18-Year-Old Busted for “Selling Child Porn” of Herself

topless-schoolgirl-poser-by-scarlet

An 18-year-old girl has been arrested on child pornography charges for selling nude pictures of herself online.

The girl, an 18-year-old unemployed resident of Saitama, was arrested on charges of selling child pornography after she sold nude pictures of herself to men online using an Internet bulletin board.

Reportedly, from December of 2009 to April of 2010 she took a number of pictures of herself naked with her cellphone, in one case selling 33 to a pair of patrons for ¥12,000.

She identified customer bank accounts, allowing police to identify 147 customers who paid her a total of ¥1,070,000 ($12,000). It is not clear whether police will be pursuing charges against them.

She admits the charges, saying she used the money to pay her rent and food bills as she had left home.

18-year-olds, though still technically minors under Japanese law, are perfectly legal to portray pornographically in Japan – although unconfirmed, observers think the most likely explanation for her arrest is that some of the photographs were of her when she was still 17, though naturally this hardly constitutes “child pornography” in the eyes of most.

The arrest has proven contentious amongst Japanese – some have denounced it as a typical abuse of a bad law in order to terrorise minors into chastity, whilst others express disgust at police and mass media which insist on calling an 18-year-old a “shoujo” instead of a young woman. None can identify a victim involved in the crime.

Ironically, she would not have faced any charges had she just had sex with the men for money, or sold them her pantsu, even if she was a minor at the time – Japanese police never take legal action against “child” prostitutes, except apparently when they happen to take pictures of themselves.

Even more ironically, in most parts of Japan a schoolgirl can be procured for much less than the patrons mentioned paid for a few dirty snaps…


    Post Comment »
    161 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of PrinceHeir
    Comment by PrinceHeir
    07:51 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    this laws are getting out of hand. i wouldn't surprised if u get arrested alone with your daughter at home naked oh wait....

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:57 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Pic or it never happpened.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    07:52 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ether the police were jealous of a girl for posting nude pictures of herself and selling it on the internet making that much money.

    Avatar of GHS
    Comment by GHS
    07:45 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah, CP. Always a hot topic for freedom of expression and what-not. Now, I don't know about the nuances of the American Constitution and their Bill of Rights, but I know for certain that in Canada, our rights and freedoms are not absolute. The government can set limits to those rights and freedoms, it's just that they need to be 'reasonable' limits. Take a case about harmful messages on cigarette packets. A company tried to say that being made to put messages about the dangers of smoking was against their freedom of expression, in this case the freedom to not say something. The courts agreed with them that their right was violated, but also concluded the government had a right to protect the general public against the hazards of smoking which took precedent over their right of (not) expressing something. The point is, if you don't like it, write to your local government representative and tell them to change things, or get out of your democratic country if you're so fed up with the "rediculous" laws.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:16 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That is a strange loophole in their laws...

    Then again, there is a loophole in their prostitution laws going the other way...

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:58 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The only thing these type of arrests do is get rid of the incompetent so that the REAL criminals have more elbow room, and even a few pieces of past police action to learn from. "Don't take pictures and I can rape all I like....got ya."

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:47 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And here i thought she was selling pictures of her when she was 5,6.
    but come on, 17 ?
    WTF is this shit ?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:53 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Just wondering, you know how you have those stupid pictures to make mobile pictures looker "cooler" I wonder if japanese mobiles come with a blur picture to censor the pictures of there mobile?

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:30 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's Konata. That's why she was arrested.

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:07 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If a girl selling underage pictures of herself is fine, then does that mean a man buying pictures of an underage girl who is selling her own picture also fine?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:26 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It should be, at least.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:12 05/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Reading stories like this makes me hope more and more for some meteor to hit the earth to make it 'restart' again o.o

    Honestly, I think less than 1% of all humans on the world have a working common sense...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:20 22/12/2016 # ! Neutral (0)

    Common sense is hardly common.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:45 17/02/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmmm... i think i would much prefer if it existed the halo array to fire as opposed to the randomness cause by a mess extinction sized meteor...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:35 02/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    yes, she should be arrested for selling those pics. honestly, thousands yen just for one pic? it's robbery!

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:31 03/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good point there Anon!

    That could come under a Consumer Court rather than Criminal Court, although free market laws still do apply.

    If the prices are too unreasonable, she would end up being boycotted. Though she might be appealing to altruistic nature (or sugar daddy nature) in people who pay too much for simple (low-value/valueless?) things as well.

    Consumers however also need general education (and reminders perhaps in media instead of all that useless and harmful subliminals and propaganda) that should be included in school 'Social Studies' syllabuses as well. Maybe a chapter on demanding receipts, real vs. apparent value and impulse purchases with this very case as an example . . .

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:08 01/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Innocent-Guilty Questionaire Factors (Yes/No questions determine what charges can be brought on. treat each question as a Juror).

    *Abstract Factors
    1) Who initiated the first move (threw the first punch)? Was this 'serial' / 'habitual' in nature or due to 'natural feelings of 'love'?
    2) Was act Consensual-Non-Coercive / Bribe-Pressure Induced (Did victim feel taken advantage of? Perpetrator's view of advantage taking form could be created.)
    3) Was the victim psychologically mature and intellectually capable of understanding relationships, has studied the subject sufficiently to make informed decisions? Psychological maturity could be tested to determine age for right to consent regardless of age.
    4) Cultural norm/practice justification?

    In this Sankaku example, factors 1, 2, 3 can be discounted. Factor 4 is debatable to a 50/50 degree.

    *Material Factors
    1) Onset of puberty another determining factor (Increases right based on uncontrollable chemical/mating instinct?)
    2) Physical maturity another determining factor (Increases right based on 'can carry to term with no significant risk to victim' as in life threatening Caesarians being required as opposed to having capacity for natural birth, regardless of pregnancy or non-pregnancy after the act)
    3) Is the victim a financial dependent? (Debatable : Financial dependent allowed/disallowed regardless of maturity AND if underage OR pre-pubescent may not be allowed to consent regardless of psychological maturity? Further - Can the law demand that Parental consent is required without trampling on self determinism and creating uproar among religious demographic? Is fiscal and statuary age based control of right of sexual association unconstitutional? (Leads to child labour laws AND psychological maturity issues / Application to pornograpy and media?)

    In this Sankaku example, all 3 Factors can be discounted.

    Verdict : 0.5 out of 7. Not guilty. Free her now with reparations pls., her intangible human rights are being trampled on.

    Avatar of Dryaxx
    Comment by Dryaxx
    03:34 18/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Can that even be illegal since it's herself =/

    Avatar of harry
    Comment by harry
    12:46 04/02/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    well same thing in america if your under 18, but you don;t have to sell it for it to be child porn, you could just be sexting nude pics to your boyfriend and it would be distributing child porn, the receiving end would be charged for getting it and the sender is the distributor.

    Avatar of daslasher
    Comment by daslasher
    02:47 10/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    okay shes 18 yet its child porn??????

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:33 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But last I checked, age of consent in Japan is 14, I've seen 15 and 16 year old gravure models, you can leave school and hold a job at 15, you can be in AVs at 18, and this WOMAN was already living on her own and out of school... HOW are they charging her with CHILD porn?

    This reminds me of how recently I was told I couldn't be an adult chaperone for my 13 year old sister and her 13/14 year old friends, because apparently "19 is still a child". I guess just because my sister and her friends are taller than me, EVEN THOUGH I have a legal State Identification Card that says I am an adult, registered to vote, and am an organ donor, I am "still a child"... *stares at Japan AND Australia for that matter*...

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:33 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Once you reach the age of consent for your state/country it shouldn't matter how old your partner is because you are, by law, technically old enough to be able to handle such decisions.
    So they should either scrap the sex with minors and change it to sex with under age of consent, or just move the age of consent up to when you are no longer considered a minor by law.
    I'm positive everyone but moral-fags and religious-fags will choose the former.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:45 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Anon (05:53 29/06/2010)

    You are wrong, theft or stealing is the only wrong thing one can do, even murder is only a form of it.
    Killing somebody is the same as stealing their life.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:13 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This post is pointless without pics...

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:26 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Are kids in their late teens still considered children in japan?

    What age do you become an "adult" in Japan?

    Avatar of Kei-chan
    Comment by Kei-chan
    06:04 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    18 in Japan, which you can get a license and marry (if your a guy, 16 girl). 20 is to legally drink for both sexes. I can't remember what else at 18 you can do, most other stuff i assume.

    This story is just an overabuse of laws designed to help children. Leave the girl alone judicial literal tards. Its not like she was actually hurting anyone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:44 05/03/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    16 if you're a girl...
    So what you're saying is that the police in Japan want same sex marriages

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    01:09 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Again, Japan FUBAR up their law. Seriously I've heard its fine to impregnate a 14! year old and marry her to boot there!

    And they arrest an EIGHTEEN YEAR old WOMAN for selling dirty pictures of HERSELF! They be messed up in sooo many ways in the governmentee there~

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:17 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The are finally, slowly starting to change these kind of stupid laws in the States.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-04
    23:55 28/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    CP should be legal to possess, make and sell if no one is hurt in the process. This is just ridiculous.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    07:25 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    More like "16 and up should not constitute CP to begin with". While I would call several minors "stupid teens/kids", I wouldn't put them under the same umbrella as a 10 y/o.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:34 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ehh....that's bull, and you know it.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-04
    17:40 30/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You mean bullseye, don't you?

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:24 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    15 is the average age of first sexual intercourse in my country, and 16 is the legal age if there's parental consent.

    There is not some out of control problem of STD's or teenage pregnancy, that's what we have sex ed for. Neither do these people get traumatized. Either the relationship works out or they break up and move on with their lives, no big deal and none of them ever complain.

    But here's the sad part. Go up across the border to some country with a legal age of 18 and suddenly that same couple gets torn appart, the older partner gets a long time in prison though not nearly long enough according to the common people, the younger partner will go to forced counseling and mysteriously ends up with a trauma, and the newspapers have a field day writing about the horrible "rape" while those 2 related families can live in shame for the rest of their lives. Than what is it really that causes the "psychological scarring"? The sexual relationship or the response of society towards it?

    If we wouldn't turn normal sexual activity into something almost spiritual and dogmatic, linked to totally unrelated concepts like respect, dignity, virtue,... there wouldn't have to be so many millions forced into the roles of victim and perpetrator.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'd agree with you if I didn't know from your previous posts that your definition of "not hurt" is narrowed down to "no scars or bruising visible".

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:41 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No it should not. I would agree with 'erotic' pics involving children only. NOT pornography as it can cause all sorts of damages. However, you can hardly call a 15 yr old a child. Maybe the limiting age is the problem here, not if it's legal or not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the making of child porn DOES hurt children. The act of simply doing it can hurt a child. It's a matter of psychological immaturity to make those decisions.

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-04
    17:38 30/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    We might want to phrase a definition of child porn, cause in my country every girl under the age of 18 showing a nipple falls under this law. Penetration hurts, duh. That's why I said, as long as no ones hurt, it's fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:13 21/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    there's no psychological immaturity, this is just a ridicolous unproven cliche everyone love to repeat without any sort of knowledge. In truth by the age of 14, even according to the strictest theories on cognitive development, you have all your marbles and have the same mind of a 40 years old. In fact the psychologist Robert Epstein created a test to determine how mature a person is and and tested many teens and adults and the result of this research is that generally teens are more psychologically mature than adults.

    Isn't it interesting that the age of maximum cognitive development and psychological maturity is the same on average you're fully into puberty. Do we need any more evidence that nature knows it better than poor arrogant humans and had already drawn its lines on the sand for us since millennia?

    Adolescence is a social myth, there's no psychological adolescent just childhood and adulthood and whether you're a mature adult or not has nothing to do with age but with the kind of person you choose to be. Teens are adults and have the same brain of adults (they actually have more grey matter) But we just have to observe our politicians to understand that having the brain of an adult means nothing, since it is capable of irrational and immature choices too.

    So clearly age can't be a limiting factor in making such a banal choice as what to do with your body, otherwise even immature 40 years old would be forbidden from making such choices. And the age recognizes that a 14 years old is mature, because while a 6 years old can kill a person withou consequence, a 14 years old is fully responsible for his crimes because he is perfectly capable of making a choice and thinking of its consequences. That's why 14 years old can be prosecuted and go do juvenile prison.

    And you're really telling me that at 14 you're old enough to maike the conscious choice to steal or kill but not old enough to make the conscious choice to have sex or take pictures of yourself naked? This is beyond stupid.

    You should read a book by Mike Males "America's War on Adolescents". He quotes dozen of studies that proves that teens are more compotent than adults, not more vulnerable or less mature at all and that treating them like babies that can't choose about their life is a form of slavery and the worst trauma they can receive not to mention a ridicolous modern norm.

    Avatar of GuhROOgaTRAVIS
    Comment by GuhROOgaTRAVIS
    23:42 28/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow, $12,000 pretty good. Think the authorities are being a little harsh. Although, if this happened here in the states, then I'm certain shit would have hit the fan a lot harder. It's Japan, give her a break.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    07:24 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She got a hell of a lot more than most of their teen prostitutes, that's for damn sure. And the only thing she had to spread her legs for was a camera.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of Anti-Pop
    Comment by Anti-Pop
    01:07 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    $, not ¥ baby ^^

    Avatar of Shizu's Waki Obsessor: MaidNiac
    23:39 28/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Meh, 17 or 18, they're just a couple of freaking numbers.

    Or Saitama has taken a few steps of becoming the next Australia..?

    Avatar of g0dslay3r
    Comment by g0dslay3r
    23:25 28/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so a father who excessively dotes on his 18 year old daughter is a lolicon according to japanese law?

    Avatar of HKE
    Comment by HKE
    10:25 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Something that i want to know about child porn... is how a " 1x years child" is still a "child" when it have already her period and can work part-time jobs and alot stuff

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:58 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wasn't there a case where a man was arrested because he was doting on his preteen daughter, whom people thought was a prostitute?

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:45 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So if you're both 17, dating and having sex... then you (the guy) had a birth day and turn 18 and she gives you birthday sex... you're a pervert that needs to go to jail?

    Yeah, it can be that screwed up.

    Avatar of DHYohko
    Comment by DHYohko
    23:29 28/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    probably, heck under US law if you date a 17 yr old and your 18 or older your a pedophile because she's still techincally a minor....

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:12 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Saying "In the USA..." is usually a bad thing to do when the laws your talking about vary by state. The states vary wildly on the age of sexual consent. But yes, Some states and prosecuters are crazy about that kind of thing(18 yr + 17 yr) in the US. As I say constantly in everyday life "Too many **** lawyers".

    I mean, We have to warn people that the coffee they just paid for is hot. Really? Should we also put red warning labels up the left legs of jeans to warn people that "This product is meant to be worn on BOTH legs. Failing to use this product properly could result in injury". With a circle with a line through it depicting a man trying to wear them on his arms(Extending away from his back) and little lines pointing to his lower back to illistrate that he won't be standing as tall as he use to.

    -Maddog

    Avatar of Azure Xuchilbara
    Comment by Azure Xuchilbara
    07:51 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    These sexually related laws are getting more and more retarded as the ones making them are becoming more paranoid and hysteric...Of not getting any~

    I guess if she let those cops in on the action, they'd probably let her off...And when I mean in on the action, I mean use her as a cum dump in some public restroom whenever they please...

    I feel sorry for the teenagers and children getting labeled as "Sex Offenders" because of these stupid laws...

    These laws, not only in Japan, but the rest of the world...Really need a bloody makeover...

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:46 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually theres a 2yr rule now. so as long as your within 2yrs of age of the person it's legal. so if i'm 18 and shes 16 it's legal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:08 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "probably, heck under US law if you date a 17 yr old and your 18 or older your a pedophile because she's still techincally a minor...."

    No, that's not US law, that's certain state laws. There is no national age of consent in the US, it's all done state by state. At least half the states are 16, a bunch more are 17, and maybe just a quarter are 18.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    07:21 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    These are the laws that people should rally to change. However, you should be warned in advanced that if you attempt to speak reasonably about issues like this, people will most likely claim you to be a pedophile, or promoting teen promiscuity.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:29 03/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's not true, there are laws that state that if you are over 18 years of age then there is a 3 year difference between people you can sleep with legally, for example an 18 yr old can sleep with a 15 year old and it isn't illegal. However, a 22 year old can't sleep with an 18 year old because they are more than 3 years of age, this works until the person reaches 21 where after that anything is open game. I don't know if this is true for other states, but this is true for Texas.

    Avatar of yaoibanana
    Comment by yaoibanana
    11:13 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    @DHYohko
    That is not true. I was 17 when my mom was trying to get me and my BF (he was 18) in trouble (she was mad because I stoped being her slave.) The cops came to my door and they told her that our relationship was legal because he is only a year older than me.

    Avatar of cryptnotic
    Comment by cryptnotic
    14:41 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No one really cares about the distinction, but it's only technically pedophilia if the object of sexual desire is prepubescent. Desire or attraction towards a sexually mature youth is not considered an abnormal paraphilia. That being said, acting on such feelings is illegal and suppressed in our society because of the social immaturity of the youth.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:54 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To DHYohko. U.S. Law (depending on the state) allows an 18yr old male to have sex with a 16 year old girl. A 19 year old can have sex with a 17 year old girl. You can legally have sex with a girl 2 years younger then you, but no younger.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:55 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not in all states. In Florida you can be older than 18 and date a minor so long you are not 3 year older than said minor. Other states have the legal age at 17 and 16 under similar conditions.

    http://www.avert.org/age-of-consent.htm

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:27 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you're within 5 years in age of each other then you are free from any legal restrictions involving pedophilia/etc.

    Dating itself is harmless. You can date all you want up and down the sidewalk for all the law cares. Sex on the other hand must play into the age of consent guidelines for most teenagers, otherwise it's statutory rape regardless of the age.

    The dicey stuff is when two 16-year olds go at it and their parents get upset. It's like playing judge-roulette. ;p

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:01 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What if I was 19 years old and was dating a 14 year old?

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:44 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're an idiot. Paedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children and prepubescent children only. A seventeen-year-old girl does not qualify.

    And there is no law relating to paedophilia; it is not illegal to be a paedophile, nor does any such charge bearing the name exist. Child abuse, yes. Attraction, no.

    Learn to research or leave the talking to the grown-ups.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:49 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    being a 'pedo' is if you are sexually attracted to 8 year olds or under. Otherwise, its natural. Girls can have babies at 12, thus logicially men are instictually attracted to girls of around and above this age, with variations due to prefference: some like older, some like younger,etc. Nature doesnt give a damn about how old you are when you give birth, only human society cares about that

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:20 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    oh you anon
    look up the word before you speak about it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:36 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The anon above is partially correct. Though it would be best to describe this situation with the term ephebophilia.

    Pedophilia refers to sexual interest in someone who is prepubescent (as puberty depends person to person there is no all-encompassing age to prescribe). Generally an age of ~11 is used as an average.

    Once pubesent there are 2 terms to prescribe. If a younger (ie 11-14) hebephilia and if older (ie 15-19) ephebophilia.

    Ephebophilia was quite common in the beginning of the last century and before and due to the general ignorance of most people is now considered interchangable with pedophilia.

    The major difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia is that first is a horrible disease and not natural (I'm speaking from a evolutionary standpoint as I am not religious). Ephebophilia is an entirely different condition and quite natural, the people who "have" it are not necessarily sick, in truth all men have some level of ephebophilia since evolutionarily the healthiest babies come from younger mothers.

    Anyhow, that's my 2 cents and I hope it will satiate some of the misinformation regarding pedophilia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:36 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Pedophiles have been around since the Ancient Greeks, or maybe even earlier. Plus, in non-Western countries, it's perfectly normal for an adult to have sex with a child. It's proof of that child's ascend to adulthood.

    Here in the West, we've outlawed it because of religion. And it has given us a warped perspective of pedophilia and adult-child sex. Children have become mindless beings with no sense of sexuality whatsoever and who apparently don't know themselves well enough to know what they like and don't like.

    What's even stranger is that there is no unanimously agreed AOC worldwide. One country sets it at 13, others at 18. Even in the US itself, each state has its own AOC. So, if 'experts' can't agree on when a child truly becomes sexually mature, why do we put so much value into their words whenever they speak bad of adult-child relations, or even the law itself?

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:00 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why are you trying to justify being a pedo? Get help instead.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:02 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, but what if...say someone who's much older than 18 but looks young enough and has a small frame? A lot of asian girls do seem to fit this description...so does that mean lots of asians are pedophiles cause we prefer our shorter girls because we're short ourselves? :<

    And what if I'm skinny as hell and prefer to be able to hug someone with my somewhat short arms? T_T

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:07 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    that doesn't make any sense at all

    Avatar of MasterYuke
    Comment by MasterYuke
    08:50 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    say that if a guy dated a 13 year old girl when he was 15. now that he is 18, would he be busted for being a pedophile? because that's what this story sounds like: things that happened in the past when she was illegal...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:04 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What if you steal in order to feed yourself or your children? Is it still evil then?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:53 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Little problem, Anonymous.

    Outside of:

    1. Killing a person or physically injuring a person without their permission.
    2. Stealing from another person.
    3. Forcing someone to do or not do something that they do not or do wish to do.

    There is NO SUCH THING as 'evil'. Those are the only 3, possibly 4 if you count the two things in number 1 as two separate things, that are TOTALLY EVIL AND WRONG!

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:10 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what about psychological torture? I would say that recurrent and credible threats of violence or whatnot are evil even if they are never acted upon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:08 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    According to Les Miserables stealing for food is evil.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:10 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    stealing is a sin no less, but I blame the society for turning their back on the fellow that has to steal to feed others

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:31 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Btw, the bit about 17 and 18 year olds is not a catch-all rule. I know it's so in California, however age-of-consent laws are different in various states.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#Defences_and_exceptions

    Close in age
    While most legislation dealing with age of consent sets a single age under which sexual relations are illegal, some jurisdictions (such as Canada[10]), have adopted close-in-age exemptions. In Canada the age of consent is 16, but there are two close-in-age exemptions: teenagers who are 14 or 15 may have sex with a partner who is less than five years older, and children aged 12 and 13 may have sex with a partner who is less than two years older. In the United States, these exceptions are colloquially known as "Romeo and Juliet" laws.

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    03:43 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Of course it's not making sense. Laws are not supposed to make sense. They just want us to blindly follow them without questioning.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:06 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Smart person should be alble to more or less tell the diference betwen whts good and 'evil'.

    For less smart people the LAW was made so that they can be told whats bad. Unfortunetly they liked it and since than bigest retards make laws for other minor retards to follow.

    Not the first case... not the last...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:37 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I lol hard how stupid it is. Facepalm.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    technically that isn't how the law works in the US there are clauses about things like that, but if it were a 17 year old and a 25 year old would be different.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:33 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    isn't weird that a fairly liberal state like california has age of consent of 18? i hate this place

    Avatar of alidan
    Comment by alidan
    15:32 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    here is the thing in America. you have to take laws with a grain of salt.

    bad laws can be put in place and are technically illegal to go ageist, but if you go before a judge and jury its possible to get the law thrown out or to use a different similar case as a deference.

    thats why loli is technically illegal, but no one has ever stood up to the law, opting for a lenient sentence, and guaranteed release instead.

    with age of consent concerned, my friend who was 17 went out with a 16 year old phyco bitch (not making that up) broke up with her, and was scared shitless for the next few years because she could have went after him with a statutory rape charge.

    granted i believe there is a 5-7 year limit on that type of thing. but the point it he had sex with her, and "rape" in this context is just normal sex. everyone knew they did it and he cant realy defend himself at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:36 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Due to a crazy law in GA, that age of consent only applies to penetration. Oral sex will land you in jail if she's 16, this is one of those times when a BJ just isn't worth it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:39 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Plus, it's also dependent upon the state in question. Some have 16 as the age of consent, others 17 and some 18.

    Age of consent 16: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia

    Age of consent 17: Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Texas

    Age of consent 18: Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, North Dakota, Oregon, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:39 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    in italy you will not charged if you and the other have an age difference minor of 5 years

    ex: 19yo with a 15 yo it's ok
    20 yo with a 15yo it's not ok

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:52 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's not like that in italy.
    Age of consent is 14 wich raises to 16 if one of the partner has some kind of authority upon the other (e.g. an educator and his pupil).
    If one of the two partners is below 14yo then there must be a maximum difference of 3ys between them (e.g. 13-16).
    To sum it up here in italy you can freely fuck with a 14yo, but it's still risky because if he/she reports you to the police you will mostly get accused rape and shit like that.
    14yo is not so low anyway they are not that much loli anymore at that age :(

    Avatar of Chrouya
    Comment by Chrouya
    03:18 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Nice, time to go to Italy and hunt lolis while I'm still young!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:37 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Age of consent laws don't work that way DHYohko
    kill you'are saelf.,

    Avatar of GHS
    Comment by GHS
    03:52 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The legal age of consent and the age you need to be in legal pornography is often different. For example, the legal age of consent in Canada is only 14, while the legal age in pornography is 18. This basically you can have sex with a 14 year old, but if you make a video of it or whatnot, you can technically be charged for making child porn. On a side note, CP can be legal in Canada, it's just that it needs to be pretty much made out of your own imagination, like a journal of your sexual fantasies, and it can't be shared with anyone else and is kept completely hidden and private.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:55 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually the age of concent in Canada was upped to 16 decades ago. Stating 14 (given the youngest ages of concent in N.A. are 16) will start a wave of loli lovers rushing into canada from all over to get arrested. Get your own 14 year olds, these ones are mine!

    Avatar of GHS
    Comment by GHS
    07:05 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, now that I check back, the age of consent wasn't raised "decades ago", it was actually raised a mere 2 years ago, back in 2008. Sorry folks, the bar has been raised already up North, sorry for any inconvenience.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:57 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It is ironic.

    Not eighty years ago it was weird for a woman to be unwed by the age of sixteen and it was perfectly normal for thirty year old men to marry teenaged girls.

    Now that apparently as we are freeing homosexuals and loosinening marriage laws. Laws against us hetrosexuals are becoming harsher and harsher.

    I'm not religious, but fuck, give me back mah RIGHTS! LIBERTY!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:37 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Age of consent refers to sexual contact, has nothing to do with dating, hell you can kiss a small child and it's technically not illegal, unless they aren't willing.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:49 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That isn't true in most states since they have a law that makes sex within a certain age range legal. I'm not sure but I think the ge range is usually 4 years.

    Avatar of Frederica Bernkastel
    04:47 29/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sadly, I don't like this type of article...The more I read it, the more I find it eerie irl when a (>40)father and his (16>)daughter go for a walk together...

    [T_T There...another bravery]






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments