Police: “Chikan Guilty Until Proven Innocent”

Everyone is guilty until proven innocent, even when they say it is the opposite. The truth is that if you are sent to court for a crime you did not commit, you are still going to jail just because something illegal happened and they don't want to have to search for the real perpetrator.

Well, it's funny because I've heard plenty of stories about how girls will try to report rapes and be laughed at by the police in Japan. And yet in these cases it's the men who are presumed guilty. What a world!

That is true MasterYuke. Otherwise how are innocent people sent to jail even when no one set them up?
Also instead of committing suicide I would rape the bitch or if she's ugly pay someone else to rape her.

^ Reminded me of The Shawshank Redemption, a great movie.

And with this thing to happen those feminist still said that they were after for equality.

Suck MY Ass!!!

i would carry a concealed 2 inch blade, assuming such a thing isn't illegal in japan, or at worst a box cutter. if im going to be accused of a crime and me life is going to all but end ill slit the bitched thought and than my own.

"Nothing at stake for either part"

Well, the girl was aiming for a ¥400,000 fine, I'd say that mean there is something she wants with the case.

What if he claimed she was trying to pickpocket her? I heard that would make the girls change their accusation pretty quick.

"Oh, eh... maybe I was wrong... umm... I, am late for... eh... something... gottago!"

So not only do we have femnazi's we have femenazi's. Considering Japan as well it's likely that the girls are the largest perverts in all these cases, i mean they sell their pantsu, their underwear, themselves, they shorten their skirts, in a lot of cases it has to be bear baiting, but probably in just as much cases they are the criminal, but what stops the girl 'copping the feel'...?

The prosecutors are seeking the fine, not the girl. Reread the sentence. The prosecutors are just quoting the girl's words, but are the ones seeking the fine. Both of those bits of information are in the same sentence, so I can see how you were confused. Plus, law doesn't work like that buddy.

I think it shows the media bias that they refer to the girl as 'the victim'. This actually assumes a crime occured.

It's one thing when something is obvious (like obviously there is a murder victim if you find a corpse) but with other crimes like this, we should say 'the accuser'.

We can always become a policeman and get free access to both schoolgirl pantsu AND uniform.

That's the only reason why they are appealing. So they can hang on to the "evidence" for longer.

We can always become policemen and get free access to both schoolgirl pantsu AND uniform.

That's the only reason why they are appealing. So they can hang on to the "evidence" for longer.

Heroic infiltration, disguise optional

We can always become policemen and get free access to both schoolgirl pantsu and uniform.

That's the only reason why they are appealing. So they can hang on to the "evidence" for longer.

Disguising as a woman in order to grope a woman... Quite a novel concept.

Wow, triple post... I thought the comment didn't go through when it didn't appear a few hours later. My apologies.

I've been having alot of problems with my comments showing up hours to days later, its indeed annoying but what am i going to do about it.

they should expect a grope if they refuse to ride the women only carriages

So them feminazis fail even more huh.

from the moment the became feminazis there was only fail......

Yes this is true, only a certain line have the women-only carriages.

there should be woman only and men only and thats that.

if a woman goes on a man only she can be beaten to death.

and there will be a unisex one, just in case there is spillover form either carriage. and this one will cost an extra 2$ to ride in, because it will have 12hd security cameras covering damn near every angle, and there will be a passenger limit, so there is no accidents, and if there is it will be caught on one of those cameras.

wtf man, do you know how freaking full the male only section is and how spacious the female only section is. This method is hardly fair or right and is just something feminazis planned to give them more dominance over males.

> there should be woman only and men only and thats that.

I don't go to Japan all that often, but that'd be awesome if I could just travel beside my female friends when I go.

Let alone if I do happen to be dating someone.

what happen with equality?
why do we need different section in train?
to give more space for women who not many of them in train compare to men who'll be crowded in male section?

and what about female who groping male passengers?

The women might or might not bring up a civil case afterwards but that is not the thing we are talking about is it? We are talking about how horrid the police is handling the case. They are the ones who are pushing the case.

This just feels like retcon... Trying to push the argument after being proven that there is a fault in your reasoning. Just drop it; you are a dumbass for arriving at that conclusion.

If that girl came up and admit she made it all up or concede that she might have mistaken the guy groping her I doubt the police will be able to further pursue this case.

If the police are willing to appeal, I'm sure that the girl keeps saying that, without doubt, that guy groped her.

Take a look at the last story like this (too lazy to go back for a link), where the girl falsely charges the guy and her friends beat him up. Then he was arrested and charged with the crimes, but then the girl said she was drunk and it didn't happen but they still pressed charges.

So even if you didn't do it, and even if the other side tells them the same...it doesn't mean shit to the japanese police.

Admittedly the Japanese police is a WTF here. That doesn't mean a woman is not to be blamed for falsely accusing a man until he gets arrested, whatever the reason is.

(Now if the woman is drunk and does retract accusations later, I'd blame the police 99.9% for not dropping it. You're not supposed to wander in public areas drunk, that's not even legal. But society accepts it as a minor offense.)

no, being drunk is ok. but being disorderly and drunk isnt.

its hard to explain but i asked a cop about this once, because its illegal to drink in public and its (i thought) illegal to be drunk in public, than why the fuck inst alcohol illegal.

basically what she said was the drunk and disorderly is when they do something bad in public, its like a modifier. say, pukeing in and of itself isn't bad, and many will show concern for you. but being drunk and pukeing you are able to be fined for your dumb ass behavior even though its pukeing its different circumstances.

I was just trying to keep it short. I think being drunk and falsely accusing someone of a crime qualifies as bad behavior.

Oh trust me, cupcake. I actually think I'm far more mellow than most people I know but I get vile looks from everyone. And it seems women just don't like the idea of seeing a big, tall asian guy.. It's like people have this preconception that asian guys are always short.

Most comments do *not* bash all women, but do bash women *at fault of these kinds of things*.

I know it's hard to tell your feelings to get the difference. But the difference is here, plain hard matter-of-factly.

Well BC could've worded that differently, but I would think that taking neither one's word, and actually investigating the case WITHOUT USING THEIR BIAS as motivation would be the ideal, but that's apparently asking too much.

its wrong to take the man's word at face value?
they dont even take the DNA result at fact values!!!