Shogakukan Bans Fan Art

hinagiku-by-youkan.jpg

Top manga publisher Shogakukan has banned almost all online fan activity pertaining to its works, most notably any form of artwork or doujinshi based on its characters.

The directives, published on their homepage and picked up on with concern by Hayate no Gotoku mangaka Kenjiro Hata:

Shogakukan forbids the following unauthorised usages of our publications on the Internet or intranets:

Posting pictures, in whole or in part, of the binding or pages of our publications.

Posting the contents or tables of contents of our publications.

Posting plot summaries or derivative stories and similar based on our publications.

Posting pictures or photographs, in whole or in part, of our characters.

Posting your own pictures (illustrations or parodies, etc.) of our characters.

Modifying our characters (including your own images) or publications for use in software, icons, wallpapers. etc.

Posting the contents of the Shogakukan homepage (pictures, data, or source) in whole or in part.

The above acts, whether commercial or non-commercial in character, are acts of copyright infringement. Those who do not respect these guidelines may find themselves subject to legal action, so please be warned.

shogakukan.png

This explicitly bans everything from fan art to wallpapers and even anime-themed avatars, and also apparently bans most Internet discussion, wiki coverage and reviews of Shogakukan works.

Just how Shogakukan expects this kind of draconian approach to suppressing its fandom to improve its position is something of a mystery, particularly given everything mentioned is traditionally considered free advertising.

The (apparently poorly understood) legal situation in most countries is that unauthorised derivative works are technically acts of copyright infringement, as copyright is held over characters and stories as well as the original work (and any translations thereof).

As a result, copyright reverts to the original copyright owner and thus distribution is subject to legal sanction at the whim of the copyright holder and the creator of the derivative work has no actual right to claim copyright of their own work (something which apparently escapes most doujin artists illegally attempting to use legal remedies such as the DMCA to control distribution of their own infringing works).

However, in many cases derivative works are explicitly permitted by rights holders on a non-commercial basis or subject to guidelines (Star Wars and Star Trek for example have elaborate rules for such creations), or else are simply tacitly ignored.

In Japan, the tradition is for the anime, manga and game industry to studiously ignore derivative works, which has allowed doujin events such as Comiket to flourish, and encouraged a multitude of artists to produce fan art depicting their favourite characters.

Many professional mangaka and artists are even active in the doujinshi field themselves, under loosely guarded pseudonyms.

Further complicating matters is the fact that in most jurisdictions copyright infringement requires some notice of objection from the copyright holder before civil or criminal action proceed – but Japanese police recently seem to have been making copyright prosecutions on their own initiative, rather than at the behest of the rights holder.

Japan also lacks a functional “fair use” doctrine for using pictures and text for commentary or reviews, or an equivalent to the DMCA’s generous allowances to sites carrying infringing content contributed by users (the DMCA grants immunity to site administrators as long as they respond to DMCA takedown requests).

All of these factors, coupled with the extreme spinelessness of most Japanese, make the Japanese Internet a rather fragile environment for the sort of activity which is taken as a matter of course elsewhere.

There is now some concern that other major publishers will follow suit with draconian copyright regimes of their own – Ishihara and the recent quake seem to have triggered an industry self-destruct mechanism…


    Post Comment »
    196 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Dickson
    Comment by Dickson
    04:47 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow...

    just...

    Wow...

    Avatar of gundam4ever2
    Comment by gundam4ever2
    04:51 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Alienating the fan base is not a good idea.

    Avatar of Yourtime
    Comment by Yourtime
    06:42 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    totally agree o_o" and you can't stop it really.. it's like ban christs.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:02 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    muhaha
    they can try

    Avatar of Keima88
    Comment by Keima88
    06:53 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    I can already see the ending.

    And it doesnt look good for Shogakukan.

    Avatar of FlyingCake
    Comment by FlyingCake
    07:37 29/03/2011 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Wat?! *Starts hoarding Hinagiku doujinshi*
    You can't take her away from mee! ;_;

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    07:46 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I get the feeling this is them stepping up to declare "All of you please just remember, we have to remind everyone legally that we own all these characters and stories. We're not going to go after you, this is just to make certain our copyright on these isn't weakened considering how many of you do this... so... ya know... just keep it away from us and don't tell us."

    They could have their copyrights in danger if they don't defend them, so this does make sense in a legal sense. Whether they do anything about it is another thing entirely, because now that it's on paper, it's been again established under no uncertain terms that they are in control of those entities.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:10 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, people could put them up on Deviant Art ^_^

    Avatar of alidan
    Comment by alidan
    08:30 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    HouseLife
    07:46

    your copyright is never realy in danger, except in the case of... lets say... a big publisher put out a game, for 60$ and distributed it for free.

    than 3 years later they decided to cash in on the people who downloaded it because they decided its not free.

    you dont lose copyright because you weren't willing to foot a 20-100k bill to go after someone you will never see a profit from. big businesses do this because its a deturant, go after 1, 10000 more wont do it. in their eyes that 20-100k lawsuit brings them at least 100k more in profit from the people who didnt pirate it.

    manga isnt that flourishing that it can do this on a large, even a small scale.

    Avatar of HouseLife
    Comment by HouseLife
    13:46 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ alidan

    You're right, copyright is more complicated than that, however it's also true that if you let rampant parodies and variations exist, then it has the potential to reduce the efficacy of your franchise. Now we all know that that's not the case in terms of Doujinshi and the like, but that doesn't change that it's still something that they occasionally need to re-establish in terms of legality for corporate purposes.

    There may also be an ulterior motive as well. Or perhaps, doubtfully, they really are getting tired of porn of their characters and want to take their fan presence in a different direction somehow. I wouldn't be surprised either way, but who cares. We'd still get porn even if there were only one person left on the planet. ...actually in that case that would be all there was.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:52 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Does this mean that we aren't allowed to draw such characters as Mario, Sonic or Pokémon anymore, as they hold the copyright to the animations of these series?

    And yes, I don' think they actually intend to do something about it, just scare people a bit, reminding them who owns what...
    Or something like that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:13 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    i would hate to see alll those Pokemon parodies out, not to mention i would have to put out my own.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    @HouseLife - you are thinking of Trademarks. Copyrights can not be diluted by infringement at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:44 26/06/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    They're not saying "All of you please remember we own the copyrights to the material we produced." They don't need to tell us, it's already the law of owning the rights to what you create.

    And this sure isn't a 'please be nice.' As you can clearly see by how a news site and its users reacted to their statement. It sounds like a threat and no one is happy to be threatened. Worse than that, they said "no plot summaries" even, which are totally harmless, and "your own pictures" aren't allowed either. That's making them out to be total dicks, not polite.

    Avatar of Shippoyasha
    Comment by Shippoyasha
    19:03 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Speaking of alienating the fanbase, I tried to post English subtitled anime music videos online and I got a quick 1 and 2 strikes (out of three) that would result me in permanent bans in a few video sites.

    They're getting so draconian, they will go straight after you even if you don't operate straight out of Japan even.

    I kinda wish they would keep a somewhat loose copyright aspects a bit too. Maybe not to the point where you disclose entire anime music soundtracks or entire anime seasons on Youtube, but they didn't totally go after your throat with each and every video and content like they do now. Now I'm frankly scared to support the anime/manga I love by working on translations, because apparently they're not going to be quiet about it any longer.

    Avatar of Dog
    Comment by Dog
    04:51 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    It's doing things like this that lead to the decline of civilizations, ( banning shit for no reason and being extremely careful). Doing things that serve to benefit and only risk causing damage.

    Avatar of HPQ5
    Comment by HPQ5
    04:52 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    >Posting pictures or photographs, in whole or in part, of our characters.

    Is it also illegal to cosplay the character? I mean if you took a picture of yourself cosplaying, doesn't that count as having a photograph of the character?

    Avatar of washuotaku
    Comment by washuotaku
    05:31 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cosplay is safe, at least in North America. It is too common for people to dress-up in there favorite characters, people even impersonate officials including Police, Fire, Politicians and so on. As long as your are not "actually" trying to be someone your not.

    As for the pictures themselves, they are solely the ownership of the photographer; unless commissioned or contract with the model and/or company. Basically Shogakukan wouldn't be able to take them down, nor would I doubt they even try too.

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    This is untested in court, but I suspect an angry company could make a fair show of dragging someone through the courts to discourage it.

    Avatar of DmonHiro
    Comment by DmonHiro

    Well... looks like that radiation from the plants affected some more then others. These guys must have been sucking on the uranium exaust... cause their brains have melted.

    Avatar of Barachem
    Comment by Barachem
    04:54 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hhhmmmmmmmmm....

    How can they ever enact such a ban?
    What about original characters that look similar to Shogakukan's?
    Heck, even characters from different series tend to be similar at times.

    What utter silly nonsense.

    Avatar of alex251
    Comment by alex251
    04:55 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    and so the end of Shogakukan has begun

    Avatar of Rehceel
    Comment by Rehceel
    04:55 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    This only makes since when you take the same kinds of drugs they were taking at the time of deciding this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    No it makes perfect sense, it's just dumb that's all.

    Avatar of Nox Kreiker
    Comment by Nox Kreiker
    04:55 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Pretty stupid how Copyright went from "You used our creation to make a profit for yourself." to "You used something vaguely referencing my creation. Prepare to be sued."

    Avatar of yaku
    Comment by yaku
    05:08 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    Not to mention the "let's be total dicks to the fanbase that helped my works become the huge hit they are now!" attitude.

    Avatar of AzureXuchilbara
    Comment by AzureXuchilbara
    05:45 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    I won't even need a speech for this one...

    All of you tight-wad idiots at Shogakukan can't stop fan-art...Nor hentai and doujins~

    *points to his Hayate no Gokuto doujin collection*

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:11 29/03/2011 # ! Drivel (-1.0)

    only for that, they deserve another tsunami ;)

    Avatar of kazaza2
    Comment by kazaza2
    05:40 29/03/2011 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Disney's been pulling the same crap since forever. They have an army of lawyers and other weasels whose only function is to stop copyright infringement no matter how small. Must make Hitler lover Walt proud.

    Avatar of Dummy00001
    Comment by Dummy00001
    05:48 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    That's why, as one critique had put it, Americans are forever stuck with the Micky Mouse.

    Those are derivative works which advance the progress. "Original works" are myth, because every creator starts from something they learned or experienced previously. All creative works are derivative.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:59 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    You should notice that there hasn't been a mainstream Micky Mouse production in decades. Whatever fandom it had promptly withered. Most kids know jack shit about MM and couldn't care less. Disney fucked themselves over.

    Avatar of Sukunai
    Comment by Sukunai
    04:56 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Either Ishy is contagious, or worse, he's not unique and there are more out there incapable of comprehending the harm they are inspiring.

    I can understand the intent of the laws, but it doesn't make the laws, bright or any friend of the industry.

    That, and I wish them luck preventing people from creating fan inspired derivatives and sharing them on the internet. Seeing as they can't seem to impede people sharing the original content either.

    Avatar of The REAL Lamberto
    Comment by The REAL Lamberto
    04:58 29/03/2011 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Ah great, don't tell me Shogakukan is gonna bow down before Ishihara.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:52 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sing it with me!~~~~
    It's the End of the World as we know it!
    the End of the Woorld as we Knew it!!!
    ~~~~
    Burn and die from intestinal worms iSHITgaru, preferably both at the same time for what you've begun ya paper raping Ass!

    Avatar of Marine-RX179
    Comment by Marine-RX179
    15:47 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Bow before Eat-shit-hara? Not just that, it sounds more like they are BLOWING him.

    Avatar of RaspberryKisses
    Comment by RaspberryKisses
    05:01 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Shogakukan ended with this ban. Good job guys they said "NO economy will not ruin us, WE ruin us!"

    Avatar of KillerYandereSama
    Comment by KillerYandereSama
    05:04 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    How much a bet this will be ignored by the fanbase.

    Avatar of torappu
    Comment by torappu
    05:06 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Indeed, I can't see how this can be even imagined to work.

    This is an utterly useless move on their part, what the fuck did they take in the days prior to deciding such a thing?

    Comment by Webbmaster62
    05:12 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ironically, I type in Hayate no Gotoku on Sankaku and there's tons of it LOL. Btw Arfect, do you mean is Kenjiro Hata concerned about the decision they just made?

    Avatar of Artefact
    Comment by Artefact

    He seems to object to it. But control over the copyright rests with Shogakukan so I don't think he has final say.

    Comment by Webbmaster62
    07:53 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's what I thought... I wonder where this is gonna go in the future... I don't see how this will stand though.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:17 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can see the ending....and it looks bleak :(

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:04 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    The Japanese will do what they've always done to get around censorship.

    They will put small black bars over certain parts when showing them, and replace characters in their names with circles when referencing them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:05 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is always China, I want to see them force these laws on it...

    It seems more and more companies are goint to commit production suicide. I wonder how will this end.

    Comment by Anonymous

    fuckinstupid.gif

    Comment by Anonymous

    It seems the radioactive cloud has finally reached the Shogakukan headquarters and caused mutations in the brains of those in power, leading them to this fucked up decision. Either that, or they were all hit in the head with a stupid stick...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:11 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can understand not wanting doujinshi, but punishing your fans gets you nowhere.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:11 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    This isn't going to work~~~

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:13 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    parodies and satire are protect by copyright law. Barclay card got there ass handed to them in court. trying to sue makers of parodies

    Avatar of AzureXuchilbara
    Comment by AzureXuchilbara
    05:51 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    With all the porn parodies I've seen like "Edward Penishands" and "Bareback Mountain" in the USA, I could not agree more...

    Why can't they see that what they are doing is sitting on a dangerously faulty chair ready to explode metal shrapnels up their draconic ass..?

    Avatar of Dragon88
    Comment by Dragon88
    05:13 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    THEY CAN'T STOP ALL OF US !!! HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA!

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:10 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    They can actually, the anime that flows over here is done via uploaders in Japan. If they stop, we stop, all the true western fans of anime could in fact be wiped out, just like Google could continue their 'child porn' thing and then we'd have no more loli.
    Our community is actually very delicate, some high up company could say 'All this is copyright infringement' and be able shut down sites like watchanimeon and others with no second thought.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:28 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, we can always draw our own lolis! Unless your live in Canada, Sweden, Australia or some of those crazy places.

    Comment by Webbmaster62
    06:34 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Your right, but I doubt that will happen too much as it won't benefit anything. Atleast for them it won't.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:34 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Do not underestimate internet. Ffs people will just use i2p and such if things get that bad. It's pretty much impossible to control fan-made material. Crypto-anarchism FTW)

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:14 29/03/2011 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Yeah, just like how the FBI wiped all real CP off the internet.
    /sarcasm off







    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments