Australia Bans Small Breasts as “Child Pornography”

Australia has reportedly banned mainstream pornography from showing women with A-cup breasts, apparently on the grounds that they encourage paedophilia, and in spite of the fact this is a normal breast size for many adult women.

The Australian Sex Party reports even Hustler has seen its publications refused publication, all thanks to the usual moral crusader “think of the children” arguments:

“This is in response to a campaign led by Kids Free 2 B Kids and promoted by Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett in Senate Estimates late last year.

Mainstream companies such as Larry Flint’s Hustler produce some of the publications that have been banned.

These companies are regulated by the FBI to ensure that only adult performers are featured in their publications.”

With small breasts now considered obscene, Australian adult rags are said to have suffered sharp increase in breast sizes.

Presumably small breasted women taking photographs of themselves will now be guilty of creating simulated child pornography, to say nothing of the message this sends to women with modestly sized chests or those who favour them.

Australia is also said to have banned pornographic depictions of female ejaculation, a normal orgasmic sexual response in many women, with censors branding it as “abhorrent”:

1. That the depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of ‘golden showers’ in the Classification Guidelines.

2. Female ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction.

It seems the UK and Australia are intent on regressing to Victorian standards of morality (although this time anyone criticising homosexuality may find themselves convicted of a hate crime), between them having now banned everything from BDSM to small breasts, even where participants are entirely imaginary.