Lolita Sex Soldier Spared: “She Was Dangerous”

condom-in-mouth-shimapan-schoolgirl-by-raskaru.jpg

A 41-year-old soldier who had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl has been spared jail, with the judge blaming the girl for being “precocious,” saying “she made most of the running.”

The 41-year-old veteran, stationed at Sandhurst Military Academy and said to have remained a private for 22 years due to a lack of competence, became acquainted with a 13-year-old girl at the stables where he worked.

The “troubled” girl confided in the man over a period of several weeks, and the pair became friends.

After getting caught drinking alcohol at school, the girl was sent home and subsequently paid a tearful visit to the stables, where she sought comfort with the private, and then accompanied him back to his room at the academy.

She provided a condom and the pair had sex.

The private was subsequently arrested after the girl produced the condom she had kept from the encounter, apparently as a trophy.

The defence claimed the girl was a “sexual time-bomb”:

“She confided in [the defendant]. He would talk to her about her problems and over a two week period they got to know one another.

She was crying and he invited her back to his room to comfort her and one thing led to another. She was a time-bomb waiting to go off. Unfortunately it was the defendant she went off on.”

The soldier pleaded guilty to one count of sexual activity with a child; the judge gave him a suspended one-year prison sentence, along with a ban on teaching any girls under 16.

The judge was uncharacteristically reasonable in her verdict:

“It was clear from the evidence that she was a disturbed girl, that her behaviour was precocious in several respects, that she looked and acted older than her age and she made most of the running.

Whether you knew her age or not, you had the duty as a man in his 40s to make sure she was the legal age.”

The judge went on to concede that being stupid was a good defence for having sex with children:

“She was just short of 14. There are many girls of 14 in this country who are sexually active – this may not be a good thing but it is a fact that has to be recognised.

This was not a breach of trust situation. Although she was vulnerable, you too in a sense, are vulnerable as you are a simple man. What occurred was stupidity rather than malice.”

Via the Daily Mail.


    Post Comment »
    148 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Bastille
    Comment by Bastille
    13:08 10/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Nice to see a judge handling a case like this properly rather than freaking out and putting all the blame on the man.

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    13:23 10/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Wow, can't believe this comes from the same country where all those teenage arrests for self-pedophilization happen.

    Anyway GJ judge!

    Avatar of Insilencio
    Comment by Insilencio
    14:17 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Wow, it's a strictass-looking WOMAN judge too.
    I have much respect for this judge. Levelheadedness will get you far. Major props.

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:36 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She looks....

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    15:39 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i'm gonna be soldier nx yr <3 =]

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    19:07 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I'm glad to see at least one judge over there has some common sense! ^^

    The man was at fault since he shouldn't have let things go that far (he was the adult in that relationship with the girl before it turned sexual, after all), but the girl was also at fault... just in a different way.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:09 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    In a country where they jail homeowners and free career criminals??? WHUT IS THIS INSANITY?!?!

    Comment by Anonymous

    well you can't deny how jealous the male judges are for making such harsh punishment sometimes,becouse they didn't have the chance to have sex with a young person.
    This woman judge couldn't be jealous and looked into all of the situations and judged with her common sense.Probably the girl didn't look that young also.

    Avatar of Gitami
    Comment by Gitami
    22:06 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Male judges can't be lenient or they'd be charged with sexism by the prosecution. How fortunate this judge could sentence without undue concern.

    Avatar of tarodar
    Comment by tarodar
    22:53 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I agree there is no way a male judge could have gotten away with this verdict.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    interesting point gitami.
    But it's very dangerous to call a male judge sexist if you stand for anything.Their decision is final no matter what.And if you belong to any group and say anything to a judge,like i heard from one guy calling a judge sexist and not doing the right decision to a judge.That judge can suspend you from your work for some time,punish you.I think the guy who complained wrote an article about it and the judge forbid him to write any articles about this matter.
    Judges can make decisions with authorithy no one else could ever have.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    forgot to mention that guy was a complaining feminist who was calling a judge sexist and wrong judgement,when the judge decided that it was a falsely accused rape,which it was.

    Avatar of Gradius
    Comment by Gradius
    06:24 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Sexual time-bomb".

    I just LOL'd !

    Avatar of Gradius
    Comment by Gradius
    06:27 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Btw, pedo bear will be fucking happy from now on!

    Avatar of naru-chan
    Comment by naru-chan
    23:36 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    if that happened in america he would've been lynched i bet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:48 30/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Gazing Ryan's Private lol

    Comment by Schrobby
    14:54 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Almost unbelievable. We need more judges like that...

    Comment by Envoy Loves You
    20:22 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ndeed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:33 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you see some of the comments in the link? Some of those people have no idea of how the society works.

    Punish the man and reverse the status quo? Give me a break. The PARENTS are not even taking care of the kids. The fact that the kid went to another MAN to do it just shows how pathetic her family is. Idiots can't even think of where the problems are and instead blame the man 100%. Yeesh.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:50 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so instead she should have gone to her FATHER instead?

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:49 21/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    For one, chances are her father wouldn't have had sex with her. Second, he might have done something if his child started acting strange or he'd pimp her out and make money off it.

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    19:45 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Finally, proof that stupidity saves your ass.

    Not that you should be proud of it though...

    Comment by BANNED_fei
    13:33 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm so proud! *tear*

    more judges should do this!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:44 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree I think the judge did on a good job this time
    Finally
    Keep up the good work

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:04 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    As long as Equality Now doesn't get into the picture.

    Avatar of Drazn
    Comment by Drazn
    05:23 09/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Against a fully qualified judge? they wouldnt dare, they would get totally *&%£ed

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:32 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i dont think mr judge is that many. those are precious gems that come once every blue moon. very very rare.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ms/mrs judge actually...

    the article is clear about it..

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:54 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She is a rare specimen. If she was younger and actually attractive, she'd be perfect.

    Oh, and if she was a man. Since woman are inherently inferior. :D

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    21:53 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Is this really the world I'm living in? Because it's PROGRESSING!

    Avatar of Tham
    Comment by Tham
    13:08 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Good God. The jailbait is more dangerous than we thought.

    Avatar of Tallgeese_VI
    Comment by Tallgeese_VI
    13:09 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't blame the man, blame that girl.

    Avatar of viewtifu1
    Comment by viewtifu1
    13:09 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    this makes me wanna watch chu bra

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Nin
    07:49 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *salutes alongside unellmay02*

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    13:10 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    They still have stables at military academy these days? Anyone for 40 year old private?

    Also private and veteran used in the same sentence is just paradoxical.

    Avatar of NoOne
    Comment by NoOne
    14:01 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:26 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Veteran means 'with experience'.

    Private is the basic rank; the first rank. This implies inexperience. Therefore the statement 'veteran private' is paradoxical.

    In the end, you can send a donkey to a battlefield, but it'll never come back a horse.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:41 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    No, a private is just a rank. It doesn't denote experience of any kind. What it does denote is competence, which is very different.

    A private is the first rank soldiers go through, those that prove to be competent with leadership skills slowly get promoted higher and higher until they themselves reach their competency own thresholds.

    This man may, or may not have had experience in war. He doesn't necessarily need to be of higher rank to have experience, it just means that he is not leadership material.

    It is not paradoxical for a veteran to remain a private. Do you think that EVERY private gets promoted to Corporal, Sergent, and so on or chooses to retire or turn down a promotion?

    No, if they remain privates, it is simply because they are appraised to lack leadership skills, regardless of how much experience in war they actually have.

    Avatar of thanto_
    Comment by thanto_
    03:37 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The article stated that he was a private due to his incompetence. Veteran literally means having a good amount of experience, but it also implies a modicum of skill in one's field. If the guy couldn't get past private for more than two decades, well...

    Avatar of red candle
    Comment by red candle
    13:12 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ".....Unfortunately it was the defendant she went off on.” I lol'ed at that one. It sucks there is not a picture of the girl (T_T)

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    13:14 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Real lolis aren't usually as attractive as the one in that picture

    Comment by BANNED_fei
    13:32 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    and he said that she looks older than 13

    do not want

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    19:13 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Do not want indeed

    Avatar of Anim3Fr33K
    Comment by Anim3Fr33K
    13:13 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    a most interesting result, its nice to see the guy not shot in this case as he was not entirely at fault.

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:30 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    yeah he was at fault , people have no morals

    Avatar of Vicious
    Comment by Vicious
    13:13 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    SO if you're a Soldier + a Lolicon = no jailtime

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    13:15 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Should put that in their next recruitment ad

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:56 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're wrong. The punishment for the transgression fit the circumstances. Under different circumstances, you could be a soldier, sleep with an underager and get significant jailtime.

    Avatar of darknetwork
    Comment by darknetwork
    00:32 18/07/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    the reason he wasn't jailed isn't because he is a soldier

    “It was clear from the evidence that she was a disturbed girl, that her behaviour was precocious in several respects, that she looked and acted older than her age and she made most of the running."

    Avatar of Densha Otoko
    Comment by Densha Otoko
    13:15 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    LOL sexual time-bomb
    you creepy veteran don't touch the young 3D girlie.
    i will show you some good 2D girls !!!!!






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments