" college seniors.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:45 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Also, drawings of them will be "drawn child porn". "Liberals", who were supposed to be the ones preventing this shit, will spur it on. This decade is fascist and I hate it

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:55 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    no u dont, i hate it

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:25 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    You, and several others, are talking about Japan, not the Obamanation. Different rules and different responsible groups. Blaming everything on feminists just make you a 'tard.

    Comment by Anonymous

    But feminists are to blame for this, be it in Japan, USA or anywhere else.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    02:16 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    The CP laws pretty much every so called first world country are among some of the most poorly written laws in history.
    They make no distinction between a seven year old which most definitely would be a very bad thing and a seventeen year old which should not even be an issue.

    Avatar of kamehappo
    Comment by kamehappo
    07:23 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Those laws and thinking behind them are based solely on jealousy, when it comes to including close to adult aged "victims", and religious bigotry.
    This despite many religions have a history of being serious child molesters.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:56 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    "This despite many religions have a history of being serious child molesters."

    Even if that were generally true, and it's not, it would still be a Tu quoque fallacy to call that. You're not very bright, are u?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:11 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    The irony being that 7 years old does not have the ability to report to police, making the actual CP go unnoticed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:56 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    That, and the busting of people for mere representations of child/teen sexuality like you'd find in anime and manga, the classification of almost anything as "child porn" (cf. guy getting arrested for filming cheerleaders), or the un(?)intended consequence of teens brought up on CP charges for photographing themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:28 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    because singers in stolen armors complain about isseis sinistrale?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:45 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    ^THAT is the bullshit I hate, why the FUK are 14 year olds getting CP charges!?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:29 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    not that the mutation of issei left arm aka sinistrale is of any worth mentioning.....

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:00 14/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    i like bewildered woman ;P to bad they dont exist in austria ;P

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:56 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even record of one's own self LOL.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:55 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They shouldn't actually. But it's the mentallity of some older guy getting ahold of the pictures i guess from distribution. That's why they are to, hit with the law. Except it becomes a Romoe and Juliet law. Then we have the females who abuse the law and call rape when there is no rape.

    Still though, its the gov who is butting in people's sex lifes lol. Teens in consent with one another is just the gov butting in. They still do it, the gov simply doesn't want record of them doing it.

    Which is lulz because again, it doesn't stop the teens from fooling with each other. It just keeps it 'off the records'.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:54 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Which is why laws are worded as "pornography featuring minors". The only problem I see here is people using incorrect terminology.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:46 14/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    FUN FACT: Did you know that if you took a video of someone raping a little girl to use as evidence in the prosecution of said rapist you would end up in jail LONGER than the rapist?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:56 15/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    FUN FACT 2

    Downloading music and movies can potentially land you in jail longer than the rapist...

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    Obviously only an asshole would take a video of a child rape instead of trying actively to stop it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:16 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    As long as the law favors feminists and right-wing conservative religious zealots, that will never happen.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:43 13/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Even white-knight liberals are on the train about BS cp laws.

    Avatar of yezeik1
    Comment by yezeik1
    04:59 18/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Liberals are always on the train about BS cp laws trolololol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:23 12/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's Japanese law, made by old fogies, not feminists or conservative religious zealots, Baka!

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:59 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just conservative nationalist idiots.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Lol this is so stupid. the average 17 in america looks like an old hag and has already been in the sac with some idiot AHAHAHAHA.

    The laws are gay. At 17 you should decide who u want to fool around with. At 17, it still doesn't stop a 17 from deciding who to fool around with.

    When the age comes when a person has the mentality to actually consent to sex, the laws on age should be lifted. No one suddenly understands everything about sex at age 18, as if they magically didn't understand what sex is at other years.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:00 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    i personally know 2 girls who had children at 16 years and this is Europe......

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:00 03/05/2014 # ! Neutral (0)

    Europe is big. In places like Kosovo 13 year olds are having babies. Gypsies marry at 12/13 and have sex then, they're all over Europe too.

    So what?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:00 10/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    i personally know 2 girls who had children at 16 years and this is Europe......

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:33 11/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    The cops here don't give a shit about that stuff here either. My sister was wifed @ 17. My wife was 17 even though I didn't even look at her in the eye until she was 18. By then, she just wanted to get the hell out of her folks' house. I was 20 though. I wasn't going to take any chances. My inheritance was still up in the air for another year.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments