zettai-ryouiki-fellatio

A court has ruled that a prostitute will be able to take legal action against her pimp for sacking her for refusing to perform oral sex on a client, despite prostitution itself being illegal.

The prostitute was told by the South African Labour Appeal Court that she would be able to seek redress after she lost her job at a massage parlour, in spite of the fact her work was completely illegal.

She is said to have been sacked for refusing to perform oral sex, letting her boyfriend visit her room, picking and choosing her clients, and for failing to secure enough johns.

She claims she has the right to refuse sexual acts to clients at her own discretion:

“Irrespective of the work I do, it’s my choice. When I fall in love, I want to say, here is something special I have to offer you.”

She inexplicably explains fellatio after sex is like being “a legal secretary and your boss asks you to make him a cup of tea. Of course you would be offended.”

Ruling on the case, the judge said that “the fact that prostitution is rendered illegal does not destroy all the constitutional protection which may be enjoyed by someone as an appellant, were they not to be a sex worker.”

However, this only pertains to the court being able to hear the case – whether the employers of prostitutes have the right to insist they actually do the work they were hired for is another matter.

It would appear if illegality is no barrier to labour law, then drug dealers and hitmen must also be given protection, and unsurprisingly a lawyer is ready to argue that this is in fact the case:

“You can’t distinguish between different kinds of illegal work.

The constitutional protection afforded by Section 23 (1) applies to everyone in an employment relationship, including, for example, a drug dealer in an employment relationship with someone he reports to.”


    Post Comment »
    98 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    00:10 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Pfff... ridiculous.

    Avatar of Shuubi
    Comment by Shuubi
    22:02 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I dont see why this has much to do with feminism. If she was a 'feminist', why the hell would she be a prostitute?

    Hell for all we know the guy could have had a damn creepy, disease-ridden dick covered in pus-oozing sores.

    Avatar of a bag of shit
    Comment by a bag of shit
    22:55 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Were a man to try to sue his "employer" of some obviously illegal "job," it would not even go to trial. In fact, the man would probably be brought up on the charges of what he admitted to doing. That's why there's so many posts about feminism/equality now.

    It ties into the myriad of recent cases in which women are engaging in illegal acts and the law is failing to punish them while the men involved get the book thrown at them. Modern judicial systems are increasingly treating women like permanent children/minors, letting them get away with almost anything.

    Avatar of stillcode
    Comment by stillcode
    21:49 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You know, in the past it was impossible for a whore to be raped because rape was considered stealing a woman's dignity and whores had no dignity to steal in the first place.

    I fail to see why the law intervenes in the illicit activities of ignominious people who refuse to participate by the laws of society. I say that if you turn your back on the law then don't come running for the law to protect you only when it suits you.

    Avatar of tingle
    Comment by tingle
    02:41 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    lol, must be one ugly customer. If a hooker turns you down you must REALLY be awful.

    South Africa has been pretty bad since the redistribution of land. Aparthied was bad but Mandella didn't know shit about running a country and made some huge economic mistakes.

    Avatar of tingle
    Comment by tingle
    02:46 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    I like what she said about her right to refuse acts. It may be odd, and it is odd but it is her right.

    Also she should get a better more understanding pimp like Butters. If she were butters' bottom botch he'd understand.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:59 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    -She inexplicably explains fellatio after sex is like being “a legal secretary and your boss asks you to make him a cup of tea. Of course you would be offended.”-

    This is a really bad comparison for many reasons.

    1, fellatio is a service that is normally performed by a hooker. While serving tea isn't normally a service provided by a legal secretary. She's comparing a service that is normally performed by her profession to a service that is not normally performed by another profession.

    2, I don't think a legal secretary would be "offended" at being asked by their boss to make a cup of tea. Perhaps they wouldn't be very "happy" with the request, but "offended" isn't quite the word I'd use to describe the feeling.

    3, She was fired for not performing the fellatio. But her comparison analogy doesn't have anything to do with the legal secretary being fired. It doesn't mirror her own situation.

    Etc.

    Avatar of Ben
    Comment by Ben
    13:15 26/08/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    *facepalm*

    Sadly, I don't even know how to argue against this...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:42 16/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Absolute bullshit. She is a prostitute, do your fucking job. If you even get a guy to love you back knowing how dirty you are you think he'll care? I hope she losese

    Comment by Pyrolight
    00:39 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    However, this only pertains to the court being able to hear the case – whether the employers of prostitutes have the right to insist they actually do the work they were hired for is another matter.

    She still could be ... "boned" for not giving out gummers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:37 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Does anyone know what game or series the article's image is from?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:39 05/10/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    south africa you crazy

    Avatar of Tateha
    Comment by Tateha
    07:16 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    giving a blowjob is like the most important job to do if your a hooker, if i was a pimp i'd fire her aswell.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:08 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well the pimp did the right thing if she wont blow a dude which is probably the biggest money maker I would have to get rid of her. Her job description is to pleasure the person paying. At my work I don't get to choose who I have to help.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:08 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whores should so what they're are told.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:08 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Whores should do what they're told.

    Avatar of Daiyousei
    Comment by Daiyousei
    05:25 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't you see? This is all a brilliant ploy on the part of law enforcement! They'll let it go for a few weeks like this, treating the cases and such as legit, , dutifully recording names, then after three or four months when all the criminals have gotten used to this they'll do a massive, over-night crack down and eliminate about 1/4 of the crime in the country!

    Avatar of darkkimsei
    Comment by darkkimsei
    03:16 12/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    All we need to solve this case is to look at the contract they had. Go through it and see if there is a clause for this type of thing. Or she should have a list of things she is willing to do prior to the meeting. That way a "customer" can decide to go for it or not. They just need a little bit of help here. Do we not learn from Japan at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:47 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What series is the picture come from? Look nice

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    10:20 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Zettai Ryouiki. It's in the line of text which appears when you run the mouse over the picture.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:45 12/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I pity the fool that doesn't know what zettai ryouiki means.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:46 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, is South Africa's judicial system a joke? Remember is it the raep capital of the world...lol...

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:39 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Define "sacked." :l

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:33 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Fired, Laid off, Unemployed etc.

    Avatar of GHS
    Comment by GHS
    19:27 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think he meant it as a lame joke...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:24 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I thought he meant "teabag".

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:54 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    DUDE!!
    If you do something illegal and your clients don't pay you for it, don't ask the court for a refund...

    HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    20:28 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think the customer should just pay more or just go get another whore, supply and demand works both ways.

    Avatar of Godot
    Comment by Godot
    16:01 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I remember seeing this story from a couple months ago. Although, I can't remember if its on TV or internet because i was sure i saw a video clip of it. Isn't it weird or does this only happen to me? =/

    Anyway, the woman was fired years ago and it took her several years to figure out she could probably sue. Incidentally she supports a jobless boyfriend/husband and a child, i think.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:30 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Uh yeah either find the link or all I see is BS.

    Plus this woman does not sound like the one you just described either.

    Avatar of Godot
    Comment by Godot
    19:29 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Found a link. No video though. I may have saw on tv or its just my memories fucking with me.

    Friday, 12 March 2010

    A South African sex worker has gone to court, saying she was unfairly sacked by a Cape Town massage parlour.

    Known as Kylie, she was dismissed for choosing her clients and spending time with her boyfriend who did not pay for her services, local media report.

    The judge said he was not sure how a person engaged in an illegal activity could challenge her dismissal in court.

    Kylie has spent seven years trying to seek redress after being sacked in 2003.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8563923.stm

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    10:23 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    'Boyfriends' who pay for a sex worker's services are customers. Or husbands, depending on where you live.

    Avatar of PrinceHeir
    Comment by PrinceHeir
    14:56 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow guess what's next? i'll sue for not drinking my milk?

    Avatar of Riiku
    Comment by Riiku
    14:51 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "It would appear if illegality is no barrier to labour law, then drug dealers and hitmen must also be given protection"

    I wouldnt agree. Hitmen do a direct harm to people. He kills them. Same goes for drugs. But prostitution, although formally illegal, stand on a different, more moralistic ground, because it does not directly harm anyone (the process of forcing prostitutes to do business is another matter). I, for one, dont care how the goverment THINK of it and what laws imposes on it. Rationally, she deserves certain protection, until you think that, lets say, if a witch was caught in medievil society, she doest deserve any kind of indulgence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:58 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    As a hoe she can harm poeple. if she has a disease she can kill a man with a blow or should i say kiss of death.

    Avatar of alidan
    Comment by alidan
    15:37 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i have to disagree on the drugs.

    i live in an area where if there is something you want, you can get it. nobody forces you.

    and before its said, there is a difference between users and addicts. and unlike everything you hear, doing a drug once doesn't make you an addict, with certain well known exceptions.

    and for the record, i dont do drugs, but most of the people i know at one point did acid, or have taken a line of coke.

    Avatar of Riiku
    Comment by Riiku
    21:29 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually I thought twice on writing about drugs, because I honestly believe that person who get himself addicted and therefore get harmed by the drugs, are entirely, ultimately and one-sidedly at fault. Nobody else is responsible for the fact that he HIMSELF chose to consume it. Therefore in my sense, it does not directly harm anyone.

    But I decided to follow herd morality on this one, cuz it was a hassle, and my point was prostitution, not drugs.

    Avatar of Psychosomatic
    Comment by Psychosomatic
    15:29 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    With drugs harming people it depends more on the type of drug being sold. Cocaine, heroine, etc etc aren't the only drugs that get sold illegally. Take prescription narcotics, for example. Mostly depends on how the person in question takes said drugs. (i.e. binging on something to OD levels or simply 'that crazy night a week ago')
    And as far as prostitution not harming anyone, that's not 100% either. There are a host of STD's out there that get transferred. From a bad case of crabs to AIDs.
    So the only thing I can really concur with you on for causing harm to others is a hitman. Money exchanges hands for the explicit purpose of injuring/killing another person.
    To the point, though....trying to grant rights given by law to something that is unlawful in the first place seems rather counter-intuitive.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:31 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Regardless if some of these, "professions", are more or less morally sound than one another, it has nothing to do with the legal aspect. Arguing that prostitution does or does not harm anyone is pointless, because the fact of the matter is it's illegal, and therefore would fit in with any other illegal line of work, whether your personal opinion believes this should be otherwise or not.

    Avatar of Riiku
    Comment by Riiku
    21:35 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh. So, as I said above, when during middle ages people catch a "witch", and burn it alive, just because they, out of fuck, thought she is a witch, the said witch entirely get what she deserved, right? Because "law" said so. And you certanly just did.

    I'm talking not about what system considers "legal", or about law. I'm talking about justice.

    I cant believe you got +0.4 for this as of yet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:32 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree, if it's illegal to do the job then it doesn't really matter if you get screwed over while doing it cause you shouldn't have been doing it to begin with.

    For example it's illegal to sell drugs. So if someone stole the dealers drugs and he called the cops saying "Ya some dude just broke into my house and stole all the illegal drugs I'm trying to sell." The cops would laugh at him and likely arrest him for being a dealer. I've known plenty of people who've gotten ripped off while selling or buying drugs and there's not a whole lot they can do about it.

    In fact I remember reading in the paper a few years ago about a guy who called the cops on someone for stealing his weed and he was arrested for possession.

    So in other words even if they let the prostitute take legal action against her pimp they should both be jailed for taking part in illegal business practices.

    Avatar of Riiku
    Comment by Riiku
    21:37 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The question is, do you believe it's wrong, without stereotypes? Or do you just think so because some one said to you it's wrong?

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:32 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I must applaud you for separating personal opinion from jurisdiction. We need more people like you. :D

    Avatar of softbanker
    Comment by softbanker
    14:37 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    A pimp slap would do the trick.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:27 11/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, no. Beat around your stable and you're not much of a pimp. Real pimps that know what they're doing would have already have the girl programmed to think he's her daddy, boyfriend, employer, etc all rolled into one. Just threaten to take all that away from her and see if her emotionally-wrecked self can survive out there on her own. And if she does start to have an independent mind, fuck her, throw her out - she's broken goods anyway. There are ten more girls out there willing to replace her anyway.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:32 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    pimp's snake slap.

    Avatar of Piecake
    Comment by Piecake
    15:01 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can't really complain if the courts are going to uphold law, but it seems silly.

    Avatar of Barbarian of Gor
    Comment by Barbarian of Gor
    15:17 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The "Modern women who seek to destroy Men" sure have a long reach...

    I mean, if she didn't want to service the "Freak" who likes to whip her till she bleeds then shit on her, but don't pay no mo' than no' reg'lar blowjob... That'd be reasonable, but she's a prostitute for goodness sake...

    But, Gawdz, even the WHORES in a sh-t country being hard to deal with...

    Oh, and on the legal thing:

    Technically, she should lose instantly with it not even getting to trial.

    It is a long standing legal precedent in basically all man's laws and traditions that an "Illegal or Immoral agreement is unenforceable in court." Capone, for instance, couldn't have "Sued" a hitman he hired to ice somebody, not that he'd have bothered or I'd want to be or be anywhere near that 'hitman'... In a country where prostitution is legal, she could bring issue, the 'moral' part would likely be set aside, but otherwise no...

    That is, though I'm sure "Equality Now" and the other "Modern women who seek to destroy men" will try to mess with this...!

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    15:17 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid ass whore + Greedy lawyer + Retarded Judge =
    prostitute charging her pimp cause of being fired...

    Me > Facepalm.

    Avatar of alidan
    Comment by alidan
    15:41 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lets go this way.

    you are a whore, probably the best and only way you can get a job in that shit hole of a country.

    aids and dessess is everywhere, and you dont want to catch it.

    you do your job, but you dont want to suck off the 300lbs guy who probably only got laid through whores means more chance dessess (fat in that part of the world, i know but point still stands)

    should you be fired because you didnt want to suck that thing? even if you did do your job?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:26 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sure I agree but that doesn't change the fact a guilty prostitute is taking the law into her own hands, a lawyer is using a woman to make money and a judge allowing her to get away with this while ignoring the fact she too Broke the damn law.

    Talk about a fn oxymoron if I ever saw one.

    If your willing to fuck a dick for money then you better be prepared to get on your knees if you ask me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:41 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree. By the way, if you get hired and have to do work for your boss, you should also agree to blow his dick.

    Because well you were hired and you can't refuse things your boss tells you.

    Avatar of alidan
    Comment by alidan
    20:18 10/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    prostitution is a bullshit thing to make illegal. anf there are only 2 reasons for it

    1 religion
    2 morals

    because when you make it illegal you make a black market, and its also unsafer.

    but where its legal, you can openly inspect and make sure everything is safe, and you you have no black market.





    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments