What is the difference between someone suffering from a “Lolita complex” and someone suffering from “pedophilia”?

Yuu Mental Clinic, an accredited psychiatric clinic, provides a full explanation of the difference in manga format with the aid of doctor Ryo Shinnai and nurse Asuna Kangoshi, translated below:


The original Japanese version.

Yuu Mental Clinic is by Ueno station in Tokyo – those in need of mental health services can visit their site here; they also publish a series of web comics explaining the treatment mental health issues through manga.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Comment by Anonymous
    22:14 28/01/2010 # ! Quality (+1.0)

    liking girls 13-17 = lolicon, but not mentally ill
    liking girls under 13 = insane pedo

    Avatar of obro
    Comment by obro
    22:35 28/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.6)

    why must pedos be insane?
    Also this manga needs more lolis.

    Avatar of Gradius
    Comment by Gradius
    22:54 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    12 and up is fucking correct and right on nowdays. In 1990 I meet a fucking sexy & hot girl, everyone guessed she was 18yo, I give her at least 17yo, but in reality she has just completed 13yo!

    She even told me she was able to enter on any nightclub she wanted w/o any problem.

    I was too stupid back there to be able to make love with her, she offered me couple of times (in a light way of course). I regret this until now.

    Avatar of Kelvin
    Comment by Kelvin
    01:50 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Hey guys. I know some of us here have our ups and downs. Take a chill pill!

    And while you're at it, please enjoy this: http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/01/20/ladies-vs-butlers-topless-loli-nurse-raep-action

    Avatar of Kortaku
    Comment by Kortaku
    10:17 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    pictures...or...you know the rest.

    Avatar of dvknight
    Comment by dvknight
    23:01 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i lol'd

    Comment by Schrobby
    23:00 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Were you able to enter her without any problem?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:41 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, I meant by psychologist's definition, pedos are mentally Ill.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Pedophilia is sexual attraction to prepubescent children. This is classed as a mental illness.

    It isn't, really, it's just another paraphilia, but it's classed as a mental illness nonetheless.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:55 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *hurries and takes swedish lessons*

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:58 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Stupid Americans.

    In Sweden all 15+ action is okie dokie."

    Stupid Swedes. In Angola all 12+ action is A-OK

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:35 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And by okie dokie, you mean to say Sweden has the highest rape statistics in Europe. Those stats are driven by a changing definition of rape and more reporting. So the true number is probably similar across Europe, but still high.

    http://www.springerlink.com/content/qph2105740rt17r0/ [www.springerlink.com/content/qph2105740rt17r0/]

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:45 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Stupid Americans.

    In Sweden all 15+ action is okie dokie.

    Comment by Anonymous
    19:18 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I've gone with an 8 years younger girl in the past (she was just 18 though).

    Problem is that young girls are typically dramatic, silly, and inexperienced. Better to go with say 23 to 30. Women still look great then, and know what they want and how to 'give it'. You get much more out of it.

    In Netherlands we say (it sounds catchier): "You have to learn [to ride bicycle] on a old bike" ;)

    Avatar of dvknight
    Comment by dvknight
    22:46 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    16 and 17-year-old adolescents qualify if they have a persistent or predominant sexual preference for prepubescent children at least five years younger than them.[4]

    Wikipedia :S

    Im 17 and i go out with 14 girl,
    im getting 18 this year and she 15...

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:43 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not necessarily. Paraphilias are generally categorized into three levels of severity, a first-level pedophile wouldn't generally meet the definition of mental illness.

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    00:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    dvknight, it's not pedophilia. Not even close. Might be illegal though, depending on where you live lol.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:59 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)


    Three years is in the gray area when your 18 and your girlfriend is 15. Depending on where you live it might be considered Child Molestation and you could be arrested for Statutory Rape for any sexual acts. In many places a 2 year difference is considered safe/legal, but a greater difference is not. It would be good for you to learn the legal language in your area since you might not be in the safe zone.

    Comment by Anonymous

    In philippines a 14 year old can get married and have sex with her husband. Its not pedo if you married her.

    Avatar of TheBeast
    Comment by TheBeast
    10:08 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    oh god, i can't believe this conversation is happening. in my opinion, 13-15 is basically when you can tell if they are going to grow up and be good looking. 16-17 is like the engines starting up. you want it, but you gotta wait. then @ 18. BANG!! lift off. basically you think to yourself, "that girl's going to grow up and be a heart breaker." and when she is of age you get to tap that ass, assuming she will let you. lol. i try to get them at ~19-24. they are still young and you don't have to listen to the drama of highschool.

    Avatar of dvknight
    Comment by dvknight
    22:41 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    what if im 17 and i like 14 girl im not bad right?

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:27 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    @obro: Although there are "insane" pedos out there the pathology for pedophilia, clinically speaking, is nothing more than an attraction to pre-pubescent children. It doesn't infer anything else. In other words, just because you are a pedophile doesn't mean that you force yourself on children or are some kind of child molester or child serial rapist. It only means that you have an attraction to children. Think of it like this: If you are a male heterosexual does that mean that you are a serial rapist and that you go around forcing yourself on women? Same thing with male homosexuals. Just because they are attracted to men doesn't mean that they are looking to force themselves on other males.
    Of course, if you do happen to have violent pathologies on top of the pedophilia pathology, then that's a pretty bad combination...

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "When cherries are red, they're ready for plucking. When girls are (thir)teen they're ready for _______."

    Changed the age a bit :D

    Avatar of Eleriel
    Comment by Eleriel
    04:27 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "if there's grass on the field, play ball".

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Better hit it before puberty does.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:45 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    hmmm well at least in the us it would still be illegal to have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 17 because they are deamed unable to say wether or not they want to have sex. So if the parent wanted to they could charge you with rape. oddly the age is 18 for men to make that choice on there own legaly

    Avatar of Deathstryker
    Comment by Deathstryker
    03:53 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    That reminded me of another one I heard:

    "If they can bleed they can breed."

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:12 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hmm Cantido that one reminds me of a danish saying which translates horribly into english but goes something like this "14=ok, 13=court" something like that...

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:36 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey, if they're old enough to bleed, they're old enough to breed. Nuff said.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:33 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    wise man

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    It's divide by two plus 7.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:49 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If anyone has read the "Bro Code" there's a "rule" in there that states the youngest one can go. I think it was like half your age plus two.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    old enough to pee old enough for me

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Amen to that.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:55 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "hmmm well at least in the us it would still be illegal to have sexual contact with a girl under the age of 17 because they are deamed unable to say wether or not they want to have sex. So if the parent wanted to they could charge you with rape. oddly the age is 18 for men to make that choice on there own legaly"

    Wrong. The Age of Consent in the US varies from state to state. In at least half the states, the legal age is 16, and no not just in southern states :P Also, in the state of Hawaii, the AoC is 16, however, someone aged 14 and 15 can consent to sex with someone less than 5 years older than them. In other words, 18 year olds can have sex with 14 year olds and 19 year olds can have sex with 15 year olds.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:14 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To quote David Spade:
    "You know the drill:
    18 is legal.
    17 with consent.
    16 with a note.
    15 if her Dad's in the room…LOW FIVE!"

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:53 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    What the psychiatric association determines and what the laws determine are two different things.

    If you're 15 and she's 13 in some certain places that is grounds to brand you a pedophile. However as you are both minor your record would be locked up, unless there's some clause that say the perpetrator will be judged as an adult.

    If she's 16 and you're 14, chances are low they'll arrest her, but if they do then they'll throw you in as well for endangering yourself. (Unsubstantiated thought)

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:09 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    Well, but I need breakfast before..

    Comment by Anonymous
    18:35 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "if there is no grass on the field, play in the mud" lol someone told me that and i never forgot it

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    somehow i stopped following you, in the middle of this huge pile of words you were spitting there....

    Avatar of MasterYuke
    Comment by MasterYuke
    09:52 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    pedophilia in this is referenced as sexual acts with a person under 13.

    wouldnt that mean child porn would be legal, since it is not the person watching it doing the sexual acts to the child? I blame the feminazis.

    Avatar of giascle
    Comment by giascle
    23:33 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not really, though if you're in school the gap seems much larger than it actually is.

    But just wait till your birthday! The second it hits midnight, bam! You're a pedophile!

    Avatar of Renegade Angel
    Comment by Renegade Angel
    22:45 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You would still be under aged and she is 14.
    If you were 18 and she was 13 then yes you would be a pedo.

    Avatar of カンチ
    Comment by カンチ
    00:10 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    My last gf was 14 when we started dating,I was 17 at the time.Men in a lot of cases are gonna find interest in a girl younger than them.I personally feel that if it's within a 3 yr range,you are good.A lot of guys have girlfriend 1-3 yrs younger.If more,I don't find anything wrong with you but It's just not my tastes.There is a say that I never forgot...because it creeps me out...

    "After 12,it's lunch"

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:55 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Then you're the worst, being a underaged pedo is worse and a pedo of legal age.

    Personally I'd say you're a lolicon/pedo if you like a girl because her body is similar to that of a younger one. Like before they turn into teenagers.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:28 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    If 17 with a 14 year old, it's not considered pedo. There's a "Romeo & Juliet" rule which allows it to be fine.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:06 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "why must pedos be insane?"

    Because it's a mental illness.

    Avatar of kamanashi
    Comment by kamanashi
    05:53 29/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    All the pedos I have met are pretty insane and are in prison now. 1 guy I know for sure will be a pedo has already raped a girl, so not much longer and he will be back.

    Avatar of Aliaus
    Comment by Aliaus
    07:56 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    and how many pedos have you met?

    Comment by Anonymous

    True, pedos are not insane, they know exactly what they are doing and should be treated with death.

    I thought lolicon was manga with girls under the age of thirteen?

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:40 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    And what if you are 22, with interest in girls aged 16?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:15 25/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think YOU should be treated with death.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:20 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    lolicon/lolicom refers to "lolita complex" and typically refers to men (or women) who like girls under the age of 18 and with a flat chest.
    Not a direct definition, but one that's passable, regardless.

    Personally, I feel it's fine to like girls/boys that young if you are close in age.
    After all, it's natural to look at people like that when they're similar to you, and if they're just a bit smaller or younger, it's more of a natural preference thing than a mental problem.
    But if you're 30+ and you're looking at girls under 15 with a dangerous sexual impulse, you should at least critique yourself and try to consult someone as to why you feel that way.
    Some people like younger children mainly because they're innocent and pure, and they're not going to throw surprising fetishes upon you, so you can have casual fun, too.

    Besides, some people just like "cute" things, while adults usually have to act the part out and it's only natural for children to actually be "cute."

    Comment by Anonymous

    When it comes to pedophilia, especially in the US, there is little room to seek treatment, as the general trend to expose the individual to a more legal investigation rather than a therapeutic evaluation, so speaking to anyone, regardless of the age, generally results in an a legal investigation, and even if there is not substantial findings (i.e., the individual has acted out on their impulses), the stigma has already been put in place. For pedophilia there is no such thing as an early intervention, as with any other psychiatric diagnosis. Now with lolicon, you are dealing for the most part with fantasy, meaning the stimulation that the individual seeks out is not real and does not involve the harm of another person. So lolicon can, and from a legal stand point, is the early signs of an individual seeking a means to at out their sexual impulses. But given that everyone that looks at lolicon has not committed a criminal offense, then it leaves the door open to the idea that maybe people can experience sexual fantasies and maintain normal social behavior (i.e., not acting out any inappropriate sexual urges). As for the DSM, it generally focuses on actions that are harmful as having sexual impulse toward someone who is not of sexual age is harmful, but does not reflect the social norms of a given society (the ages of consent varies from culture to culture). Lolicon is a complex (i.e., an internal process that may or may not be acted on), while pedophilia is something that for the most part is acted on (i.e., an impulse that seeks out external gratification in what it is attracted to). Now here is the kicker, given we only use data based upon harmful interactions (i.e., forced sexual interaction), and does not take into consideration data from situations that are outside of this (and in fact negates this data by then placing the child in a situation where the social norm of the interaction was inappropriate and harmful is pushed onto the child so that, in the harmful fashion they are accusing the adult, they are imposing on the child, and in turn manifest what they seek, supporting the reality of the belief). So, this question, although debated, does not show any sign of a clear answer. I recall hearing an individual describe a girl who indicated that she was an older guys "best lay" and so ended up being diagnosed as bipolar, and the guy a criminal, which both, despite treatment, did not end with a good outcome. So, there is not clear answer, despite the data we have.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:55 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Wouldn't really call pedos insane. It's quite a leap from having a sexual intrest for something and rape / taking advantage. I don't really care if someone gets his/her jollys by masturbating to 2d pedo-porn.

    Btw. I'm more of lolicon / dfc lover myself..

    Avatar of Azaius
    Comment by Azaius
    02:56 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    There's actually a term that no one seems to know that describes the preference for mid to late teenagers. When it comes to legal issues, it's still always referred to as pedophilia even though it's not. Although still illegal, it's mentally normal to like said age range.

    Avatar of T-Joker
    Comment by T-Joker
    07:47 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm not lolicon neither pedo. I'll just hit the nurse :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:51 14/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's okay, I'm a Lolicon, but I must say the nurse is HOT!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:03 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    U12 is where it's at.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:34 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    in Canada you used to be able to consent at 14 now it's 16. But my parents won't let me even at 19...

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    23:15 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You didn't read, didn't you?

    liking girls 13-17 = okay
    liking girls under 13 = okay
    having sex with girls under 13 = not okay

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Having sex with girls 13-17 is okay now? Wat?

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's okay, though, Myballz. In Texas, they only have affairs with cattle.

    Avatar of thanto_
    Comment by thanto_
    12:37 30/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, and who would want to have sex with a 13 year old cow? Too old. Do not want.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:13 24/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Having sex with girls 13-17 is okay now? Wat?"

    Yes, OK in the sense of not being mentally ill, but it's still ethically wrong.

    Avatar of Sarissofoi
    Comment by Sarissofoi
    23:34 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ofcourse it is okay in many countries.
    In many countries it is okey if you are young. If you are adult this is wrong and you go to jail.
    Another reason why becoming adult suck.

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    23:39 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not exactly okay. Just within the bounds of sanity.

    Killing your neighbor because he's sleeping with your wife is a sane act, but still an illegal one. Same principle.

    Avatar of Myballz
    Comment by Myballz
    02:16 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In some cases having an Affair with a 13 year old Boy or Girl is consinder by law in Texas Punishable.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:17 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually that example of killing your neighbour defines you as being temporarily insane, which by plea makes the act legal and therefore lets you escape persecution.

    Avatar of Tex_Arcana
    Comment by Tex_Arcana
    00:24 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The insanity offense is infrequently cited, and therefore works only in rare instances. I take your point that my example isn't the best one, though.

    You'd have a hard time convincing a jury that a professional robbery was the result of insanity, though.

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    01:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes it is okay, my country states that the minimum age of consent is 12. It only becomes a crime if you compensate or in other words, there's prostitution...

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:00 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    @ Ichiro

    "having sex with girls under 13 = not okay"

    Sorry but your avatar begs to differ.

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    09:30 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Truth hurts...

    It's not okay... I'll do it anyway...

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:49 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's the spirit, why denying our emotions that makes us human?

    Do it anyway, providing it's consensual. :p

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:07 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I think they mean sexual thoughts and desires is what's okay. As in it's natural. However, since most people just accept laws as governing what they should THINK as well as do, it won't be "okay" for some time.

    tldr; even if it says it's okay, keep your thoughts to yourself (or anon boards/sancon).

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:19 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Dammit anon. You beat me to the punch.

    Avatar of Juuza Sama
    Comment by Juuza Sama
    23:25 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't define it cause as a "fear of sex with adult" but I believe it's more like a desire or an passion, and this is caused to some people who are attracted by the beauty, innocence, and cuteness of little girl.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:01 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I am forced to agree that the desire of innocence is present within some lolicons and such...

    Innocence is becoming more and more rare in this day and age and people tend to desire what is hard for them to acquire themselves.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:02 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To some people it's a fear of sex with adults, they only explained one possibility, and going by current Japanese trends possibly the most likely there, not necessarily here.

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    22:46 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So it's okay for me to fap to school swim suit girls?

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    22:53 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    So I'm allowed to fap to 14+?

    Avatar of OTIKA
    Comment by OTIKA
    23:51 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're allowed to fap to anything as long as you keep a low profile...

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:18 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    also your picture of your beautiful mom is allowed ??

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    00:03 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    By societies current, almost hypocritical standards? No. By true definition and trending of the last several hundred years? Fuck yes.

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:50 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    In ancient Greece, having sex with young girls and/or boys on the streets was part of their culture. Heck, they even married off nieces to their uncles.

    Mind you, they did adult women too, and anyone who had sex with a married woman was the right to be killed by the husband. But they sure didn't see anything wrong with what we call pedophilia. Nature AND history is more right than what these politicians believe.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:09 24/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    For the record, in ancient Rome a boy was only considered a man after raping an under 15 year old girl.

    The Chanterbury Tales [from 12th century] present a "less old" example. A story is told in which a 15 year old girl marries a 60 year old man, making clear that it was not an uncommon practice at the time.

    So I have to say BlaqCat is right on the "couple hundred years". "Throughout all human history"? not by a long shot.

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    00:12 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Several hundred years? More like, throughout human history.

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    22:45 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    To avoid scrutiny from society, become a kindergarten teacher. Thats what Hanamaru has thought me.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:42 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Actually, people with sexual interest towards adolescents would be diagnosed with ephebophilia.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:02 28/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well, I'll admit it for a fairly large number of people here. I'm an ephebophile. Onii-chan, it's fairly legal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:23 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so what would you call someone with no attraction to male or female, but an attraction to large machines? of food for that matter?

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:11 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I have to fully agree on this. I my self am a Lolicon and proud of it. I enjoy the aspect of innocence and ignorance of the way of the world that most loli characters portray.

    So do i have a mental problem? Well i know i have other problems but besides that. I dont go chasing after kids in the supermarket offering them candy, or babysitting the neighbors kids then taking naked photos of them. Things like that i would address a mental illness along the lines of Pedophilia.

    Avatar of Shigure
    Comment by Shigure
    12:29 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    and hungry, respectively

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:56 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    baby + blender = salsa!

    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    00:11 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    "Diagnosed"? You assume that's actually a mental illness. The vast majority of males are ephebophiles, as in, they are sexually attracted to adolescents.

    It's completely natural for a male to be attracted to a female who has the ability to give birth. It's just how biology works.

    Now, someone with a sexual attraction to adolescents where they are -only- attracted to adolescents and it negatively affects their daily life, would be considered having the "mental disease of ephebo/hebephilia".

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    13,14,15 = undeveloped still , that makes you pedo . Stop justifying it, you sick perverts

    Comment by Anonymous
    06:37 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    tldr, im a tremendous faggot.

    Avatar of BlaqCat
    Comment by BlaqCat
    07:49 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Keep that kind of talk to Australia. We here on Sancon appreciate our lolis, and small breasted womenz.

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:54 31/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ;( Don't remind me. Ausfag here. And there's nothing wrong with lolis or flat chested womenz, Australian government!

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:49 14/11/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're obviously too stupid to underrstand that sexual preference for girls/boys between 12 and 16 is not Pedophilia, it's Hebephilia. And preference for 16 to 21-25 year old women is Ephebophilia.

    Note that I wrote PREFERENCE, not ATRACTION, you can get turned on by, say, a 60 year old woman/man and you would still be a Teleiophile if you strongly prefer people between 25 and 55 years old.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:41 29/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    giri giri safe!

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments