Woman Gets Life Sentence for Forcing Boy to Touch Breasts


A woman has been sentenced to life in prison after she “forced” a 13-year-old boy to touch her breast.

The 34-year-old Nevada woman was accused of kissing a friend’s 13-year-old son in 2008, asking him if he would have sex with her and placing his hand on her breast. She denied the charges, saying she was drunk and had not forced him to touch her.

The boy is said to be undergoing therapy after this ordeal.

In a week-long trial, she was convicted of lewdness with a minor under 14 and ordered to serve a life sentence, based on Nevada’s mandatory minimum sentence for this class of crime. She will be eligible for parole in 10 years.

Jurors were not allowed to know that she faced a life sentence if convicted.

Even the judge appeared aghast at the sentence he handed down, saying he had no choice to impose a life sentence but was not sure why the prosecution was insisting on charges under laws which would attract the minimum sentencing requirement (they could have charged her with a lesser offence).

The district attorney who prosecuted her defends the sentence, saying she was “convicted of precisely of what she did” and that the sentence is simply in line with state mandatory minimum sentences.

There is some dispute over why she was not offered a plea bargain.

The defence claims the district attorney did not offer a plea bargain, whilst the district attorney claims she did not want to negotiate a plea bargain as she felt being forced to register as a sex offender would ruin the rest of her life more surely than a conviction would.

However, even if released on parole she would now have to register as a sex offender.

The defence asserts that this extreme sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment:

“This is cruel and unusual punishment. She put his hand on her boob while she was wearing a bra, now she’s getting life.”

The defence notes that “she is getting a greater penalty for having a boy touch her breast than if she killed him.”

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Reizo
    Comment by Reizo
    14:41 21/04/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Poor kid. He'll be having nightmares for life.

    Avatar of LanSlyde
    Comment by LanSlyde
    22:54 21/07/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    yes... nightmares of being kidnapped by a group of older women and being forced to become their toy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 19/11/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.4)

    I hope he never has a chance to touch a boob again

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    17:37 28/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Utterly ridiculous, what world is this

    Avatar of Ikuhisashiku
    Comment by Ikuhisashiku
    05:47 22/04/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    >The boy is said to be undergoing therapy after this ordeal.

    Really? An ordeal?
    You will have to excuse me if my memories have faded a bit, but at that age, I can guarantee I would've been quite happy to find myself in that situation. And until a picture of the woman in question arrives, that is my stand on the topic until otherwise noted.

    Avatar of Ikuhisashiku
    Comment by Ikuhisashiku
    05:49 22/04/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    I take that back -- that was certainly an ordeal.

    May he recover quickly.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:20 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, exactly :P

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:28 26/12/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    poor kid realized he was actually gay after this event, so now he's recieving "therapy" to cure him of his homosexuality. really that's the only answer that fits, what kind and how much of a pussy do you need to be to need therapy after something like this? even if she was ugly as hell, simply washing your hands with soap would be enough.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:26 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Cruel and unusual punishment indeed. It's not like a violent crime was committed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:41 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ah, but this IS a violent crime.... at least according to the 'adults and children having sex is bad' idiots out there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:21 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The boy is said to be undergoing therapy after this ordeal."

    @Quote: T_T ... IDGI

    Avatar of caiooa
    Comment by caiooa
    07:31 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    “This is cruel and unusual punishment. She put his hand on her boob while she was wearing a bra, now she’s getting life.”
    ok, if a drunk 34 years old guy take his friend's 13 years old daughter and force her hands in his body, it would be death sentense for sure. So, if she have done the crime, it doesn't mater if she was drunk. It isn't a unusual punishment at all.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:40 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, it is. They are making out that this is 'so damaging' to the boy, which is a piece of crap. In fact, if they allow the boy to FORGET that this happened if it was truly forced, he will most likely not have any problems from this.

    Oh, and in the case above that you mentioned: it depends. Frankly, I wouldn't call for a 'death sentence' or any sentence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:20 28/02/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not really for sure. Well, either that, or a lot of chicks I know were very very merciful to their first "lovers".

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    There is something seriously wrong with that boy if a 13 year old refused to fuck

    Comment by H-Ero
    09:02 23/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You didn't see her pic did you? Bitch is fugly.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:38 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Any kid would be scarred for life if a woman like that pounced herself on them.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:40 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I was thinking like "what's wrong with that? isn't the boy supposed to feel lucky?" until I actually saw the picture of the woman. NOW I understand why the boy's getting therapy.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    01:23 29/07/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Eh, I still think the kid is a wuss if getting propositioned makes you need therapy. Just say ``ew`` and be done with it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:36 28/02/2012 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it was a hot MILF it would be okay, but if not he tells on her and needs a therapy?
    Something is wrong for this way of thinking. Doing something by force is allways wrong no matter how the person looks, it only gets more worse with the appearance.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:25 05/09/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    so if she had been beautiful we could make her a hero..listen to yourself..the law is wrong..and any male or female making fun of this is forgetting that woman are raped and beaten all the time with very little punitive consequences to the men who do these things every day!!! regardless of how they appear to the victim or the public....and how,just how does a drunken woman make a 14y/o boy touch her anywhere? the judge was disgusted to have to hand down the sentence and you make jokes about how the woman looked..maybe you think molesters should all be goodlooking,(and it does not appear that was the case anyhow)would that make it alright in your mind..that is what you are saying ...you'll make a great parent..molestation is ok if the perp is goodlooking,or if the perp is male, send the woman away for life,or boys will be boys,what goes on in your mind?...making jokes over things like this is a big part of the problem..and if it wasn't a joke all the worse!..actually i don't believe the boy is getting therapy for this one incident..something else is going on..like maybe the parents or system that made the therapy happen or because of all the atten..but not because a drinken woman came on to a teenager..i don't believe it..think of the crap this kid has had to go thru..the whole thing is out of balance and puts every citizen at risk..when our laws are so out of line with the crime we are going down the road from which we all become vulnerable to prosecutors and judges that will use their the law for their own agendas instead of being a public servants.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:21 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The defense should appeal this sentence. They are exactly right when they say that this is a 'cruel and unusual sentence' because she is getting more of a penalty than she would if she had killed the boy in question!

    I swear, these 'mandatory minimum's' are getting stupider and stupider. It's simply time to realize that pedosexuality is a NORMAL sexuality, and legalize it, because of stupidity like this.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:58 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    wow this country really is developing a bunch of pussies. when i was 13 i would not need therapy nor press charges if a woman offered boobs and pussy.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:22 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    True..... I swear, this country is getting stupider and stupider when it comes to pedosexuals, at least as far as 'da law' goes. Funny thing is that people are becoming more and more accepting of it in society as a whole, while the 'lawmakers' keep on trying to use it as a 'boogie man' to deflect people's attention away from other things.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:37 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Feel so glad i live in Korea. Americans fucked up justice system is so ridiculus. last time they sentenced 400 years of jail life to a man who possessed 4 child porno. (he didn't make it. merely downloaded it.)

    And no they never give this punishment to famous celebrities who commit crimes as often as eating just because they are capable of hiring good lawyers.

    US is a dumbfuck country. So far, our of many countries i traveled/lived in, Korea and Japen were the safest, and at least system makes sense.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:47 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lol yea plastic women ftw amirite?

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:15 23/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Better than an average woman... MUCH better than the fat women of the US.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:10 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    are you joking? shes getting more time for making a DUDE touch her than if shed killed him! so if i went out and killed someone and someone else did this theyd be on them first? fucking stupid laws they have...

    Comment by Anonymous
    11:31 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "The boy is said to be undergoing therapy after this ordeal." Poor kid he didn't get to attend school so he can high five all his friends

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:20 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If he would high-five his friends it would mean that, by transfer of property, the women forced all of them to touch her breasts. MATH IS AWESOME

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:04 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    “This is a just and adequte punishment. he put her hand on his crotch while he was wearing pants, now he's getting life like he deserves.”

    if this was the other way around...

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    01:24 29/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Oh please, crotch is not chest.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:15 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did she have a prior record? i know in my state if you get a 3rd felony its good bye.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:41 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    extreme faggot inside
    if was me i'll bang her hard

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:13 23/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So you're going to sacrifice yourself and fight that monster... yes go ahead and bang her with a club until she no longer wakes up.

    If you get crushed under her weight... we will hold a hero's funeral.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    03:58 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    la mujer tiene que estar muuy pero muuuy fea como para que un niño necesite terapia y sea encerrada para que nadie mas corra el peligro!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:58 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What 13 year old boy needs therapy after that? Though the legality of the situation is absolute since she was caught but the heck? Therapy? At 13 if my son needed therapy after seeing a naked woman, or even groping the breasts of a clothed woman I would probably wonder where I went wrong.

    As for the sentence, completely excessive. Even registering as a sex offender is over the top given the nature of the "crime". Its not like she actually had intercourse with the boy. Rape is rape, and if she forced the boy to have sex against his will with her there are severe problems but this did not occur.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:07 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Saved the pic at the top of the article.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:29 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    well if a guy ask a little girl to touch his penis this will have the same ordeal right ?? womans and mens are equal :p

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    01:22 29/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Breasts != Penis. Clit = Penis.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Holy shit.... America I am disapoint.

    What the fuck is wrong with people these days? And what kind of faggot has to have therapy after such an ordeal? It boggles the mind.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:41 21/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She shoulda just kidnapped/raped/killed the kid, the sentence would've only been 20 years then. Lololo too bad those who live in america don't don't exploit the loopholes in the fucked up justice system.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:57 23/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If you wanted to rape a woman, would you kill her just to get a shorter sentence?

    ... to kill is to perform an infinite crime - you can't recover from that. Normal rape is, on the other hand, a medium-level crime which one can easily recover from, no matter what the "statistical evidence" of radical feminists aver.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:25 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "undergoing therapy" my fucking hairy asshole. -_- Some one please show these people a real school...or a little place called the internet... so that they can see what these "innocnet" little snowflakes are up to.

    When I was 13, there wasn't a tit around I didn't touch or try to touch and older women were the best target, especially for bragging rights.

    Life for helping a 13 year old get some old tit? Yet murderers get a decade or less sometimes? WTF...

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:02 23/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Firstly she is fugly.

    Secondly, I've never been into older women. Or more like, whether it's a fetish involving a big sister, female teacher, mom, aunt or w/e, it's always a huge turn-off. On the other hand, their opposites have always had the opposite effect. What I'm trying to say is that people have different tastes, and you would do well to accept that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:27 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If it was a man who had a little girl grab his chest everyone would be calling for a death sentence.
    If women want equality they can fucking have it.

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    01:21 29/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Um, I don`t think we`d react that way to a man, man chest is not sexualized, especially when clothed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:39 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is ridiculous, and no way do I believe that the ridiculousness will end any time soon.

    00:34 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is proof minimum sentencing laws are a broken concept and punishment needs to be decided on a case by case biases.
    What she did may have been wrong but this is cruel and unusual punishment almost on the level of stoning.

    The sex offender registry laws also need to be changed to only require those convicted of actual rape and then only for seven to ten years vs life.

    Anyone who disagrees can leave the country or better yet this dimensional plane of existence.

    But then this just farther proves what I believe that the position of prosecutor/DA in the US needs to be cleansed of those unfit for the job with fire.

    If I was the judge I would have threw the case out if I could even if it would have gotten me some fire but made it clear I would punish her if I had the option of a lesser and more fitting sentence.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:40 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You know, this wouldn't have happened if there was no lolicon and shotacon readily available on the internet.

    Avatar of kafkafuura
    Comment by kafkafuura
    02:06 22/04/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And you think a back-country woman was reading shotacon? o.o;; Could she even use a computer?

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments