Battle of 2D vs 3D Fiercer Than Ever

Raven, I was thinking something, then I read your post, then I felt like I completely agreed with what you said.

It's not really a debate since every time one of these articles is posted the vast majority think 3D is better.

Even with a superior artist, it's almost impossible to ignore the genuine beauty of a real living, breathing, girl.

Nods...
There is some great 3D photography and some very good 2D artwork based from it... some of it, not-so-good in my opinion.

But, we the ISSUE to get back too is a choice for relationship. An ugly person or drawing is not attractive.

There maybe a 0.1~0.0001% chance you'll have sex and have a relationship with a 3D person in the photograph. You bump into her, she digs you etc etc.

There is a 0.0% of having a relationship with a drawing. No matter what she says... in your head.

2D never ages, won't get stretch marks, won't nag, won't bitch and is always there for your sexual fantasies.

But by golly, I do like a warm wet pussy for my fingers to play with.

There is nothing really philosophical about it.

Let's be real for a minute. Usually the guys who go on and on about 2D being better than "3D pigs" think that they are somehow hurting real women by saying so. They are lashing out and think that the girls who might be reading might actually give a damn, when the reality is that it's rare to find a person, male or female, who would feel inferior to a drawing.

Usually it's guys who have been burned by women who can't get over it, or it's guys who think that they are entitled to the perfect girl while putting no effort into making themselves a great guy.

You'll very rarely find a well-adjusted male who would prefer 2D to 3D. If I showed you a beautiful girl with a great personality who was interested in you, and let you choose between her and a drawing of said girl, you'd have to have serious issues if you chose the drawing.

If you want to compare, compare originals from both. Fake 2D can't win, but real 2D stands a chance. Why not compare 2D with 3D cosplays of the same image, then 2D will surely win

This is the first time where I think that 3D wins the majority of the comparisons. 2D has some strong wins like with #48, but I think that the ones like #3 for 3D are just better bases than their derivatives.

In terms of rarity, there are many ways and millions of great artists who can turn up great beauty in character design.

While in reality, you need to have been born with the right DNA and had the right lifestyle and the right life choices to be so well featured as a beautiful model and such, or even have the skills to get the right costume/clothing/cosplay.

Beauty is amazing in all their forms, but in terms of rarity, it has to be with real life.

you would asume that would speak for it self. that people know that difference.

Horrific like this one http://img3.sankakustatic.com/wp-content/gallery/misc-ero-xii/2ch-makes-3d-moe-5-036.jpg

As I understand it, it is supposed to prove that 2D can make a 3D image look better, but they have yet to prove that point even with all of the artistic liberties they take.

Some of the 2D I like better than the 3D, just because I don't like the source image, but for most I'm indifferent or leaning towards 3D. That leads me to believe their point would be easier to make with less worthy source material, but lets me respect them for not choosing the easy way out.

Ikr. 2ch needs some better artists, I can imagine better 2D drawing than that.
The photography though is amazing.

Bridget fan in denial of real reason WHY he's a Bridget fan!

Because if Bridget was 3D, someone would eventually bring up Implants... and it would fit in the concept/backstory.

either they are clueless or its just artistic expression.

Moral story, you cannot fuck 2D !

its funny when u think about it, if u're here, then the chances of u banging any of them(2D or 3D) are o%

well, guess that includes me too