Lolita Sex Soldier Spared: “She Was Dangerous”

condom-in-mouth-shimapan-schoolgirl-by-raskaru.jpg

A 41-year-old soldier who had a sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl has been spared jail, with the judge blaming the girl for being “precocious,” saying “she made most of the running.”

The 41-year-old veteran, stationed at Sandhurst Military Academy and said to have remained a private for 22 years due to a lack of competence, became acquainted with a 13-year-old girl at the stables where he worked.

The “troubled” girl confided in the man over a period of several weeks, and the pair became friends.

After getting caught drinking alcohol at school, the girl was sent home and subsequently paid a tearful visit to the stables, where she sought comfort with the private, and then accompanied him back to his room at the academy.

She provided a condom and the pair had sex.

The private was subsequently arrested after the girl produced the condom she had kept from the encounter, apparently as a trophy.

The defence claimed the girl was a “sexual time-bomb”:

“She confided in [the defendant]. He would talk to her about her problems and over a two week period they got to know one another.

She was crying and he invited her back to his room to comfort her and one thing led to another. She was a time-bomb waiting to go off. Unfortunately it was the defendant she went off on.”

The soldier pleaded guilty to one count of sexual activity with a child; the judge gave him a suspended one-year prison sentence, along with a ban on teaching any girls under 16.

The judge was uncharacteristically reasonable in her verdict:

“It was clear from the evidence that she was a disturbed girl, that her behaviour was precocious in several respects, that she looked and acted older than her age and she made most of the running.

Whether you knew her age or not, you had the duty as a man in his 40s to make sure she was the legal age.”

The judge went on to concede that being stupid was a good defence for having sex with children:

“She was just short of 14. There are many girls of 14 in this country who are sexually active – this may not be a good thing but it is a fact that has to be recognised.

This was not a breach of trust situation. Although she was vulnerable, you too in a sense, are vulnerable as you are a simple man. What occurred was stupidity rather than malice.”

Via the Daily Mail.


    Post Comment »
    148 Comments
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Bastille
    Comment by Bastille
    13:08 10/01/2010 # ! Quality (+0.8)

    Nice to see a judge handling a case like this properly rather than freaking out and putting all the blame on the man.

    Avatar of Darkrockslizer
    Comment by Darkrockslizer
    13:23 10/01/2010 # ! Good (+0.4)

    Wow, can't believe this comes from the same country where all those teenage arrests for self-pedophilization happen.

    Anyway GJ judge!

    Avatar of Insilencio
    Comment by Insilencio
    14:17 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Wow, it's a strictass-looking WOMAN judge too.
    I have much respect for this judge. Levelheadedness will get you far. Major props.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:09 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    In a country where they jail homeowners and free career criminals??? WHUT IS THIS INSANITY?!?!

    Avatar of tarodar
    Comment by tarodar
    22:53 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I agree there is no way a male judge could have gotten away with this verdict.

    Avatar of Gradius
    Comment by Gradius
    06:24 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    "Sexual time-bomb".

    I just LOL'd !

    Avatar of Gitami
    Comment by Gitami
    22:06 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Male judges can't be lenient or they'd be charged with sexism by the prosecution. How fortunate this judge could sentence without undue concern.

    Avatar of Miroku74
    Comment by Miroku74
    19:07 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I'm glad to see at least one judge over there has some common sense! ^^

    The man was at fault since he shouldn't have let things go that far (he was the adult in that relationship with the girl before it turned sexual, after all), but the girl was also at fault... just in a different way.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:14 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    interesting point gitami.
    But it's very dangerous to call a male judge sexist if you stand for anything.Their decision is final no matter what.And if you belong to any group and say anything to a judge,like i heard from one guy calling a judge sexist and not doing the right decision to a judge.That judge can suspend you from your work for some time,punish you.I think the guy who complained wrote an article about it and the judge forbid him to write any articles about this matter.
    Judges can make decisions with authorithy no one else could ever have.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:43 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    forgot to mention that guy was a complaining feminist who was calling a judge sexist and wrong judgement,when the judge decided that it was a falsely accused rape,which it was.

    Avatar of naru-chan
    Comment by naru-chan
    23:36 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    if that happened in america he would've been lynched i bet.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:48 30/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Gazing Ryan's Private lol

    Avatar of Gradius
    Comment by Gradius
    06:27 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Btw, pedo bear will be fucking happy from now on!

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:36 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She looks....

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    15:39 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i'm gonna be soldier nx yr <3 =]

    Comment by Anonymous

    well you can't deny how jealous the male judges are for making such harsh punishment sometimes,becouse they didn't have the chance to have sex with a young person.
    This woman judge couldn't be jealous and looked into all of the situations and judged with her common sense.Probably the girl didn't look that young also.

    Avatar of Yoshii-kun
    Comment by Yoshii-kun
    19:45 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Finally, proof that stupidity saves your ass.

    Not that you should be proud of it though...

    Comment by Schrobby
    14:54 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Almost unbelievable. We need more judges like that...

    Comment by Envoy Loves You
    20:22 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ndeed.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:33 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you see some of the comments in the link? Some of those people have no idea of how the society works.

    Punish the man and reverse the status quo? Give me a break. The PARENTS are not even taking care of the kids. The fact that the kid went to another MAN to do it just shows how pathetic her family is. Idiots can't even think of where the problems are and instead blame the man 100%. Yeesh.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:49 21/04/2011 # ! Neutral (0)

    For one, chances are her father wouldn't have had sex with her. Second, he might have done something if his child started acting strange or he'd pimp her out and make money off it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:50 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    so instead she should have gone to her FATHER instead?

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    21:53 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Is this really the world I'm living in? Because it's PROGRESSING!

    Comment by Anonymous
    13:44 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I agree I think the judge did on a good job this time
    Finally
    Keep up the good work

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:04 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    As long as Equality Now doesn't get into the picture.

    Avatar of Drazn
    Comment by Drazn
    05:23 09/02/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Against a fully qualified judge? they wouldnt dare, they would get totally *&%£ed

    Comment by Anonymous
    14:32 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    i dont think mr judge is that many. those are precious gems that come once every blue moon. very very rare.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:54 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    She is a rare specimen. If she was younger and actually attractive, she'd be perfect.

    Oh, and if she was a man. Since woman are inherently inferior. :D

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:04 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    ms/mrs judge actually...

    the article is clear about it..

    Comment by BANNED_fei
    13:33 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'm so proud! *tear*

    more judges should do this!!!

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:34 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Some should stop all the hate comments on the journal site

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:24 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Last time I remember being disturbed didn't matter at all, she's 13, you are guilty, no mercy whatsoever.

    Finally it seems one judge realized whats wrong and right... yeah right, he had the whole military behind him.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:39 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    The military was probably looking for a reason to ditch the tard and she gave it to them.

    The man's a war hero dammit.

    Comment by Anonymous
    23:24 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    He should have just fap to the loli girl on the above picture.

    Its 'safe'.

    Comment by Anonymous
    22:39 05/06/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Not in the UK it isn't. That picture has human rights.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:15 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Sounds like a mentally/emotionally unstable girl to me and the guy simply making use of that. Really the judge is far too lenient.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:05 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *Sounds like a mentally/emotionally unstable man to me and the girl was simply making use of that.

    There, I fixed it.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:17 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    This reminds me of a film called Crush.

    Still I fail to see how consensual sex is a crime, let alone the business of anyone but the two people that engaged in it. It is not the government's place to tell people what they can and can not do as long as they are not hurting anyone.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:46 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Consensual sex shouldn't be a crime but when someone is for example drunk or mentally unstable you're taking a risk whether they still like what happened when they sober up or become better. I don't think it's fair to just take that risk when the other party is in such a state and hope for the best. For children of that age(13) whose mind is far from matured you're taking the same risk. I've seen a story about a woman who had sex with an adult man when she was still a kid and very much regrets it. The fact remains you can far more easily overpower a child mentally/emotionally as an adult.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    for having a condom she wasn't so mentaly challenged but actually smart.

    Avatar of Sylar
    Comment by Sylar
    02:46 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes that woman you are talking about may have regret it but that doesn't make the guy a rapist. People do a lot of things they regret even when they are grown ups.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:21 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Being drunk or clearly mentally handicap is not consensual.

    It is not the government's job to protect our kids. It's ours as parents; and if parents fuck up and don't tell them the facts, responsibilities, and consequences of sex, then it is their fault.

    We are rewarding bad parenting and ignorance in general, which will only spiral out of control.

    I've told my girl that they should never do anything they are uncomfortable with, should use a condom properly if she does choose to have sex, to beware of predators online and off, and to most importantly think carefully about who she wants to give her body to. That sex is between two people that really love each other, and I'd hope she'd share her feelings so I could help her make better decisions.

    We're very close. She's only 10, but because I was honest and open with her, and we sat down and talked, she was mature enough to understand I cared and loved her enough to tell her the truth. I believe she knows that she should trust her father.

    I wanted to be pre-emptive before possible mistakes happen. Good communication is extremely important, and if their parents are off at the bar or in front of a TV, they are going to resent them.

    As a libertarian, all I can do is spread common sense.

    Comment by Anonymous
    00:40 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Everythings the business of moralfags.

    I saw an article on it where a businessman was thrown into lockup for 4 hours for an anti gypsy email...that he didn't write.

    Avatar of Tallgeese_VI
    Comment by Tallgeese_VI
    13:09 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Don't blame the man, blame that girl.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:22 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    after reviewing the comments from that site and sancom...i feel sort of pissed off a bit. the peeps over at dailymail are soo unlinient....

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:54 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Damn, you're right. These people suck pretty bad.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Avatar of Kelvin
    Comment by Kelvin
    20:20 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Justice has been served!

    Avatar of Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Shi nai weaboo
    Comment by Nin
    07:49 11/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *salutes alongside unellmay02*

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-03
    20:20 10/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    *sigh*

    No one should go to jail for consensual sex, age doesn't matter. Even the "51-week prison sentence suspended for two years" he got is too much. Stupid laws should be abolished.






    Post Comment »

Popular

Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments