Dragon’s Crown “Grossly Sexualized Adolescent Fantasy”

There are no "real feminists". All modern day feminists fight for gender superiority.
You can fight for equality, or you can be a feminist. You can't do both.

femanazis - professional victims. Just look at the cunts ( both women AND "men" ) that infest Athieism Plus. They've infected what was originally a forward thinking movement of intellectuals and critical thinkers and turned it into a pathetic bitch-fest where every person should feel justified to be offended at EVERYone if they don't fit in with their facist agenda. They're ruining everythign for everyone around the world with their nonsense. And with the women associated with that cult...fair enough, they're women who have issues with men, no matter how twisted their own ideas are. It's to be expected of butthurt, fugly bogmonsters who are self loathing and resentful of thier lack of femininity. It's boring but not that annoying. It's the emasculated limp wristed herbivore fawning pandering pathetic loser BETA-Males that support them in just yet another sneaky way to try and get in the women's underwear, like the deluded sickening white knights that they are. Cunts, every last one of them.

Actually, Anon 01:01, equality is exactly what feminists fight for. Feminism just means that you want both men and women to have exactly the same rights.

Women who hate men and who want women to be *superior*, on the other hand, are NOT feminists. They're misandrists.

Both "feminism" and "masculisum" are useless ideas anyways. Both males and females have been deemed both superior or inferior to each other by society in a multitude of different ways. By supporting one you're ignoring the other and that doesn't help equality in my eyes. I would think that a person who consider themselves equal would also treat everything else equally, meaning supporting a person of either sex who is being harmed or treated unfairly. It should be considered hypocritical to support the freedoms of one and not the other.

Actually, if you dig a bit into feminism you'll find out that the feminism movement have never been about equality, but about increasing women's privileges.

They have a long history of having men-hating nutjobs in powerful and influential positions, and that this hypcritical view on male vs female sexuality where bikini amazon = WRONG! while loincloth barbarian = YOU GO GIRL! is entirely in line with feminism ideology.

@08:33 - there was a time when specific aspects of society required feminism, though, like the right for women to vote and the fairness of various laws. I think now we've pretty much gotten to the point where our rights have become equal but society in general just doesn't treat both men and female with equal freedom when it comes to different things.

Feminism is only really useful now in societies where equal rights have not been achieved. Social views should be a whole other thing entirely.

To see the state of equality for both men and women in our society today, for example, you only need to look at the toy isles and how they're separated between male and female. Society should see all those things in either aisle as acceptable for anyone of either gender to purchase, not discourage anyone. That's where all the gender stereotypes and hatred start.

@01:41 - wait... Atheism Plus? You're talking about the idea that came out of the same mind that did this amazingly awesome thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boobquake

Wow, I'm surprised that there are other sancom readers that know of the hilarious freak-show named "Atheism Plus".
They are hilarious in their insanity, but I'm still surprised, since I always thought no more than a few hundred persons even noticed their existence.

@09:06 - the funny thing is, I have yet to see any threat from the "feminist" aspect of Atheism Plus. I think it does a lot of damage when MRA or anyone in general attacks someone for even mentioning the word "feminist" and then associate it with "Dworkinism" when they haven't done or said anything to justify that level of threat. What I know about the person who started the movement, she doesn't seem at all like even Anita Sarkeesian levels of Feminazi. Not saying you guys are wrong, I'd just like an example of when Atheism Plus has done something shitty.

I mean, there are still instances these days, like in the Fighting Game Community where there's been a case recently where a clan's team leader started treating his female member like absolute shit for no other reason besides simply her being female, and I see no problem with some kind of feminist group standing up for someone put into that horrible position.

@09:06 - the funny thing is, I have yet to see any threat from the "feminist" aspect of Atheism Plus. I think it does a lot of damage when MRA or anyone in general attacks someone for even mentioning the word "feminist" and then associate it with "Dworkinism" when they haven't done or said anything to justify that level of threat. What I know about the person who started the movement, she doesn't seem at all like even Anita Sarkeesian levels of Feminazi. Not saying you guys are wrong, I'd just like an example of when Atheism Plus has done something shitty.

"Women who hate men and who want women to be *superior*, on the other hand, are NOT feminists. They're misandrists."

Well, these people do call themselves as feminist.. I'd think the real feminist as you claimed should do something to kick out this fake people from sullying the group's name.

So far, nothing has been done, and there are many feminist(or fake, hard to tell) that I observed do have superiority mentality. Thinking their gender is better, and the manipulating the situation so it be on favor of woman, disregarding any common sense and rule.