China “Begged” US for Senkaku Landing: “Just 3 Hours!”

Senkaku Complex

Japanese have been reacting strongly to reports that China has been secretly “begging” the USA to allow them to temporarily land PLA forces on the disputed Senkaku Islands.

According to comments by US officials reported in the Japanese media, rather than discussing its legion of army hackers attacking US interests or the nuclear antics of North Korea, China’s leaders have been desperately begging the US to countenance them seizing Japanese territory:

The reason [the Sino-American summit at the Sunnylands Ranch] has been brought forward 3 months is because of China’s pleading to the US. President Xi Jinping wants to discuss China’s maritime territorial disputes, especially the dispute over the Senkaku Islands with Japan.

Using various channels, China was desperately begging for America “to let the PLA conduct a temporary landing on the Senkaku Islands,” even going so far as to suggest “it can just be for a day – even 3 hours! We want to work out a way of doing it without bothering the US.” Xi Jinping said he would accept “any condition.”

According to the official, by way of incentive for the US to betray its ally, China has been offering preferential access to Chinese markets, a re-evaluation of its exchange rate and the purchase of more US government bonds.

The US is supposedly having none of it, believing it already has the Chinese at a definite disadvantage:

President Xi’s power base is weak and because he has to accommodate the factions of both Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin he can’t decide on anything. His economic policies have been a succession of failures, and some now believe they are on the verge of an economic meltdown.

In addition, between the TPP and Abe’s independent foreign policy they are facing the prospect of a successful encirclement. The party and the army are on the verge of exploding.

If Xi can’t pull something out soon things will become very dangerous for him.

Amongst Japanese there is outrage at the suggestion that China would try such a thing:

“Did they really think they’d say yes?”

“Just how incompetent is Xi’s leadership to try this?”

“Just asking was wrong. If America went along with it, they’d lose all support amongst the Japanese people.”

“I don’t believe this.”

“If it is true it is awful, but it sounds too shady to be true.”

“I don’t think much of the credibility of this, but it definitely sounds like something the Chinese would try.”

“What good would only 3 hours do?”

“I rather doubt they would leave. America doesn’t have the guts to attack them anyway.”

“A landing would mean war. Do they really want one that much?”

“How could the US expect to let them occupy it? It is Japanese territory!”

“America doesn’t care about that.”

“If they went along with it they’d lose all their Japanese bases and Japan would become militarily independent. Not a great move for China.”

“So if the US allows it they can just land there? The Japanese government may be America’s vassal but I don’t think they would go along with it.”

“The US just has to ignore any landing and Japan is screwed.”

“Sounds like just the sort of thing Obama would do.”

“Were they to allow this the US forces in Japan would soon be expelled…”

“You don’t think we would ever hear about them agreeing to allow it, do you?”

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Neonie
    Comment by Neonie
    08:51 07/06/2013 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    China wants to put it's big hard ships in Japana's islands. How lewd.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:56 07/06/2013 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Nah, just the tip >.>

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:47 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:08 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    bawk bawk

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't get it.

    Avatar of Powerpuff Loli
    Comment by Powerpuff Loli
    14:26 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just the tip. They say they'll pull out as soon as they come (to an agreement with Japan).

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:40 15/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why would they need to beg they could buy the islands since the US Owe them vast amounts of money.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:24 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    We have been seeing many of these 'authentic' news articles spun from japanese sources. The title of the article itself is childishly written and makes the purpose suspect. They are most likely fabrications or wild embellishments to rile up support for the current PM, seeing as how jap media sucks politican cock the best in the world. The timing of the article coincides with recent reports on setbacks of 'abenomics', so it is very suspect.

    Politics 101: Always deny, playdown, and deflect discontent to external enemies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:18 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just for 3 minutes, just for 3 minutes!

    Comment by Anonymous

    Like the rest of us, it just wants to crossbreed with Japan. Willingly or not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:41 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    It's funny how everyone believe this from a single source....

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:02 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    >Xi Jinping said he would accept “any condition.”
    He can't be this nutty. Can he?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:08 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Sounds like a setup for gay porn.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:08 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You don't know much about China and Chinese "communists", do you?

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:50 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ 11:02:

    It's been a traditional move for governments whose countries are suffering economic problems or political weakness to distract/redirect the thoughts of its people by whipping up nationalism. Sometimes this is done by speechmaking, sometimes this is done by actually starting a war.

    Some examples:

    * Argentina vs the U.K. in the Falklands (aka Los Malvinas) War.

    * The U.S. vs Whomever in the "War on Drugs"

    * The U.S. vs The U.S. and Others in the "War on Terror"

    I didn't say it was a *good* move, or an *effective* move, just that it's a *traditional* move.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:52 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am sure when Sankaku got shutdown the admins can start new religious sect with current user-base as their follower and probably 100times more profitable..

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:52 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sensationalist article from a sensationalist source for the sake of sensationalism? Welcome to the world of generic journalism.

    It works wonders on the massses...

    Kinda like how after 9/11; majority of focus on Patriot Act et al where most news relating to it were pretty much universally "'Murrica! You hate? You're not American! You support terrorists!".

    Now look where that got us and those abroad. Should of gone Ron Paul. Obama isn't that far from Bush.

    Avatar of cats2
    Comment by cats2
    09:03 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.3)

    The U.S. even issued a statement saying they think the islands belong to Japan officially not that long ago..

    But yeah, incoming anti U.S. hate and near retarded Okinawan's protesting them again..

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:36 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    We have been seeing many of these 'authentic' news articles spun from japanese sources. They are most likely fabrications or wild embellishments to rile up support for the current PM. The timing of the article coincides with recent reports on setbacks of 'abenomics', so it is very suspect.

    Politics 101: Alway deny, playdown, and deflect discontent to external enemies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:21 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Politics 102: There is never a guideline that is sufficient in your analysis of the political situation.

    I agree, this stinks of embellishment and campaigning. But aside from that, there are quite a few good examples of foreign policy taking precedence over domestic policy. Consider Nixon's efforts in China, or the Bush and Obama administrations' current stance with China (engagement and rivalry, but not ideological enemies to the bitter death).

    There is much to be pessimistic about. Don't let that blind you from what keeps civilization ticking.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:12 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Okinawans have no valid reasons to hate Japan or America.

    After all, it's not as if retreating Japanese troops massacred thousands of them instead of leaving them to advancing American troops at the end of WWII. It's the honorable death that these Okinawan women and children had always wanted...

    Then, as reparation for the war, these same Japanese gave Okinawan land away to Americans to occupy. So now these ppl that fought their war, on Okinawan land, killing Okinawan people, throws Okinawa around as bargain chips. No hard feelings! :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:16 11/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    As if Okinawans haven't suffered enough under Japanese occupation enough.

    Avatar of kaku
    Comment by kaku
    10:05 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    how would u like Russians come over and occupy Maine to Florida...of course not. bet you will be one of the retards protesting too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:31 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    At least try to make a valid comparison dumb cunt/

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:22 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It IS a valid comparison.

    Avatar of washuotaku
    Comment by washuotaku
    10:24 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not a good example since neither have any relevance to Russia; should have went with Alaska since they once owned it.

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    09:31 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Doesn't* Fucking edit button.

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    09:30 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    The USA never technically owned Okinawa so using Alaska is no better.

    Anyway the Analogy does work well with regards to how an individual state would be kinda pissed if a foreign power had major bases there and the rest of the US told them to suck it up.

    I really wonder if the people saying the analogy does work actually understood the analogy in the first place.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:55 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    dumb bitch. Try harder and at least put something out that is remotely comparable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:41 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    America should leave Okinawa just to watch China take ownership of Senkaku. Watching the retarded looks on their faces would be epic.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:55 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    they'd blame the US for that too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:05 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0) watch china take ownership of japan you mean.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:05 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    no. the japanese sdf is pretty strong compare to the inexperienced, cheap, and generally incompetent chinese navy. this is mostly due to corruption within the navy ranks as well as a general shift of direction toward producing cost effective ships due to armor becoming obsolete in face of thermal nuclear weaponry. most of chinese weapons platform have become increasingly mobile but completely devoid of protection. in a conventional war, chinese navy would likely lose big time.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:27 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)


    Dumb fuck nerd-generaling

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:53 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's a harsh world out there, eh 16:07 ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:07 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)


    Only place SDF is strong is when there is no real battle and in jap fantasy land. Case in point: a member of their 1st airborne brigade (supposedly an 'elite' organization) decided he was going to waltz around Iraq in a flimsy ass truck. He got dragged off like a bitch without even putting up a fight and got beheaded as one of the first japanese killed in Iraq.

    Just 1 lands in iraq and in a real battlefield and gets fucked like a bitch. That's telling.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:15 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    no. the japanese sdf is pretty strong compare to the inexperienced, cheap, and generally incompetent chinese navy

    Ever heard the term "zerg rush"? PLAN outnumbers the SDF navy 5 to 1. You will need far more than better training to sink 5 vessels for every one of your own.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:45 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    A single long range sea surface skimming Sunburn antiship missile that can't be intercepted will sink an aircraft carrier. Chinese cruisers can fire a dozen of them within half a minute.

    SDF ships, while "balanced," doesn't come close in alphastrike.

    Frankly, the Chinese got the right idea. "Defense" is an outdated concept when weapons have became this destructive. Unload as much firepower as conceivable in as short a period as possible, before you're inevitably sunk by a single missile. You're an expendable weapon platform, any ammo not fired before you're fish fodder equals your failure.

    Comment by Anonymous

    You mean we can have cheap shit from Japan once more?! Sure China, here's the keys. Don't forget to lock up.

    Comment by Anonymous

    You notice how things that make japs uncomfortable or insecure always gets downvoted. How many loser japs from 2ch comes here and think that actually 'influences' our opinions?


    Comment by Anonymous
    21:06 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    This wouldn't be too surprising considering 2channers/Japanese has in the past mass downvote and upvote things. However weeaboos and japanophiles have this "adopted" nationalism, so not always neccessarily Japanese.

    But if you think it doesn't affect opinions then you need to learn a bit about Bandwagon Jumping.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:32 07/06/2013 # ! Drivel (-0.7)

    “Just asking was wrong. If America went along with it, they’d lose all support amongst the Japanese people.”

    Ask us if we give a fuck.

    “I rather doubt they would leave. America doesn’t have the guts to attack them anyway.”

    LOL @ this jap. Whose embassy was flattened by our bombs? Whose defectors do we have? Whose blind lawyer activist escaped from lol guards to our embassy in the middle of their capital? Korean war with over 1 million ch n ks dead says otherwise. Anyway, now with technological parity japs wet their panties or have instant menstruation at the mere mention of chinese power.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:55 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Nice sunny weather to bring out the trolls~

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:40 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    lol @ "facts"
    try harder

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:24 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    dude i'm white lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:47 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    12:40 LOL bitch please. Do some research instead of circle jerking with slanty eyes with dental floss for eyes.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Cry harder and go try the downvoting spree. It will help you feel better from being nuclear ass fucked with facts ^^

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:48 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I like how this guy talks like he had anything to do with the above.

    just a troll, ignore 'em.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Same message though. Fuck anti-US crowd thing. Are you not reading or just squealing 'troll'?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:39 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Remember kids, when the US military pulls out, China pulls in.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    09:56 07/06/2013 # ! Good (+0.4)

    The only reason why China has been on reasonable good behavior is because they fear the US military.

    Yes the US government is a troll times but it's still far less of an asshole then the other two major powers in the region.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Does being any less of an arsehole, make any difference?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:11 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Unless there's big enough power difference then yes.

    Why else do you think everyone hates America going around guns blazing playing super hero in other countries?

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    09:33 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    In this case it actually does.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:21 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    China pulls in, they suffer major loses because the Japanese army is actually pretty strong. Even if they win, they leave themselves vulnerable to various countries with a history of military opportunism *cough* US *cough*.

    Avatar of Pyrolight
    Comment by Pyrolight
    09:35 08/06/2013 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    The US would not ever try and invade China considering the cluster fuck Iraq was.

    Too much to lose not much to gain.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:58 09/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Right, not that we ever scaled the walls of beijing and fuked chnks left and right. The picture is still in pentagon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:05 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They should just DP the bitch. Japan can take it, amirite?

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:30 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    We might just go for that. Thanks for the tip.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:39 07/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Remember kids, when it is convenient U.S. will make it really ...
    To get the country out of the financial suffocation nothing more interesting than someone shaking money .......

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments