operation-tomodachi.jpg

Japanese gratitude towards the US military’s earthquake relief efforts, dubbed “Operation Tomodachi,” has resulted in the flattering image above, prompting a delighted reaction from Americans and a somewhat more mixed response from Japanese…

The original post and a selection of the comments it provoked:

operation-tomodachi.jpg

“This was sent to us by a man in Hokkaido. It says, ‘To everybody in the U.S. 7th Fleet: Thank you. The Japanese people will not be beaten.'”

“What is this I’m feeling…..is it….patriotism? How nice.”

“Someone…likes us?”

“Very cool. Also interesting to discover that the Japanese national animal is an owl, if thats the case.”

“Green pheasant is the national bird.”

“Note to self: Do not eat Green Pheasant in Japan.”

“That is seriously….adorable.”

“Great things like this make me proud to be in the Navy, though I only sit around in Hawaii as this goes on.”

The appreciative counter-response from 2ch upon seeing the image and responses it elicited:

“USA! USA!”

“What is up with this toadying picture…”

“A nice picture in great taste!”

“I get the eagle but what the hell is that other bird?”

“Some kind of owl I think.”

“Looks like a sparrow.”

“A pheasant or crested ibis I reckon.”

“This is a kind of irritating picture but we’re all grateful so who cares!”

“Way too sycophantic but a lot of people in Japan fall for that sort of American heroism though.”

“But Hokkaido wasn’t even effected by the disaster…”

“So cool I got wet.””That owl is cute.”

“I’m grateful to the yanks but this is creepy. It looks like it was done by some homosexual who wants an American to do him.”

“Good stuff. You should spread your legs wider and fawn on them more.”

“I’ve never seen a picture depicting so much ass-kissing.”

“For Japanese sensibilities this probably seems too fawning, but you have to remember they are a bunch of idiots and can’t understand it unless you really spell it out for them.”

“Nice pic – GJ!”

“Well, there are masochists in every country.”

“Make us the 51st state please. Our government is just too useless.”

“A lot of people seem to think America’s armed forces are helping us for free. Remember that Japan has to pay for the upkeep of US forces stationed here. Flattering them as our saviours like that is a bad habit of the Japanese.”

“I’m reminded of that photograph of MacArthur and the emperor.”

“Well, America is so widely hated that it’s no wonder they are happy when their little Pochi draws close.”

“This is just the sort of thing which’d appeal to Americans. The artist knew his audience alright…”

“At least it isn’t some creepy moe illustration!”

“They’ll like it, so that’s good enough. They did after all help the victims. But we do have to pay for all those forces in any case…”

“There’s no harm in flattering them. It’ll make sure they realise the Japanese people don’t support the DPJ’s pro-China and anti-US foreign policy.”

“This is pretty creepy. The picture really expresses the servile character of the Japanese…”

“It looks more like the bird is being menaced by the eagle, doesn’t it?”

“Like the bird was the victim of domestic violence but still likes the eagle anyway…”

bald-eagle.jpg

“America’s national bird is the bald eagle then?”

“A carnivore…”

“But will it be eaten afterwards?”

Japanese can likely be forgiven for taking US aid for granted considering the billions of dollars of their taxes used to support the US bases in Japan, although there is probably no harm in letting Americans think they are being magnanimous all the same.

Japanese can probably also be forgiven for being unable to recognise their own national animal considering how boring and nondescript it is; conversely, Americans tempted to crow about their own majestic choice of raptor should probably consider the scepticism of their own founding father Benjamin Franklin:

“For my own part I wish the Bald Eagle had not been chosen the Representative of our Country.

He is a Bird of bad moral Character. He does not get his Living honestly.

You may have seen him perched on some dead Tree near the River, where, too lazy to fish for himself, he watches the Labour of the Fishing Hawk; and when that diligent Bird has at length taken a Fish, and is bearing it to his Nest for the Support of his Mate and young Ones, the Bald Eagle pursues him and takes it from him.

With all this Injustice, he is never in good Case but like those among Men who live by Sharping & Robbing he is generally poor and often very lousy. Besides he is a rank Coward: The little King Bird not bigger than a Sparrow attacks him boldly and drives him out of the District.”

Franklin considered the turkey a more appropriate national bird for the United States of America…


    Post Comment »
    175 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Envoy Loves You
    22:18 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    “I’m grateful to the yanks but this is creepy. It looks like it was done by some homosexual who wants an American to do him.”

    That was my first thought too.

    Avatar of Pantsu_Rider
    Comment by Pantsu_Rider
    Comment by Anonymous
    22:34 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    3rd the motion to agree with proposition!

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    22:36 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    And the eagle points "You're next. ☆~_^"

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    23:48 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    It COULD be both...

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    True since the green pheasant shown was the female bird. The male looks like a peacock.

    Avatar of Crim
    Comment by Crim
    01:01 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Kinda of looks like a standard American marriage

    With the woman beat up- err... I mean fell down the stairs

    Avatar of YakomoFujikawa
    Comment by YakomoFujikawa
    22:24 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    WTF is that bird anyway? It doesn't look like an owl nor a sparrow. Not even a pheasant, which I think is rather unpleasant. What kind of references did the artist borrow? Because I don't see why one guy thought it was a sparrow. If it indeed is an owl, then just looking at it makes me want to empty my bowels. DX

    Avatar of renstalon
    Comment by renstalon
    22:26 04/04/2011 # ! Good (+0.4)

    The Japanese people I have talked with on this topic have expressed much thanks for America's help and aid.

    The newspaper said America's armed forces worked very hard to help the victum's of disaster and were impressed by their effectiveness in setting up bases of operation for the SDF to do their work properly.

    It's a shame that people have to criticize humanitarian efforts in such a time of crisis.

    Comment by Anonymous

    yeah, definitely do it 10 years after the fact. i like living safe without an opinion, too.

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音
    22:51 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.1)

    Libyan bombing was also classified as a "humanitarian" operation, with a cocky name Odyssey Dawn, and a few hundred millions dollar worth of humanitarian tomahawk missiles.

    Avatar of Achiuakuna
    Comment by Achiuakuna

    What's your point? Despite the factual errors in your statement, you think the US is dropping bombs in Japan right at this moment?

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音

    Haha, factual errors? Have you seen the congress summit? They don't fucking know. They don't know who they're protecting, they don't know why they got involved, they don't know what's going to come of it.
    No, I'm not saying America is dropping physical bombs on Japan, but they did indeed get a chance to drop a small propagandish bomb. Kick us out and we'll leave you stranded during your next earthquakish crisis.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:12 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    There's still the SDF bro.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:15 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Just ignore 美しい音. Everything American does he has a problem with it. I bet even if an American pulled him out of a burning building and he'd still find something nasty to say about it.

    Ironicly he has about the same level of intelligence as those "America fuck-yeah" yanks. He's just a flip of the same idiot coin.

    Avatar of Achiuakuna
    Comment by Achiuakuna
    08:26 06/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    You interpret actual aids as "propagandish bomb"? That is just beyond pathetic. By your logic, the whole concept of humanitarianism should be eliminated because the ulterior motive of "we'll leave you alone in the next quake if you piss me off" is SOOOOO great that we should do away with aids altogether. We can let thousands of people die so that they don't live to see the supposed "propaganda".

    So what has your country done to help the earthquake? All I see is a generic internet hater hating on others who actually helped. If you are not so insecure about how insignificant and pathetic you are, you wouldn't even feel the need to join the "cool train" of US bashing. If you really have a problem with how people are handling this, why don't you do something meaningful like volunteering to help them yourself?

    Avatar of kazaza2
    Comment by kazaza2
    00:47 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @ 美しい音

    So no matter what the US does you'll have a problem with it.
    Stand on on the sidelines and their heartless bastards.
    Send assistance and it's a public relations gimmick.
    Altruism doesn't exist in the real world so I'm not looking for it. Even friends get something out of helping each other. Personally as an American I'm glad were doing something more than providing lip service and platitudes.

    Avatar of starsplash
    Comment by starsplash
    02:16 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    The humanitarian bombings that was done was to prevent Gadafi's forces from entering cities where you know they just wont occupy the city. They would kill and torture civilians.

    Id say thats humanitarian if you ask me. There was no offensive in that effort.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:47 07/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Your sadly mistaken if you really believe the US is trying to help the rebels in Libya for altruistic reasons. They do have gain for helping the rebels topple the old government of Libya. Why didn't they intervene in Egypt when the government was too killing it's people?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:37 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    american mafia = eagle doing thumbs up to the wounded. come on guys, we've seen this before. they'll help, but with a contract of giving the help back. this isn't really called help since japan would be in another debt. added debt+current debt+shit head political leaders = more depressing country.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:49 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    What has your country done? That was rhetorical so don't answer it.

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音

    Well I'll answer instead then. I wouldn't really want to hear any of those biased accusations coming from a person with little knowledge of today's politics.
    The Japanese government widely opened the door for the US helpers, whilst calling a ~certain country~ an aggressor for sending 2 planes with humanitarian supplies. How this whole Tomodachi operation would be seen, if China or S.Korea would send their own military to help out? Stupid Jap govt would start yelling they're being attacked or occupied.

    It's certainly not a matter of generosity, but rather a matter of whom the victim chooses to be saved by.

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    22:37 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    After reading Ben's commentary, I'm feeling pretty vindicated in going with the Bald Eagle after all.

    Avatar of Shizu's Waki Obsessor: MaidNiac
    22:38 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Needs MOE version with America-neechan helping imouto Japan-tan now~

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    Avatar of Shizu's Waki Obsessor: MaidNiac
    01:54 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Much appropriate and lovable~

    Now for a hawt yuri skinship!

    Okay, I know I'm being greedily perverted :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:09 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @Dia: Damn, that's so cool! That would've been a great choice!

    I'm okay with the cartoon in question, however. It's being too over-examined.

    Avatar of Kitsune9Tails
    Comment by Kitsune9Tails
    12:05 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    OMG, perfect. We've got to get that made official.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:16 11/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Much, MUCH better :D ty it made my day :D

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    22:39 04/04/2011 # ! Good (+0.7)

    Aren't the US bases still much cheaper than having your own real army?

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音
    22:49 04/04/2011 # ! Good (+0.3)

    Yeah, I agree. Why the fuck would any country build it's own military when they can just use the American military instead?!

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:59 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Must be that the American military can say "why the fuck we should do this/that"
    Opposed to own military that doesn't question the reason.

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音
    23:04 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    I was being sarcastic. If every country would let itself be defended by the American army, then who will the US be defending them from? The earth would just turn into 1 big empire, opening the door to the first in history World Civil War.

    Avatar of Dia
    Comment by Dia
    23:13 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    Wouldn't that be desirable? If only one army had real firepower, wars would be less destructive.

    Avatar of 美しい音
    Comment by 美しい音
    23:20 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @Dia
    I loled. So much for global balance of powers...
    Tell me you're trolling, please.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:19 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dude learn some hsitory ...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:28 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    It would become a Pax Americana. That's until the American army would start abusing its position and people would get angry at it.

    Just like it happened to Romans.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:18 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    If they are policing the police, who will police the police?
    The coastguard?!

    Avatar of Ihmhi
    Comment by Ihmhi
    02:35 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well that's a switch. Someone is outsourcing something TO us instead of from us...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:32 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Problem is we still pay thru the nose for most of it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:01 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Still sucks to depend on someone though. I think Japan's the only country with no army. It's just sad.
    The Japanese were very efficient soldiers, they even beat Russia in the Russo-Japanese war. My great grandfather used to serve the Imperial army during world war 2 and he was a master of Judo, Karatedo and Kendo. They were fucking awesome man. Though he chose to stay here in the Philippines instead of going home.

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    23:22 04/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Because we got cheap/free Lolis here

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:13 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    there are no awesome soldiers in a war, no glory or grandness, just men and women killing eachother most times at the whim of somebody else who only has his own interests in mind. that goes for any and every country. there is no such thing as war without innocent casualties. because a well trained soldier is a well trained puppet.

    I understand the necessity of being able to defend your country when attacked or threatened, but to make murderers hero's just because it was governmentally sanctioned is both hypocritical and disgusting.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:25 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @anon

    Ah so my brother is a murderer, thanks for telling me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:06 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Thts dumb. War and murder have no common place. Its like saying consensual sex and rape are the same. Soldiers know going in that someone will die and they may kill or be killed; on BOTH sides they know that as fact - Consensual.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:10 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    the puppeteer is the murder? your brother can just be ignorant

    Avatar of Gitami
    Comment by Gitami
    10:02 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The result is murder or killer, that's unchangeable unless you want to say it's legal sanction, which would make Islamic stoners not killers or murderers too.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:48 04/04/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    While they indeed defeated Imperial Russia in 1905 when Russia wasn't exactly at its best (remeber, it collapsed mere 12 years later), japanese lost miserably to Soviet Russia a grand 3 times - in campaigns of 1938, 1939, and in august 1945 (loosing 80 000 soldiers KIA and 700 000 MIA vs. soviet losses of mere 15 000)

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:29 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    1945 can hardly be counted as Soviet Russia attacked few days AFTER Japan surrendered.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:56 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    False. Soviets attacked on 8th of August and Hirohito addressed his nation on August 15.

    Avatar of hugh
    Comment by hugh
    23:50 04/04/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Not having an army is sad? This may surprise you, but it wouldn't be sad if every country went that route.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:19 03/05/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    But nobody does that because nobody trusts each other.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:00 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Note the past tense: Were and Was. The Japanese Army was dissolved and now only exists as a shadow of itself as the Japanese Self Defense Force.

    Avatar of Gitami
    Comment by Gitami
    09:58 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Much like how France had awesome armies before 1850s.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:07 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Costa Rica has no military either.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:37 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yep, that's why they had to hire Big Boss

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:38 05/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Plenty of countries don't have a real army. Germany for one...

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:49 07/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Japanese have an army. They just call it the self-defense force.

    What they have is a constitution that doesn't allow them to utilize their army for military means outside their own borders.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:53 08/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The way it should be.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 03/12/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    canada, u.a.e., and several small euro countries have no armies.







    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments