Brother Rapes Imouto 22 Times, Imouto Pleads For Leniency


A brother who raped his little sister 22 times has been spared the maximum sentence by his own sister’s plea for leniency.

The incident occurred in Taiwan’s Miaoli county, where a 19-year-old youth was found to have regularly raped his little sister, in the 6th year of elementary school, a total of 22 times over a 6 month period.

His crimes were supposedly prompted by him watching pornographic films, after which he would assault his sister as she bathed or slept.

As their parents were rarely home as a result of their jobs, it took some time for his conduct to come to light. His sister bore his attentions rather than report him.

After his arrest and conviction for multiple counts of rape, his little sister reportedly asked the court for leniency in sentencing:

“I want you to give my brother the chance to make a fresh start in life!”

This, coupled with his apparent strong remorse and the further intercession of his mother, caused the judge to sentence him to 8 years in prison rather than the 10 years the prosecution sought.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Morgadeth
    Comment by Morgadeth
    15:43 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Bet the parents are going to give this a stern ignoring.

    Avatar of War Hawk
    Comment by War Hawk
    17:28 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Let's hope that will not happen..

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:49 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Naaa Incest happen all the time. Even here I slept with my cousin last month she doesn't talk about our secret in her own family. So guys why don't you try it?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:13 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    @ Frost_Byte
    You such a spoilsport,
    No it won't I use a condom I'm not that stupid if she get pregnant then I'm screwed!

    Avatar of Diemeow23
    Comment by Diemeow23
    20:33 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)


    Yeah your right, I also don't think of incest as THAT bad of a thing, in fact a little tear jerking when I saw it from Yosuga no Sora Royal families have done it dozens of times(what makes you think "keeping the royal bloodline intact" mean) but when I sit down the table and watch everyone around me I go "Nahhh! not gonna happen"

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:00 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Well going for a first cousin gives you something like a 3% increase of genetic problems for the baseline of 3%.
    So about 6% chance, compared to like 8 or 9 from having a kid when you're over 35...doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Anyways, isn't our society supposed to believe love conquers all or something? ^^;

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:36 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.8)

    Incest is not rape.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:57 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.8)

    I already have years ago with my cousin as well although she was the one who came onto me. Best sex ever.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:01 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Frost Byte, you wouldn't damage your genes and bloodline. The fact is that unless you have a genetic disorder that runs IN YOUR ETHNIC GROUP, having children with a brother or sister will do NOTHING to make it more or less likely that you will pass that genetic condition down to your children or a genetic condition will suddenly 'pop up'.

    In fact, some people who are very knowledgeable in this have said that picking a random stranger to have a child with is more likely to have you have a child with a genetic disorder than picking a brother or sister to have a child with.... hell, even a father or mother, aunt or uncle!

    Avatar of Achiuakuna
    Comment by Achiuakuna
    19:50 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Anon, you lucky lucky man.
    All my cousins are male.

    Avatar of War Hawk
    Comment by War Hawk
    18:27 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)


    Well, actually I don't actually see incest as really something bad, I mean, if that's what people want they can have it right?

    It's just that I only see my family and relatives as well, family and relatives.. that's all..

    And for all the genes and stuffs.. I just heard a lot of it from my families and wikipedia. So I just got too stuck up on that just now, sorry..

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:58 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I have no interest in family. I can never see them as anyone else but family.

    Comment by Dark Mage
    03:48 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @ anon 18:37 It's not incest if it's with a cousin.
    For some reason I can see some hillbilly in Georgia or Alabama saying that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:05 26/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    LOL even animals have behavioral patterns that prevent them from inbreeding in the wild. On top of that your
    @Anonymous 20:00
    Your so called research is full of shit. Fucking moron..This is why I don't work with the general public so your all a bunch of morons. I do genetic research at my Uni...and can tell you have no fucking clue as to what you are talking about lol

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:57 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.1)

    its not incest if its with cousin

    Avatar of War Hawk
    Comment by War Hawk
    17:52 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.1)

    No thanks. I don't want to shame my family and damage my genes and bloodline.

    And by the way, it's only a matter of time before your secrets get discovered..

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @20:34 What are you allergic to vagina?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:24 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    i had sex with my sister when i was about 15 (she was 17) nothign to be ashamed of.
    we did it from time to time for about 5 years, till she got a boyfriend,then we got kind of separated...and then time passed.
    I still see her when it's our parents' birthday and in some special ocations, We both remember and live our lifes normaly.
    our parents never knew about it though, and as it was (and still is) seen as a bad thing and all the shit they say, we told noone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:32 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have some pretty hot cousins. They're only cousins by marriage though. Does that still count?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:49 26/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    One interesting finding recently was that just as inbreeding can increase chances of genetic defects, it also increases chances of passing on good genes as well.

    Avatar of War Hawk
    Comment by War Hawk
    18:11 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)


    Heard of inbreeding before? That is the main reason of genetic damage. This has a high chance if you're mating with someone who's related to you..

    But still, what you're saying is partly true though..

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:34 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    ewww...I had my cousin want me to take her virginity, no thanks. Thou that was still better than the two mentally unstable daughters of my parent's churchy friend, who fondled & practically tried to rape me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:00 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Anonymous 18:01

    I'm glad to actually read something by someone who knows what he/she is talking about. This is entirely true and I studied about birth defects in college in which I found out that all of those so called scientists claiming genetic defects in babies born of incest were full of BS. I wish people would call out all of those lying bastards about their pseudo science and stop them from spreading their false claims.

    PS. Incest is only a religious issue and a choice that should never be forced on someone for or against since just like being gay there is nothing wrong with it and I believe people have the right to choose who they love. I wouldn't do it myself since my sister is a bitch and I can't even comprehend my mom like that but different people are different and have different families.

    PPS. I like that they actually bring up the subject in anime without all of that BS pejudice that comes along with any mention of incest in the west. Before religion outlawed incest there were no real problems with it and with some royalty it was encouraged.

    Avatar of War Hawk
    Comment by War Hawk
    20:44 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)


    Dang man.. you'd really have to be careful around with those daughters of your parent's friend.. like you said I'd prefer to be in company with my cousin pestering me to have sex with her rather than psychos wanting to rape me o_o


    Yeap. It's just a matter of love and whom you're comfortable with. If I have to choose to be forced to marry with a girl I don't really like or marry my sister whom I truly love, I'll choose to go for my sister.

    But like how you think about it.. it's never gonna happen!! LoL (plus, I don't have a sister.. so 0% chance of incest xD)

    Btw, I watched that Anime before.. I am honestly surprised that there's a sex scene there.. though it's censored o.O But overall it's good, though I never got the chance to finish watching the entire episode :\

    SoraxHaruka FTW!!! xD

    Avatar of Pyrus
    Comment by Pyrus
    21:14 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    In case anyone has forgotten, if a particularly bad recessive gene is possessed by one family member, then chances are it is possessed by other family members as well:
    1. If you're doing your sibling, both of you may have that recessive gene from whichever parent & give it to any "accidental" children.
    2. If you're doing a 1st cousin, each of you has 1 parent that is a sibling of the other's parent & both parents may have that recessive gene from their mother or father and gave it to you & your cousin.
    3. Same thing with doing aunts & uncles, nieces & nephews.
    I imagine that the more removed in relation you are, the less likely both you will have the recessive gene, but the chance is still probably high enough that you should take extra care not to have any kids with the grandchildren of your parents' aunts & uncles.
    Unless of course, you like having albinos, hemophiliacs, color-blinds, and whatever else as future family members. Just ask European royalty. They haven't started marrying outside the royal family circles for nothing.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    19:52 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I've found that in a lot of asian happens quite a lot (which is why we can't believe their sexual assault statistics).

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:27 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    agreed, they simply have a lot on unreported cases.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:03 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.9)

    His Little Sister Can Be That Cute.

    Avatar of PonySlaystation
    Comment by PonySlaystation
    21:12 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    My little sister can't be that lenient...

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:17 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.8)

    HA! Good one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:01 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    hmm it seems the little sister enjoyed that :)

    Avatar of Noodlestein
    Comment by Noodlestein
    20:54 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.4)

    So remorseful that he did it 21 more times.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:56 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.9)

    My little sister can't be this cute.

    Avatar of Ota-Kool
    Comment by Ota-Kool
    18:28 23/10/2011 # ! Quality (+0.9)

    My little sister can't be this good at sex?

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:55 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    She is. I can vouch for that. ;)

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:14 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    Because people don't mind there own fucking business when nobody is complaining.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:05 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    He didn't do anything wrong. Why he must go to jail just for having a good time?

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @23:25 Ironic you spelt intelligence wrong.

    Comment by flood
    00:17 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    *indian accent↓
    He raped her 22 times before the cops got him.

    Somebody's gonna getta hurt real bad.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:14 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.1)

    My little sankaku can't be this creepy.
    lol who am i kidding

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:02 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh crapped I just turned the last flag on my imoutou route now

    Avatar of a lolicon
    Comment by a lolicon
    00:36 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @xxxfl0od3rxxx Russell Peters = win.

    Comment by Anonymous

    @21:05 because he raped her little sister. That's incest, and it's illegal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:25 23/10/2011 # ! Drivel (-0.8)

    I hope you tards are kidding....but knowing the general interlligence of this lot; chances are you just got out of the closet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:35 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    He went to jail probably to not provide enough orgams to the sister. How old she was anyway?

    Avatar of Heigen
    Comment by Heigen
    01:26 24/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    22 times sounds more like an relationship more than rape.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:57 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yes sir, a lovely, lovely relationship. Am I the only one jealous? Mhh hmm just imagine that little fresh and virgin body makes me tremble in excitement.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:49 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You mean you don't do your GF in the bath? Oh, who am I kidding, this is sankaku, I shouldn't expect people to understand what real lovers do.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:09 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    When she was bathing and sleeping.....yeah

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:44 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.9)

    Raped her or had statutory rape sex with her? Which was it? Personally, I believe that if she pleaded for leniency on him, it was the latter.

    This is the EXACT reason why I say that the statutory rape laws need to go, they are NOT being used to protect children, they are being used to force conservative sexual morality on the children in question.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:25 23/10/2011 # ! Good (+0.7)

    I agree. What's worse is hearing about 18 years olds getting fucked over for being with a 16-17 year old. Yet when an 18 year old is with a 40-60 year old nobody gives a fuck. I have never agreed with these imaginary lines we draw in the sand. It's bullshit. Even when the case here is some 11-12 year old with a 19 year old. I've had a 12 year old ask me to fuck her, using those actual words to me, when I was 17 but I didn't. People know what they want and don't want.

    Avatar of Pyrus
    Comment by Pyrus
    21:57 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    It's not bullshit when the under 18 girl is stuck with a baby while still in school & the 18/19 year old guy can't and/or won't help raise the baby.
    Then you have the parents wanting an abortion or putting the child up for adoption (if the girl wants the baby) or wanting to make the girl raise the baby as punishment (if the girl wants an abortion). Some parents will even kick the girl out the house or push her off on friends or relatives if they can.
    The basic intent was that people shouldn't be having sex (or having babies or catching/spreading diseases) until they are capable of handling the consequences. In most modern societies, people often assume once you're 18, you should be capable. It ain't always true, some people are responsible enough not to get pregnant (or get anyone pregnant) or diseased (or spread disease) before they turn 18, but many clearly aren't (their bodies are ready but their minds aren't). Some full grown "adults" aren't either. But society isn't always going to take the time to look at each individual and test to see who is ready & who isn't. Society will pick what they consider a safe point & judge all by that point even when it might not fit as a method of prevention or damage control.
    This is way too long...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:29 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    No, there aren't. A lot of adults like to believe that they are 'better able to make decisions' than children, but that is bullplop if you consider an adult in a situation she/he has never been in before compared to a child in a situation she/he has never been in before.

    To be blunt, the ONLY time that society should intervene is when someone is in PHYSICAL DANGER.... that's it, child, teenager or adult.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:28 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Very agree. Despite how independent people may want to feel in their youth, there are certain decisions that need still need to be made for them, and it's the responsibility of those who better understand the consequences to prevent them from doing things that will sabotage their own lives. Seriously, just look back at your childhood and try and remember all the retarded things you wanted to do that could have/did fuck you royally in the end.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:00 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Bullshit. Everyone old enough to find a job is old enough to support a family. Sure, it won't be an 8 to 6 desk job, but it's quite possible.
    And even if a girl gets pregnant while not able to raise the child, she can always choose to abort. Her parents shouldn't have a say in it under any reasonable law.

    As for STDs, schools teach about those by the time teenagers gain significant interest in sex. "They are too stupid to protect themselves" is no excuse to treat them like incapable morons. The later is far more harmful to the developing mind than moral crusaders like to believe.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:44 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anyone who thinks the age of consent laws need to be removed are not seeing the big picture here. It's true, teen pregnancy and STDs is a huge problem, especially in the United States.

    In addition to what previous anonymous have said, I'd like to point out that you may feel like you are properly educated and smart enough to make wise decisions before age 18, but take a look around you. Would you trust even half of the dumb-asses you went to high school with to wear a condom and do the right thing? I wouldn't. Once they're 18 the police can start putting fools in butt-fucking prison.

    I hate the government stepping in and telling people how to be parents, but that is a problem, most parents don't know what the hell they're doing so their kids run around fucking unprotected. So society had to step up and make a law to be parents for them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:49 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The better way of enforcing this (instead of jailing two concending lovers) is education. Teach the conciquences of sex, ie diseases, babies, and so on. I dont care what anyone says, a proper educated 14 year old can concent to sex.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:50 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anonymous 23:59 24/10/2011, I am. The fact is that you should be able to do anything with a child that the child in question, no matter what the age, as long as they are able to say "Yes" or "No".

    By 2, all children have that ability in spades. I know many children who tell their parents "NO!" just because it is a new word to them on a regular basis for everything at that age.

    Simply put, as I said: IF WE WEREN'T MEANT TO HAVE SEX FROM BIRTH, nature would have made us without genitals until the age of 13-18.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:59 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why not a 3 year old then? You people are either stupid to think a child is as wise as you (even in the most unfamiliar situations) or you are just as unwise and ignorant as a child. Either way, I'm glad the world does not listen to you or care about you.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Who the hell said you should be allowed to fuck a three year old? No one was making that arguement.

    I bet your one of those people that think somone of 16 years, isnt capeible of concending to sex. That you magicly become able to, when you turn 18. Why not? Asshole.

    Avatar of Blue Slime
    Comment by Blue Slime
    00:40 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Statutory rape laws are there to deter adults from taking advantage of children who don't fully understand the risks and consequences,and/or haven't been sexually developed long enough to be in control of their urges.

    Just because we have crazy penalties for minors to have sex with each other doesn't mean the core pretense of "children and teenagers are easier to manipulate and less able to cope with being used as a sex toy" is false.

    What I think we DO need is much lower penalties when the "culprit" is still young enough to count as a statutory "victim" themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:08 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Statutory rape laws have insane age limits. I can understand them for incredibly young children, but at the age of 13, teenagers are more than capable and willing to have sex. But oh no, let's treat them like some kind of sub humans instead of properly educating them and allowing them to think for themselves. A teenager making conscious choices? Preposterous!

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:32 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uh, with all due respect, BULLSHIT! The fact is that those laws do NOTHING to prevent adults from having sex with children, they are just there to punish those adults ATF for daring to tell society to stick their 'moral' bullshit.

    It's time to realize that the BEST way to prevent children from being taken advantage of, sexually or in another way, is to be OPEN with children about sexuality and teach them from VERY young that if someone tries to touch them on their genitals or anywhere else without their permission?

    THAT IS WRONG after the first incident and the saying of "Hey, I don't like that, don't touch me there!"

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:22 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sonic says, that's no good!

    Avatar of milkmandan
    Comment by milkmandan
    10:55 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I totally agree. I wrote a term paper about the age of consent in my debate class. I too myself am a victim of this bullshit. Had a girl friend in high school who was 16, I was 17. Both of us in Junior year. Parents found out we had been sleeping together, next thing you know I am in court, I am getting a criminal record and shes getting away clean. I get charged for statutory rape because the age of consent in my country is 17. It is retarded.

    Comment by Anonymous

    good I hope they lock you up for life you retard..

    Avatar of senorkami
    Comment by senorkami
    09:23 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nah. A 19 year old having sex with an 11 year old is legit statutory.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:05 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Is everyone ignoring the fact that he had sex with not just a minor but his sister. And for those who I guess didn't read the she was in 6th grade part who think she is 16-17. Just an FYI most 6th graders are around 12 but I guess we can assume she is an idiot and was held back a few times.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:04 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    13, not 12, unless children in your country begin 1st grade at 6. And nobody really thought she was 16-17, this is an entirely different discussion.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:20 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    School ages vary. In my 6 th grade our class ages varied from 11 to 13. I was 12 turning 13. Others 11 turning 12.

    Avatar of VVayfarer
    Comment by VVayfarer
    19:55 29/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)


    1st grade - 7 years old
    2nd grade - 8 years old
    3rd grade - 9 years old
    4th grade - 10 years old
    5th grade - 11 years old
    6th grade - 13 years old

    5.5th grade anyone?

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:30 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are you fucking kidding me Anon?

    Avatar of VVayfarer
    Comment by VVayfarer
    20:23 29/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    She didn't want the sex -- it's nearly impossible for her to begin with.

    At the very least, she shouldn't be able to feel sexual about her brother. The Westermarck effect ensures that, while the brother was old enough to be attracted to her (six years rule), she -having become used to her brother due to her parents' regular absence- was practically asexual towards him.

    She didn't wish for him to be punished, but that doesn't mean he didn't rape her or pressure her into sex; she simply forgave him out of love or kindness, or out of more strategical reasons.

    Avatar of Kiljoy616
    Comment by Kiljoy616
    03:08 10/02/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sound like Christianity is seeping into Japanese culture, good luck with that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:41 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    >statutory rape

    *snickers* oh wait, your serious. bwahahahaha

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:16 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why is it that all the trolls are always 12 year old insecure boys?
    0/10, try harder

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:22 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Why is it that all the trolls are always 12 year old insecure boys playing Call of Duty?"


    Avatar of coeur_noir
    Comment by coeur_noir
    18:06 23/10/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    +1 I'll back you up on that one...

    Comment by Anonymous

    She'd thank her brother later when the skills she had acquired are put into real use. Also, 8 years later, they'd have such a lovely reunion since both of them will be legal to have sex.
    Young sister: "Brother, I missed you so much."
    Older brother: "Let's not waste the two years that you've gave me. Get on now!"

    Comment by Anonymous

    > they are being used to force conservative sexual morality on the children in question.
    > conservative sexual morality on the children in question.
    > morality on the children
    > children

    Goob job, sir.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:30 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    There is a difference between RELIGIOUS 'morality' and true morality.

    Apparently, you fail at making the distinction.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:15 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Morality is a set of personal convictions of how a proper human being should behave. There is nothing religious there.
    Ethics on the other hand is a set of social rules about how a proper human being should behave.
    The difference is not that subtle. Even you shouldn't have too much trouble comprehending it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:31 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry dude but your wrong. Morality is a concept and can be defined according to religion (Divine Command Theory) or within a limited scope of humanity (Ethical Humanism).

    This type of thing is the whole reason philosophers like David Hume, Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant wanted to present moral truism in which we could live by, objective ideas that go against the established beliefs (I.E. it's wrong because it's wrong).

    Unfortunately universalization of any concept or maxim is nigh impossible, so every arguement will devolve into "I think this, or I think that".

    So Sad.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:56 25/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Conservative religiotards are fucked up in the head.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:59 24/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Apparently YOU fail at definitions. Morality by definition is religious (rules set out for man by a diety). And religion has very little to say about sex and age.

    There is no "true morality" as you call it. What we do have is something called Ethics, which are rules set out for men by men. The concept of Age of Consent is an ethical issue and it is very gray, as is evidenced by the wide range of AoC laws that vary by recorded history and currently by jurisdiction.

    Comment by Anonymous

    Retarded moralfags are everywhere on this planet. <_<

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments