Home Nudity Man Guilty of Indecent Exposure

These verdict and sentences are sexist.

There are Mens' Rights Movements that he could join.

This whole thing is ridiculous. If he was the one seeing her naked from the window they would have convicted him for being a peeping tom.
A man just can't get a break.

Very much inclined to agree with Sylar. Since when did women become more special than men? They. are. not.

@19.50
Well in society it is
here's the proof

http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/ob/masturbation/sexismmasturbation.jpg

@ 23:11
Sir, your epic graph just explained the whole verbally inexpressible problem SanCom has been telling us about for years.

"I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail." Totally indeed.

Honestly, I think if this man was being raped in his own home, he'd still get convicted for being nude.

It was 5:30 o'clock in the morning. Really how the fuck could he know that they are crazy women who take little kids for walks threw his yard at such hours?
Actually: Let the poor kid sleep, you bitch!!!!

“I don’t fine people for being stupid. We’d all be in jail.”

At least the judge admits his own stupidity... And no sir, there are some of us that aren't stupid either...

Because realistically nudity is sinful, right? Sex is a sinful act, and as such anyone and everyone who had sex regardless of reason should be punished, right? Because parents these days are so fucking stupid and complacent in raising their kids that they need the MOTHERFUCKING government to intervene and protect their kids, right?

While I agree kids are easily impressionable, I don't fucking believe seeing a naked man aside from one's father or self to be fucking traumatizing. If our society is so goddamned hell-bent on eliminating sexuality from the youths, why the fuck don't they just ban youths from the internet? Better yet, FUCKING EDUCATE THEM. Also another FYI is that kids aren't stupid. Watching 'PORN' will not fuck up their lives anymore than their parents and society beating up on them for having a healthy sex drive.

The funny things?
In the "dark age" nudity was ok. Churches were full of naked statues.
When the "dark age" finished nudity became a sin.
It's pretty hilarious.

Also
>The woman who brought the charges, who is incidentally married to a local police officer
Mmmhmh,

that fucking whore is a mad woman who abuses her husband status of policeman and goes around "i'm going to sue you bitch".

That bitch should get a pwned by an incoming car. WTF is wrong with her? It's not like the dude was staring at her and her son while jerking off. Fucking whore.

socialism and comunisim just around the bend people take over most of the business in america then manage everyone because carbondioxide is dangerous to the enviroment. I think verdicts like these prove that this is where we are going.

What does socialism have to do with it? If anything, it's rightist movements that condone a loss of privacy.

It's not rightism or leftism, it's authoritarianism.

The swiss are left, Stalin was left, Stalin was a firm believer in authoritarianism...the swiss are authoritarian in saturday night live skits.

Hitler was in the right, and he was pretty "authoritarian", so to speak. But I can't think of a right-wing leadership that was ever "non-authoritarian".

So much for the "authoritarian" theory. It's the conservatives with their puritanical view on things and you know it. If you think people in West Virginia are inbred dumbasses, where do you think they originally came from?

Hitler was on left. You know nazi-national SOCIALISM. How socialism can by on right?
And Stalin and Hitler(comunnism and nazism) cooperate longer that they fight.
German Blitzkrieg was fueled by soviet suppllies.

i thought human rights people would be all over this one... where have they gone?

off saving children who don't exist

@Sarissofoi

Let me guess, you're right-leaning in your politics and you're a Yank. They're the only ones I've ever seen make that mistake. They see the word socialism and it almost seems like their mind gets locked or something.

National Socialism has about as much to do with Socialism as the following:

- Pennsylvania Dutch and the Netherlands. These guys were Germans not Dutch, that was simply a mistranslation of the term Deutsch, which is German for.... German.

- French Fries originating in France. They're from Belgium, and while the Walloons might act a lot like Frenchman, they're about as French as the Québécois are, or the Cajuns for that matter.

- Equality Now and them actually being interested in Equality. All they care about is power over others, whatever the cost.

Just because someone calls something or someone something, does not mean that they are what is claimed. Example: A member of the Washington Redskins isn't really a Native American indigenous to the area of Washington State. (Which would be Yakama, Wanapum or Colville.)

National Socialism has more in common with Fascism than it does with regular Socialism. And Fascism is very much right wing.

Yeah, that's why National Socialism set up socialized medicine, government-controlled and tax financed day care centers and pensions, and lots of other things right wingers are always clamoring for.
But redefining things to suit your purposes was a nice try.

Ask any credible Historian where the Nazi's fit on the left/right scale and all of them will say on the right hand side.

That's not redefining things, that's just you not being able to handle the truth.

if this man is guilty of indecent exposure, i fear for all of us

The issue is that the judge and the police had been offended via someone who knew them. Buddy system in full effect! The verdict was hers, and hers alone. She condemned him when she looked in and found out her husband isn't the biggest around.
That kid prolly gets beat up daily now.

She probably used the kid.

i live on the side of the mountain , my windows facing start into elementary school grounds and are on the same level due to the slope . I cant even walk around in my underwear when my window is open :'(

lol theres a kindergarden right below my apartment complex and theres a road that can look straight into my house...........i feel very violated even though i'm in the safety of my own home :(

There a high school(only last three years, Japan way) under my apartment but my fucking window faces the other way around. It's so sad to be so near the show and not being able to enjoy it. And i probably still can't walk naked with open windows because there other buildings facing mine. Guys from other apartments could probably see me.
It's all loss for me.

That's child protection for you... You lose your right to privacy, they lose their right to think... Because in the book of the lawmakers, children just can't.

Almost sound like that movie with the cop screw over the family. Money is all that mater in the states, people really just think they are safe been just normal people haha, not in this country, there is always some waco waiting to screw you over, better not to trust anyone not even your neighbors in the states, or who know who will file a complaint on you for what ever.

They should probably get the shit cleaned out from their ears too. I suggest Roto-Rooter.....

...orally.

Goddamn these Calvinist assholes! >< It's the man's own damn house.... let him do whatever the fuck he wants in it! And in order for the mother and son to see what they did, they'd have to have been trespassing on the guy's property anyway. And this was early in the morning? Ooo.... I'd sue the bitch. I'm not sure what litigation could be used, but any way to stick it to that nosy whore.

I doubt this went to a jury. But yes, some laws are just ass backwards. I can buy an uzi in Virginia, but I can't dress or not dress the way I like in my own house.

I suspect if there was a jury at all it was a hung jury of hand picked sympathizes and butt buddies.
I like to call this sorta behind the scenes good ol boy networking teabag politics.
The real crime here is he may have to register as a sex offender.
Sex offender laws in the US have been pretty much broken since 2003.

@Miroku74: Just because the Puritans were Calvinists, it doesn't mean all Calvinists are that bad - at the extreme end of Calvinism, some of us are almost anarchists.

Anyway, for once I'm glad I live in the UK. It's a tried and tested principle of English common law that you can be naked in your own house even with the curtains open as long as it's not your deliberate intention to cause alarm and distress to passersby.

I second that.

wonders to himself why the guy didn't file peeping tom charges against the lady.... did no one ever see that coming, or has no one yet made that connection?

She said she was taking the kid for a walk. Doesn't that look strange to anyone? Not only she wasn't getting prepared for work but she was taking a walk and the most strange of all she had a child with her. WTF was she doing with the poor child at such hours?

Funny, not to long ago there where tons of americans here praising their legal system that allowed them to do pretty much whatever they wanted in their own home, including making a lot of bulletsize holes in eventual thieves. Apparently though, you're not free to be naked in your own homes...

This raises a question, assume a thief broke into your house during night and you wake up and end up gunning him down, would you get charged for indecent behaviour/exposure if you slept naked and didn't have time to dress?

You make a good point.
Or, at least you WOULD be making a good point if it wasn't for the fact that the reason this case is getting so much coverage is that it seems to be unique.