USA: No Trial Needed for Lolicon Life Imprisonment


The US Supreme Court has ruled that a law which allows “sexually dangerous” prisoners to be jailed forever without trial does not violate the Constitution.

The case centres on Graydon Comstock, who was convicted of possessing child pornography and sentenced to three years imprisonment. Immediately prior to this sentence he served a separate sentence for engaging in lewd acts with a minor.

Six days prior to the end of his sentence, the government branded him a “sexually dangerous” paedophile who might reoffend, and denied him release, placing him into indefinite “civil commitment” in a federal prison.

He has since spent nearly three years in prison despite having been convicted of no further crime, and having served his sentence.

Release of such “committed” prisoners is possible only if they are deemed to be no longer dangerous – without a treatment program recognised as being capable of this, their imprisonment effectively becomes indefinite.

The law responsible for extending this practice to the federal level, the 2006 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, was soon challenged by prisoners now being denied release indefinitely, eventually reaching the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court justices finally ruled 7 to 2 in favour of the law:

“It is necessary and proper for Congress to provide for the civil commitment of dangerous federal prisoners.”

Democrats are delighted by the victory – Obama even recently promoted the lady who argued for indefinite sentences on behalf of the federal government, Elena Kagan, to the Supreme Court herself.

She is on record as having argued that the government should be able to restrict any speech it considers “harmful,” irrespective of the First Amendment

A Democratic senator holds forth in support of the decision:

“The process to enact this law to protect our children from those who would do them harm was difficult. I am heartened to see an overwhelming majority of the Supreme Court uphold this important child protection law.”

Some states already operate similar laws, but this decision ensures the federal government can now freely override sentences throughout the land.

The solicitor general for Kansas, Stephen McAllister, a supporter of the law, suggests that allowing indefinite civil commitment for all kinds of criminals might now be possible:

“Constitutionally, it might be possible. I don’t have a constitutionally limiting line for what kinds of mental disorders might be permissible and what [might] not. If they lead to danger to others, potentially, they could be covered under such a law.”

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 24/05/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    Lady Justice may be blind, but her scales let her know when enough gold has been put forth so she can reach a decision.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:28 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    This isn't really news; the U.S.A. has had, far and away, the largest incarcerated population of any non-totalitarian nation in the world.

    It is, of course, bullshit, but it's the type of bullshit that's been foisted on us for quite some time now with three strikes programs, mandatory sentences, etc, etc. The fact that the individuals in question are generally poor and unable to make even the most basic of attempts to fight the process is why you never hear about it on the news.

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    05:14 19/05/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Fail: it`s very uncertain that USA is a non-totalitarian nation.

    Comment by Anonymous

    You stupid fuckface. You don't know what a totalitarian state is.

    Avatar of Ifr22k
    Comment by Ifr22k
    03:53 19/10/2015 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, the USA surprisingly has a bigger incarcerated population than ANYONE, even totalitarian nations.

    Yes, even countries with dictatorships imprison less people than the US. I'm not kidding.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:17 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    and to think that this was a country where everyone could get treatment and help for issues such as this. i can already imagine the sheer amount of false claims on the horizon.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:10 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    At least the USSR used nuthouses to get rid of dissidents, no matter whether they're indeed lunatic (Novodvorskaya) or not (Brodsky). I fail to see what the US as a state gains by doing this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:11 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    They are just sacrificing the few for the votes of many. It operates on the same principle of gaybashing. Doesn't do anyone much good but sacrifices few votes to do the 'in' thing of that time.

    Avatar of Smiling Jack
    Comment by Smiling Jack
    21:33 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "She is on record as having argued that the government should be able to restrict any speech it considers “harmful,” irrespective of the First Amendment"

    The country's in no danger at all... after all who needs human rights.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:34 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    It strikes me that one can not see the difference between child molestation and drawn pictures.
    gg USA.

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    00:28 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    American justice at its finest.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:59 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    ‘Democrats are delighted by the victory – Obama even recently promoted the lady who argued for indefinite sentences on behalf of the federal government, Elena Kagan, to the Supreme Court herself.’
    And here I thought Barack Obama was just as bad as George Bush. I was wrong - he's a lot worse. How is that when the Democrats win the election we get a Republican on steroids for president? Well, at least we got ‘change’ all right.

    Avatar of chengsta
    Comment by chengsta
    03:13 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Looks like I'm moving back to austrailia, the lesser of the 2 evils >_>

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:29 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Anyone who still thinks the good ol' USA isn't in decline had better think again.This is a very slippery slope that WILL lead to innocent people having (what's left of), their constitutuinal rights violated.

    The US is going to more ressemble a Socialist country after the Obama addministration is said and done with it.Why is it they are so fast to limit/take away rights of legal US citizens, but let illegals almost literally get away with everything they do illegally, including existing here illegally.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:35 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    You are now being charged for thinking of doing bad things.

    Avatar of Ifr22k
    Comment by Ifr22k
    13:16 08/09/2017 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, too similar to thought-crime to be of comfort to me. I also am not cool with indefinite sentences with NO trial, that can swiftly spiral out of control.

    Plus, once these kinds of things become codified, then if you're a person in a high place, or have friends in high places, you can just use stuff like this to eliminate people you don't like through false accusation and evidence implantation.

    Just gotta find a hacker, some false witnesses, and a crooked law enforcement officer official or two, and poof! Instant fake pedophile! Who gets locked up "indefinitely" to protect "the children".

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    22:13 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I have not read any of other comments yet, but i guess there is many raging against Democrats, left and "liberals" about this issue. Do they really think conservative religious right or Republican Party would be any milder in this kind of cases? Of course i myself question the sanity of these laws and even constitution. Who were in power when Adam Walsh Child protection and Safety Act was introduced in 2006?
    Answer that and continue your ranting, if you still feel like it.
    This is a big mistake by Obama & Co.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:15 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Very bad precedent. It starts with real child pornography possession, then goes to fictional, then goes to "you looked at me funny".

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:17 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Hey this is cool we can make all terrorist go to jail permanently since we can brand them as sexually dangerous since if we trial them for terrorism it would take too much time and money since no trial is needed if we brand them under it

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:53 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    America fail yet again.
    I live in america.
    I view and own loli material.
    I find actual children repulsive little bastard that I can't stand to be around and would never do anything to them and I only like drawn loli.
    Gov. would never believe me and would destroy my life over drawings of fake girls that is art.
    I rot in jail for an undetermined amount of time, and if I get out I am still considered a "sex offender".
    Gov. tramples all over our basic rights yet again, boasts about it, and gets away with it worry free.
    My hope and what little respect I have for my gov. dies.
    Solution: I need to get the fuck out of this shit hole fast.

    Comment by Anonymous

    And go where? Loli material is banned everywhere else in the world except Japan.

    You're a fucking moron.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:59 20/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Actually, no, it isn't. It is LEGAL in the United States under federal and state law, unless you are talking about the obscenity laws, which are unconstitutional in and of themselves.

    Sweden hasn't banned loli material, neither has Russia, China, etc.

    You are dramatically overstating the 'bannedness' of it, and frankly those laws are in violation of human rights in the first place (the right to view what you wish as long as it is not physically harming a REAL LIVING PERSON).

    Comment by Anonymous

    Wow you must be one hell of a pedophile if your only reason to get the hell out is because you're afraid of being caught with your child pornography.

    Fucking sicko.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:01 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I see US is trying to imitate China.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:36 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    O cool so i get less time Murdering someone than looking up little child porn? Cool lets go kill people now sounds more logic.
    Maybe the US government should change its rules and rethink about it?

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:22 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    US one step closer to Dictatorship

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:32 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Maybe I'm misinterpreting something here, but this seems quite distinctly Orwellian to me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:21 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    /bush accent: Those paedofilez are terrorists!

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:21 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    GUY WE NEED TO MOVE OUT OF AMERICA BEFORE THE SYSTEM TAKES OVER. This is not a joke people. slowly USA is becoming a land of control and mental slavery.

    Avatar of g0dslay3r
    Comment by g0dslay3r
    01:48 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    whats the point in locking them up forever if they are never going to be freed.might as well just kill them so we can stop wasting our tax money keeping pieces of trash alive

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:54 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Long live the american Constitution!

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:00 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Time to boycott America. Then again, China is a good tool to destroy America.

    America, f**k no!

    Comment by Anonymous

    You're an idiot.
    You're upset that you might be imprisoned indefinately if you get caught with child pornography or commit multiple rapes/sexual offenses?
    Try that in China and you'll be EXECUTED.

    Fucking brainless moron.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:24 20/05/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Actually, no, you wouldn't be. The fact is that China is fine with those things as long as you are not deemed 'dangerous to society' because you are a capitalist or something similar.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:16 10/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I WISH that the pedophiles would boycott America. Then again, we can't always get what we with for.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:24 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of savantique
    Comment by savantique
    02:53 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Artefact, quote a source for your material in this article. I would especially like to see a reputable source explicitly state that Obama backed this decision being a constitutional law professor.

    Avatar of tingle
    Comment by tingle
    21:22 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    strange i heard that it was for detainment AFTER the origanel trial. This is wierd.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:36 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Victory for the LORD ENKI! Die loli fuckers in prison logical step to death sentence you. For what life you are worth if you like this shit? None I say for children are not to be violated and your friends should receive the right punishment whether it is drawing or not matters no more! :D

    Avatar of Sukunai
    Comment by Sukunai
    00:33 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow 19 pages in mere hours.

    Remember people, if you would fuck kiddies, or even THINK of fucking kiddies, with pictures or even just with drawings, you might wish to get something else to get off with if you live in the US land of the free.

    Because it isn't necessarily the land of the free for everyone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:54 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Or just move to an Islamic country.

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    14:03 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You may have to convert to Islam then. They only allow Allah's Faithful to enjoy loli-marriages, not infidels.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:24 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I WILL NEVER SEE OR WATCH JAILBAITS AGAIN. hentai is jailbait. lolicon is jailbait.

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    01:26 19/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not my hentai. I lean towards big, well endowed, wide hipped milfs! See Tetrotodoxin, Nagi Project, Reoparudo, Jeanne DAck etc.
    I am aware one day this can be considered as criminal too, if this hysteria about different sexual leanings doesn`t end.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:47 18/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Man, this is pretty out of hand for the US. I know that the law sees that loli/shouta can promote pedophilia, but this is too far. Then again, look at it from their perspective, they just want the children to be safe from pedophiles; would you want your child to be molested or raped by some crook? They're not taking any chances to let that happen, but I do think it is bad to throw one in jail just because of a difference in opinion or sexual preference.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:46 21/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    US nuke yourself, at least the congress.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:02 21/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I wouldn't want to step into the USA. USA treat legally-entered foreigners like criminals.

    America is the village drunk of the world who used to be great now a wasted one.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:51 22/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not to sound too viral markety ...

    I live in the UK, and plan on writing a letter to the PM and Deputy PM to see if I can get the lolicon ban repealed.

    I'm going to make a petition to accompany it, so, would anyone here sign it when I do? (Regardless of where you live?)

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:22 21/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Why do I read this blog? It's always full of the same depressing bullshit.

    Life sucks.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:37 21/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    How can this ever be possible? So if someone wants to ruin my life randomly, he only has to point in my general direction and scream "pedo!" and I'll be arrested (indefinitely) without any kind of trial to allow me to prove my innocence?

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:28 21/05/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you even read the article thoroughly? Or did you just skim through the comments?

    Comment by Anonymous
    12:38 27/08/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    its be fo' de chilluns yo!

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments