12-Year-Old Girl Raped in “Muslim” Marriage

Actually a things like that doesn't exists anymore because it is everywhere against the laws. *rolls eyes*

You should update your knowledge.

@20:18
Are you blind or are you stupid? Choose correct answer.

Your grammar is terrible weaboo.

>calling someone a weeaboo on sankaku complex

why are you even here

Sounds like 女中 あゆ should update HIS knowledge because not only is that still legal in some Middle Eastern countries, it's still a common practice. Sankaku Complex has even reported on it, as some poor 12 year-old girl tried to run away from her arranged marriage.

Implying that the Muslim World is one that should co-exist with ours, much?

>Actually a things like that doesn't exists anymore because it is everywhere against the laws.

Did you even read the article? The article at the top of the page? The article about the illegal marriage and subsequent rape of a young girl?

English is not your first language: I can forgive your poor grammar, but not your poor logic.

02:04 You are retarded

agreed as it may be 'illegal' in the uk, these things are quite legal in the islamic countries...and besides...just because its illegal doesn't mean people aren't doing it...I lol at you...

06:19 im a muslim malaysian...its pretty damned illegal to have sex with lolis in my country.

marry a loli -> yes
have sex with loli -> no

IMO, its freaking sick to have sex with an underage BTW. pre-adult girls hurt like hell when their hymen broke.. evenmoreso for lolis.

bah, just personal view.

@ 06:38

"IMO, its freaking sick to have sex with an underage BTW. pre-adult girls hurt like hell when their hymen broke.. evenmoreso for lolis."

I agree with you on the matter, but I think the hymen breaking hurts about as much. An immature and/or reluctant person will tensen their muscles more though and that will cause more pain than with adults. In fact all girls don't have hymens, and some hymens just stretch... though stretching shouldn't be underestimated, that's what mine did and it hurt like fricking hell.

But to get to the point...

It's truly more about the *psyche* breaking. And that I can tell you hurts more than the hymen part. :)

@10:59 true. point taken.

@20:08 28/12/2009

There were other religions that promoted that kind of stuff,but most of them were either wipeout by other competing religion (Christians and Islam) or deserted by its followers due to common sense.
Those religions including: Vikings belief system (rape of captured women),ancient middle eastern pagans (children sacrifice),ancient south american religions(heart sacrifice and torture),various pacific deities that demands cannibalism from its followers and many other nightmarish stuff that man came up as an excuse for religions.

the funny thing is... in Indonesia, a Habib (guru/spiritual teacher in Islam) sue the Playboy Indonesia magazine for "spreading pornography and immorality to people" and give a testimony in the Court, while holding the magazine, said "I HAVE READ THIS, and proclaim that... [etc. etc.]" See?

It's unfair to judge things as 'common' when you get the news from Sankaku.

Again, let me get this straight:
-We Moslems are allowed to keep slaves, AS LONG AS WE TREAT THEM AS IF OUR OWN FAMILY (let them eat in our table and wear the same kind ol clothes as ours). This single MOST Moslem aspect is then one most forgotten by Arab fags or any Moslem wannabe.

-We are allowed to mary lolis, but we are only allowed to have sex them when they get their periods, and of course, their consent. This is what happened when Muhammad married Aisha. For the note, she was happy for the marriage. This consent part is the one most fabricated or ignored by most practitioner though.

-Again, let me get this straight. The practitioners are at fault, not the religion.

By the "slaves", you mean something like maids, right? I can understand if that's the case, the word "slaves" is what make it more extreme than it should be.

Anon 09:29 It's the religious propaganda rather than what actually written in Qur'an and Hadits

We are allowed to have sex with our slaves even though they already have a husband. It's in Qur'an. If you actually read it, you'll know it.

Non the less, their custom encourages such trait from individuals.

Islam does not encourage people to become sex-maniacs, it does however promote loli sex.

which part was illegal? the fact that she was 12 or the fact that she was his cousin?

The fact that Islamic practices are illegal in the UK.

incest pales in comparison to the former fact.

Their father read too much incest doujin

First cousin relationships are not considered incest in the UK. The only small restriction is that a minister can refuse to marry first cousins if their conscience is against it, but you can always shop around until you find one that will perform the ceremony. Cousin couples are usually advised to have genetic counselling before starting a family though.

Like i knew it! You britfags are the product of continued inbred LOLOLOLOL

"First cousin relationships are not considered incest in the UK. The only small restriction is that a minister can refuse to marry first cousins if their conscience is against it, but you can always shop around until you find one that will perform the ceremony. Cousin couples are usually advised to have genetic counselling before starting a family though".
that comment explains so much starting with that down syndrome look all of them have and the messed up teeth lol

you're obviously muslim
and if this comment is rated down, then my statement is true

Actually, if your comment is rated down, it means it's bad.

I rated it down to help make your comment true.

No need to thank me. =P

HURR negative rating means bad comment HURR
people taking offense will obviously rate the comment down, and people who take offense are people who fit the accusation

Muhammad married a 6 year old girl! Ok he didn't "consumate the merriage" until she was mature enough, meaning 9 years old.

Given that the religion promises 72 Virgins jihad martyrs, not even Negi has that large an harem! Since their religion unofficially bribes them with sex I'd dare to say they are sex maniacs.

Uhm, this raises the question, how old are the 72 virgins they get? Are they loli? And if they are lolis, do they stay loli forever? Maybe the virgins are customized for their master, maybe they receive a variety of petanko, loli and mega-oppai virgins. Also, 72 virgins is not enough for the hymen-hungry muslim dick, do the wives regrow their hymen after each penetration? Or maybe the "72 virgins" means "72 at any one time" getting newly manufactured virgins and disposing of the *used* ones. Do they get only muslim virgins or caucasian and asian virgins too? Do muslim otaku get 2D virgins?

Guess I'll have to read the Quoran a little more.

Just because they're virgins doesn't necessarily mean that they're all women.

If you know what I mean.

"Just because they're virgins doesn't necessarily mean that they're all women."

lol exactly what I said to my friends...

that was, 72 year old virgin you read it wrong

Ouch... A 72 year old virgin, and it still didn't say it was a woman...

The term "virgins" is only used to make it simpler for the western media to use.
A more fitting term would be..."perfect" women/very beautiful women.
Age does not matter as everyone is of their prime age in the hereafter.

TexasDude:

I think the "72 virgins" is not specific. I bet what the wimp-dick guy gets is 72 virgin hamsters. Or perhaps, they themselves are raped by 72 virgins male horses?

Either way, they have a sex problem in that they are insecure with their performance and size issues. Who knows. Afterall, if they see a womans eyes - its the womans fault the male Muslim can't control himself. How lame.

WHO THE FUCK NEED 72 HUMAN VIRGINS IN HEAVEN WHEN YOU CAN RULE AND FUCK COUNTLESS NUMBER OF EVERY SPECIES (2D AND 3D) IN HELL.
HELL YEAHHHH!!!!

ok this is messed up. i mean,72 virgins or a 72 year old virgin?
and gender/species not specified?
muslims are fucked up.
for one thing a guy can only handle one at a time(uness he deformed(eww)) and they`re virgin won`t have sex with you. another point a 72 year old?might as well have sex with a mummy for crieing out loud. there isn`t one opption that makes sense. my friend once told me "You shoul only have one because if you have more you`ll be cheating the other(s)"

dude, becaome a sex-maniac is fine, islam did not bribe the moslem with sex, the moslem were promised the happy life in the afterlife, as long as they follow islam rules.

if only islam said believe in islam and you can have sex anyway you want, that is bribe, but in this case, i don't think that what islam promised is qualify as bribe.

i just could not understand, why you people keep accusing islam and its worshipper, when criminality happen in every side of this world, be it muslim or not.

Just because this sort of thing happens a lot in many places doesn't make the crime any less serious.

If one guy kill another it is unlikely that you will hear about it in the news, but if he blows himself up and kills a hundred then that would be front page news.

If crimes like these are commonly committed everywhere then it should be given a lot of attention.

One crime committed is bad enough. The fact that more are being committed everyday means that the world is really fucked up.

An every-day crime is given less attention than a similar one, by your words, one hundreds items as worse.
Oh what a strange we live in eh? Running things by logic and other such retarded ideas.

we're not in the 15th centery anymore where you have 10 kids as soon as possible in hope that a few survive... welcome to a future where most if not all survive! there's no need for 12y to be sexually active... especially with older people (men or women) let them be children for awhile..

and thats coming from someone that doesn't belive in any religion!

It's funny people support gay and lesbians while fighting straight Marriages such as this
I don't think age matters if they get married yeh I said it..

It does matter if the girl didn't want to marriage and have sex. The girl was obviously raped. It's not some happy marriage shit going on here. And the rapist himself was mentally raped by the two fathers.
Who the fuck thinks of that poor girl? She's a human you know.Straight marriage my ass.

Try saying all that stuff about rape and underage stuff when the Apocalypse come and The few survivor will have to fuck their way up the evolutionary chain so the human race could survive.

It's funny how they expect you to respect there religion and ways when you go to there country but they never consider that this should ably for them also.

Different places, different rules. Generally you're expected to adept to the rules of the place you're staying.
If you can't adept, then find another place.

I live in an Islamic country and we have laws that prohibit anyone younger than 16 from getting married:
not just "consummating the marriage"
but getting married in the first place.
and I find the "marriage" in this article very offending to the laws of my Islamic country.

TO speak more clearly...
[btw, I am different person from 23:24 29/12/2009; the guy above me]

I live in Indonesia, the country where Islam rule; yet they still call this country as a 'democratic'.... o__0

I said that it is common in Indonesia to marry boys and girls below 17; and has become such a custom here; that only starts to decline in the mid 90's (mostly due to the economic recession and hardships to maintain a family).
If you can read Indonesian ( I'm not sure that this is available in English), you can search "Syekh Puji" in Google. This man married 12 years-old girl, as the 2nd wife. His age is about 40 (42, if I not mistaken) and got arrested for comitting a child abuse (yet thousands of people still be free for doing the same thing)...
We even have the Polygamy Award several years ago... >___<!!
Muslims called polygamy is an "act of faith," that is better to marry a girl than to do adultery....

There's still many crimes that Muslims here done in the name of "Act of Faith." You can search about "Front Pembela Islam" (The Front of Defenders of Islam) and read about how selfish they can be.

I don't get the 'act of faith' stuff but a crime is a crime even according Islamic standards. This incident was illegal according to Islamic laws as well. I think the punishment this act is 50 lashes (or was it lashing to death?)
It's the person at fault, not the religion.
Most crimes are committed in America (and most by Christians)
Should I assume that Christianity is a sick religion,immoral and disgusting just because of that? No. It's the person at fault.
And btw, suicide is very sinful in Islam too. Terrorists are just brainwashed people who think they are dying for the sake of Islam or whatnot.

That's only because you're looking at it through the eyes of your "superior" American culture.

Public Orgies? Since when did that hurt anyone?

Pitting animals against each other? Is there anything inherently wrong with it? Only modern first world societies have this idea of "Since we're superior to animals, we must protect them".

Worshipping multiple gods? So you find Hindi or Shinto to be barbaric then? Since these religions also have multiple gods.

Not everyone in the world is American, the fact you feel the need to jealously whine and moan about their culture is funny though, so thanks for bringing that up. :)

Considering their hygiene and lack of protection, it no doubt hurt many. That is only the people and slave that were "willing" for it mind you.
"Pitting animals against each other?" That is also wrong and a poor taste in entertainment and completely different to over-protecting them (I don't remember not-shooting animals doing them harm) but if you could stick to what I actually said instead of running off on a tangent because you can;'t fault my logic that would be grand.

You called completely separate ideals barbaric, ideals only tangibly related. Religion is all fundamentally stupid, this articles seams to be lost on you, but having a separate god for every object and occurrence is to much.

You silly uneducated individual.

During the Roman Empire and Ancient Greece most scientific fields were born, knowledge and civilization were born. A fun fact: Never again in history have humans accomplished more in the fields of knowledge and technology than during the Ancient Greece/Roman Empire period.

So, who the fuck are you, someone from these modern Dark Ages, void of all reason and logic, where equality and religion are fucking NORM, to judge about the Ancient Empire?

In fact, I believe we have only degenerated, thanks to the Dark Ages, religion and now, Equality. I'm not the only one who believes so, Nietzsche and many philosophers of the 18th and 19th century think so. And the evidence supports it. And one more thing, polytheistic religions are nothing like monotheistic religions, so don't think that woshipping multiple gods=multiple monotheistic religions. I could explain in detail why polytheistic religions aren't as nearly as harmful as monotheistic ones, but I can't be bothered now. Look it up somewhere "polytheism and monotheism". Anyway, don't talk if you have no idea what you're talking about. That's all.

"Romans at one time have no problem with paedophilia." Just this sentence, earned such an agressive responce, but for all the wrong reasons. I am merely pointing out the changes that can happen in societies moral standards.

How did the talk about polytheism, slavery, barbaric games have risen from this one sentence.

You guys still fail to articulate on my other points.

Anyway, im the 'anon' that started the comment, just in case u confuse me wif sum other anon

Anon2, you start half of your sentence with a variation of "In my opinion".
Fine you have an opinion, it's completely factually wrong and morally wrong retarded but you're entitled to your own moronic opinions so you can do as you please. :)

"Some dead guy from last decade says "modern" advancements suck"
Hurr, some uncredited dead guys from a decade ago ages with my opinion on modern science, how intelligent and relevant.
Ahah, oh wow.

DeathCrunch, I honestly believe you are mentally handicapped. No, really, I do. Don't get me wrong, I don't want to insult you, I just genuinely believe you are retarded.

Starting from your retarded angsty teen name "DeathCrunch" to your inability to address the person you are talking to properly (Anon2, what the hell?) to your incoherence when expressing yourself, to your lack of any logical thinking and to the obvious huge gap in your education.

I really pity your shallow little mind and I can only hope that one day you will resemble a human being. My only advice is: start reading books and learning, you are so uninformed and deluded, it hurts. And sorry, I can't take you seriously anymore, so I can't argue with you anymore. That's all, good luck. And one more time, this is not meant as an insult, I just want to help you.

Okay, first of all, define morality for me, what you and I see as morality is completely dfferent from each other and especially different from anyone else who grew up in entirely different cultures and homes. You can't claim something as morally wrong or factually wrong until you define clearly what morality and facts are. The "Dead guys" you're complaining about, are also the people who asked such questions as "What is Morality?" and their work stemmed from the great thinkers like Plato and Aristotle, so I wouldn't go complainng about them as you clearly have no idea who they are. Since the view on morality is subject to opinion, let's look at the facts.

1. The parties involved pushed for consumation of a marriage between a 16 year old boy and 12 year old girl.

2. By UK law, this is illegal.

Therefore, factually, by this society's standards, this action was wrong and the parties responcible were punished. There relly isn't anything else to discuss here.

Anon2, as he/you was/were the second anon in this discussion, I'm sorry you can't follow rudimentary logic. If you'd rather I follow your logic and address every single person posting anonymously at the same time I think you have a problem.
I'm also sorry you weren't blessed with the courage or intellect to create a name you could be identified with.

A shame you spent all that time writing that whiny comment instead of actually being able to back up your pathetic "argument" oh well. If you bitch out so easily I don't mind. You can push your hilarious hippy bullshit elsewhere.

Not the same anon, just wanted to point out that you're retarded Deathcrunch. You're describing the Roman Empire as it is wwas the Dark Ages. The Romans had better hygiene than most of post-Roman Europe due to the aqueducts as well as *gasp* public bathhouses. Let's not forget about those wonderful roads with proper mile markers either, or the DOMED Colosseum where they could hold NAVAL battles. Roman culture is centuries ahead of most "cultures" today, and they've been gone for centuries (476 A.D. for Western and 1453 A.D. Eastern). Before you go off spouting about how filthy and uncultured another culture is, learn the difference between two bloody eras.

"Not the same anon"
I bet.
Regardless, no period was specified, ever, so you can stop dick riding the Romans now.
The naval battles were even worse.
They just used more slaves and give them more knifes, explosives and flamethrowers.

I hardly see why you think the "intelligent" opinion is that this is a great improvement on being eaten/mauled by wild animals.
Because it as a great team building activity or just a colossal waste of life and money?

Okay both of you just shut up Okay?
Read the history books again.Romans was nothing compared to Minoans,Sumerians,Egyptians,Indians(from India)and Chinese.Why?These are the cornerstone of civilisation.They were building great things long before the romans exist.In fact the only thing that romans excels is in their efficient use of Iron and military strategy,while other stuff they just borrow from either the greeks or other civilisation through the silk road.Even their famous Gladiator Games were borrowed from other cultures around them (mostly greece and egypt).

nope, its killing. they just cant find/lift bigger stones to give them the 1-hit-kill. no torturing intended.

I assure you that's not true. The point is to drag it out.
They have plenty of rifles for 1HKO's.

At Anonymous who said: "no torturing intended:"

you're such a fool, idiot, ass-licker moron.... I wonder if your small and useless brain can even think that:

if there is no intention to torture, then just shoot an arrow straight to the heart of the accused.

This is why moslems are hated; because they insist of many things that they even don't think about the consequences first (and keep insisting, to which level they cannot endure; then they call it "insult for Islam from some kafir" thus legalize genocide and murder in the name of Islam). I can mention many examples of moslems act foolishly and not willingly to admit or bear their consequences, but instead accuse others as being "kafir."
Yes I know, because I live in Islam-majority country. Not all moslems are bad; but many of them is.

Excuse me. I made a typo. I meant to say:
If you have answered no to all these questions, that means you have NOT been exposed to REAL Islam.