BDSM Sex Couple Charged with Assault
- Categories: International, News
- Date: Jun 6, 2010 22:53 JST
- Tags: BDSM, Bizarre, Censorship, Courts, Feminism, Law, Rape, Sweden
A couple who decided to engage in kinky BDSM sex now face prosecution after police decided to file charges of aggravated assault against the man, despite both parties consenting.
The couple, a 32-year-old man and a 16-year-old girl (the age of consent in Sweden is 15), met on a Swedish sex website and struck up a steamy BDSM-based relationship.
The girl, apparently the masochist of the pair, wrote in a letter that she wanted to be “used, abused and thoroughly humiliated,” and her sadistic partner was only too happy to oblige, locking her into a cage and applying nipple clamps, amongst other acts.
However, a relative of the girl noticed bruises left over from their play, and police soon stuck their nose in with a view to arresting the man.
The public prosecutor is outraged at the consenting couple’s dungeon antics, conceding that whilst she cannot charge the man with rape due to the consenting nature of their sex, she can still charge him with aggravated assault whether both parties consented or not:
“What I want to establish is that even if they say they are in agreement over this then you not allowed to seriously assault someone.
It is on this issue that the district court has to issue a ruling, is this aggravated assault and was she able to agree to it?”
Sweden apparently allows consenting parties to beat each other’s brains out if they do so in the ring, as with boxing or similar, but it may very well not be permissible to engage in rough sex or BDSM play, consent or no.
The defendant is said to be calling an expert in sadomasochism to testify on his behalf, in a case which could soon be giving police in less radical nations ideas about how to finally get rid of their unwanted perverts without falling foul of tedious arguments over civil liberties – simply accuse them of violence against women.
Leftist gender politics appear to have come full circle – once intended to free women from traditional restrictions, advocates of such politics now use them to restrict and control others, imposing censorship and anti-sex laws in the name of protecting women and girls from male bestiality.
Indeed, feminism is now ironically proving far more effective than traditional religious concerns in imposing moralist laws on the public – few things are now considered more harmful than something potentially injurious to the rights of women.
| 
Gate Monstrously Chaotic
Tekken 7: Fated Retribution Trailer A Total Knock Out
Valkyria Chronicles Remaster Gunplay PV
Sankaku App 1.6: Intents & Users
Top 20 Winter 2016 Anime You’ll Keep Watching
Uppers PV Dives Headfirst
Subarashii Sekai Jokes Abound
Musaigen no Phantom World Full of Cute Girls
Bullet Girls 2 PV Unsurprisingly Naughty
Bashful Homura Figure
To Love-Ru Darkness Tentacle Troubles Abound
Mangaka Celebrate Twintails Day
Hoppa Hentai Vaginar Virgin Red Sentai Parody Onahole
Taimanin Yukikaze “Lowest of the Low!”
Yandere Simulator Gets Personal
Naruto SUN Storm 4 OP Endlessly Energetic
Saijaku Muhai no Bahamut Hardly Draconic
Splatoon Squid Sisters Invade NicoNico Tokaigi 2016
Top 9 Anime of 2015, According to IGN
Rena Momozono’s Hot Hardcore F***ing Eloquently Titled
Carnivore Taiga Cosplay Too Cute For Words
Alluring Ahri Cosplay Magically Charming
Tsukihi Araragi BDSM Ero-Cosplay by Komugi Platinum Sexy
Goddess of Twitter “Pink & Perky!”
Serene Horo Cosplay Pure Gold
Iona Ero-Cosplay by Komugi Taking on Water
Cute Kashima Cosplay Full of Elegance
Umaru Ero-Cosplay by Asami Hamsterific
Goddess of 2ch: “Pink & Soft All The Way!”
Kuroneko Cosplay by Mikehouse Full of Life
The irony of you chastising others for not having the balls to challenge laws you don't like from within an anonymous forum post sailed entirely over your head, didn't it pedo?
Contesting statutory rape is like trying to prevent witch burnings. You're not going to be popular for trying.
This is true of many loony left countries.
I think the UK also does not allow consensual sm
lefts are always worried about a fascist take over but in truth the fascists are in power
How exactly are fascists in power? Fascism is virtually dead in Europe considering what happened in World War 2. The original fascists are either dead or old beyond belief.
Where that picture comes from?
I find it hilarious that the prosecutor is trying to force her to sue when it seems that no one else in her family is trying to go against him, lol.
banging someone half your age; epic win. going to jail for bruise marks; prison rape.
Some additional information according to Swedish newspapers is that she stayed at his apartment for a weekend. He told the police that he during times locked her in a cage and also that he put clamps on her nipples that he fastened to the wall, forcing her to stand on her toes unable to move and proceeded to whip/cane her.
When she got home, her mother noticed severe bruising and swelling and therefore contacted the police. The police are bound by law to start an investigation, and that investigation later lead to charges being filed.
There are no information about what the girl has or has not said, other than the prosecutor saying that the crime is more serious due to that she is a young girl that is very (implied; psychologically) unwell. This could really mean anything though and is a pretty standard thing to say.
My personal reflection is that I cant help but wonder what taking this case to court is going to do to her, depending on how she feels about it today.
ToxikEnvy: They are not forcing her to sue, she doesn't need to do anything and can just sit quiet if she wishes. Assault and aggravated assault falls under "common charges" or something along those lines which means police are forced to investigate and file charges even if the victim does not wish for it.
"male bestiality"? Someone needs to consult a dictionary before writing.
this is some BS, but he will get punished for this no matter what happens due to people being retarded nowadays.
You guys really need to read the facts articles instead of Artefact's usual sexist slant he sticks on the end of thinsg.
Your issues with 'feminism' and 'evil womenz' have nothing to do with this. It's just a dumb case, caused by dumb police and dumb lawyers and a dumb bystander. The girl involved in all this did not press charges against the man; remind me again why this has anything to do with women being evil?
You need to learn that both men and women are flawed, and nonemoreso than the other. In a general sense, it's humanity itself that is 'evil', gender has nothing to do with it. And anyone who sincerely buys into that view that containing a difference in chromosomes somehow influences your moral decency, I honestly just feel sorry for you.
The evil prosecutor in this case, Ulrika Rogland, is a woman.
So, because one woman does something bad, all women are bad.
Yeah, that's sexism at work. Thanks for giving such a wonderful example.
I mean, your claim is as idiotic as claiming that, proven by your idiotic comment, all men are idiots.
In reality, men generally aren't idiots, even if you are one. Using logical fallacies doesn't make you smart, it just makes you easy to laugh at.
What did I claim?
Why is my comment idiotic?
Why am I an idiot?
I quoted you where you asked what this had to do with women being evil. I gave an example of a woman being evil. That's it. Then you went on a fucking rampage about what you probably wish I had said just so that you could rage about some bullshit you had read somewhere else.
Do the world a favor; take anger management classes.
p.s. Internet = srsbsns. Ya rly.
Well, proves that lawyers are scum like we did not know that anyway.
Can someone tell me about a page where I can find girls who want to be (at least) verbally abused?
I see, Swedens criminality rate isn't actually that high, the prosecutors are just paranoid.
Maybe they are so bored from the lack of criminals that they are willing to prosecute innocent people just to have something to do.
As a girl who loves being submissive, this really pisses me off. Not only are they totally invading this couple's privacy, but they are totally out of line by comparing it to violence against women. I hate these fucking anti-sex "feminists" who are trying to tell me that my fantasies and inclinations are wrong. Stay out of my damn bedroom.
I hear you sister! I can't stand these feminazis that think they can make decisions for us, the ones they think they are protecting. If they were truly advocating women's rights, they would let all women think what they want to think, not how THEY want to think.
But that would open the field for men to brainwash women into thinking they like to have sex with them!!!
Sounds like that man
*puts on sunglasses*
needs to pull his head out his ass.
See what I mean?
The New World Order wants to enslave humanity, and one of their most powerful weapons is to destroy the man, under all sorts of guises, like "Feminism".
Problem is that the rights of the feminists and these moral crusaders STOP when they are trying to force their view of morality on other people, period and done with.
I am very sure that Sweden's courts will see the perilous path that the police are treading down, and will throw out this case.
It's also time to realize that 'pervert' is a man-made invention that has no meaning, period and done with.
It's not a question about sex, it's a question if you are allowed to assault someone because they consent. They can have sex as much as they want according to the law.
For example, two drunk men in a bar decides to go outside and beat the crap out of each other, both of them will be charged with assault in Sweden. This case is about sex, but couldn't one say that the state shouldn't be involved in a private duel either?
According to the law you cannot consent to assault. Don't think this case will go anywhere though, just make sure no one sees your partner beaten black and blue.
It's not the same thing. When you're drunk you're not fully aware of what you're doing and saying.
Unless this girl was not in full possession of her faculties (which I highly doubt) I don't see why the state should be involved.
hmm if they are both agreed upon doing(which is stated here) it then i guess no charges should be made. plus it's their life though i guess the relative was concerned about her family. ahh laws :D
What? Consensual means nothing anymore?
Holy shit. This guy literally just stomped the shit out of 95% of the posts in this thread.
Could you dumb fucks actually learn about the law before crying havoc?
THERE IS NO FEMINIST AGENDA OR SO CALLED "LEFTIST GENDER POLITICS" AT WORK HERE.
This is based on precedent, primarily of UK cases, all the way from R v Coney (1882) to probably the most famous application of the doctrine; R v Brown (1994).
These cases were established because it was determined that society did not approve of such levels of violence, consensual or otherwise. And you know what? NEITHER OF THOSE CASES INVOLVED WOMEN.
R v Coney involved a fistfight between two MEN. R v Brown featured a group of sadomasochistic gay MEN.
If you fucktards would open a book for once, you'd know this. But I guess it's easier to simply bitch about feminism than it is to actually know anything.
Fucking idiots.
If you followed your own advice more closely you might realise Swedish law is based on civil law, not common law, so a precedent in a UK court has absolutely no bearing on their decisions.
Feminazi lawyers... what is the world coming to?
Same with children actually.
Child protection and women rights are used to control people!
It's not about rights or protection anymore!
Anonymous said:
Could you dumb fucks actually learn about the law before crying havoc?
THERE IS NO FEMINIST AGENDA OR SO CALLED "LEFTIST GENDER POLITICS" AT WORK HERE.
This is based on precedent, primarily of UK cases, all the way from R v Coney (1882) to probably the most famous application of the doctrine; R v Brown (1994).
These cases were established because it was determined that society did not approve of such levels of violence, consensual or otherwise. And you know what? NEITHER OF THOSE CASES INVOLVED WOMEN.
R v Coney involved a fistfight between two MEN. R v Brown featured a group of sadomasochistic gay MEN.
If you fucktards would open a book for once, you'd know this. But I guess it's easier to simply bitch about feminism than it is to actually know anything.
Fucking idiots.
--Reposting for emphasis, you permavirgin misogynist pedophiles.
Pttf. Well the girl was 16 and the guy was 32. Of course this is going to be bad. Case over. No arguing about it. Age of consent is merely a trap designed by law makers. It doesn't mean anything with that huge of an age gap.
I'd be interested to know if the same charges could be pressed for an 18 year old and 20 year old that were in the exact same situation. If that's true then I have a reason to find these charges outrageous.
Right now they're only half outrageous due to the girl's age.
Uh, EXCUSE me? Did you really just blame feminism and gender politics? Why don't you stick to writing about things you know about, huh? There are PLENTY of people who identify as feminists and also happen to be into BDSM. The feminism I know cares about CONSENT. I, as a feminist, could care less if you enjoy being flogged or needle play. If y'all consent to it and enjoy it, have fun.
I really like the picture chosen for this article :D
My friend of mine made this comment about this article on Facebook:
"I like how they said that feminism has come full circle, because it really has. Feminists a few decades ago were fighting for women to freely express their sexuality, and now radical feminists are trying to outlaw hentai and BDSM because it's 'degrading,' even though no actual woman are mentally harmed or offended in either of those."
Dad: "Well, son, you're of legal age now, your life is your own, and can do anything you want that doesn't hurt someone else."
Son: "Can I kill myself?"
Dad: "There's a law against that."
Son: "Why?"
Dad: "The State is presumed to have an overriding legal interest in protecting the life of an insane person."
Son: "But I'm not insane -- I just want to kill myself."
Dad: "The way the laws are written, attempting suicide is proof that you're insane, and then the State steps in to protect you from yourself."
Son: "So, there's no way I can legally attempt to kill myself, and the law is written in a way which prevents my own life legally, totally belonging to myself."
Dad: "Yup. Of course, if you succeed in killing yourself, there isn't anything the State can do about it. It's only if you try and FAIL to kill yourself that they will step in."
Son: "That's messed-up. Why is it like that?"
Dad: "Because too many people are unwilling to think clearly, and even lie to themselves."
@ Anon 18:37 :
I think the BDSM people are twisted and sick, but I don't trust the psych people to be able to cure them, and I FEAR handing that power and legal charge to the psych people.
If psychiatry truly is a science, why is it that Doctor A will testify in court, "That man is _not_ sane.", and Doctor B will testify in court, "That man _is_ sane."?
Possible answer: "Psychiatry _is_ a science, and the only reason the two doctors disagree is because one of them is incompetent or outright lying."
SARCASM Oh, well, then that's all right, then. /SARCASM.
Wow, your comment is full of SPECIAL logic.
So, people in courts making wrong statements proves that they, as a whole, are not scientific.
You just proved science wrong, including general doctors (he was murdered/no he wasn't), geologists (the company knew it'd suck/they didn't), meterologists (the weather would have prevented him/no it wouldn't) and many others.
Congratulations. Or, maybe, your argument is retarded. I am leaning to that.
Hint: Some things can have different view points. Real life isn't math, there is not a 100% possibility something will happen in exact one specific way. A wound can have many causes, even if they look identical. Drilling oil can have many causes, even if the act of drilling was the same.
And acting in some way can have different psychological causes.
DUH. That's the real world. Unlike the videogames you're used to, things are a little more complex. What you hear in court is simply all sides reporting what is best for their view point. That is why you have both sides. The jury and the judge are supposed to work this out to avoid interest conflicts. DUH.
Legal system: It's really easy, if you use your damn brain.
Wrong case, right issue. There should probably be limits to BDSM, somewhere around feral country, but this is not it, unless those bruises were truly severe.
Stupid feminazi prosecutor.
Feminazi: Because wanting equal rights for women is just like gassing millions of jews.
Anywaaaaay....
Anybody know what CG is this game from?
And once again,the Law has denied the obvious logic.Enough said.
The media is already making him out to be a woman beater.
Sweden likes to convict people for committing victimless crimes. This will be no different.
"Sweden likes to convict men for committing victimless crimes"
Fixed.
Tough luck...
either cops in sweeden are running out of money so they are sticking their nose in everything or they have too much money and want to spend some
WTF??
The girl didn't file the charges the state did.
I think it's time to tell the state to fuck right off.
If she had had a problem, well she didn't that's the thing.
"Apparently in Sweden it is permissible to kill people if they consent, under the guise of euthanasia"
It's not. Doctors may abort life-supporting treatment, but active euthanasia is illegal. People have gone to jail for it.
Passive euthanasia is still murder in much of the world.
If you'd read up about the case you would have realized it is a case of voluntary passive euthanasia, which in most countries are considered legal or grey-area.
In almost all western countries the patient's right to refuse treatment, even if it causes the death of the patient, is established.
Taking someone off life support is usually allowed, especially if its determined that they are braindead etc.