“How Men & Women Rate Partners”

how-men-and-women-rate-each-other-in-equation-form.jpg

The process by which men and women rate prospective partners has, by the marvels of science and simple arithmetic, been reduced to an equation of unparalleled accuracy.

This diagram of course yields the insight that a man possessed of great wealth, intellect, or affability can easily compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness, or indeed a deficiency in any of the other qualities, in the eyes of a woman, but even the most lovely of female geniuses is unlikely to have much success with suitors if she is less than attractive.

Via SF Weekly.


    Post Comment »
    152 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of OTIKA
    Comment by OTIKA
    18:00 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Should be on the front page of Sankaku for truth.

    Avatar of MasterYuke
    Comment by MasterYuke
    09:57 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the female equation is wrong. it should be:

    money x (intelligence + looks + humor)
    if money = 0 then rating = 0.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:08 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Indeed, that is the correct equation

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:51 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    actually its: (m * (i + h)) + (L * (i + h))

    You have to have money or looks, otherwise the equation is 0.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:39 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wrong. Money is everything to the female human, looks are the fifty heptillion candle-sized roll of cash on top of the money cake.

    Avatar of Shuubi
    Comment by Shuubi
    16:53 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ...and you are clearly a moron. Not all women care about money. I'm a woman myself, and I couldnt give a shit if my partner was rich or poor.
    Maybe if you actually knew more women you wouldnt have to resort to retarded generalizations made up by ronery otaku who just want to justify the fact that they have never met any real women.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:36 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Two things wrong here:

    1) You're not a woman (or just too butch-looking to tell the difference).

    2) If you were, you'd fuck Bill Gates all the way to your fake orgasm, just so you could go buy that Louis Vuitton you've ALWAYS wanted.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:34 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    anyway, regardless of what you say things have not been looking up for your kind of woman... congratulations....your a dieing breed...

    Avatar of kafkafuura
    Comment by kafkafuura
    00:31 07/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is an English speaking world standpoint (being in English). In Japan more women are looking for marriage partners so they can "settle down" - which unfortunately to them means "I don't have to make money for myself anymore!" most of the time.

    marriageability = money/otaku * (youth + looks + .5*(humor+intelligence) - gambler)

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:11 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ everybody, specially Mikorio who cannot find a way to counter these equations.

    Here's my equation:

    2D > 3D

    Short and simple. Period.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:06 06/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's not an equation, that's an inequality.

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:06 07/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    WIN

    Avatar of SaruDa
    Comment by SaruDa
    18:09 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The maximum rating for a guy is 4, but the maximum rating for a girl is 2? Us guys are screwed!

    Comment by Nin
    04:04 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But the average score for either is 0, so worry not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:51 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Max isn't 4 for guy, that '1 or 0' thing is just for women (i think it says).

    "a man possessed of great wealth, intellect, or affability can easily compensate for a lack of physical attractiveness, or indeed a deficiency in any of the other qualities, in the eyes of a woman"

    Like how women go all schoolgirl over hot/muscle guys even if they a brick, for a bit atleast.
    Or funny guys even if they don't look the best or got munyz, or da smartest.

    Comment by SwagginBros
    18:10 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This is so true!

    I don`t want to make love with ugly woman anyways, the child would look ugly. If you view it from grandfather/mother aspect(I`m not that old FYI), do you want to see an ugly daughter/son of her/his child?

    Avatar of Mikorio
    Comment by Mikorio
    18:13 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I cannot find a way to counter these equations.

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    18:32 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't men care about intelligence particularly at all though

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:12 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not if all they're after is a cheap lay. I certainly wouldn't want to spent any significant amount of time with a complete idiot though.

    Avatar of CowExtract
    Comment by CowExtract
    04:06 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I certainly do. For me the chart would look like this:

    (Humor x Intelligence) + Looks - (Nag x Bitch / Total Whore) = SUCCESS

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:44 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's just "1" or "0" for women or "Yes" or "No" if ya look at it that way.

    Doesn't really say they got to be smart, just have a brain, or some people might look at it like "No, she isn't smart to me; Yes, she's hot; Yes, she funny/humor"

    Avatar of Van-d-all
    Comment by Van-d-all
    18:36 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Given the articles about Japanese woman I'd say that $ should be a multiplier put before the rest of the sum :P

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    18:36 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This also means that a woman who is stupid and unfunny can be a supermodel and be rated poorly.

    Then again, how many guys actually get to know supermodels rather then just see them?

    Avatar of Lilith
    Comment by Lilith
    18:58 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, I'm not you, but I wouldn't marry a supermodel just because she is extremely good looking, equation looks pretty good to me, being a looker does not make you any less annoying, and there's nothing worse then annoying women out there.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:43 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't be dumb. Nobody marries a supermodel, they just phuck'em and brag about it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:17 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can't disagree with anon's statement, because I can't cite any cases where a person did marry a supermodel. However, I dont think this is a formula for marriage material. But simply showing how one's mind works when looking at someone you would want to date (or marry).

    Maybe we need a number range to show a possible max score on both sides.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:31 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No Chris is right

    These equations are flawed. Look:

    1 x (0 + 0) = 0 x (0 + 0)

    Girl with looks but nothing else gets the same score as girl with nothing at all? Of course not.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:35 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The equations are wrong.

    The male one is close enough. A hideous woman is worthless no matter what else she has going for her.

    The female one is wrong, though. In the female equation money should be the multiplying factor with an average income being equivalent to 0.

    Bitches and whores, boys.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:54 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, the equations are pretty accurate. Apparently ugly women can seduce men as well...no less than 5 was it?

    In any case, to anon 23:31, if someone has 0 for both humor and intelligence, doesn't that probably mean they're in a vegetative state/dead? Your scaling is flawed, not the equations

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:59 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am 23:21

    My scaling is not flawed. Notice the theorist behind the equations invented the scaling.

    "*These variables go from 0-1..."

    Avatar of Domo-Kun
    Comment by Domo-Kun
    01:03 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Do any of you men look for Humor?
    Not me.

    For me it would be something like (Looks+Intelligence-Crazy)x Whether or not they are Asian.

    Avatar of basilio
    Comment by basilio
    07:53 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Crazy should be a positive factor!!! Crazy girls are hot. Look at School Days. And Higurashi no Naku Koro ni.

    What else says "I love you" more than a girl running at you with a machete in her hands?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:49 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, you're on the right track. There was a snippet in New Scientist that suggested that, on average, men tended to be joke tellers, and women tended to enjoy laughing at said joke tellers, even when the joke was not so great. Women are not so much joke tellers (even though there are many highly successful female comedians).

    The general theory was that it helped social bonding, and that a sense of humour conveyed certain positive traits about a potential partner that was of more interest to women than in men.

    See, I'm doing science!

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:52 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Korean women actually have hidden values for looks. What you see may not be what you get, and your children will suffer for it.

    Avatar of Kortaku
    Comment by Kortaku
    19:48 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    troll on.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:19 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    plastic surgery...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:16 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ABC's Ugly Betty

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:36 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually its rather inaccurate

    Who looks for intelligence in a woman?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:03 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I do...
    And I haven't found any
    Which is why it is a multiplying factor

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:47 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree with anon

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:28 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's just another factor in the equation... you might get lucky. But the equations look accurate...frigteningly accurate.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:04 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I do,stupid women annoy me.

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    20:46 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You mean you don't look for intelligence? Oh god, might as well get a retard to subt your wife.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:56 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    but the problem still don't change, who actually possess any of those 4 things that women are looking for?

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:59 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I can't tolerate stupidity in a girl. Doesn't matter how pretty they are, I can't respect someone who isn't willing to better themselves.

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    18:50 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Here in my place, I always see old ugly male foreigners (white) who has an ugly brown wife which came from a remote poor area...

    The thing that bothers me is that how come do they have ATTRACTIVE children? I mean, from all the people I've seen.. ugly white foreigner + ugly brown poor native = Attractive/Beautiful children... wth...

    Anyone familiar with Jason Ivler would know what I mean...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:13 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey~~
    Don't tell me you are from the Philippines?

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:14 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    what u never done math!!!!!!!!!!
    negative X negative = positive
    (ugly man sleeps with ugly woman they produce Attractive/Beautiful child)

    see how easy ;)

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    19:20 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sorry...

    I'm only good with DFC...

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:22 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ugly x ugly of same race, will be still ugly, but when you mix different races, no matter how attractive parents are, children always will have a best set of genes from both, just look at all the half-asian chicks, unlike 100% asians most of them are really hot.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:31 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's called hybrid vigor. It's used in farming to increase corn yields worldwide.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:34 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I second the motion!

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:14 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In the review system, ugly games do not get negative scores...

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    (ugly + ugly)/2 = ugly

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:04 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Simple. Gene diversity tends to create genetically strong offspring. Doesn't always end up as attractiveness, but it tends to. This is perhaps why so many asian/caucasian mixes can be so attractive.

    Comment by Anonymous
    21:12 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Geinus! Dr.Evofoo the person who made this is brilliant!

    Avatar of Zashiki Warashi
    Comment by Zashiki Warashi
    23:38 04/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's since long well known how it works:
    http://www.laddertheory.com/

    Avatar of erochichi
    Comment by erochichi
    00:36 05/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It can be your fault if your child is born ugly. Have you ever thought of that? What reason do we have to believe you look attractive, without any proof? This site is full of other "attractive" guys who have all time to sit on the net. Why aren´t hey spending good time with girls, if they are so attractive?
    Answer: they are only dreaming. In reality they are themselves ugly as dragons anus.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments