Mother to Police: “He Didn’t Pay for the Pics of My Daughter!”


A mother who approached police with a complaint about a man who allegedly refused to pay her for pornographic pictures of her daughter has been arrested, prompting the apprehension of a number of other mothers involved in similar crimes.

The young mother in this case approached Miyagi police with the complaint that “I sent pornographic photos of my daughter to a man I met online, but he hasn’t paid me properly!”

This admission understandably prompted an investigation, which was to result in 12 arrests across eight prefectures.

Police found mothers and other female relatives involved in selling thousands of pictures of their daughters, aged anywhere from 1 to 12.

Reportedly, these women were not in any economic hardship and were instead motivated by a desire for extra spending money.

In one case a mother received 3 million yen over 10 years for having her daughter participate in 60 photography sessions; in other cases mothers have progressed from selling pictures to selling their daughters bodily for sex.

Via Itai News.

    Post Comment »
    Sort by: Date | Score
    Avatar of Y10NRDY
    Comment by Y10NRDY
    13:04 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    how about some pictures of the mother for some wincest/loli/milf triple threat?


    Comment by Anonymous
    02:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    lol@everyone deliberately missing the point


    Comment by Anonymous
    02:18 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I don't even think my imagination is capable of picturing "pornographic images" of 1-year olds. Are they dressed up in torn fishnet stockings and made to giggle for the camera, perhaps?

    I'm starting to think I should burn my family album. If those baptism pictures ever got out I somewhat worry what would become of me...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:12 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    with 1 year olds it's pretty much a really hard pic or it isn't considered porn so that should answer the question.

    Avatar of Riiku
    Comment by Riiku
    20:59 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    I dont get it. When someone enjoys the view of yours naked body, isnt that, like, good? I know I would be glad knowing that some womans enjoy pics of a 6 year old naked me. Like, she faps to it, she wants me, how is this even a little bit bad? Especially if I'll never see her in my life.

    Avatar of tingle
    Comment by tingle
    01:26 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    If you took pictures of yourself when you were a child, and then saved them until you were 18 would it be legal to sell them to pedophiles?

    10:31 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Somewhere around the world, taking nude pictures of yourself (especially for underage ppl) is considered as sex offending. Yea, no joking...

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:53 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes, it's happened in the USA:

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:54 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I actually I meant "no, you can't" or "yes, it would be child pornography" lol sorry.

    Avatar of Sarissofoi
    Comment by Sarissofoi
    01:56 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That is the question.
    Propably you would be send to jail for selling child pornography anyway.

    Avatar of Eleriel
    Comment by Eleriel
    03:45 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    that's actually a pretty curious question...
    would it be more like showing someone your family album?
    I suppose it depends on what you were doing in the photos...

    If you had someone else take the photos of you, they might get into trouble though.

    moot point though, a 1-12 year old probably wont have that idea on their own. :\ it's more if you find old photos of yourself while cleaning your house I'd guess.

    Comment by Schrobby
    04:01 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's a great pension plan... ^_^

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    01:11 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    Nothing wrong with exploiting a little assets as long as the proceeds are equally divided and permission has been obtained from both parties.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:20 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    So you are going to ask a 1 year old baby girl, "Hey babe, can I take pictures of you?", and if she replies "Agaga!" you take it as a yes, right?


    Comment by Anonymous
    16:03 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    agaga! Is widely accepted as the standard for a 1 year old saying she consents to sex so why wouldn't it apply to photography as well?

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    01:23 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    When I mean permission it does adheres to the basic contractual kind that courts of law acknowledge.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:46 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    you can't sign a contract with a baby

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    02:01 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Then it is void and illegal.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:35 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    come on you hypocrites. there's nothing wrong with selling pics of your daughter. nobody's right is getting violated, so in a real liberal country, it should be allowed.

    Avatar of Shuu
    Comment by Shuu
    08:14 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (-0.2)

    In a real liberal country you'd still have to ask your daughter first... now, we didn't hear whether the older ones participated voluntarily (most of them probably didn't), but there's no way to secure the consent of a one year old....

    Avatar of Chen-04
    Comment by Chen-04
    18:25 18/07/2013 # ! Neutral (0)

    That's what parents are for or how do you think babies used for movies/advertisements are contracted? lol

    Big news: parents don't need no consent from their children to make them do stuff. They have the right to make then do what they want just because they are the parents. Like, making them eat their vegetables or ensuring they go to school. Children don't have the right to refuse. If they do, they deserve punishment.

    So this has really nothing to do with "consent".

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:13 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "pictures of their daughters, aged anywhere from 1 to 12"

    So you are sending pictures of your little baby girl during her first steps or whatever and it is illegal?
    Cute baby pictures are always neat and I see no sexual desire in them.
    But wow, these sickos. I don't wanna know what they do with the toddler pics. *shiver*

    Comment by Anonymous
    09:31 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    same anon here.
    The above sentence with the baby pictures should be:

    [...]and I see no way for anyone to have sexual desires for them.

    Avatar of Reichi
    Comment by Reichi
    06:26 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    2D women wouldn't sell sexy pictures of your infant!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:45 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    This the fucking japan nation :)

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:48 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I was watching one of those cops show documentaries and this chick called the cops to complain that the crack house she'd just been to had sold her a piece of chalk instead of crack, and she wanted the cop to go there and get her money back.
    Hilarity ensued.
    Take away lesson: being a crack addict is bad for your IQ.

    Comment by Anonymous
    08:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    STUPID!! We should erase them from our gene pool!

    Comment by Anonymous
    07:29 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well go to isohunt and type the word "model" and You'll see the same thing mentioned here, only from Russia

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:10 12/03/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    is she stupid?

    Avatar of tyciol
    Comment by tyciol
    03:25 15/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    We have to keep in mind: perhaps the daughter had a disease (like flesh-eating bacteria) and the mother wanted the money to pay for the operation.

    Comment by Anonymous
    Comment by Anonymous
    06:17 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The naiveness of that mother amazes me. Her logic it's the same of a junkie who complains to police because the drugdealer sold him aspirin instead of meth.

    Comment by Anonymous
    20:28 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well it is Crysis on the world money is not comming much. So people need to get the money somehow..

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:43 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Did you not read the article? The mothers were living as well as you can live and they still sent those photos. They did it because they wanted extra money.

    Avatar of EleutheroZeroONE
    Comment by EleutheroZeroONE
    13:32 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    But it PREDOMINANTLY isn't!

    Avatar of Stiyl-Magnus19
    Comment by Stiyl-Magnus19
    06:50 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    O.O ...Without words

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:32 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Seems like japanese women are falling further and further with mothers like these. It's no wonder why otakus have become disillusioned with reality and refuse to date such human scum.

    Avatar of Ichiro Ino
    Comment by Ichiro Ino
    01:32 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    In before when feminazis says men do these things on their children...

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:08 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Ugh, parents. Typical

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:30 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Wow.... These stories always crack me up.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the world became more weirder..

    Comment by SnooSnoo
    01:15 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Looks like the Chinese idea of 养儿防老 (have kids to insure you are taken care of when you are old)
    rubbed off these mothers in an extreme way.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:15 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe in a literal sense?

    Avatar of zidus
    Comment by zidus
    01:06 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    These kinda news really make my stomach turn and woe for the future of humankind. Reading this I cringed so hard like never before, if I didn't knew better I would think it's some kinda sick joke. So disturbing.

    I mean, what kind of world do we live in where the mother doesn't get payed for the pictures of her daughter? I am speechless. I just hope that bastard gets caught and gets publicly executed.

    Avatar of PikachuEXE
    Comment by PikachuEXE
    12:02 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That man should at least trade his "nutritional liquid" for the photos
    1 shot = 1 photo
    and add some liquid in the milk their daugthers drink everyday
    make them more attractive(and sell more photos again

    Avatar of A_Moose
    Comment by A_Moose
    10:09 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of Chris
    Comment by Chris
    04:23 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Well played Zidus.

    Avatar of OTIKA
    Comment by OTIKA
    01:52 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Bottom line:
    Trust no one but yourself and your own instincts.
    Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
    Have a subtle plan to kill anyone and everyone you meet; this way you have something to fall back to when they do turn against you.

    And most importantly: Do not let anyone stand right behind you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 03/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    01:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Morality is subjective, it changes with time moralfaggot. What may be yesterday's norm may be tomorrow's vices, so why adhere to a system that may be exploited by the power-hungry "leadership".
    Being free from morals and making decisions based on logic is the next step in humanity.

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    01:29 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (+0.2)

    A transaction was supposed to have occur, the man is the one at fault as he committed a breach of contract.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:36 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yeah, but that guy will get away with it. The police is too busy hunting down mothers who take pictures of their daughters.

    Wait... they are hunting the distributor and not the buyer!?

    I see some progress!

    Comment by Schrobby
    04:04 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    That must be the first time ever police is going after the makers and distributors of CP...

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:18 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You're a god.

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:42 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Hey, people value things differently. If men are allowed to or find it acceptable to have a fling with any girl that wants to, then what's is wrong for girls to sell and boys to buy? Likewise if people want to say girls can do whatever they want.

    Wait a second, it's the children... My tears drip so far... They don't. Not when children in numerous developed countries are protected for after rape or busy knocking each other up.

    Avatar of Sarissofoi
    Comment by Sarissofoi
    01:22 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Next step to become inhumane monsters.
    Hell yeah!

    Avatar of MasterYuke
    Comment by MasterYuke
    08:47 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I'll tell you what's inhumane: "aged anywhere from 1 to 12"

    I mean come on! that's the best age range!

    Avatar of dzodzu
    Comment by dzodzu
    13:17 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    You... he he.. XD

    Avatar of TNinja
    Comment by TNinja
    08:54 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    I kinda knew something like this already is going on, but I didn't really exspect that they would go to the police.

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I don't know in what kind of morals you believe but the poor mother didn't get payed for the pictures! I don't want to live in this kind of disgusting, horrible world. I think I'll just kill myself.

    Isn't there any justice? How can that criminal bastard walk freely why not having paid for the pornographic pictures of a little girl?

    What is this?

    Avatar of Dirty_Dingus008
    Comment by Dirty_Dingus008
    13:12 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Proof positive that most women are as clever as a bag of Rocks!

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:59 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    words just fail me... i.. ah..gah

    the stupidity on display hurt's my head.

    Comment by Anonymous
    10:59 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    words just fail me... i.. ah..gah

    the stupidity on display hurt's my head.

    Comment by Anonymous
    16:17 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Yes. Most women are Rocket Scientists. What's your point..

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:03 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    03:04 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Comment by Anonymous
    02:41 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)


    Avatar of Sarissofoi
    Comment by Sarissofoi
    01:11 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Exactly my words. Or meyby not.

    Avatar of Ken
    Comment by Ken
    16:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    daughters of bitches...

    Comment by Anonymous
    01:22 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Try past.

    The whole idea that children are precious flowers that must be loved and kept innocent is VERY modern. 100 years ago no one would have batted an eye at an event like this.

    Child labor? Child prostitution? All were a parent's right and domain in the past, and outside the nobility (which is what most people hear about), sex work for kids was pretty common.

    Avatar of DFC
    Comment by DFC
    15:33 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Exactly my sentiments. Afterall you are your parent's property to a certain extent.

    Avatar of TehBoringOne
    Comment by TehBoringOne
    21:47 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Were you sold to prostitution by your daddy?

    Just a question, I'm not judging you.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:15 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    "What kind of world do we live in?"

    The answer is simple: a damn big one. And because of modern technology we can access this kind of information much more easy, but that does not mean that this is everyday custom. It's just one example.

    Anyway, things got better in this area, there were much more in number and much more severe atrocities done earlier in history.

    Guess we arrived at the top a while ago though, things only go downhill since some time. Especially since feminazis rose to power.

    Comment by Anonymous
    15:59 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    this is quite common, look through police record for sex offenders with underage victims and/or pornography charges. I can't speak worldwide but in the US over 90% of sex crimes involving minors are by relatives. And in cases of pornography for sale or prostitution 48% involve the mother or both parents being aware or profiting from the sale.

    Avatar of AsakuraZero
    Comment by AsakuraZero
    03:17 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    au contraire, its a small world and it gets more and more smaller, soon will be a "small town big hell"

    Comment by Anonymous
    03:16 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    I come to this website for this kind of news.

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:48 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    what we need is a zombie apocalypse to force people work together .

    Comment by Anonymous
    04:23 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Work together for what? Survival or brain-eating?

    Avatar of thanto_
    Comment by thanto_
    12:28 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    The creation and distribution of child pornography, obviously.

    Avatar of TehBoringOne
    Comment by TehBoringOne
    21:49 02/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    An alien invasion would be better...

    Comment by Anonymous
    17:07 01/01/2010 # ! Neutral (0)

    Indeed. Once the zombie apocalypse comes there will be no more Chris Hansen to stop us.

    Comment by Anonymous
    05:35 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    the few that survive are the only ones with brains
    the rest where just brainless humans that turn into zombies....

    Comment by Anonymous
    02:52 31/12/2009 # ! Neutral (0)

    Maybe the daughters were getting a share and did this of their own free will? Did you think of that?

    Post Comment »


Recent News

Recent Galleries

Recent Comments