“Why Does Japan Still Have Housewives?”

kiss_yori_saki_ni_koi_yori_hayaku-asagiri_itsuki-skyfish_0.png

In response to foreigners questioning their considerable backwardness, the Japanese have been pondering why it is so many of their women still aspire to and succeed in becoming housewives when the rest of the world is now enlightened enough to make both man and wife slave away at a workplace equally.

Overseas the more politically correct perceptions of housewives range from them being sad relics of patriarchal oppression to nothing more than workshy NEETs, and in many developed nations girls who aspire to full-time dependency and a large family would be quickly rushed to a career counsellor and given a handful of condoms.

In Japan however, many young women still earnestly aspire to remove themselves from the labour pool as soon as they can find a husband – although most of them evidently decide to forego the trouble of childrearing – and the nation boasts rates of female employment a staggering 4% lower than Germany (64%), and 6% lower than the US (66%).

Despite this love of home life most Japanese men surveyed seem to express a preference for their wives to remain employed, possibly a desire entwined with the peculiar institution of Japanese matrimonial finances, in which the wife receives her husband’s wages and then grants him a suitably small allowance.

An article describing how an unrepresentative sample of random foreigners mostly expressed pity for their archaic state of existence soon had Japanese themselves pondering why it is there are still so many housewives left in Japan, and why women apparently yearn to become them:

“Do they really want to work that much?”

“Overseas women do. They want to be recognised as such, unlike the ones in Japan.”

“Actually, doesn’t this have more to do with them not having any money for themselves if they don’t work? Only Japan has the custom of having the wife control the household’s finances completely.”

“Fewer housewives is sure to mean more divorces. If you have money and a job why would you put up with an annoying husband? You can live as you like.”

“I want to be a stay at home husband. I want to raise kids!”

“I don’t think I could stand all the lunch time chats with local mamas…”

“Who cares about that, spending time with my kids is what I want. It’s a shame I was born a man, paternity leave notwithstanding.”

“Don’t worry about it. In Tokyo there are loads of single mothers and fathers too. Part time worker house husbands are common as well.

“Try reading the blogs of some housewives – they really don’t get it at all. They complain about how hard it is as a housewife when they spend all day playing games, and then complain about husbands not doing an equal share of the chores despite them being housewives…”

“That’s not a housewife, that’s a NEET. If she’s a housewife she does all the chores and childrearing and he goes to work. There’s no need to for him to do chores.”

“Some idiots don’t grasp this. If you argue about it you’ll be accused of being out of step with the times or abusing your spouse.”

“I do it full time! It’s fun and I’m happy, my kids are cute and I always did enjoy housework and cooking.”

“I’m so envious of you…”

“With sacking people getting easier and easier in Japan, being a housewife is way too risky. The guy serving your ramen could have been working at a bank before he got sacked you know.”

“I used to be in charge of a department at a small magazine, and now I get turned down at the interview for a part time manual labour job at a warehouse…”

“All those girls at elementary school who were saying ‘in the future I want to get married and become a housewife!’ were basically just saying they never wanted to work, weren’t they?”

“But now more young women want to become housewives. It’s a good thing.”

“Is it really? Rather than have kids and make a family with two working parents, the ones who hope to become housewives just hang on and wait, so the average age of marriage gets even higher and the birth rate even lower. And they certainly seem to refuse to lower their expectations even when they are just looking to become dependants.”

“I really do not get all these women who graduate from university with the earnest desire to become housewives. What a waste of our taxes…”

“Right, and there are ones from Toudai and places who end up as housewives…”

“A UK think tank was saying 4 years ago that if Japanese housewives would actually work Japan’s GDP would increase 30%!”

“In the midst of deflation and high unemployment, do you think increases in the amount of labour are going to increase GDP?”

“A woman’s place is in the home. I think this is wisdom the human race has developed over thousands of years.”

“More like in a few tens of years in the case of full-time housewives.”

“At least from the Meiji period?”

“What? I thought all those women were out working in the fields, in factories, and in households?”

“Only the top aristocrats and merchants could ever afford to support housewives.”

“So, isn’t it really just the case that all these foreigners are just too poor to afford to keep a wife?”

“And jealous, no doubt.”

“Japs live different lives according to the gender of their birth. We can never hope to emulate the white masters.

“I think what you people mean is that these days nobody anywhere can afford to support a wife. Japan is just finding that out at present.”

“No way. Housewives are basically a post-war phenomenon in Japan. We never had them before and we’ve only had them for a few decades.”

“A woman working in a rice field can after all carry her infant on her back. Even now, in Touhoku and the like there are families with two breadwinners, and only in the cities can you find loads of housewives.”

“The real reason Japanese women are so keen on becoming housewives is because in Japan it is normal that ‘the woman controls the purse strings’ after marriage.

Overseas it is taken for granted that the man controls the family finances. A housewife who doesn’t work won’t have a penny of her own to spend, so naturally she wants to work herself.

I’d like to see the people who write these articles about Japanese women see how bizarre people overseas think it is for Japanese men to hand all their wages over to their wife every month and then be given an allowance of a few hundred dollars to spend themselves.”

“But wives do such a good job managing the money, I think it is a good thing.”

“Japanese housewives press a button on a rice cooker to make their husband’s bento, enjoy lunch at a family restaurant, then press another button on a washing machine, set the Roomba going and then go out and enjoy themselves. No wonder Japanese women want to become housewives.

Women overseas who aren’t really aware of just how pampered these women are and think more in terms of gender equality are left wondering why they aren’t more keen on working and buying things themselves…”

“Hardly surprising when Japanese housewives get all their husband’s money to use as they see fit. Elsewhere they’d just get something to cover their expenses.”


    Post Comment »
    254 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Conduit
    Comment by Conduit
    18:58 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    If you want to raise and family and be a stay at home mother for that purpose, its a perfectly valid life choice in my opinion.

    However these women who want to be housewives but have no desire to have children, are just lazy bitches leeching off of society.

    Or to put it another way, raising a family is a productive endeavor, sitting on the couch watching soaps all day, is not.

    Avatar of Kouma
    Comment by Kouma
    19:41 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Agreed. I think being a housewife is great when work is actually being done and children are actually being raised. Otherwise, it's just freeloading.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Wow! You got deownvoted for saying that? It must be the truth.

    Avatar of Kouma
    Comment by Kouma
    19:41 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agreed. I think being a housewife is great when work is actually being done and children are actually being raised. Otherwise, it's just freeloading.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    22:51 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Agreed if one parent wants to stay at home they should run the home and raise the kids.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:15 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Being a housewife is no excuse for lazing around on the couch eating chips while watching TV the whole day.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    23:34 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course not that's as bad as being an absent parent without the benefit of bringing in extra money.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:16 27/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think things will even themselves out eventually. Keep eating those chips and you'll turn ugly. And nobody likes ugly bitches.

    Avatar of takarada
    Comment by takarada
    18:58 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.7)

    They get to keep their husbands salary, of course they don't want to work.

    Avatar of God
    Comment by God
    20:56 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Feminism is actually a brain-washing conspiracy of the big corporations to have more and cheaper labor available. Spread the word. Don't tell where you heard of this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:32 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Plus, if she's not at home all day as a housewife, how will she ever have the time to get pressured into sex by her husband's boss?

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:31 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    milk man

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:45 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    It in Japan's case the Ramen man that comes around every night.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:17 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Tofu driver, Bunta comes to your house to service your wife.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:02 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Because they are the perfect targets for NTR anime/manga.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:25 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Your child is the messiah!"

    Poor Joseph!

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:45 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Fact: The husband being a carpenter increases chance of housewife birthing a messiah.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:22 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Poor farmers have high chance of being offered 2nd hand goods.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Being a Jew increases chance of finding unleavened bread lying randomly on the ground.

    Avatar of Benoist
    Comment by Benoist
    18:57 31/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    it wasn't his son, to begin with

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:25 22/03/2013 # ! Drivel (-0.8)

    "Your child is the messiah!"

    Poor Joseph!

    Avatar of McSquid
    Comment by McSquid
    19:05 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    "Overseas it is taken for granted that the man controls the family finances."

    Clearly, this person doesn't know what s/he's talking about.

    Comment by Anonymous

    >letting a woman control your bank account

    nope.avi

    Bitch don't need 100 pairs of shoes.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    23:39 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Welcome to the consumer culture and that's just one aspect of it.

    No one really needs a $300,000 3500 sq feet home, a 60" tv, or a $40,000 SUV either but we're told we need these things to be happy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:57 24/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Screw consumer culture. None of those things interest me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:53 30/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    300,000 MAY buy you a 1200 sq ft home in the bay area of california (or any other desirable metropolitan area where there are JOBS).

    Comment by Dark Mage
    23:44 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    No he doesn't In Asia it is common for the wife to control finances apparently this is also true in Russia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:55 24/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, I've been hearing stuff like that too. Don't know how true it is, though.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:38 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Around here the person earning the money is usually the one in control of it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:32 24/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Over here, shared bank accounts are common. So both.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:54 26/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah everyone knows man controls nothing in the household. He is controlled by the woman. After divorce she can get everything he had. Even make him support her after divorce with alimony. I believ it is right if the guy dose something bad to her, but if he did nothing wrong than it is just exploitation of the man.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:08 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    To me the weird thing about being a housewife are some of the women who are fully educated and go straight to being one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:25 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    So what ? I don't see that weird. They trade off their education for a family. Some of them may find happy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:35 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why'd they bother getting a degree in some specialization they'd never use, then? You don't need to shell out thousands of dollars in college tuition just to be educated enough to "know things".

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:12 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thing is, higher education only educates you enough to not be a complete beginner anymore. Instead you become a fresh graduate, ready for training on-the-job as a readily-exploited intern.

    Quite a few women, even if they find a matching job for their diploma, end up finding a guy and giving birth and then falling into the housewife routine.

    What I'm saying is, don't put so much weight on a university degree. It's just a paper that certifies that you've passed some formal criteria in an environment that trains you to do exactly that.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Yea, they waste money getting that education just to throw it away. Makes sense. Idiot.

    Avatar of Actar
    Comment by Actar
    21:04 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't understand why so many people find this bizarre. As a degree is necessary for most jobs, many of us get a degree just as a fall-back, in case the things that we truly want to do fail.

    If a girl can't find a husband or start a family, she still has her education and can provide for herself until she can settle down. (This can apply to men as well.)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:34 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    The benefit of education is not limited to just working a deskjob, idiot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:31 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Like if education was a big deal anyway. It's wasted anyway.
    Most successful guys had shit education but they were smart individuals and managed to reach the top and right now most of the well educated fresh of college people are going back to flipping burgers.
    "Wasting education is such a sin" that's fucking retarded.
    Investing time on the family, actually caring about the kid's future insted of expecting the media to raise them. That's not a fucking waste of time.
    Maybe if they did that more in Ameria they wouldn't have such fucked up new generations that clearly had 0 good parenting and not all the education in the world will make up for it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:06 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hows that liberal arts degree working out for ya? heh

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:56 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "So what ? I don't see that weird. They trade off their education for a family. Some of them may find happy."

    The world needs less families. And not using your education to use is just.. dumb.

    "The benefit of education is not limited to just working a deskjob, idiot"

    But the benefit of education is not limited to not using it, idiot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:13 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They do that to hook rich men in Cancun. Not kidding either. I know a few successful birds that vacation down there and they all say the college girls vacationing there only do do to try hooking a rich guy. The degree is just an excuse to go on vacation and pretend they're on equal footing with the rich dudes they try landing before becoming trophy wives.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:11 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    There's nothing wrong with a woman being a housewife.

    I actually think a lot of western families would be better off the woman stayed home to take care of the kids than leaving the children in daycare while they have a career.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:27 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    as staeted thou unless the guy makes a shit ton no one has the cash for it anymore. and if you tryed to give guys higher pay the gender equality people would come out the wood work and scream blue murder...

    its just a part of out society that has changed and now it seems odd when we see it else where that or we try to pine after the "good" old days...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:50 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    You were doing so well with the first part!

    There's absolutely nothing wrong with being a housewife. It is a person's prerogative to choose how he or she lives his or her life.

    But the second part? It is not the woman's burden to stay at home. Additionally, a man can can just as easily take care of the children while the woman brings home bread. It's a case by case basis bro.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:17 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    >>There's nothing wrong with a woman being a housewife.

    Every job that is gendre-specific (or almost like that) is wrong on some level. Well, not the job per se, but the social reality of those jobs.

    It's not right that there are no females on fighting roles in the military as well as that there are practically no female CEOs (at least in my country, G8 material).

    Comment by Anonymous

    Go watch Anita Sarkeesian's video, then watch others' response videos and you will regret standing up for what you are now saying.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:36 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    That bitch is a grade A fraud, I don't have one feminist friend who doesn't hate her self absorbed pop culture expert shit smelling mouth.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-04
    21:20 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    A job that is gender specific is a job, that either most women or most men don't want to do.

    Most guys don't want to be a nurse, hence the majority of nurses is female.

    Most girls don't want to become an engineer, hence the majority of engineers is male.

    If people don't have the freedom to choose what they want, but need to find a job that pays their bills... things change.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:23 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    When our soldiers are held captive & raped senseless, will you feel the same, I wonder...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:34 23/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.6)

    You do have a point, but we don't have any large scale conflicts between big armies any more. The realities of asymmetric warfare make the capture of an allied soldier incredibly unlikely compared to past times, and when it happens, there are large amounts of resources available and also actually put to use on rescuing them.

    Doesn't seem to bother the Israelis anyway (nearly 50/50 male/female cannon fodder and officers), and they run one of the most effective and efficient fighting forces on the globe...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:25 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Except you forget that Israel is extremely reluctant to let their female soldiers near combat situations due to repeated evidence that it actually makes the enemy fight harder (Muslim men don't want to be beaten by women) and makes nearby soldiers take unnecessary risks for the purpose of being a man in front of a woman.

    These is aside from my personal belief that War should be solely between men. The slaughter of women is abhorrent in every way. Men were made to die.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:09 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon 10:25, your information is not very up-to-date (as are the interpretations of the "evidence" you mentioned). It slowly began to change after an amendment to the military service law in 2001, and by now it's still a consideration during tactical planning within a unit, but there's no real reluctance left in general. Heck, there's an (almost) all-female infantry battalion. It's true that as of now only 7% of all women in the IDF are primarily front-line infantry soldiers, but that number is rising. Since the Segev Committee, the IDF is aiming for 50%.

    I feel your concerns from the 2nd paragraph. But the only conceivable war still left to be fought that could entail slaughter of women on the battlefield is against North Korea. Other than that, as I said, the only combat opponents still left on this planet are bearded muslims, Black African militia men, and warriors from obscure Asian ethnicities. Israel is a special case as it's the only highly developed country in such a situation, but of course it would be a bad idea for the military of other countries engaged in such a conflict on their own soil to employ women in front line service. Mainly because they're underdeveloped though, which is the reason for their troubles in the first place. Intervening forces from the highly advanced armies of the G8 though are nowhere near as affected.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:13 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I need to make a correction here:

    only 7% of all women in the IDF are primarily front-line infantry soldiers

    That of course was supposed to be "only 7% of all front-line infantry soldiers in the IDF are women". Important difference...

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:48 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    10:25

    You're one of the biggest idiots and sexists I've seen around here. Neither were men made to die nor is the killing of female soldiers in war worse than killing a male soldier.
    All killing is equally bad or equally justified. If a female soldier is trying to shoot you and you let her just cause she is a female you deserve to die.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:23 27/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    In Defense of 10:25

    Have you tried fucking a male soldier? No? Case closed. Women are better than men because they have pussies. And we need those pussies.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:15 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Househusbands are not unheard of. It's not gender specific.

    Anyway, women usually have better affinity with their kids which makes them better suited as caretakers. There is nothing wrong in making a objective choice if said choice is gender biased. It's simply unreasonable.

    This kind of attitude is exactly what's wrong with neo-feminism. You can't force true equality on people when their natural aptitudes differ. Next thing you know, we'd have to start letting fatties into the Olympics because it's discriminating to only pick fit people.

    It's not right that there are no females on fighting roles in the military as well as that there are practically no female CEOs

    Women aren't put in fighting roles out of practical reason. Do you know what happens to women captured as PoWs? They get tortured and raped. Usually at the same time. That's bad both for PR and morale.

    As for CEOs, well, I don't mean to sound like a supremacist or anything, but common male personality traits tend to be rather advantageous in highly competitive and stressful environments. Testosterone is kind of useful when you are swimming in the shark pool as a morning exercise.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:23 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you saying men who want to stay home and bond with their children shouldn't be allowed to just because it's not in the "natural aptitude" of most men?

    Even if people tend to fall along gender roles (which yes, sometimes they do), all people are different. Some men do have what would be considered a "motherly instinct" and they want to play with their kids. Some women are highly competitive, ambitious, cutthroat and good at dealing with stress. You can't pigeonhole the exceptions to their gender based on the traditional or even current trends.

    Let people do what they want. As a man, your "natural aptitude" should be working in the fields doing physical labor, but that doesn't mean you HAVE to.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:37 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you saying men who want to stay home and bond with their children shouldn't be allowed to just because it's not in the "natural aptitude" of most men?

    No. Nice strawman through.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Women aren't put in fighting roles out of practical reason. Do you know what happens to women captured as PoWs? They get tortured and raped. Usually at the same time. That's bad both for PR and morale.

    May I take the liberty to refer you to my other comment @ 00:34 23/03/2013 #comment-1271460? Also, the only recent well-documented cases where female soldiers have been taken PoW had their captors acting more like they were afraid of them than anything else.

    Most (all?) armies in the G8 (including Japan) employ women in active fighting roles. Even so, female soldiers in the west have more to fear from their male comrades than the enemy. Especially true for the US armed forces.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:01 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    May I take the liberty to refer you to my other comment @ 00:34 23/03/2013 #comment-1271460? Also, the only recent well-documented cases where female soldiers have been taken PoW had their captors acting more like they were afraid of them than anything else.

    Oh, really? Why don't you tell that to Rhonda Cornum?

    There hasn't been much wartime rape on civilian populations either. There are simply not enough opportunities for that to happen. I wouldn't draw any conclusions on the lack of evidence, considering women have never participated in a severe and prolonged large scale conflict.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:23 27/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh, really? Why don't you tell that to Rhonda Cornum?

    Funny that you should mention that case, because it IS one of those well-documented ones where the captors where indeed acting more afraid of her than anything else. I suggest you read her book, or at least anything more informative than her wikipedia entry.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 27/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    23:23 here, I forgot to add:

    There are simply not enough opportunities for that to happen.

    Exactly my point.

    women have never participated in a severe and prolonged large scale conflict

    Which also won't happen anymore. Maybe with the exception of North Korea, but I'm actually just as afraid of how WE will deal with THEIR frontline women soldiers. Having women throughout all branches and roles in the military could help a great deal to alleviate the potential issues.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:46 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    My mother chose to be one. She chose to raise me fully rather than become too busy to take care of me.

    Avatar of Ragefat
    Comment by Ragefat
    22:20 22/03/2013 # ! Good (+0.7)

    And now you're on Sankaku, she did such a nice job...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:16 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol you made my day,i was raised by my distant mother and crazy aunt which abused throughout my childhood because she hated my father with the unspoken approval of my mother,it was horrible,the only support i had were my two uncles and a few friends who knew my situation

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:57 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why can't you do both? My parents both worked and raised me. My mother stayed with me until I was old enough to go to school and then got a job. She didn't want to have a second child without a dual income so when my sister was born, she had enough savings to stay home from work until my sister started school. Both my parents worked during school hours and then picked me up from school. If there are two parents, I don't think it should be all that difficult. At the very least, get a part time job.

    Comment by Taylor
    04:01 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    Comment of the week.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:19 27/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    You should have banged your aunt.

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    23:00 22/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    My mother raised me and my brother and sisters while we were growing up. She would work also, leaving us in the care of the neighborhood women she trusted.

    Life was tough, but we got by.... with a little help from our friends. And vice versa. ^_-

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:16 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    But what if the neighborhood woman also worked?

    Comment by Anonymous

    My sentiment, exactly. Someone have to keep the house tidy and clean, and keep eyes on the kids development..

    I rather have my wife doing it than some stranger like a nanny that may or may not give a damn about me and my family condition.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:20 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    i'd rather have me do it, and the wife can go work...

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:20 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    The west's ideal life is to let the school and the TV take care of the children, eat fast food or frozen food and work hard all day to have money to waste on expensive garbage and then let the kids go die in useless wars when they are 18.
    God bless our glorious nation.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:15 25/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    dont forget daycare from when the kid is 1-2 years old until they start school(here in the nordic countries)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:54 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree. It's distressing when I realize how many of my friends barely talk to their parents because they grew up with little interaction with them.

    I don't know if it has to be the woman; I think just have a parent be a full-time caretaker would be beneficial. Though there HAVE been interesting studies/discussions as to why women may be more suited in general, I'm sure that just as in anything else it comes down to the individual.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:19 23/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "I actually think a lot of western families would be better off the woman stayed home to take care of the kids than leaving the children in daycare while they have a career."

    Got any proof to support that?

    Comment by Anonymous

    why would you need proof for something that obvious?.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:10 26/03/2013 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Because it's false. The earth being flat was very obvious to people too.

    Every halfway reputable social scientist and education researcher knows that the daycare < full-time family care argument is complete and utter bull.








    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments